goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: steve dave on January 26, 2010, 12:21:57 PM

Title: McCay
Post by: steve dave on January 26, 2010, 12:21:57 PM
You guys remember, like, two weeks ago when I said he was going to switch to the Katz?  :users:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: EllToPay on January 26, 2010, 12:23:22 PM
 :runaway:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 26, 2010, 12:24:53 PM
yes....
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Pete on January 26, 2010, 12:27:50 PM
WRSOAT landing McCay would be amazing.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: ChiComCat on January 26, 2010, 12:46:20 PM
Quick everyone, to ksufans premium to get the scoop
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: steve dave on January 26, 2010, 12:47:24 PM
Well, today, I'm told it's 80% (down from 100%)  :flush:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Pete on January 26, 2010, 01:01:05 PM
Well, today, I'm told it's 80% (down from 100%)  :flush:

It's because Tate told Bill no.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: steve dave on January 26, 2010, 01:01:59 PM
Well, today, I'm told it's 80% (down from 100%)  :flush:

It's because Tate told Bill no.

Buddy says it's because Grunhart (sp?) stepped in
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: SuperG on January 26, 2010, 01:41:34 PM
Who's Grunhart?
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: steve dave on January 26, 2010, 02:38:11 PM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Cire on January 26, 2010, 02:40:42 PM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.

He hates us much in the same way that BV has an unmentionable sin if you get what I mean.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: steve dave on January 26, 2010, 02:44:21 PM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.

He hates us much in the same way that BV has an unmentionable sin if you get what I mean.

In the butt?  :confused:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: wiley on January 26, 2010, 03:23:09 PM
So who calls in the next time he's on 810 or whatever show he's on and call him out on being mean to old people?  Seriously, McCay was comin to help grandpa and he did that.....uncalled for

still 80% chance of snow, i'm not taking the fullsize SUV out of the garage.  80% is pretty solid chance amirite?
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: scottb1987 on January 26, 2010, 03:27:51 PM
McCay is meh. I only want players that want to be here.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: wiley on January 26, 2010, 03:40:51 PM
McCay is meh. I only want players that want to be here.

but i wanna win...we are fracked...buh bye football board
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Skipper44 on January 26, 2010, 04:00:07 PM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.

Grunhard was always anti-emaw on his radio show on 810 during the DOD, but I thought we just enjoyed yanking the chains of our thin skinned fan base.  Unfortunately, this news indicates he really is a hater  :curse:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: scottb1987 on January 26, 2010, 04:29:53 PM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.

Grunhard was always anti-emaw on his radio show on 810 during the DOD, but I thought we just enjoyed yanking the chains of our thin skinned fan base.  Unfortunately, this news indicates he really is a hater  :curse:

If this is true, I hope he Brook Berringer's himself.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Kat Kid on January 27, 2010, 07:21:07 AM
McCay is meh. I only want players that want to be here.

"Ya know, if I could just clone Marcus Watt and have a whole team!"
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: SuperG on January 27, 2010, 03:02:43 PM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.

Wouldn't this be a good time to send Joe Bob over to have a heart to heart with Mr. Grunhard? Perhaps, given the opportunity, he'd realize that Youngster McCay is truly better off in purple.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: steve dave on January 28, 2010, 07:08:49 AM
 :lynchmob:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: nunyabizness on January 28, 2010, 11:49:40 AM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.

Wouldn't this be a good time to send Joe Bob over to have a heart to heart with Mr. Grunhard? Perhaps, given the opportunity, he'd realize that Youngster McCay is truly better off in purple.

Hahaha, what you dont know is that Coach Grunhard already knows about Steve Dave comment saying McCay is going to decomit from OU and he is pissed.  He has deep pockets and will sue you into the stoneage bad person.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: felix rex on January 28, 2010, 12:26:06 PM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.

Wouldn't this be a good time to send Joe Bob over to have a heart to heart with Mr. Grunhard? Perhaps, given the opportunity, he'd realize that Youngster McCay is truly better off in purple.

