goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: KITNfury on October 11, 2011, 02:37:58 PM
-
TT has a shitty run defense. I don't really feel worried about this game. Am I missing something, or are they going to exploit our safeties all game?
-
I was feeling all :excited: about the prospects of a 7-0 meeting with Oklahoma, until I realized that underestimating tech could be deadly.
Now I'm all :ohno:
-
It seems like as a team they are underrated, but we match up really well against them, so we shouldn't be too worried.
-
I think we're all waiting for the KITN, however the match up with Tech is very nice. I thought they looked pretty shitty vs KU!
-
Their passing O > our running O. Tech can throw for yards faster than the 'Cats can run for yards. This is a cause for concern, and should temper any overconfidence.
-
I've thought we would lose the last 3 games, no sense in changing that now.
-
Their passing O > our running O. Tech can throw for yards faster than the 'Cats can run for yards. This is a cause for concern, and should temper any overconfidence.
Baylor without the talent.
-
If our D can manage a few stops and not get bombed over the top like we allowed to Baylor we should win this game...but that isn't Tech's offense. They like to throw shorter our routes and slants to convert. Their 3rd down percentage isn't too bad either.
Doege threw 66 attempts vs. A&M. That' nuts. We have to put some pressure on hiim because if you let him make 2 or 3 reads someone is going to be wide open.
-
Their passing O > our running O. Tech can throw for yards faster than the 'Cats can run for yards. This is a cause for concern, and should temper any overconfidence.
Baylor without the talent.
It's not a race.
-
I'm nervous to see how our offense does in a hostile environment (Miami does not count as a hostile environment). We burn so many timeouts because of our audibles and barely snap the ball with one second left on the playclock at home, I have to imagine we are going to have even more issues with that in a loud atmosphere. I'm expecting the "check with me" audibles will cause a handful of delay of games and false starts this weekend.
-
Bad things happen to us in in Lubbock. I am more worried about the KITN outcome as opposed to a Dr. McSchemey outcome.
-
I'm nervous to see how our offense does in a hostile environment (Miami does not count as a hostile environment). We burn so many timeouts because of our audibles and barely snap the ball with one second left on the playclock at home, I have to imagine we are going to have even more issues with that in a loud atmosphere. I'm expecting the "check with me" audibles will cause a handful of delay of games and false starts this weekend.
This... I dont really like the check with me audibles. 75% of the time its the same play... but go Cats :ksu:
-
Their passing O > our running O. Tech can throw for yards faster than the 'Cats can run for yards. This is a cause for concern, and should temper any overconfidence.
this applies to most teams, though it doesn't mean they have better offenses than ksu.
-
Their passing O > our running O. Tech can throw for yards faster than the 'Cats can run for yards. This is a cause for concern, and should temper any overconfidence.
this applies to most teams, though it doesn't mean they have better offenses than ksu.
yeah our offense is designed to keep other offenses from being on the field.
-
'Cats are like 3 - 10 against Tech all-time, and we have not won in Lubbock since 1997. Just sayin'. :ohno:
-
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/7089676/texas-tech-red-raiders-eric-stephens-knee-done-season (http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/7089676/texas-tech-red-raiders-eric-stephens-knee-done-season)
-
'Cats are like 3 - 10 against Tech all-time, and we have not won in Lubbock since 1997. Just sayin'. :ohno:
Mike Leach isn't walking through that door.
-
I'm nervous to see how our offense does in a hostile environment (Miami does not count as a hostile environment). We burn so many timeouts because of our audibles and barely snap the ball with one second left on the playclock at home, I have to imagine we are going to have even more issues with that in a loud atmosphere. I'm expecting the "check with me" audibles will cause a handful of delay of games and false starts this weekend.
This... I dont really like the check with me audibles. 75% of the time its the same play... but go Cats :ksu:
You guys are new to K-State football aren't you? Snyder teams always take the clock down to 1 regardless of audibles or check with mes. It's what he does and it is to control the clock. No matter how loud or often the crowed counts down it will always be like that with a LHC Bill Snyder team. Shouldn't be a problem IMO.
-
I feel like we roll in this game. Feel like I'm missing something. Course, like someone said before, felt like we were gonna lose the last 3, hope this time I'm right.
