goemaw.com

General Discussion => Essentially Flyertalk => Topic started by: Trim on October 08, 2011, 08:07:45 PM

Title: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 08, 2011, 08:07:45 PM
FanningKSU is NOT the, or even a, owner of goEMAW.com.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: OK_Cat on October 08, 2011, 08:34:20 PM
Twitter babes everywhere are devastated
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: j-dub on October 08, 2011, 08:43:30 PM
the eff is this
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 08, 2011, 09:52:29 PM
the eff is this

A national investigation has uncovered that fanningksu has taken fake clamsing to a disturbing new level.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 08, 2011, 10:03:23 PM
 :lol: BTW Trim how did this rumor start again? I'd love to know. Enlighten me!
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 08, 2011, 10:07:00 PM
:lol: BTW Trim how did this rumor start again? I'd love to know. Enlighten me!

:dubious:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 08, 2011, 10:26:24 PM
:lol: BTW Trim how did this rumor start again? I'd love to know. Enlighten me!

:dubious:
Squawk?
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 08, 2011, 10:27:36 PM
:lol: BTW Trim how did this rumor start again? I'd love to know. Enlighten me!

:dubious:
Squawk?
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 08, 2011, 10:33:11 PM
Trim is this a campaign to let people know that you own this site?
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 08, 2011, 10:42:52 PM
Trim is this a campaign to let people know that you own this site?

No. TP did that, homewrecker.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: OK_Cat on October 08, 2011, 10:46:22 PM
good thing Mrs. CNS Casey is an honest, god-fearing woman.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 08, 2011, 10:56:11 PM
I can't help I'm good looking and your all jelly!
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 09, 2011, 07:33:56 AM
So there I am, minding my own business watching the wild wild cats take it to the Bears, when this guy walks in powercat polo, pants up to his chin, yelling and interrupting my scene.

goEMAW IS THE WORST SITE ON THE INTERNET, he yells.  THE goEMAW OWNER BANGED MY WIFE AND LEFT MY LIFE IN SHAMBLES. I AM GOING TO PUT ON MY CAMOUFLAGE AND SHINE UP MY RIFLE AND HUNT HIM DOWN.  IT IS OPEN SEASON ON WIFE FUCKERS.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 09, 2011, 07:36:00 AM
Then I do the only logical thing I can do, drink more and ignore the guy.

But details slip out.  He is visiting from Kansas City.  So this event happened closer to the World Headquarters than I first expected.

It was time to put the owners on trial.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 09, 2011, 07:37:43 AM
For an entire week there was much denying and finger pointing. 

Speculating on my part, with my super brain, led to two likely candidates. 

However, those candidates would soon be rebuffed and an even more heinous villain would emerge.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 09, 2011, 07:41:02 AM
This mystery villain told the guy's wife that he was the Sole owner of goEMAW in order to seduce her.


It all became clear.  There is a wife-banging, homewrecking, imposter on the loose.  No women in Kansas City could be safe from this faker.

Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 09, 2011, 07:41:47 AM
But who is this mystery seducer?
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: steve dave on October 09, 2011, 09:09:51 AM
that is a fantastic story emawgeddon
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 09, 2011, 09:11:52 AM
edge of my seat.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: AppleJack on October 09, 2011, 09:26:59 AM
Hey I live I in KC, should I tell my wife?
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: DQ12 on October 09, 2011, 09:59:30 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clker.com%2Fcliparts%2F9%2F9%2F0%2F7%2F1194986464834380906smiley108.svg.med.png&hash=82e3f2881b576e432b7856eb6b6acda6bc89613a)
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Pete on October 09, 2011, 10:20:27 AM
It's just good to have my name cleared, ya know?  :adios:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 09, 2011, 11:03:28 AM
Hey I live I in KC, should I tell my wife?

I don't think you have to lie about being the owner of goEMAW to bang your wife, but what do I know?
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 09, 2011, 11:05:47 AM
bsac does it again. that dirty rascal.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 11:15:25 AM
I mean, wouldn't the "I had an argument with Real World Wes one time" line be enough?
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: pissclams on October 09, 2011, 01:10:52 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clker.com%2Fcliparts%2F9%2F9%2F0%2F7%2F1194986464834380906smiley108.svg.med.png&hash=82e3f2881b576e432b7856eb6b6acda6bc89613a)

keep going 'geddon
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: kim carnes on October 09, 2011, 01:58:50 PM
I mean, wouldn't the "I had an argument with Real World Wes one time" line be enough?

fanning did?
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 09, 2011, 02:04:58 PM
You guys do know I was at the game yesterday right? And I haven't wore a Kstate polo in like a year.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Pete on October 09, 2011, 02:13:33 PM
You guys do know I was at the game yesterday right? And I haven't wore a Kstate polo in like a year.

