goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Pete on September 18, 2011, 04:25:36 AM
-
Looks like Bryce didn't play today. Nagging injury? :dunno:
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
-
We'll be fine without him, nobody needs a primadona anyway.
-
Eye hernia season has stared early. Is there a ground hog we can consult to see if this will be like a long winter/short winter sort of deal?
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
LHCBS:MDJD of football knows how to motivate these youngsters. I'm sure if Bryce knows what is good for him he will take this opportunity to learn from his mistakes. Hopefully he will take it on himself to learn from LHCBS: MDJDJedi to get back in the team's good grace so he can contribute to the team.
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
-
He sucked at Tennessee. I don't know why we'd expect him to be good here.
-
he was hurt. should play at miami.
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
Don't care. We have no explosion at RB . . . none.
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
Don't care. We have no explosion at RB . . . none.
We have it at QB, though.
-
Our RBs are better than they've looked so far.
I'm really surprised our first 2 opponents seemingly have not accounted for Klein/QB run game in their defensive scheme.
Brown will be fine. I think he has the most explosiveness of any of our guys, but if he's dinged he loses that.
If we run power out of 2 back sets, then Brown and Pease fit well. But the 1 back read option stuff fits Hubert better.
It would seem Wilson is a bit in the doghouse, we seemed to use TEs quite a bit at the H back spot instead of a FB, even in gun formations.
Klein has to make throws like the one he missed to BSmith off of play action next week. We can't miss those and win in Miami. That and we can't have the 4-5 drops we had yesterday from our WRs.
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
:emawkid:
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
Kiss my ass kst8cat. LHC Bill Snyder rough ridin' sucks at coaching football in 2011 and is a dickhead. eff him.
-
Bill doesn't know exactly what he's doing.
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
Kiss my ass kst8cat. LHC Bill Snyder rough ridin' sucks at coaching football in 2011 and is a dickhead. eff him.
:lol: God, you rough ridin' suck.
-
He sucked at Tennessee. I don't know why we'd expect him to be good here.
:confused:
-
I want to see our four headed monster go up against KU's version of what they call defense. Could be fun.
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
I think you are really refering to _33.
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
I think you are really refering to _33.
I want Snyder to lose every game, too. The sooner he's gone, the better.
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
I think you are really refering to _33.
I want Snyder to lose every game, too. The sooner he's gone, the better.
59-7 really had to hurt last year, didn't it? I bet you were more torn up about it than Beems. Was that worse than 39-14 in the CTR? Serious question.
-
LOL
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
I think you are really refering to _33.
I want Snyder to lose every game, too. The sooner he's gone, the better.
59-7 really had to hurt last year, didn't it? I bet you were more torn up about it than Beems. Was that worse than 39-14 in the CTR? Serious question.
It was worse, because losers like you only care about beating KU. Your dumb ass would be fine going 1-11 every year as long as we beat KU and Snyder is at the helm. Snyder needs to go, and if losing to KU speeds that process along, I will cheer the eff out of him against KU.
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
I think you are really refering to _33.
I want Snyder to lose every game, too. The sooner he's gone, the better.
59-7 really had to hurt last year, didn't it? I bet you were more torn up about it than Beems. Was that worse than 39-14 in the CTR? Serious question.
It was worse, because losers like you only care about beating KU. Your dumb ass would be fine going 1-11 every year as long as we beat KU and Snyder is at the helm. Snyder needs to go, and if losing to KU speeds that process along, I will cheer the eff out of him against KU.
You are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
-
eff you LHC LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
I think you are really refering to _33.
I want Snyder to lose every game, too. The sooner he's gone, the better.
59-7 really had to hurt last year, didn't it? I bet you were more torn up about it than Beems. Was that worse than 39-14 in the CTR? Serious question.
It was worse, because losers like you only care about beating KU. Your dumb ass would be fine going 1-11 every year as long as we beat KU and Snyder is at the helm. Snyder needs to go, and if losing to KU speeds that process along, I will cheer the eff out of him against KU.
You are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
If we fire snyder and hire his idiot son, or some Offensive Coordinator from Rutgers or some other no name crap candidate (which wouldn't surprise anyone) then yeah, huge risk, but Leach or Rodriguez would come in a heartbeat. Not a huge risk.
-
you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.
