goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Rumsfield on October 02, 2011, 01:59:49 AM

Title: 7-0
Post by: Rumsfield on October 02, 2011, 01:59:49 AM
 :combofan:
Hi Brent.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: pike on October 02, 2011, 02:02:43 AM
Well, let's not get too ahead of ourselves here.

I rough ridin' hate Missouri  :curse:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: kcchiefdav on October 02, 2011, 07:27:54 AM
Mizzou's rushing D is pretty solid. I don't love our chances against them.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Dub on October 02, 2011, 07:39:08 AM
Well, let's not get too ahead of ourselves here.

I rough ridin' hate Missouri  :curse:

We were ahead of ourselves after miami.   If you want to play this win down, you can go hang out in the corner by yourself.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: doom on October 02, 2011, 07:40:50 AM
Well, let's not get too ahead of ourselves here.

I rough ridin' hate Missouri  :curse:

We were ahead of ourselves after miami.   If you want to play this win down, you can go hang out in the corner by yourself.

This win was great, but there are no easy wins in the big 12 this year. 
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Dub on October 02, 2011, 07:48:57 AM
Well, let's not get too ahead of ourselves here.

I rough ridin' hate Missouri  :curse:

We were ahead of ourselves after miami.   If you want to play this win down, you can go hang out in the corner by yourself.

This win was great, but there are no easy wins in the big 12 this year. 

That is exactly my point.  No one thought we would beat miami.  The entire country sucked off RG3.  Not sayin we will win 10 games or anything, I'm just saying we just surpassed every expectation we had going into this year and thats somethin to be excited about.  Enjoy the wins bro, that's why we follow this crap.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: PowercatPat on October 02, 2011, 08:30:59 AM
Mizzou's rushing D is pretty solid. I don't love our chances against them.

This. I don't think we'll win.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 02, 2011, 08:34:35 AM
Based on everything I've seen we match up horribly against MU. 

Our weird ass play calling, and half a step above anemic passing game is going to have to perform a whole lot better if K-state is going to beat MU.

Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Barry McCockner on October 02, 2011, 08:37:03 AM
Well, let's not get too ahead of ourselves here.

I rough ridin' hate Missouri  :curse:

We were ahead of ourselves after miami.   If you want to play this win down, you can go hang out in the corner by yourself.

This win was great, but there are no easy wins in the big 12 this year. 

KU's still in the Big 12, right?
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: kso_FAN on October 02, 2011, 08:56:25 AM
Based on everything I've seen we match up horribly against MU. 

Our weird ass play calling, and half a step above anemic passing game is going to have to perform a whole lot better if K-state is going to beat MU.



I agree for the most part, but I also don't think Missouri is any better than Baylor. We certainly can't get only 6 points off of 3 TOs and settle for FGs again.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: fatty fat fat on October 02, 2011, 08:57:34 AM
2009 mizzou nightmares.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Cire on October 02, 2011, 09:44:59 AM
Good god, mizzou will tear us apart.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: catzacker on October 02, 2011, 09:52:20 AM
We have to actually account for the QB run game vs MU.  We didn't necessarily have to against Baylor.  And MU actually makes an effort to run the ball, which Baylor really didn't.  that said, Klein worked over MU last year (and MU had a better defense).  Hopefully we find different ways to run the ball and stick to what is working rather than absurdly dropping klein back  for multiple series in a row. 
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 02, 2011, 10:13:22 AM
Also, will we win at Tech? 
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: DQ12 on October 02, 2011, 10:40:17 AM
We have to actually account for the QB run game vs MU.  We didn't necessarily have to against Baylor.  And MU actually makes an effort to run the ball, which Baylor really didn't.  that said, Klein worked over MU last year (and MU had a better defense).  Hopefully we find different ways to run the ball and stick to what is working rather than absurdly dropping klein back  for multiple series in a row. 
:confused:

Explain. 
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: kcchiefdav on October 02, 2011, 10:52:08 AM
We have to actually account for the QB run game vs MU.  We didn't necessarily have to against Baylor.  And MU actually makes an effort to run the ball, which Baylor really didn't.  that said, Klein worked over MU last year (and MU had a better defense).  Hopefully we find different ways to run the ball and stick to what is working rather than absurdly dropping klein back  for multiple series in a row. 
:confused:

Explain. 