I have no direct knowledge here or anything, but FWIW, I believe that it was being suggested that you might be the OTHER character in the story.  :users:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 02:48:12 PM
You guys do know I was at the game yesterday right? And I haven't wore a Kstate polo in like a year.

I have no direct knowledge here or anything, but FWIW, I believe that it was being suggested that you might be the OTHER character in the story.  :users:

Yes, confirmed.  We haven't yet identified the tucked-polo guy whose wife, now ex-wife, fanning banged under the auspices of being BSAC.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 09, 2011, 03:08:07 PM
You guys do know I was at the game yesterday right? And I haven't wore a Kstate polo in like a year.

I have no direct knowledge here or anything, but FWIW, I believe that it was being suggested that you might be the OTHER character in the story.  :users:

Yes, confirmed.  We haven't yet identified the tucked-polo guy whose wife, now ex-wife, fanning banged under the auspices of being BSAC.

Well technically I know who that guy is.

I don't know who the mystery seducer is, but the angry mob seems to believe it was Fanning.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 03:38:10 PM
I don't know who the mystery seducer is, but the angry mob seems to believe it was Fanning.

There are only 3 other names I'm willing to consider.

1.  TP, for obvious reasons.

2.  Fitz.  Look how often he uses the word "my".  Could easily see him pitching ownership of GPC to some sloppy drunk porker at a KC hotel bar.  Once she awoke from her roofie-induced slumber, the last thing she could remember was him saying something like "you may recognize me from my TV show or my K-State website, go... go-something". 

3.  King Winters.  A newly-crowned Wintz was a little power-drunk one night and exaggerated his role here.  I don't think TBL is giving him shuttle rides to KC though.

All that said, look how defensive Fanning is.  Clearly it's him.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 09, 2011, 03:53:39 PM
I don't know who the mystery seducer is, but the angry mob seems to believe it was Fanning.

There are only 3 other names I'm willing to consider.

1.  TP, for obvious reasons.

Definitely not.

2.  Fitz.  Look how often he uses the word "my".  Could easily see him pitching ownership of GPC to some sloppy drunk porker at a KC hotel bar.  Once she awoke from her roofie-induced slumber, the last thing she could remember was him saying something like "you may recognize me from my TV show or my K-State website, go... go-something". 

Nope. This guy would have known, was gpc subscriber.


3.  King Winters.  A newly-crowned Wintz was a little power-drunk one night and exaggerated his role here.  I don't think TBL is giving him shuttle rides to KC though.

No way, Winters has his choice of young co-eds, no reason to go after this man's wife.


All that said, look how defensive Fanning is.  Clearly it's him.

Yes, very suspicious.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Pete on October 09, 2011, 03:57:16 PM
We don't know if the perpetrator knew that the woman was married.  Could be an honest mistake.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 04:06:43 PM
We don't know if the perpetrator knew that the woman was married.  Could be an honest mistake.

Sure, but there's still the Fake BSAC matter.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Pete on October 09, 2011, 04:44:28 PM
We don't know if the perpetrator knew that the woman was married.  Could be an honest mistake.

Sure, but there's still the Fake BSAC matter.

Well, you sort of have to forgive the dude if it actually DID assist in getting him laid. 
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: kim carnes on October 09, 2011, 04:47:48 PM
We don't know if the perpetrator knew that the woman was married.  Could be an honest mistake.

Sure, but there's still the Fake BSAC matter.

Well, you sort of have to forgive the dude if it actually DID assist in getting him laid. 

I agree with Pete.  He shouldn't be wrecking homes though.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 05:44:45 PM
We don't know if the perpetrator knew that the woman was married.  Could be an honest mistake.

Sure, but there's still the Fake BSAC matter.

Well, you sort of have to forgive the dude if it actually DID assist in getting him laid. 

Remember when there was a guy in falloon and clams correctly determined that it was fanning?