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi223.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fdd296%2Fcalliekimburu%2Fdarthsnyder.jpg&hash=6bff0e7de5518c00740636ae1a22320641ee8803)
-
Things I worry about in Lubbock:
History..how many facepalm :facepalm: games have I watched on TV from Lubbock.
The dink and dunk jet offense... we struggle against this and I am surprised teams havent made more use of it against us and tech is quite good at it. They may try and go deep on us a few times too but it the slant bubble screen etc type of plays that has me concerned.
WHile they have been bad against the run they really havent played a team that is all run and so they will counter-scheme against the sceheme doctor for it. Its imperative in every game that our team be able to move the ball slowly on O. More than a couple 3 and outs and we lose this one.
Cockiness/KITN... we are KSU fans, when the team is playing well we always expect this, in fact I would soooo enjoy a 42-0 butt whoopin of Tech this game. The mU game was more enjoyable to watch than BU for sure so theres that.
All that said if we play our game make no mistakes control the game etc we can and should win in Lubbock. I beleive!!! GO CATS!!!
-
I'm now convinced we'll lose. :runaway:
-
'Cats are like 3 - 10 against Tech all-time, and we have not won in Lubbock since 1997. Just sayin'. :ohno:
Lubbuck has been rough on us.
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
I'm concerned that our offense hasn't been forced to play from behind by more than 7 points..and if Tech gets a lead late...our slow motion offense is in real trouble. :frown:
-
I'm concerned that our offense hasn't been forced to play from behind by more than 7 points..and if Tech gets a lead late...our slow motion offense is in real trouble. :frown:
Behind by 9 late 4th quarter against Baylor.
-
I'm concerned that our offense hasn't been forced to play from behind by more than 7 points..and if Tech gets a lead late...our slow motion offense is in real trouble. :frown:
Behind by 9 late 4th quarter against Baylor.
Bookcat, Pick one:
[ ] You got told
[ ] You got rough ridin' told
[ ] Told and the Beautiful
[ ] Told Spice Deodorant
[X] Told Ballz
-
I'm concerned that our offense hasn't been forced to play from behind by more than 7 points..and if Tech gets a lead late...our slow motion offense is in real trouble. :frown:
Behind by 9 late 4th quarter against Baylor.
Boom, roasted!
-
Things I worry about in Lubbock:
History..how many facepalm :facepalm: games have I watched on TV from Lubbock.
The dink and dunk jet offense... we struggle against this and I am surprised teams havent made more use of it against us and tech is quite good at it. They may try and go deep on us a few times too but it the slant bubble screen etc type of plays that has me concerned.
WHile they have been bad against the run they really havent played a team that is all run and so they will counter-scheme against the sceheme doctor for it. Its imperative in every game that our team be able to move the ball slowly on O. More than a couple 3 and outs and we lose this one.
Cockiness/KITN... we are KSU fans, when the team is playing well we always expect this, in fact I would soooo enjoy a 42-0 butt whoopin of Tech this game. The mU game was more enjoyable to watch than BU for sure so theres that.
All that said if we play our game make no mistakes control the game etc we can and should win in Lubbock. I beleive!!! GO CATS!!!
They're 115th against the run. We should be able to jam it down their throats.
-
Guys there is no way 2011 Tech O > 2011 Baylor O, or even 2011 Mizzou O. We'll stop them enough times to win.
-
'Cats are like 3 - 10 against Tech all-time, and we have not won in Lubbock since 1997. Just sayin'. :ohno:
No. Snyder beat Leach in 2000. I would be surprised if that is the all time record as well.
-
Key per play stats:
TT Off yards per play: 6.22 (#32)
TT Off points per play: .54 (#19)
TT Off TOs per possession: .007 (#1)
TT return game yards per return (KO and Punt): 22.69 (#5)
TT Def YPP: 5.97 (#100)
TT Def PPP: .39 (#69)
TT Def TO forced PP: ..031 (#33)
TT return def YPR: 17.26 (#49)
KSU Off YPP: 4.74 (#103)
KSU Off PPP: .38 (#73)
KSU Off TOPP: .020 (#33)
KSU Ret YPP: 17.43 (#64)
KSU Def YPP: 5.01 (#38)
KSU Def PPP: .28 (#19)
KSU Def TOFPP: .030 (#38)
KSU Ret Def YPP: 18.5 (#73)
Things that stand out:
Tech's offense is solid. While they may not be as explosive as Baylor's (or even Missouri's) they are still one of the better offenses in the nation. Top 20 in points per play and top 35 in yards per play are great, but combined with being #1 in turnovers per play makes it even tougher. K-State's defense matches up well in most of those areas, but for the 3rd week in a row they will be facing a tough task. Tech has one of the best return games (#5 in yards per return combining punt and KO) in the country as well.