I assume he means that Baylor almost never has set run plays for RG3. Mizzou does run set plays for Franklin.

 However, I'm much more worried about our O matching up against their D more than the other way around. I could easily see them winning a super low scoring game in high teens or low twenties.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: the KHAN! on October 02, 2011, 10:56:17 AM
Also, will we win at Tech? 

eff yes. Book it.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: DQ12 on October 02, 2011, 11:08:00 AM
We have to actually account for the QB run game vs MU.  We didn't necessarily have to against Baylor.  And MU actually makes an effort to run the ball, which Baylor really didn't.  that said, Klein worked over MU last year (and MU had a better defense).  Hopefully we find different ways to run the ball and stick to what is working rather than absurdly dropping klein back  for multiple series in a row. 
:confused:

Explain. 

I assume he means that Baylor almost never has set run plays for RG3. Mizzou does run set plays for Franklin.

 However, I'm much more worried about our O matching up against their D more than the other way around. I could easily see them winning a super low scoring game in high teens or low twenties.
Okay, that makes some sense, but we had to account for RG3's legs on every play.  Athur's only job yesterday was to make sure RG3 didn't get loose outside the pocket and he did very good with that.  Speed at linebacker is the most important thing in stopping the QB run game, and we have it in spades. 

When Baylor did set run plays for RG3, they blew up, most notably, that 3rd and 4 speed option they ran that RG3 fumbled.  May have been the biggest play of the day.  That play turned the game around.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Dub on October 02, 2011, 11:15:48 AM
We have to actually account for the QB run game vs MU.  We didn't necessarily have to against Baylor.  And MU actually makes an effort to run the ball, which Baylor really didn't.  that said, Klein worked over MU last year (and MU had a better defense).  Hopefully we find different ways to run the ball and stick to what is working rather than absurdly dropping klein back  for multiple series in a row. 
:confused:

Explain. 


Mizzou is basically Baylor lite, but with more meth.  Not sure why everyone is so worried.  ZOMG, we have to account for a running QB?! I'd rather do that than have a QB that has 500+ yard with 5 TD's in the previous few occasions.


I assume he means that Baylor almost never has set run plays for RG3. Mizzou does run set plays for Franklin.

 However, I'm much more worried about our O matching up against their D more than the other way around. I could easily see them winning a super low scoring game in high teens or low twenties.
Okay, that makes some sense, but we had to account for RG3's legs on every play.  Athur's only job yesterday was to make sure RG3 didn't get loose outside the pocket and he did very good with that.  Speed at linebacker is the most important thing in stopping the QB run game, and we have it in spades. 

When Baylor did set run plays for RG3, they blew up, most notably, that 3rd and 4 speed option they ran that RG3 fumbled.  May have been the biggest play of the day.  That play turned the game around.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 02, 2011, 11:47:16 AM
my EMAW is running so high right now, I just don't believe Bill "Cortez" Snyderman can be beaten by the visor. No Chance GO CATS!
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Bookcat on October 02, 2011, 11:51:21 AM
the buzz hasn't wore off.

I'm convinced..right now...that we'll beat MU by 14+... I know that isn't right...but wer'e freaking ranked! omfg
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: pike on October 02, 2011, 11:54:05 AM
Well, let's not get too ahead of ourselves here.

I rough ridin' hate Missouri  :curse:

We were ahead of ourselves after miami.   If you want to play this win down, you can go hang out in the corner by yourself.

I'm not playing the win down, asshat. Just because we beat Baylor doesn't mean we're going to go 7-0.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: kslim on October 02, 2011, 11:56:51 AM
if you bros dont think baylor is better than mizzou then you dont watch much football /respect ftb go cats :emawkid:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Bookcat on October 02, 2011, 11:57:13 AM
it'll be another screamer vs. MU.

I'd better go stock up on heart meds.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: ksu101 on October 02, 2011, 12:01:25 PM
I thought about posting something similar to this, but then i realized we are K-State and we will find away to eff it up.  :dubious:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 02, 2011, 12:25:33 PM
the buzz hasn't wore off.