Now think about that guy telling people he owns goEMAW.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 09, 2011, 06:11:39 PM
I won't take part in these witch trials! You guys know I was in Manhattan all weekend. F you haters!  :shakesfist:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 06:22:36 PM
I won't take part in these witch trials! You guys know I was in Manhattan all weekend. F you haters!  :shakesfist:

You know better than all of us that the episode in question happened weeks, maybe months ago.  The husband's rant was 2 Saturdays ago during the Baylor game.  The further description from the husband's buddy of your lies happened during yesterday's game. 
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: steve dave on October 09, 2011, 06:24:19 PM
what if fanning is BSAC  :sdeek:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 09, 2011, 06:27:42 PM
 :dubious:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 06:28:09 PM
what if fanning is BSAC  :sdeek:

I personally took BSAC's KSTATEO jacket from him at the Royals game months ago for the BBBS raffle.  Not fanning.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: I_have_purplewood on October 09, 2011, 06:52:44 PM
 :popcorn: (ftp://:popcorn:)  Jesus I'm glad this isn't on premium. 
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2011, 06:53:08 PM
Could this all be a Kaiser Soze style mind F by 'geddon?  I don't know what gain it would ultimately lead to, maybe just for her entertainment, but it definitely seems to be working so far.


 :dunno:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 06:57:45 PM
Could this all be a Kaiser Soze style mind F by 'geddon?  I don't know what gain it would ultimately lead to, maybe just for her entertainment, but it definitely seems to be working so far.


 :dunno:


You're saying she's the wife-rough rider?  Interesting theory.

I hope hemmy's got plenty of ink for his printer.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 09, 2011, 06:58:27 PM
Could this all be a Kaiser Soze style mind F by 'geddon?  I don't know what gain it would ultimately lead to, maybe just for her entertainment, but it definitely seems to be working so far.


 :dunno:


I'm not even real.  I'm actually a Trim sock.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 09, 2011, 06:58:52 PM
who's wife?   :horrorsurprise:

also I have a hard time believing that saying you own this cesspool would help seal the deal with any respectable lady(so obv. again all signs point to fanning)
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 07:00:16 PM
who's wife?   :horrorsurprise:

also I have a hard time believing that saying you own this cesspool would help seal the deal with any respectable lady(so obv. again all signs point to fanning)

Good point.  Add y-l_a to the prosecution's dream team counsel of attorneys.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2011, 07:02:22 PM
who's wife?   :horrorsurprise:

also I have a hard time believing that saying you own this cesspool would help seal the deal with any respectable lady(so obv. again all signs point to fanning)

Look, she did cheat on her hubby.  Kinda tells you what kind of girl we are talking about here...
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2011, 07:04:00 PM
Could this all be a Kaiser Soze style mind F by 'geddon?  I don't know what gain it would ultimately lead to, maybe just for her entertainment, but it definitely seems to be working so far.


 :dunno:


You're saying she's the wife-rough rider?  Interesting theory.

I hope hemmy's got plenty of ink for his printer.

I am saying that there is no wife and that the guy was staged...






...maybe
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 09, 2011, 07:06:35 PM
Could this all be a Kaiser Soze style mind F by 'geddon?  I don't know what gain it would ultimately lead to, maybe just for her entertainment, but it definitely seems to be working so far.


 :dunno:


You're saying she's the wife-rough rider?  Interesting theory.

I hope hemmy's got plenty of ink for his printer.

I am saying that there is no wife and that the guy was staged...






...maybe

So what I am either a lesbian or a liar?  Convenient coming from a guy pretending to be a brain surgeon  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2011, 07:10:14 PM
Could this all be a Kaiser Soze style mind F by 'geddon?  I don't know what gain it would ultimately lead to, maybe just for her entertainment, but it definitely seems to be working so far.


 :dunno:


You're saying she's the wife-rough rider?  Interesting theory.

I hope hemmy's got plenty of ink for his printer.

I am saying that there is no wife and that the guy was staged...






...maybe

So what I am either a lesbian or a liar?  Convenient coming from a guy pretending to be a brain surgeon  :rolleyes:

:Nojudging:

Dishonesty is only bad when it isn't put to good use or doesn't ultimately end in entertainment for me.