Tech's defense provides a favorable match up for K-State, though K-State's offensive numbers are below average. K-State's ability to sustain drives without many big plays does skew those low numbers in both PPP and YPP, but on the road and in a hostile environment both could be tough to overcome. Plus K-State's return game has been average this season.
The numbers, even with Tech's defensive struggles would seem to give them the advantage. However, its hard to go against what the Cats have done, and in spite of those numbers I still think K-State is the better team and if they continue to play like they did the last 3 weeks they should still come away form Lubbock with a win. I see another close game down to the 4th quarter that comes down to K-State forcing Tech into redzone FGs instead of TDs.
Cats 34
Raiders 30
-
Allan Evridge
-
I'm concerned that our offense hasn't been forced to play from behind by more than 7 points..and if Tech gets a lead late...our slow motion offense is in real trouble. :frown:
Behind by 9 late 4th quarter against Baylor.
Bookcat, Pick one:
[ ] You got told
[ ] You got rough ridin' told
[ ] Told and the Beautiful
[ ] Told Spice Deodorant
[X] Told Ballz
I would write in Told and Daring
-
Key per play stats:
TT Off yards per play: 6.22 (#32)
TT Off points per play: .54 (#19)
TT Off TOs per possession: .007 (#1)
TT return game yards per return (KO and Punt): 22.69 (#5)
TT Def YPP: 5.97 (#100)
TT Def PPP: .39 (#69)
TT Def TO forced PP: ..031 (#33)
TT return def YPR: 17.26 (#49)
KSU Off YPP: 4.74 (#103)
KSU Off PPP: .38 (#73)
KSU Off TOPP: .020 (#33)
KSU Ret YPP: 17.43 (#64)
KSU Def YPP: 5.01 (#38)
KSU Def PPP: .28 (#19)
KSU Def TOFPP: .030 (#38)
KSU Ret Def YPP: 18.5 (#73)
Things that stand out:
Tech's offense is solid. While they may not be as explosive as Baylor's (or even Missouri's) they are still one of the better offenses in the nation. Top 20 in points per play and top 35 in yards per play are great, but combined with being #1 in turnovers per play makes it even tougher. K-State's defense matches up well in most of those areas, but for the 3rd week in a row they will be facing a tough task. Tech has one of the best return games (#5 in yards per return combining punt and KO) in the country as well.
Tech's defense provides a favorable match up for K-State, though K-State's offensive numbers are below average. K-State's ability to sustain drives without many big plays does skew those low numbers in both PPP and YPP, but on the road and in a hostile environment both could be tough to overcome. Plus K-State's return game has been average this season.
The numbers, even with Tech's defensive struggles would seem to give them the advantage. However, its hard to go against what the Cats have done, and in spite of those numbers I still think K-State is the better team and if they continue to play like they did the last 3 weeks they should still come away form Lubbock with a win. I see another close game down to the 4th quarter that comes down to K-State forcing Tech into redzone FGs instead of TDs.
Cats 34
Raiders 30
skipped straight to the bottom.
-
'Cats are like 3 - 10 against Tech all-time, and we have not won in Lubbock since 1997. Just sayin'. :ohno:
No. Snyder beat Leach in 2000. I would be surprised if that is the all time record as well.
My bad. We've lost 8 of 11 to Tech all time. Been outscored 183-62 in last 3 games. I read somewhere else we had not won in Lubbock since 1997, if we have since then, be sure to let me know because I sure can't remember.
2000 win was in Manhattan.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/preview?gameId=312882641
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/scores100/100295/100295413.htm
-
I predict ty getting a pick and throwing the :lynchmob:.
KATS-38
TTTU-30
Is this the prediction thread now?
-
41-31
Go cats.
-
I predict the :lynchmob: sign to be thrown up multiple times this game.