I'm convinced..right now...that we'll beat MU by 14+... I know that isn't right...but wer'e freaking ranked! omfg

And Missouri isn't even receiving votes. What a bunch of clowns.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: bigwilliestyle1407 on October 02, 2011, 12:25:52 PM
 

[/quote]
Okay, that makes some sense, but we had to account for RG3's legs on every play.  Athur's only job yesterday was to make sure RG3 didn't get loose outside the pocket and he did very good with that.  Speed at linebacker is the most important thing in stopping the QB run game, and we have it in spades

When Baylor did set run plays for RG3, they blew up, most notably, that 3rd and 4 speed option they ran that RG3 fumbled.  May have been the biggest play of the day.  That play turned the game around.
[/quote]

 :opcat: yeah buddy :lynchmob:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Dub on October 02, 2011, 12:27:11 PM
Well, let's not get too ahead of ourselves here.

I rough ridin' hate Missouri  :curse:

We were ahead of ourselves after miami.   If you want to play this win down, you can go hang out in the corner by yourself.

I'm not playing the win down, asshat. Just because we beat Baylor doesn't mean we're going to go 7-0.

I didn't say we were going to go 7-0.  I'm a happy fan, we're ranked and undefeated.  I'm enjoying the win, and your worrying about missouri and it's not even monday yet.  You can fret all week, just saying enjoy it a bit... asshat.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: pike on October 02, 2011, 12:27:57 PM
It's never too early to start hating Misery.

eff

 :curse:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: bigwilliestyle1407 on October 02, 2011, 01:31:10 PM
It's never too early to start hating Misery.

eff

 :curse:

I hate mizzu all the time but get even more hate in my heart on game week :chainsaw:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: doom on October 02, 2011, 08:25:31 PM
the buzz hasn't wore off.

I'm convinced..right now...that we'll beat MU by 14+... I know that isn't right...but wer'e freaking ranked! omfg

which means we inevitably lose this next game. 
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 02, 2011, 08:45:27 PM
that said, Klein worked over MU last year (and MU had a better defense).  

i was somewhat pak'd at a bar in arkansas during the mizzou game last year, but i absolutely at no point in time had a feeling that klein worked them over.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: the KHAN! on October 04, 2011, 12:08:42 AM
He was working on them, not so much a workover.

When Coffman touched the field, it seemed like our Jenga, or mojo, came tumbling down.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: ksu101 on October 04, 2011, 12:17:02 AM
October 29th Gameday comes to the the Little Apple!!!     :ksu:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: nicname on October 04, 2011, 12:18:52 AM
sig
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 04, 2011, 12:55:34 AM
I want it too.  But I am not going to get ahead of myself.  A lot of crap has to fall in place b4 we get a GameDay again.


And by the way, did anyone notice the slack-jawed herda-hadda yokel in the bottom right-hand corner of that picture?!?   :surprised:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: the KHAN! on October 04, 2011, 12:57:41 AM



And by the way, did anyone notice the slack-jawed herda-hadda yokel in the bottom right-hand corner of that picture?!?   :surprised:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_ls112bYBEm1qma5w1.gif&hash=f0872e6a6d12c9c81300b50cbf566dad183cf2d5)
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 04, 2011, 01:04:24 AM
Here are the games that week.  There are actually some pretty dece. ones we'd have to compete with.   :eek:  :ohno:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule/_/week/9



But yeah, I'm not gonna get ahead of myself.   :D
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: pike on October 04, 2011, 01:06:02 AM
Here are the games that week.  There are actually some pretty dece. ones we'd have to compete with.   :eek:  :ohno:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule/_/week/9



But yeah, I'm not gonna get ahead of myself.   :D

Clemson vs Ga Tech

 :ohno:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 04, 2011, 01:09:25 AM
In looking at the upcoming schedules of those two teams, I don't see either losing.  It's gonna be GT vs. Clemson.   :cry:











Of course this is a moot point because I'm sure we'll somehow shazbot! up two of the next three games or something.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: the KHAN! on October 04, 2011, 01:10:59 AM
In looking at the upcoming schedules of those two teams, I don't see either losing.  It's gonna be GT vs. Clemson.   :cry:

Hey now, Oklahoma vs KSU COULD be a better game, if we don't blow it.... I don't see the fighting Stoops losing it.