Also, Kaiser Soze was a puppet master, not a lesbian.  Honestly don't know where that came from.  Compliment. 
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: pike on October 09, 2011, 07:22:12 PM
Could this all be a Kaiser Soze style mind F by 'geddon?  I don't know what gain it would ultimately lead to, maybe just for her entertainment, but it definitely seems to be working so far.


 :dunno:


I'm not even real.  I'm actually a Trim sock.

I think BSAC is a trim sock
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 07:28:54 PM
Could this all be a Kaiser Soze style mind F by 'geddon?  I don't know what gain it would ultimately lead to, maybe just for her entertainment, but it definitely seems to be working so far.


 :dunno:


I'm not even real.  I'm actually a Trim sock.

I think BSAC is a trim sock

You also think the government did 9/11.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: wetwillie on October 09, 2011, 07:34:42 PM
Hide yo kids hide yo wife. Fannings rough ridin' everything that moves!
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Kat Kid on October 09, 2011, 07:35:05 PM
Could this all be a Kaiser Soze style mind F by 'geddon?  I don't know what gain it would ultimately lead to, maybe just for her entertainment, but it definitely seems to be working so far.


 :dunno:


I'm not even real.  I'm actually a Trim sock.

I think BSAC is a trim sock

You also think the government did 9/11.

That's sure sounds like something BSAC would say...
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 07:37:23 PM
Could this all be a Kaiser Soze style mind F by 'geddon?  I don't know what gain it would ultimately lead to, maybe just for her entertainment, but it definitely seems to be working so far.


 :dunno:


I'm not even real.  I'm actually a Trim sock.

I think BSAC is a trim sock

You also think the government did 9/11.

That's sure sounds like something BSAC would say...

I'm honored.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 09, 2011, 07:50:44 PM
Kaiser Soze was a puppet master

When I was coming up with my ultimate plan to take down the Aggieville Creepster, Plan C did involve hiring actors, so I guess I wouldn't put it past me.

But ultimately, I went with Plan E.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2011, 08:12:38 PM
Kaiser Soze was a puppet master

When I was coming up with my ultimate plan to take down the Aggieville Creepster, Plan C did involve hiring actors, so I guess I wouldn't put it past me.

But ultimately, I went with Plan E.
:surprised:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 09, 2011, 08:33:28 PM
:flush:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 08:34:56 PM
:flush:

Hmmmmm.....
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 09, 2011, 08:38:51 PM
Kaiser Soze was a puppet master

When I was coming up with my ultimate plan to take down the Aggieville Creepster, Plan C did involve hiring actors, so I guess I wouldn't put it past me.

But ultimately, I went with Plan E.
Sounds like fanning should've thought of going with plan b (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.madeformemories.com%2Fimages%2Fpregnant-woman-clipart.gif&hash=af91f616ef7bea8adbda28a1f1cc2749dbd8e2ef) rumblings
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 09, 2011, 08:41:45 PM
Kaiser Soze was a puppet master

When I was coming up with my ultimate plan to take down the Aggieville Creepster, Plan C did involve hiring actors, so I guess I wouldn't put it past me.

But ultimately, I went with Plan E.
Sounds like fanning should've thought of going with plan b (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.madeformemories.com%2Fimages%2Fpregnant-woman-clipart.gif&hash=af91f616ef7bea8adbda28a1f1cc2749dbd8e2ef) rumblings
  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 09, 2011, 08:43:28 PM
Kaiser Soze was a puppet master

When I was coming up with my ultimate plan to take down the Aggieville Creepster, Plan C did involve hiring actors, so I guess I wouldn't put it past me.

But ultimately, I went with Plan E.
Sounds like fanning should've thought of going with plan b (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.madeformemories.com%2Fimages%2Fpregnant-woman-clipart.gif&hash=af91f616ef7bea8adbda28a1f1cc2749dbd8e2ef) rumblings
  :horrorsurprise:

^^^

The look of a guy who knows there's about to be a bastard baby popping out inexplicably already wearing a tilted baseball hat.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: kim carnes on October 09, 2011, 08:46:52 PM
Kaiser Soze was a puppet master

When I was coming up with my ultimate plan to take down the Aggieville Creepster, Plan C did involve hiring actors, so I guess I wouldn't put it past me.