-
eff you LHC LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
I think you are really refering to _33.
I want Snyder to lose every game, too. The sooner he's gone, the better.
59-7 really had to hurt last year, didn't it? I bet you were more torn up about it than Beems. Was that worse than 39-14 in the CTR? Serious question.
It was worse, because losers like you only care about beating KU. Your dumb ass would be fine going 1-11 every year as long as we beat KU and Snyder is at the helm. Snyder needs to go, and if losing to KU speeds that process along, I will cheer the eff out of him against KU.
You are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
If we fire snyder and hire his idiot son, or some Offensive Coordinator from Rutgers or some other no name crap candidate (which wouldn't surprise anyone) then yeah, huge risk, but Leach or Rodriguez would come in a heartbeat. Not a huge risk.
Would love TCU to get left out of the 64 teams (assuming we get in) just for another shot at Patterson.
-
you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.
so you should be happy Snyder isn't playing BB. :dunno:
-
you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.
so you should be happy Snyder isn't playing BB. :dunno:
touche.
-
Our RBs are better than they've looked so far.
I'm really surprised our first 2 opponents seemingly have not accounted for Klein/QB run game in their defensive scheme.
Brown will be fine. I think he has the most explosiveness of any of our guys, but if he's dinged he loses that.
If we run power out of 2 back sets, then Brown and Pease fit well. But the 1 back read option stuff fits Hubert better.
It would seem Wilson is a bit in the doghouse, we seemed to use TEs quite a bit at the H back spot instead of a FB, even in gun formations.
Klein has to make throws like the one he missed to BSmith off of play action next week. We can't miss those and win in Miami. That and we can't have the 4-5 drops we had yesterday from our WRs.
Seems Klein should put a little more air under the ball on those long throws, huh? Give those big receivers a chance to get up and make the play? Somewhere between his current throws and Denard?
And hey everybody, how 'bout those Sean Snyder special teams again this week? :love:
-
We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.
I think the team has looked much better than last year. It's hard to say whether any improvement has or has not taken place before they start playing real teams. :dunno:
-
And hey everybody, how 'bout those Sean Snyder special teams again this week? :love:
They were actually solid. It helped that they finally quit messing around and put Thompson back their to return punts.
-
you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.
2008: 5-7
2009: 6-6
2010: 7-6
2011: 2-0 w/ better defense
:dunno:
-
you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.
2008: 5-7
2009: 6-6
2010: 7-6
2011: 2-0 w/ better defense
:dunno:
that's not improvement. That's scheduling quirks, dumbass.
-
And hey everybody, how 'bout those Sean Snyder special teams again this week? :love:
They were actually solid. It helped that they finally quit messing around and put Thompson back their to return punts.
didn't we drop another punt?
-
you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.
2008: 5-7
2009: 6-6
2010: 7-6
2011: 2-0 w/ better defense
:dunno:
This would've won you the argument if you'd just mentioned how we were one win away from the CCG.
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
KU has better running backs than K-State.
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
KU has better running backs than K-State.
um, no
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
:lol:
KU has better running backs than K-State.
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
KU has better running backs than K-State.
Could be. Guess we will find out.
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
KU has better running backs than K-State.
um, no
KU's leading running backs:
RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
J. Sims 56 254 4.5 3
D. Miller 34 173 5.1 3
K-State's leading running backs:
J. Hubert 26 120 4.6 0
Robert Rose 5 29 5.8 11 0
:rolleyes:
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
KU has better running backs than K-State.
um, no
KU's leading running backs:
RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
J. Sims 56 254 4.5 3
D. Miller 34 173 5.1 3
K-State's leading running backs:
J. Hubert 26 120 4.6 0
Robert Rose 5 29 5.8 11 0
:rolleyes:
How do you define "leading" ?
-
All those stats show is that your backs carry the ball more than ours. Dumbass.
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
KU has better running backs than K-State.
um, no
KU's leading running backs:
RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
J. Sims 56 254 4.5 3
D. Miller 34 173 5.1 3
K-State's leading running backs:
J. Hubert 26 120 4.6 0
Robert Rose 5 29 5.8 11 0
:rolleyes:
How do you define "leading" ?
Statistical leaders.