Hahaha, what you dont know is that Coach Grunhard already knows about Steve Dave comment saying McCay is going to decomit from OU and he is pissed.  He has deep pockets and will sue you into the stoneage bad person.

Mods, can have a "litigation board" to consolidate all these outstanding claims against you? TIA.

P.S. Might as well start one for opcat  :opcat: (lmao)
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Pete on January 28, 2010, 12:30:50 PM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.

Wouldn't this be a good time to send Joe Bob over to have a heart to heart with Mr. Grunhard? Perhaps, given the opportunity, he'd realize that Youngster McCay is truly better off in purple.

Hahaha, what you dont know is that Coach Grunhard already knows about Steve Dave comment saying McCay is going to decomit from OU and he is pissed.  He has deep pockets and will sue you into the stoneage bad person.

We can't do a rough ridin' thing on this board without Steve Dave getting our asses into trouble. 
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 28, 2010, 01:21:01 PM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.

Wouldn't this be a good time to send Joe Bob over to have a heart to heart with Mr. Grunhard? Perhaps, given the opportunity, he'd realize that Youngster McCay is truly better off in purple.

Hahaha, what you dont know is that Coach Grunhard already knows about Steve Dave comment saying McCay is going to decomit from OU and he is pissed.  He has deep pockets and will sue you into the stoneage bad person.

We can't do a fracking thing on this board without Steve Dave getting our asses into trouble. 

Pete, check private threads about how to deal with the steve dave issue.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: steve dave on January 29, 2010, 09:54:35 AM
 :flush:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: fatty fat fat on January 29, 2010, 04:34:56 PM
what is going on.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: steve dave on January 29, 2010, 04:35:37 PM
what is going on.

Nothing, unfortunately
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 29, 2010, 05:21:37 PM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.

Wouldn't this be a good time to send Joe Bob over to have a heart to heart with Mr. Grunhard? Perhaps, given the opportunity, he'd realize that Youngster McCay is truly better off in purple.

Hahaha, what you dont know is that Coach Grunhard already knows about Steve Dave comment saying McCay is going to decomit from OU and he is pissed.  He has deep pockets and will sue you into the stoneage bad person.

We can't do a fracking thing on this board without Steve Dave getting our asses into trouble. 

Pete, check private threads about how to deal with the steve dave issue.

limestone,

don't forget to bring both "versions" of emawllc contract to ultra secretive pak'r on saturday. :winkwink:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: theswo on January 29, 2010, 05:23:46 PM
what is going on.

Nothing, unfortunately
Nothing, as in nothing new lately? Or nothing, as in it's definitely not happening?

Really want McCay to be EMAW
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: steve dave on January 29, 2010, 05:43:27 PM
what is going on.

Nothing, unfortunately
Nothing, as in nothing new lately? Or nothing, as in it's definitely not happening?

Really want McCay to be EMAW

not happening  :embarrassed:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: hemmy on January 29, 2010, 10:00:27 PM
Mods, please ban steve dave.

This looks an awful lot like its patterson.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: steve dave on January 30, 2010, 06:28:48 AM
hemmy.....shut up
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: SuperG on February 02, 2010, 05:43:19 PM
Who's Grunhart?


Grunhard, his high school coach or something.  Supposedly hates the f^ck out of us.

Wouldn't this be a good time to send Joe Bob over to have a heart to heart with Mr. Grunhard? Perhaps, given the opportunity, he'd realize that Youngster McCay is truly better off in purple.

Hahaha, what you dont know is that Coach Grunhard already knows about Steve Dave comment saying McCay is going to decomit from OU and he is pissed.  He has deep pockets and will sue you into the stoneage bad person.