But ultimately, I went with Plan E.
Sounds like fanning should've thought of going with plan b (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.madeformemories.com%2Fimages%2Fpregnant-woman-clipart.gif&hash=af91f616ef7bea8adbda28a1f1cc2749dbd8e2ef) rumblings
  :horrorsurprise:

fanning, did you or did you not bed down a married woman?
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 0.42 on October 09, 2011, 08:50:11 PM
 :sadpeek:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 10, 2011, 10:39:16 AM
It's just good to have my name cleared, ya know?  :adios:

Ditto.  I was beginning to believe the accusations myself.  I was like a much better looking Amanda Knox.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 10:48:35 AM
Kaiser Soze was a puppet master

When I was coming up with my ultimate plan to take down the Aggieville Creepster, Plan C did involve hiring actors, so I guess I wouldn't put it past me.

But ultimately, I went with Plan E.
Sounds like fanning should've thought of going with plan b (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.madeformemories.com%2Fimages%2Fpregnant-woman-clipart.gif&hash=af91f616ef7bea8adbda28a1f1cc2749dbd8e2ef) rumblings
  :horrorsurprise:

fanning, did you or did you not bed down a married woman?

Did not! I even feel bad for this poor bastard!
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: CNS on October 10, 2011, 11:32:22 AM
Kaiser Soze was a puppet master

When I was coming up with my ultimate plan to take down the Aggieville Creepster, Plan C did involve hiring actors, so I guess I wouldn't put it past me.

But ultimately, I went with Plan E.
Sounds like fanning should've thought of going with plan b (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.madeformemories.com%2Fimages%2Fpregnant-woman-clipart.gif&hash=af91f616ef7bea8adbda28a1f1cc2749dbd8e2ef) rumblings
  :horrorsurprise:

fanning, did you or did you not bed down a married woman?

Did not! I even feel bad for this poor bastard!

The literal bastard that is about to be born of this schemed night, the bastard of a husband, or the bastard that took advantage of a vulnerable married woman and this website's good name?

For the record, I think you are clean.  At least that is what the Mods told me to say(good cop/bad cop).  Just watch out for 'clams. 
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 10, 2011, 11:35:37 AM
so do we know for a fact that the guy in question is fanning or is it just an educated guess based on evidence and descriptions/reports?
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2011, 11:37:17 AM
so do we know for a fact that the guy in question is fanning or is it just an educated guess based on evidence and descriptions/reports?

HIGHLY educated guess, bordering on the level of fact.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 12:06:40 PM
so do we know for a fact that the guy in question is fanning or is it just an educated guess based on evidence and descriptions/reports?

HIGHLY educated guess, bordering on the level of fact.

Please share these rumblings Trim. Do I need to post a picture of myself up next to this perpetrater? This thread is nothing without pics.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2011, 12:17:40 PM
so do we know for a fact that the guy in question is fanning or is it just an educated guess based on evidence and descriptions/reports?

HIGHLY educated guess, bordering on the level of fact.

Please share these rumblings Trim. Do I need to post a picture of myself up next to this perpetrater? This thread is nothing without pics.

Sure, I'd love to see who you attempt to pin this on.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: CNS on October 10, 2011, 12:19:17 PM
rather than a picture, you should submit a crime scene style drawing.  Prob be more helpful, imo.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: steve dave on October 10, 2011, 12:27:13 PM
emawgeddon, do an mspaint of what the poor husband looks like. 
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 12:27:37 PM
Do these pics look like someone who needs to lie about owning goEMAW to get laid? Look at those baby blues...

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 12:28:49 PM
I Mean come on...

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 10, 2011, 12:30:42 PM
Do these pics look like someone who needs to lie about owning goEMAW to get laid? Look at those baby blues...

i mean the weirdest beyond weird part of this whole thing is that someone would lie about this. i mean this place is a shithole dump. it's the equivalent to someone saying that they are a homeless bum with the hopes that it's going to help them get laid. i mean just weird beyond weird.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 12:54:17 PM
BTW Trim, what kind of lawyer are you? I'm guilty without trial? What kind of practice do you run?  :shakesfist:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: j-dub on October 10, 2011, 12:59:09 PM
i'm just a jumble right now.. a little :surprised: mixed with  :lol: with a  :facepalm:/  :cheers: on top.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2011, 01:04:24 PM
BTW Trim, what kind of lawyer are you? I'm guilty without trial? What kind of practice do you run?  :shakesfist:

I can't give you legal advice.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 01:32:36 PM
BTW Trim, what kind of lawyer are you? I'm guilty without trial? What kind of practice do you run?  :shakesfist:

I can't give you legal advice.