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
KU has better running backs than K-State.
um, no
KU's leading running backs:
RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
J. Sims 56 254 4.5 3
D. Miller 34 173 5.1 3
K-State's leading running backs:
J. Hubert 26 120 4.6 0
Robert Rose 5 29 5.8 11 0
:rolleyes:
How do you define "leading" ?
Statistical leaders.
What stats are you looking at?
-
All those stats show is that your backs carry the ball more than ours. Dumbass.
Why can't you just accept the reality that KU has better running backs than K-State?
:confused:
-
Sadly for ku, they look pretty good on offense against decent defenses . . . for awhile, and then Chuck Long Syndrome strikes and that's all she wrote.
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
KU has better running backs than K-State.
um, no
KU's leading running backs:
RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
J. Sims 56 254 4.5 3
D. Miller 34 173 5.1 3
K-State's leading running backs:
J. Hubert 26 120 4.6 0
Robert Rose 5 29 5.8 11 0
:rolleyes:
How do you define "leading" ?
Statistical leaders.
What stats are you looking at?
Are you blind?
-
When you guys get a better running back that Bryce, I'll admit that your backs are better. Also, if you guys are able to reverse 59-7, I will admit that Ron Grill is building a monster. I would have given you guys more credit this week but then you got 768'd.
-
When you guys get a better running back that Bryce, I'll admit that your backs are better. Also, if you guys are able to reverse 59-7, I will admit that Ron Grill is building a monster. I would have given you guys more credit this week but then you got 768'd.
Bryce has 3 carries for 16 yards (for a team that beat Eastern Kentucky 10-7).
:lol:
-
So, I guess the Ga Tech's RBs are like, 10 times better than yours?
-
So, I guess the Ga Tech's RBs are like, 10 times better than yours?
Rank Name Games Carries Net Avg. TDs Ydspg Wins Losses Ties
1 Georgia Tech 3 163 1283 7.87 18 427.67 3 0 0
2 Army 3 215 1087 5.06 9 362.33 1 2 0
3 Navy 3 163 1075 6.60 10 358.33 2 1 0
4 Utah St. 2 100 667 6.67 10 333.50 1 1 0
5 Air Force 2 104 640 6.15 5 320.00 1 1 0
6 Eastern Mich. 3 136 869 6.39 4 289.67 2 1 0
7 Nevada 2 111 544 4.90 4 272.00 1 1 0
8 Oregon 3 114 783 6.87 7 261.00 2 1 0
9 Purdue 3 139 776 5.58 9 258.67 2 1 0
10 Missouri 3 128 772 6.03 6 257.33 2 1 0
11 Nebraska 3 133 757 5.69 12 252.33 3 0 0
12 Ohio 3 145 745 5.14 5 248.33 3 0 0
13 Michigan 2 76 490 6.45 3 245.00 3 0 0
14 South Carolina 3 125 727 5.82 11 242.33 3 0 0
15 Alabama 3 109 726 6.66 12 242.00 3 0 0
16 Cincinnati 3 120 717 5.98 11 239.00 2 1 0
17 Wisconsin 3 128 715 5.59 11 238.33 3 0 0
18 Kansas 3 157 705 4.49 8 235.00 2 1 0
19 Mississippi St. 3 135 694 5.14 7 231.33 1 2 0
20 Wyoming 3 122 680 5.57 9 226.67 3 0 0
21 Texas 3 141 679 4.82 8 226.33 3 0 0
22 Illinois 3 145 671 4.63 9 223.67 3 0 0
23 UCF 3 133 670 5.04 12 223.33 2 1 0
24 San Diego St. 3 118 662 5.61 8 220.67 3 0 0
24 Northwestern 3 148 662 4.47 8 220.67 2 1 0
:ck:
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
KU has better running backs than K-State.
um, no
KU's leading running backs:
RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
J. Sims 56 254 4.5 3
D. Miller 34 173 5.1 3
K-State's leading running backs:
J. Hubert 26 120 4.6 0
Robert Rose 5 29 5.8 11 0
:rolleyes:
How do you define "leading" ?
Statistical leaders.
What stats are you looking at?
Are you blind?
Are you stupid?
-
Ga Tech had 606 rushing yds in one game, KU has 708 in 3. :ck:
-
You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.
Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc
obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively. Especially with Nix and their nose. They were both active vs. Tide's OL. But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.