Why would he sue me for something somebody else said on a public message board?  :confused:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: wiley on February 03, 2010, 10:15:27 AM
"officially signed with OU"....damn :blank:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Pete on December 29, 2011, 02:54:11 PM
Bumped as a chance for Steve Dave to redeem himself. 
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: kslim on December 29, 2011, 02:58:15 PM
Bumped as a chance for Steve Dave to redeem himself. 

unfortunately that grunny guy that was talked about itt is ku's guy now. hopefully he sees how rough ridin' terrible it will be
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 29, 2011, 03:01:06 PM
Why would pain pill overdoseaggie give him a release to play in conference?
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Pete on December 29, 2011, 03:04:45 PM
Why would pain pill overdoseaggie give him a release to play in conference?

Only two possible reasons.  1) He sucks, and/or 2) He agreed to go to KU (zero threat to OU, obviously).  I'm voting both.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: MadCat on December 29, 2011, 03:08:15 PM
Why would pain pill overdoseaggie give him a release to play in conference?
He's got enough C4 crammed in him to level Manhattan/Lawrence.  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 29, 2011, 03:09:14 PM
Bumped as a chance for Steve Dave to redeem himself. 

That pondwater jason dude is just waiting for a mod slip-up.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: kslim on December 29, 2011, 03:10:06 PM
Why would pain pill overdoseaggie give him a release to play in conference?
He's got enough C4 crammed in him to level Manhattan/Lawrence.  :horrorsurprise:

this could get messy folks
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Pete on December 29, 2011, 03:20:48 PM
Got a PM that said McCay redshirted, and got hurt.  Stoops is releasing him out of kindness, and OU is super deep at WR. And, that we love him very much.   :love:
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Ira Hayes on December 29, 2011, 03:54:15 PM
We are super deep at WR too.  Baby Lockett + Deante Burton + The Fifth Gronkowski + umpteen however many JUCO kids.

Some website slaps five stars on a kid and it wrecks his career.  Five star kids don't redshirt.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 29, 2011, 03:57:40 PM
We are super deep at WR too.  Baby Lockett + Deante Burton + The Fifth Gronkowski + umpteen however many JUCO kids.

Some website slaps five stars on a kid and it wrecks his career.  Five star kids don't redshirt.

Our wide receivers are not nearly as good as most of our fans would lead you to believe.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: OK_Cat on December 29, 2011, 04:01:59 PM
We are super deep at WR too.  Baby Lockett + Deante Burton + The Fifth Gronkowski + umpteen however many JUCO kids.

Some website slaps five stars on a kid and it wrecks his career.  Five star kids don't redshirt.

Our wide receivers are not nearly as good as most of our fans would lead you to believe.

jordy was horrible for our program/fanbase.  now every 2 star is the "next jordy" 
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 29, 2011, 04:30:21 PM
We are super deep at WR too.  Baby Lockett + Deante Burton + The Fifth Gronkowski + umpteen however many JUCO kids.

Some website slaps five stars on a kid and it wrecks his career.  Five star kids don't redshirt.

Our wide receivers are not nearly as good as most of our fans would lead you to believe.

Don't forget that they will move Sams to WR.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Ira Hayes on December 29, 2011, 04:41:29 PM
We are super deep at WR too.  Baby Lockett + Deante Burton + The Fifth Gronkowski + umpteen however many JUCO kids.

Some website slaps five stars on a kid and it wrecks his career.  Five star kids don't redshirt.

Our wide receivers are not nearly as good as most of our fans would lead you to believe.

jordy was horrible for our program/fanbase.  now every 2 star is the "next jordy"  

Everybody that commits to a BCS school is automatically a 2 or 3 star.  The recruiting sites can't afford to look like complete dumbasses. Nobody would subscribe.  Burton was a zero star recruit when he committed about a month ago. But once he did, some fat guy like Fitz actually takes the time to look the kid's YouTube highlights and if they are really good they give him 3 stars.  If the fat guy who may or may not have ever played football is unsure, they get 2 stars.  No YouTube video? 2 stars.

Now, magically, Burton is a 3 star recruit. That's how it works.

Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 29, 2011, 04:46:43 PM
We are super deep at WR too.  Baby Lockett + Deante Burton + The Fifth Gronkowski + umpteen however many JUCO kids.