My mom use to be the main para legal for Paul Morrison at Johnson County Court House. I might just have to put in a call, Paul seems to know how to get out of these types of messes.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: steve dave on October 10, 2011, 01:38:20 PM
I was about to say that this thread just got even creepier but then realized that it was fanning posting tons of pics of himself  :sdeek:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2011, 01:39:38 PM
BTW Trim, what kind of lawyer are you? I'm guilty without trial? What kind of practice do you run?  :shakesfist:

I can't give you legal advice.

My mom use to be the main para legal for Paul Morrison at Johnson County Court House. I might just have to put in a call, Paul seems to know how to get out of these types of messes.  :thumbsup:

Yes, he handled his own very well.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: pissclams on October 10, 2011, 01:40:30 PM
BTW Trim, what kind of lawyer are you? I'm guilty without trial? What kind of practice do you run?  :shakesfist:

I can't give you legal advice.

My mom use to be the main para legal for Paul Morrison at Johnson County Court House. I might just have to put in a call, Paul seems to know how to get out of these types of messes.  :thumbsup:
yup, by having sex with the women that worked in his office.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 01:41:15 PM
I was about to say that this thread just got even creepier but then realized that it was fanning posting tons of pics of himself  :sdeek:
:blush:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2011, 01:42:44 PM
I was about to say that this thread just got even creepier but then realized that it was fanning posting tons of pics of himself  :sdeek:

I don't see them, but man, remember how BMW used to debate using that strategy?
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2011, 01:44:26 PM
BTW Trim, what kind of lawyer are you? I'm guilty without trial? What kind of practice do you run?  :shakesfist:

I can't give you legal advice.

My mom use to be the main para legal for Paul Morrison at Johnson County Court House. I might just have to put in a call, Paul seems to know how to get out of these types of messes.  :thumbsup:
yup, by having sex with the women that worked in his office.

:horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: CNS on October 10, 2011, 01:45:42 PM
Look, I am not saying I condone this sort of behavior, but I have a feeling that this is about to turn into a Photoshop thread.

Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 10, 2011, 01:46:01 PM
I was about to say that this thread just got even creepier but then realized that it was fanning posting tons of pics of himself  :sdeek:

:lol:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 01:47:50 PM
I was about to say that this thread just got even creepier but then realized that it was fanning posting tons of pics of himself  :sdeek:

:lol:

 :lol: and also  :ohno:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 02:30:51 PM
BTW don't you guys find it a little funny that no one expects this to be Trim? I mean the signs matchup to a T and he was awfully quick to point the finger elsewhere!
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: CNS on October 10, 2011, 03:02:36 PM
BTW don't you guys find it a little funny that no one expects this to be Trim? I mean the signs matchup to a T and he was awfully quick to point the finger elsewhere!

Interesting....the Smelt It/Delt It defense.

Hmmm...
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: pissclams on October 10, 2011, 03:23:32 PM
BTW don't you guys find it a little funny that no one expects this to be Trim? I mean the signs matchup to a T and he was awfully quick to point the finger elsewhere!

the thing is that I know trim and the chances of him ever getting laid are some where south of 0%. 
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2011, 03:56:00 PM
BTW don't you guys find it a little funny that no one expects this to be Trim? I mean the signs matchup to a T and he was awfully quick to point the finger elsewhere!

I've already been interrogated and cleared.

Then I do the only logical thing I can do, drink more and ignore the guy.

But details slip out.  He is visiting from Kansas City.  So this event happened closer to the World Headquarters than I first expected.

It was time to put the owners on trial.

For an entire week there was much denying and finger pointing. 

Speculating on my part, with my super brain, led to two likely candidates. 

However, those candidates would soon be rebuffed and an even more heinous villain would emerge.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 10, 2011, 05:18:29 PM
BTW don't you guys find it a little funny that no one expects this to be Trim? I mean the signs matchup to a T and he was awfully quick to point the finger elsewhere!

the thing is that I know trim and the chances of him ever getting laid are some where south of 0%. 

Trim was the first person I accused.  Doesn't seem too outlandish  :dunno:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: pissclams on October 10, 2011, 05:18:55 PM
BTW don't you guys find it a little funny that no one expects this to be Trim? I mean the signs matchup to a T and he was awfully quick to point the finger elsewhere!

the thing is that I know trim and the chances of him ever getting laid are some where south of 0%. 