KU has better running backs than K-State.
um, no
KU's leading running backs:
RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
J. Sims 56 254 4.5 3
D. Miller 34 173 5.1 3
K-State's leading running backs:
J. Hubert 26 120 4.6 0
Robert Rose 5 29 5.8 11 0
:rolleyes:
How do you define "leading" ?
Statistical leaders.
What stats are you looking at?
Are you blind?
Are you stupid?
KU's leading running backs:
RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
J. Sims 56 254 4.5 3
D. Miller 34 173 5.1 3
K-State's leading running backs:
J. Hubert 26 120 4.6 0
Robert Rose 5 29 5.8 11 0
-
You are stupid, confirmed.
-
Ga Tech had 606 rushing yds in one game, KU has 708 in 3. :ck:
What's your point? Where did I say that KU had better running backs than Ga Tech?
:confused:
-
You are stupid, confirmed.
KU's leading running backs:
RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
J. Sims 56 254 4.5 3
D. Miller 34 173 5.1 3
K-State's leading running backs:
J. Hubert 26 120 4.6 0
Robert Rose 5 29 5.8 11 0
-
RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
J. Sims 56 254 4.5 3
D. Miller 34 173 5.1 3
K-State's leading running backs:
J. Hubert 26 120 4.6 0
Robert Rose 5 29 5.8 11 0
[/quote]
What is the 11 under Rose's stats?
-
RUSHING CAR YDS AVG TD
J. Sims 56 254 4.5 3
D. Miller 34 173 5.1 3
K-State's leading running backs:
J. Hubert 26 120 4.6 0
Robert Rose 5 29 5.8 11 0
What is the 11 under Rose's stats?
[/quote]
Longest run from scrimmage.
-
So because you're banned everywhere else this means we're going to be subjected to all of your angst, rage, and validation seeking?
-
I'm not understanding what stat you are looking at that makes KU's RB better than KSU's It seems to me that KSU's #1 back has better yards per carry average than KU's #1. And KSU's #2 back has better yards per carry than KU's #2.
I didn't go to KU so maybe you learned different math than me but your logic is not adding up in this one beams.
-
I'm not understanding what stat you are looking at that makes KU's RB better than KSU's It seems to me that KSU's #1 back has better yards per carry average than KU's #1. And KSU's #2 back has better yards per carry than KU's #2.
I didn't go to KU so maybe you learned different math than me but your logic is not adding up in this one beams.
Banging 3 200 pounders in a night > Banging 2 10's in a night per Beems math
-
this thread was way better when we were arguing about Snyder. I hate how well beems owns this rough ridin' board. He is so good at drawing out the horrible moron posters. So good.
-
this thread was way better when we were arguing about Snyder. I hate how well beems owns this rough ridin' board. He is so good at drawing out the horrible moron posters. So good.
I move we shift the focus of conversation on to a certain chicken wing focused chain restaurant and the people who are or aren't likely to eat there.
-
this thread was way better when we were arguing about Snyder. I hate how well beems owns this rough ridin' board. He is so good at drawing out the horrible moron posters. So good.
I move we shift the focus of conversation on to a certain chicken wing focused chain restaurant and the people who are or aren't likely to eat there.
or mennonites.
-
this thread was way better when we were arguing about Snyder. I hate how well beems owns this rough ridin' board. He is so good at drawing out the horrible moron posters. So good.
I move we shift the focus of conversation on to a certain chicken wing focused chain restaurant and the people who are or aren't likely to eat there.
yo bro, you like b-dubs?
-
this thread was way better when we were arguing about Snyder. I hate how well beems owns this rough ridin' board. He is so good at drawing out the horrible moron posters. So good.
I move we shift the focus of conversation on to a certain chicken wing focused chain restaurant and the people who are or aren't likely to eat there.
yo bro, you like b-dubs?
Only for UFC! Tap or snap, winglets.
-
you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.
2008: 5-7
2009: 6-6
2010: 7-6
2011: 2-0 w/ better defense
:dunno:
that's not improvement. That's scheduling quirks, dumbass.
I totally disagree. We sucked balls in 2008 (Prince's last year). We got blown out numerous times. In fact, it is hard to believe we even got to 5 wins. 2009 was head and shoulders a better year, and should have been a bowl season had we won in Louisiana. Went from 2-6 in conference to 4-4. No improvement, are you kidding me? Snyder did very well with the hand he was dealt in 2009. We want even more now, but you can't say things didn't improve, dumbass.