-
38-21 pistols firing :frown:
-
38-21 pistols firing :frown:
pistols firing, haha
:frown:
-
I predict the :lynchmob: sign to be thrown up multiple times this game.
I think this, but with the two hands about 2 ft apart and emaw crying.
-
Key per play stats:
TT Off yards per play: 6.22 (#32)
TT Off points per play: .54 (#19)
TT Off TOs per possession: .007 (#1)
TT return game yards per return (KO and Punt): 22.69 (#5)
TT Def YPP: 5.97 (#100)
TT Def PPP: .39 (#69)
TT Def TO forced PP: ..031 (#33)
TT return def YPR: 17.26 (#49)
KSU Off YPP: 4.74 (#103)
KSU Off PPP: .38 (#73)
KSU Off TOPP: .020 (#33)
KSU Ret YPP: 17.43 (#64)
KSU Def YPP: 5.01 (#38)
KSU Def PPP: .28 (#19)
KSU Def TOFPP: .030 (#38)
KSU Ret Def YPP: 18.5 (#73)
Things that stand out:
Tech's offense is solid. While they may not be as explosive as Baylor's (or even Missouri's) they are still one of the better offenses in the nation. Top 20 in points per play and top 35 in yards per play are great, but combined with being #1 in turnovers per play makes it even tougher. K-State's defense matches up well in most of those areas, but for the 3rd week in a row they will be facing a tough task. Tech has one of the best return games (#5 in yards per return combining punt and KO) in the country as well.
Tech's defense provides a favorable match up for K-State, though K-State's offensive numbers are below average. K-State's ability to sustain drives without many big plays does skew those low numbers in both PPP and YPP, but on the road and in a hostile environment both could be tough to overcome. Plus K-State's return game has been average this season.
The numbers, even with Tech's defensive struggles would seem to give them the advantage. However, its hard to go against what the Cats have done, and in spite of those numbers I still think K-State is the better team and if they continue to play like they did the last 3 weeks they should still come away form Lubbock with a win. I see another close game down to the 4th quarter that comes down to K-State forcing Tech into redzone FGs instead of TDs.
Cats 34
Raiders 30
The problem with calling Tech's offense really good at this point is:
New Mexico: #119 Total Defense, # 119 Scoring Defense, #119 Pass Efficiency Defense
Nevada: #46 Total Defense, #86 Scoring Defense, #42 Pass Efficiency Defense
Kansas: #120 Total Defense, #120 Scoring Defense, #120 Pass Efficiency Defense
Texas A&M: #99 Total Defense, # 64 Scoring Defense, #84 Pass Efficiency Defense
Or, through their first 5 games they've faced opponents who defensively gave up on average 457.92 yds a game, that's roughly equivalent to facing the 110th ranked defense in the country on average.
In other words, I think Tech's offensive production is skewed by having played horrible defenses, and I am going to reserve my opinion on said offense until they play against a real defense, which will happen this Saturday.
I think we have a DAMN good chance to win this thing easily.
-
I think we win. This team reminds me of that legendary 2007 Rock Chalk Jayhawk squad. That team went on the road and easily beat mediocre teams.
Rock. Chalk. Jayhawk. Go KU. And KSTATE.
-
The problem with calling Tech's offense really good at this point is:
New Mexico: #119 Total Defense, # 119 Scoring Defense, #119 Pass Efficiency Defense
Nevada: #46 Total Defense, #86 Scoring Defense, #42 Pass Efficiency Defense
Kansas: #120 Total Defense, #120 Scoring Defense, #120 Pass Efficiency Defense
Texas A&M: #99 Total Defense, # 64 Scoring Defense, #84 Pass Efficiency Defense
Or, through their first 5 games they've faced opponents who defensively gave up on average 457.92 yds a game, that's roughly equivalent to facing the 110th ranked defense in the country on average.
In other words, I think Tech's offensive production is skewed by having played horrible defenses, and I am going to reserve my opinion on said offense until they play against a real defense, which will happen this Saturday.
I think we have a DAMN good chance to win this thing easily.
Thanks for those numbers, I was going to look but was too lazy. I do agree that haven't faced much and that inflates their stats, but I still see an efficient offense that scores well and doesn't turn the ball over.