Trim was the first person I accused.  Doesn't seem too outlandish  :dunno:

:lol:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 10, 2011, 05:24:27 PM
BREAKING

WE NOW HAVE AN ARTIST'S SKETCH OF THE MYSTERY SEDUCER


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi72.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fi195%2Fjnm8888%2Fcompositesketch.png&hash=bf5ce92d9bb5b2e02c6e94d674206a45d3917e09)
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: steve dave on October 10, 2011, 05:28:22 PM
BREAKING

WE NOW HAVE AN ARTIST'S SKETCH OF THE MYSTERY SEDUCER


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi72.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fi195%2Fjnm8888%2Fcompositesketch.png&hash=bf5ce92d9bb5b2e02c6e94d674206a45d3917e09)

 :lol:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2011, 05:52:18 PM
BREAKING

WE NOW HAVE AN ARTIST'S SKETCH OF THE MYSTERY SEDUCER


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi72.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fi195%2Fjnm8888%2Fcompositesketch.png&hash=bf5ce92d9bb5b2e02c6e94d674206a45d3917e09)

 :eek:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 06:04:32 PM
BREAKING

WE NOW HAVE AN ARTIST'S SKETCH OF THE MYSTERY SEDUCER


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi72.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fi195%2Fjnm8888%2Fcompositesketch.png&hash=bf5ce92d9bb5b2e02c6e94d674206a45d3917e09)

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: I_have_purplewood on October 10, 2011, 06:14:31 PM
Sometimes I really wish I knew what the hell was going on around here.......and then, sometimes not :dunno: (ftp://:dunno:).  But still... :popcorn: (ftp://:popcorn:)
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2011, 06:23:42 PM
Sometimes I really wish I knew what the hell was going on around here.......and then, sometimes not :dunno: (ftp://:dunno:).  But still... :popcorn: (ftp://:popcorn:)

That guy in the sketch (fanning) told some married lady that he owned goEMAW to get her to sleep with him leading to her and her husband getting divorced.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 07:19:58 PM
Sometimes I really wish I knew what the hell was going on around here.......and then, sometimes not :dunno: (ftp://:dunno:).  But still... :popcorn: (ftp://:popcorn:)

That guy in the sketch (fanning) Allegedly told some married lady that he owned goEMAW to get her to sleep with him leading to her and her husband getting divorced.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: wetwillie on October 10, 2011, 08:10:29 PM
I don't know why this fanning character is downplaying the whole thing.  Before the 1bigwillie offed himself after too many painkillers and whiskey he had a similar thread about trying to avoid the beat down coming his way after shagging a married lady.  Just own in brah.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: I_have_purplewood on October 10, 2011, 08:15:43 PM
I don't know why this fanning character is downplaying the whole thing.  Before the 1bigwillie offed himself after too many painkillers and whiskey he had a similar thread about trying to avoid the beat down coming his way after shagging a married lady.  Just own in brah.

The 1bigwillie offed himself?  Say it ain't so. 
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 08:24:23 PM
I don't know why this fanning character is downplaying the whole thing.  Before the 1bigwillie offed himself after too many painkillers and whiskey he had a similar thread about trying to avoid the beat down coming his way after shagging a married lady.  Just own in brah.

Sounds like a pussy!   :lynchmob:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: ChiComCat on October 10, 2011, 08:45:48 PM
I don't know why this fanning character is downplaying the whole thing.  Before the 1bigwillie offed himself after too many painkillers and whiskey he had a similar thread about trying to avoid the beat down coming his way after shagging a married lady.  Just own in brah.

The 1bigwillie offed himself?  Say it ain't so. 

We've vowed to do a better job of picking out the warning signs since then. 

1) Banging married chicks
2) Pretending an uncorked bottle of champagne is your penis as you open it
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 08:52:16 PM
I don't know why this fanning character is downplaying the whole thing.  Before the 1bigwillie offed himself after too many painkillers and whiskey he had a similar thread about trying to avoid the beat down coming his way after shagging a married lady.  Just own in brah.

The 1bigwillie offed himself?  Say it ain't so. 

We've vowed to do a better job of picking out the warning signs since then. 