Some website slaps five stars on a kid and it wrecks his career.  Five star kids don't redshirt.

Our wide receivers are not nearly as good as most of our fans would lead you to believe.

jordy was horrible for our program/fanbase.  now every 2 star is the "next jordy"  

Everybody that commits to a BCS school is automatically a 2 or 3 star.  The recruiting sites can't afford to look like complete dumbasses. Nobody would subscribe.  Burton was a zero star recruit when he committed about a month ago. But once he did, some fat guy like Fitz actually takes the time to look the kid's YouTube highlights and if they are really good they give him 3 stars.  If the fat guy who may or may not have ever played football is unsure, they get 2 stars.  No YouTube video? 2 stars.

Now, magically, Burton is a 3 star recruit. That's how it works.



What if the guy watching the youtube is not fat, but really lazy?
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Ira Hayes on December 29, 2011, 04:50:03 PM
We are super deep at WR too.  Baby Lockett + Deante Burton + The Fifth Gronkowski + umpteen however many JUCO kids.

Some website slaps five stars on a kid and it wrecks his career.  Five star kids don't redshirt.

Our wide receivers are not nearly as good as most of our fans would lead you to believe.

jordy was horrible for our program/fanbase.  now every 2 star is the "next jordy"  

Everybody that commits to a BCS school is automatically a 2 or 3 star.  The recruiting sites can't afford to look like complete dumbasses. Nobody would subscribe.  Burton was a zero star recruit when he committed about a month ago. But once he did, some fat guy like Fitz actually takes the time to look the kid's YouTube highlights and if they are really good they give him 3 stars.  If the fat guy who may or may not have ever played football is unsure, they get 2 stars.  No YouTube video? 2 stars.

Now, magically, Burton is a 3 star recruit. That's how it works.



What if the guy watching the youtube is not fat, but really lazy?

Thanks for the correction.  The guy is either fat or he will be fat in a few years.  It takes time to put on that much weight.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: PoetWarrior on January 05, 2012, 10:29:59 AM
:-I

I'd imagine that someone from Kansas, in this century, who would choose KU over K-State to play football, generally feels inferior to most others.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: PoetWarrior on January 05, 2012, 10:37:02 AM
@JMcCay19 (https://twitter.com/#!/JMcCay19)

Tell him how you feel.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: EMAWmeister on January 05, 2012, 10:45:30 AM
He took a visit but is seemingly denying everything
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Kermit on January 05, 2012, 11:39:29 AM
KC radio guys and even Jon Kirby has said he is a K-State lean. 
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 06, 2012, 11:09:44 AM
KU.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Panjandrum on January 06, 2012, 11:20:45 AM
KU.

Official?
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: MadCat on January 06, 2012, 11:21:21 AM
Link?
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 06, 2012, 11:23:59 AM
KU.

Official?

the slant is reporting it...soo sorta?
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: EMAWmeister on January 06, 2012, 11:32:49 AM
Meh. Not a terrible loss.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: Do Work Son on January 06, 2012, 11:35:48 AM
@JMcCay19 (https://twitter.com/#!/JMcCay19)

Tell him how you feel.

FP TC
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: catzacker on January 06, 2012, 11:40:57 AM
He’s not a ksu lean.  He’s a ku lean and always has been since deciding to transfer/getting run by bob.  The reports that he is a ksu lean are only to make it appear that “hey, look, Charlie’s already beating Bill for instate kids”. 
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: PoetWarrior on January 06, 2012, 11:57:13 AM
Yes, obvious.

But we didn't do our* part.
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: PoetWarrior on January 06, 2012, 12:01:40 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs15.postimage.org%2Fa8ebsds3f%2Fimage.jpg&hash=b29c131d8824cc5776ec33b21c63c6679b9fbf3a)
Title: Re: McCay
Post by: felix rex on January 06, 2012, 01:08:32 PM
Warm up the recycled Lamark jokes.