We'll have to do 2 of the following 3 (at least) for this to be an easy win:
1) Be +2 or better in TO margin.
2) Score a defensive or special teams TD.
3) Have many more big plays than usual on offense; something like 7-8 YPP overall and 9+ YPA attempt in the passing game.
-
The problem with calling Tech's offense really good at this point is:
New Mexico: #119 Total Defense, # 119 Scoring Defense, #119 Pass Efficiency Defense
Nevada: #46 Total Defense, #86 Scoring Defense, #42 Pass Efficiency Defense
Kansas: #120 Total Defense, #120 Scoring Defense, #120 Pass Efficiency Defense
Texas A&M: #99 Total Defense, # 64 Scoring Defense, #84 Pass Efficiency Defense
Or, through their first 5 games they've faced opponents who defensively gave up on average 457.92 yds a game, that's roughly equivalent to facing the 110th ranked defense in the country on average.
In other words, I think Tech's offensive production is skewed by having played horrible defenses, and I am going to reserve my opinion on said offense until they play against a real defense, which will happen this Saturday.
I think we have a DAMN good chance to win this thing easily.
Thanks for those numbers, I was going to look but was too lazy. I do agree that haven't faced much and that inflates their stats, but I still see an efficient offense that scores well and doesn't turn the ball over.
We'll have to do 2 of the following 3 (at least) for this to be an easy win:
1) Be +2 or better in TO margin.
2) Score a defensive or special teams TD.
3) Have many more big plays than usual on offense; something like 7-8 YPP overall and 9+ YPA attempt in the passing game.
Agree.
Also,
I think we win. This team reminds me of that legendary 2007 Rock Chalk Jayhawk squad. That team went on the road and easily beat mediocre teams.
Rock. Chalk. Jayhawk. Go KU. And KSTATE.
:dubious:
-
The problem with calling Tech's offense really good at this point is:
New Mexico: #119 Total Defense, # 119 Scoring Defense, #119 Pass Efficiency Defense
Nevada: #46 Total Defense, #86 Scoring Defense, #42 Pass Efficiency Defense
Kansas: #120 Total Defense, #120 Scoring Defense, #120 Pass Efficiency Defense
Texas A&M: #99 Total Defense, # 64 Scoring Defense, #84 Pass Efficiency Defense
Or, through their first 5 games they've faced opponents who defensively gave up on average 457.92 yds a game, that's roughly equivalent to facing the 110th ranked defense in the country on average.
In other words, I think Tech's offensive production is skewed by having played horrible defenses, and I am going to reserve my opinion on said offense until they play against a real defense, which will happen this Saturday.
I think we have a DAMN good chance to win this thing easily.
Thanks for those numbers, I was going to look but was too lazy. I do agree that haven't faced much and that inflates their stats, but I still see an efficient offense that scores well and doesn't turn the ball over.
We'll have to do 2 of the following 3 (at least) for this to be an easy win:
1) Be +2 or better in TO margin.
2) Score a defensive or special teams TD.
3) Have many more big plays than usual on offense; something like 7-8 YPP overall and 9+ YPA attempt in the passing game.
when i run the numbers i see the same thing. the biggest possibility is #3 on your list. i predict a couple of long (40 yds+) open field touch down runs thus satisfying your #3.
-
when i run the numbers i see the same thing. the biggest possibility is #3 on your list. i predict a couple of long (40 yds+) open field touch down runs thus satisfying your #3.
Did you use one of these?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.media.desicolours.com%2F2009%2Fmarch%2Fcomputer13.jpg&hash=7986de2ba064f6760bfb1e85c3c210d63ca60ca2)
-
i use a commodore 64
-
I think it's a tough game for us that favors Tech. They are a good offensive team they will score points on us and likely not turn it over. They are not good on defense but they do a pretty good job of creating turnovers. This means we likely lose the turnover battle because both defenses are similar at creating turnovers but Tech takes care of the ball much better thne we do. They will also likley have the advantage in special teams as well. Combine those with being on the road and we probably lose a close game.
If we want to win I think we need to force them into some uncharasitic turnovers and somehow manage to be even or better in special teams. Neither of those are out of the question but not the most likely scenario IMO. WE will move the ball on them but I just see our margin of error on offense as being pretty slim much slimmer then their's. Penalties and other inevitable small mistakes are much more likley to equal missed scoring oppurtunities for us then they are for them and I think we have a hard time keeping pace unless we balance that with some takeaways.