Of course this is a moot point because I'm sure we'll somehow shazbot! up two of the next three games or something.

Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: waks on October 04, 2011, 01:14:10 AM
In looking at the upcoming schedules of those two teams, I don't see either losing.  It's gonna be GT vs. Clemson.   :cry:











Of course this is a moot point because I'm sure we'll somehow shazbot! up two of the next three games or something.

If we won the next three of our games where would we be ranked? We'd be at least top 15 right? How much would Georgia Tech move up?
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: DQ12 on October 04, 2011, 01:19:35 AM
In looking at the upcoming schedules of those two teams, I don't see either losing.  It's gonna be GT vs. Clemson.   :cry:











Of course this is a moot point because I'm sure we'll somehow shazbot! up two of the next three games or something.

Ga. Tech at Miami?

 :dunno:

If we don't get Gameday for a 7-0 LHC Bill Snyder vs. a 7-0 Bob Stoops I'll probably just quit caring about this season and sports in general. 
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: nicname on October 04, 2011, 01:57:46 AM
In looking at the upcoming schedules of those two teams, I don't see either losing.  It's gonna be GT vs. Clemson.   :cry:











Of course this is a moot point because I'm sure we'll somehow shazbot! up two of the next three games or something.


quit being a lame, getting ahead of yourself is what being a fan is all about.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 04, 2011, 06:59:48 AM
won't OU have been in a crap ton of gameday games this year?
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: kslim on October 04, 2011, 07:30:07 AM
won't OU have been in a crap ton of gameday games this year?

very good point ww, with this weekend that makes two, they will more than likely be in gameday for bedlam as well, we might be screwed bros
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: bigwillie20 on October 04, 2011, 07:44:57 AM
Will settle for Gus   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 04, 2011, 07:49:00 AM
won't OU have been in a crap ton of gameday games this year?

very good point ww, with this weekend that makes two, they will more than likely be in gameday for bedlam as well, we might be screwed bros


 :bawl:

We're fracked.

:bawl:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: fr@ck me on October 04, 2011, 08:09:17 AM
Well, let's not get too ahead of ourselves here.

I rough ridin' hate Missouri  :curse:

We were ahead of ourselves after miami.   If you want to play this win down, you can go hang out in the corner by yourself.

This win was great, but there are no easy wins in the big 12 this year. 

KU  :dunno:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: mocat on October 04, 2011, 08:14:27 AM
GUYS, what about 8-0 @ OSU  :dunno:
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Bookcat on October 04, 2011, 12:21:22 PM
if our D were to hold TTech's track meet to fewer than 30pts I'll be most impressed.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: AbeFroman on October 04, 2011, 12:27:43 PM
if our D were to hold TTech's track meet to fewer than 30pts I'll be most impressed.

Tech doesn't have a track meet offense anymore. They played ku's defense last week.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 04, 2011, 12:29:56 PM
if our D were to hold TTech's track meet to fewer than 30pts I'll be most impressed.

Tech doesn't have a track meet offense anymore. They played ku's defense last week.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tiricosuave.com%2Fimages%2Fcost_ohsnap.jpg&hash=694c3652c6d3829257fac2948887a9516212a782)
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Bookcat on October 04, 2011, 04:10:16 PM
if our D were to hold TTech's track meet to fewer than 30pts I'll be most impressed.

Tech doesn't have a track meet offense anymore. They played ku's defense last week.

they can still put up points..but yea, I agree with KU's defensive suckiness. Makes our D last year look respectable.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Rumsfield on October 22, 2011, 10:25:55 PM
:combofan:
Hi Brent.
Just basking in the glory of calling it
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: ew2x4 on October 22, 2011, 11:59:16 PM
Calling it 3 weeks ago isn't exactly impressive. Calling it 3 months ago and maybe I wouldn't think you're a giant doucher.
Title: Re: 7-0
Post by: Rumsfield on October 23, 2011, 12:27:30 AM
Calling it 3 weeks ago isn't exactly impressive. Calling it 3 months ago and maybe I wouldn't think you're a giant doucher.
You are right.
Bill =W. Buffett, calling that.