1) Banging married chicks
2) Pretending an uncorked bottle of champagne is your penis as you open it

I didn't do it dip shits!  :dubious:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: CNS on October 10, 2011, 08:55:54 PM
BREAKING

WE NOW HAVE AN ARTIST'S SKETCH OF THE MYSTERY SEDUCER


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi72.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fi195%2Fjnm8888%2Fcompositesketch.png&hash=bf5ce92d9bb5b2e02c6e94d674206a45d3917e09)

 :lol:

:fanningtastic:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 10, 2011, 08:59:15 PM


Remember when there was a guy in falloon and clams correctly determined that it was fanning?

Now think about that guy telling people he owns goEMAW.

Sidebar: clams is it all natural or have you been hitting the MuscleTech
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: ChiComCat on October 10, 2011, 09:02:18 PM
I don't know why this fanning character is downplaying the whole thing.  Before the 1bigwillie offed himself after too many painkillers and whiskey he had a similar thread about trying to avoid the beat down coming his way after shagging a married lady.  Just own in brah.

The 1bigwillie offed himself?  Say it ain't so. 

We've vowed to do a better job of picking out the warning signs since then. 

1) Banging married chicks
2) Pretending an uncorked bottle of champagne is your penis as you open it

I didn't do it dip shits!  :dubious:

I never said we were worried about you...
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2011, 09:21:24 PM


Remember when there was a guy in falloon and clams correctly determined that it was fanning?

Now think about that guy telling people he owns goEMAW.

Sidebar: clams is it all natural or have you been hitting the MuscleTech

This is the deepest mystery goEMAW has ever faced.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 10, 2011, 09:29:13 PM
I don't know why this fanning character is downplaying the whole thing.  Before the 1bigwillie offed himself after too many painkillers and whiskey he had a similar thread about trying to avoid the beat down coming his way after shagging a married lady.  Just own in brah.

The 1bigwillie offed himself?  Say it ain't so. 

We've vowed to do a better job of picking out the warning signs since then. 

1) Banging married chicks
2) Pretending an uncorked bottle of champagne is your penis as you open it

3) Hooks up with chicks that he only knows through twitter.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: pissclams on October 10, 2011, 09:57:51 PM


Remember when there was a guy in falloon and clams correctly determined that it was fanning?

Now think about that guy telling people he owns goEMAW.

Sidebar: clams is it all natural or have you been hitting the MuscleTech

This should answer your question. (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=14123.msg329478#msg329478)
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 10, 2011, 10:03:01 PM


Remember when there was a guy in falloon and clams correctly determined that it was fanning?

Now think about that guy telling people he owns goEMAW.

Sidebar: clams is it all natural or have you been hitting the MuscleTech


This should answer your question. (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=14123.msg329478#msg329478)

Case closed.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: EMAWgeddon on October 10, 2011, 10:06:16 PM


Remember when there was a guy in falloon and clams correctly determined that it was fanning?

Now think about that guy telling people he owns goEMAW.

Sidebar: clams is it all natural or have you been hitting the MuscleTech

This should answer your question. (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=14123.msg329478#msg329478)

mystery intact :nono:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 10, 2011, 10:34:58 PM
I don't know why this fanning character is downplaying the whole thing.  Before the 1bigwillie offed himself after too many painkillers and whiskey he had a similar thread about trying to avoid the beat down coming his way after shagging a married lady.  Just own in brah.

The 1bigwillie offed himself?  Say it ain't so. 

We've vowed to do a better job of picking out the warning signs since then. 

1) Banging married chicks
2) Pretending an uncorked bottle of champagne is your penis as you open it

3) Hooks up with chicks that he only knows through twitter.

Case closed! Unless I knew her on twitter, I didn't do it.
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: Trim on October 11, 2011, 07:45:14 AM
Man, when fanning decides to 'fess up to a little thing like this, he really lets it all out.

I've grown a liking to this board. I have givin up an alter ego Wackycat to committ here, but help me out... Why can't you vaginas go to the games? I gave up my summer to save for Miami, I take it on the chin for Trim that I did a married girl, and I make a jounalist salary?!?! Why can't you pussies go to the game??? Help me out!  :shakesfist:
Title: Re: ATTN: VULNERABLE, POSSIBLY MARRIED, FEMALES IN THE KC AREA
Post by: kslim on October 11, 2011, 10:19:35 AM
you can never trust a ginger, these are facts that need submitted to the courts