-
They lost their 114 ypg RB. We are going to eat them.
-
They lost their 114 ypg RB. We are going to eat them.
Unless making them throw more bites us in the ass.
-
i use a commodore 64
this is fun to say out loud
-
I'm concerned that our offense hasn't been forced to play from behind by more than 7 points..and if Tech gets a lead late...our slow motion offense is in real trouble. :frown:
I think there's a relative possibility that the O can move faster & potentially score within a minute or two if need be. We just haven't needed to. KSU ball all year has been run clock.
-
Texas State ran for 256 yards against their D. No one for the Tech D was hurt or suspended.....I checked.
Will we stomp them for that many? :dunno:
All I know is that their rushing D is ranked behind KU's ....and that blew my mind.
-
41-31
Go cats.
I'm taking this one to the bank. Dlew has been spot on all season.
-
Guys I don't know if I'll be able to watch the game! Has me very worried :ohno:
-
it'll be a game where if we get scored on and are trailing I'll shut the muther effer off for 3 minutes...then turn it back on....
-
41-31
Go cats.
:emawkid:
-
I'm concerned that our offense hasn't been forced to play from behind by more than 7 points..and if Tech gets a lead late...our slow motion offense is in real trouble. :frown:
I think there's a relative possibility that the O can move faster & potentially score within a minute or two if need be. We just haven't needed to. KSU ball all year has been run clock.
The O needed a quick score and got it against EKU. :gocho:
-
Special Teams has me all :ohno:
-
Special Teams has me all :ohno:
Doerr has me all :ksu:
-
didnt really know where to put this, just thought it was a good video that needed to be shared
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zDJ0Um4lFI&feature=share
:lynchmob:
-
lol fatty
-
just thought it was a good video that needed to be shared
you were wrong.
-
kope22 may be the worst poster on any board in the history of ksu personalities and fans
-
lol fatty
-
Win by 10, but it'll look shitty at the end and we almost give the game away. Just my two pennies.
-
Texas State ran for 256 yards against their D. No one for the Tech D was hurt or suspended.....I checked.
Will we stomp them for that many? :dunno:
All I know is that their rushing D is ranked behind KU's ....and that blew my mind.
And KU rushed for 239, Nevada put up over 300, and A&M over 200.
-
Hey Ladies
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
didnt really know where to put this, just thought it was a good video that needed to be shared
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zDJ0Um4lFI&feature=share
:lynchmob:
:facepalm:
-
Texas State ran for 256 yards against their D. No one for the Tech D was hurt or suspended.....I checked.
Will we stomp them for that many? :dunno:
All I know is that their rushing D is ranked behind KU's ....and that blew my mind.
And KU rushed for 239, Nevada put up over 300, and A&M over 200.
We're going to have to take knees after each 15 yard run if we're going to dominate the clock like the Scheme requires.
-
We are going to rush for a season high tomorrow night boys. :emawkid:
-
Texas State ran for 256 yards against their D. No one for the Tech D was hurt or suspended.....I checked.
Will we stomp them for that many? :dunno:
All I know is that their rushing D is ranked behind KU's ....and that blew my mind.
And KU rushed for 239, Nevada put up over 300, and A&M over 200.
We're going to have to take knees after each 15 yard run if we're going to dominate the clock like the Scheme requires.
pfft, like you have a clue what the scheme requires.
-
:facepalm: at you guys being over-confident. TBH whenever I see any team with the name "Kansas" in it for football all I see is a W. Snyder hasn't won here in what 10+ years? I remember KU saying the same crap, "Leach isn't walking through the door" bla bla bla. Yes, our run D is awful, our star running back is out, and our star WR is injured. But guess what, we will still win. Much more worried about going to Norman the next weekend.
Wreck Em!
-
:facepalm: at you guys being over-confident. TBH whenever I see any team with the name "Kansas" in it for football all I see is a W. Snyder hasn't won here in what 10+ years? I remember KU saying the same crap, "Leach isn't walking through the door" bla bla bla. Yes, our run D is awful, our star running back is out, and our star WR is injured. But guess what, we will still win. Much more worried about going to Norman the next weekend.
Wreck Em!
You're more worried about a NC contender on the road vs KSU at home? I don't follow the logic.
-
:facepalm: at you guys being over-confident. TBH whenever I see any team with the name "Kansas" in it for football all I see is a W. Snyder hasn't won here in what 10+ years? I remember KU saying the same crap, "Leach isn't walking through the door" bla bla bla. Yes, our run D is awful, our star running back is out, and our star WR is injured. But guess what, we will still win. Much more worried about going to Norman the next weekend.
Wreck Em!
You're more worried about a NC contender on the road vs KSU at home? I don't follow the logic.
No offense, but you guys will be a pretty easy win. OU worries me because it could be a game that kills our young teams confidence, and starts a slide. I don't expect to be within 21 points of them.
-
:facepalm: at you guys being over-confident. TBH whenever I see any team with the name "Kansas" in it for football all I see is a W. Snyder hasn't won here in what 10+ years? I remember KU saying the same crap, "Leach isn't walking through the door" bla bla bla. Yes, our run D is awful, our star running back is out, and our star WR is injured. But guess what, we will still win. Much more worried about going to Norman the next weekend.
Wreck Em!
You're more worried about a NC contender on the road vs KSU at home? I don't follow the logic.
No offense, but you guys will be a pretty easy win. OU worries me because it could be a game that kills our young teams confidence, and starts a slide. I don't expect to be within 21 points of them.
You sound like our resident Baylor poster, good grief.
-
:facepalm: at you guys being over-confident. TBH whenever I see any team with the name "Kansas" in it for football all I see is a W. Snyder hasn't won here in what 10+ years? I remember KU saying the same crap, "Leach isn't walking through the door" bla bla bla. Yes, our run D is awful, our star running back is out, and our star WR is injured. But guess what, we will still win. Much more worried about going to Norman the next weekend.
Wreck Em!
Are all texas tech fans this rude? Talk about coming off as cocky. Good grief.
-
:facepalm: at you guys being over-confident. TBH whenever I see any team with the name "Kansas" in it for football all I see is a W. Snyder hasn't won here in what 10+ years? I remember KU saying the same crap, "Leach isn't walking through the door" bla bla bla. Yes, our run D is awful, our star running back is out, and our star WR is injured. But guess what, we will still win. Much more worried about going to Norman the next weekend.
Wreck Em!
You gave no substantial content that would go along with your argument, just fortified our premises (run D is horrible, etc.).
Are all Tech fans this stupid? I mean, I know it's a community college, but...eek.
-
How long do you think it will be before the Football team takes the field in Under Armor Polo Shirts, just like Pat Knight?
-
Do these guys look overconfident???? More like they're ready to bone thug some tubby....
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fc0013999.r32.cf1.rackcdn.com%2Fx2_8c51fc0&hash=297a586e00a00bcb030d377d125784f02cce2eee)
-
:facepalm: at you guys being over-confident. TBH whenever I see any team with the name "Kansas" in it for football all I see is a W. Snyder hasn't won here in what 10+ years? I remember KU saying the same crap, "Leach isn't walking through the door" bla bla bla. Yes, our run D is awful, our star running back is out, and our star WR is injured. But guess what, we will still win. Much more worried about going to Norman the next weekend.
Wreck Em!
You're more worried about a NC contender on the road vs KSU at home? I don't follow the logic.
No offense, but you guys will be a pretty easy win. OU worries me because it could be a game that kills our young teams confidence, and starts a slide. I don't expect to be within 21 points of them.
:) I am very happy about this statement. let's hope the their players feel the same way.
-
:facepalm: at you guys being over-confident. TBH whenever I see any team with the name "Kansas" in it for football all I see is a W. Snyder hasn't won here in what 10+ years? I remember KU saying the same crap, "Leach isn't walking through the door" bla bla bla. Yes, our run D is awful, our star running back is out, and our star WR is injured. But guess what, we will still win. Much more worried about going to Norman the next weekend.
Wreck Em!
You gave no substantial content that would go along with your argument, just fortified our premises (run D is horrible, etc.).
Are all Tech fans this stupid? I mean, I know it's a community college, but...eek.
I don't need to. You are Kansas State, enough said.
-
I don't need to. You are Kansas State, enough said.
Damn straight
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcSCIakKEu0yZV-3ZTWJI-0cH5EFFGQJUwe2LaCngSmWmjdUG35451qGITaJ&hash=e30f52438629779f533d213fb642734690831c77)
-
:facepalm: at you guys being over-confident. TBH whenever I see any team with the name "Kansas" in it for football all I see is a W. Snyder hasn't won here in what 10+ years? I remember KU saying the same crap, "Leach isn't walking through the door" bla bla bla. Yes, our run D is awful, our star running back is out, and our star WR is injured. But guess what, we will still win. Much more worried about going to Norman the next weekend.
Wreck Em!
You gave no substantial content that would go along with your argument, just fortified our premises (run D is horrible, etc.).
Are all Tech fans this stupid? I mean, I know it's a community college, but...eek.
I don't need to. You are Kansas State, enough said.
Get back to the box, sand aggie.
-
Do these guys look overconfident???? More like they're ready to bone thug some tubby....
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fc0013999.r32.cf1.rackcdn.com%2Fx2_8c51fc0&hash=297a586e00a00bcb030d377d125784f02cce2eee)
Guy on the left. Anybody know who he is or what gang sign he's flashing?
-
Do these guys look overconfident???? More like they're ready to bone thug some tubby....
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fc0013999.r32.cf1.rackcdn.com%2Fx2_8c51fc0&hash=297a586e00a00bcb030d377d125784f02cce2eee)
Guy on the left. Anybody know who he is or what gang sign he's flashing?
Flashing a weaker version of the Bloods. Not sure who he is, but a great looking bunch. :love:
-
Texas State ran for 256 yards against their D.
On the one hand, Tech's d-coord said that he didn't watch any film of us before we played them. We gouged them in the first half until they made adjustments at halftime.
On the other hand, their d-coord is apparently stupid enough to not know that Dennis Franchione has always run the triple option. So Bill's got that going for him.
-
Also,
I don't need to. You are Kansas State, enough said.
:lol: at any Tech fan who doesn't know that they're Kansas State with a slight recruiting advantage.
-
Also,
I don't need to. You are Kansas State, enough said.
:lol: at any Tech fan who doesn't know that they're Kansas State with a slight recruiting advantage.
wows youre an idiot
-
We were the upset pick of the week on ESPN hahaha. You guys are undefeated and ranked, and still you guys were picked to "upset" us. I really can't wait for tomorrow, there is no way in hell we lose. 99% sure.
-
At least they think we'll win :dunno:
-
We were the upset pick of the week on ESPN hahaha. You guys are undefeated and ranked, and still you guys were picked to "upset" us. I really can't wait for tomorrow, there is no way in hell we lose. 99% sure.
we're the 1%. Prepare to have The Chamber Occupy your Wall Street all night long.
-
We were the upset pick of the week on ESPN hahaha. You guys are undefeated and ranked, and still you guys were picked to "upset" us. I really can't wait for tomorrow, there is no way in hell we lose. 99% sure.
we're the 1%. Prepare to have The Chamber Occupy your Wall Street dry county all night long.
-
I think Wreckdemtech is a Beems sock. Probably given up on KU (as he should) and decided to be a fan of whoever we're playing each week.
-
I think Wreckdemtech is a Beems sock. Probably given up on KU (as he should) and decided to be a fan of whoever we're playing each week.
Screw KU! They need to just scrap their football program.
Anyways, it's gameday. Sorry, gonna have to knock you guys out of the top 25.
-
Losing to sandaggie would be embarassing.
-
Wreckdemtech, we are gonna wreck your face
-
Wreckdemtech, we are gonna wreck your face
Sure you are. Because you guys have so much success in Lubbock right? :grin:
-
Ask your mom about that
-
we got all three wins from gameday picks. Tech sucks.
We were the upset pick of the week on ESPN hahaha. You guys are undefeated and ranked, and still you guys were picked to "upset" us. I really can't wait for tomorrow, there is no way in hell we lose. 99% sure.
we've been the "underdogs" the last 3 games, and have won them. That's completely fine with me. Tech sucks, at least we've actually won a BIG12 championship.
oh....btw, Lubbock is a sh*thole.
-
41-31
Go cats.
Powerball please