-
KU's running backs are 100% better than K-State's 30% of the time
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.geekalerts.com%2Fu%2FBrian-Fantana-Anchorman-Sex-Panther-Cologne.jpg&hash=eb2f7d83d0b8336bf1d0939f77b0a99ea1424625)
-
Darrian Miller is very good. So far, he's looked like the best back on either team.
This is definitely subject to change.
-
I'm not understanding what stat you are looking at that makes KU's RB better than KSU's It seems to me that KSU's #1 back has better yards per carry average than KU's #1. And KSU's #2 back has better yards per carry than KU's #2.
I didn't go to KU so maybe you learned different math than me but your logic is not adding up in this one beams.
If you're going to base everything on yards per carry then I'll post Anthony Pierson's stats:
Tony Pierson 15 128 8.5 47 1
Oh, look, DJamer Beshears is even better:
D.J. Beshears 3 29 9.7 18 0
Not to mention that KU's two leading rushers have a combined six TD's, while K-State's have zero. Sims, Miller, and Pierson have more yards than any running back on K-State's team. It's honestly not even close.
-
look, man. it's obvious that ku's back's stats are better than k-state's, but that's not what this is all about. no one on here is mad at snyder for not giving enough carries to hubert or robert rose. we all know deep down that whenever stubborn snyds decides to start giving bryce the ball he'll be the best back in the conference and probably one of the best in the nation.
-
The Chamber 44 217 4.9 2
In two games!!!!
:comeatme:
-
In reviewing GaTech box scores, it appears KU's ground game is somewhere between Middle Tennessee and Western Carolina. So is their offense. Apparently, MTSU is like really rough ridin' good at offense.
This is horrifying, because based on the BMWanalysis above, KU's running game is better than ours.
Guys, I don't want to be worse than Middle Tennessee :bawl: :bawl: :bawl:
-
jeeze, Beems just put the clownsuit on this entire thread.
-
Your idea of a clownsuiting is totally wrong. Just out of curiousity, what do you think it means? Because it apparently means the exact opposite of that.
-
eff you LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
I think you are really refering to _33.
I want Snyder to lose every game, too. The sooner he's gone, the better.
59-7 really had to hurt last year, didn't it? I bet you were more torn up about it than Beems. Was that worse than 39-14 in the CTR? Serious question.
It was worse, because losers like you only care about beating KU. Your dumb ass would be fine going 1-11 every year as long as we beat KU and Snyder is at the helm. Snyder needs to go, and if losing to KU speeds that process along, I will cheer the eff out of him against KU.
I am thankful that you obliged me in giving an honest answer here and showing the world what a misguided idiot wacko you really are.
Anyone else here convinced we should all root against K-State in every game from now on, especially against rivals? (I mean besides OK Cat and Kat Kid)
-
i hope that the MODS?! have put together a list of posters to PI based on this thread
thanks for your services beems :emawkid:
-
eff you LHC LHC Bill Snyder
eff you, Rusty. You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner. You must be leading a very miserable life.
I think you are really refering to _33.
I want Snyder to lose every game, too. The sooner he's gone, the better.
59-7 really had to hurt last year, didn't it? I bet you were more torn up about it than Beems. Was that worse than 39-14 in the CTR? Serious question.
It was worse, because losers like you only care about beating KU. Your dumb ass would be fine going 1-11 every year as long as we beat KU and Snyder is at the helm. Snyder needs to go, and if losing to KU speeds that process along, I will cheer the eff out of him against KU.
I am thankful that you obliged me in giving an honest answer here and showing the world what a misguided idiot wacko you really are.
Anyone else here convinced we should all root against K-State in every game from now on, especially against rivals? (I mean besides OK Cat and Kat Kid)
Metaphor:
You are trying to make the best of the hand being dealt; but you are forgetting that the game is 5 card draw.
-
you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.
2008: 5-7
2009: 6-6
2010: 7-6
2011: 2-0 w/ better defense
:dunno:
that's not improvement. That's scheduling quirks, dumbass.
I totally disagree. We sucked balls in 2008 (Prince's last year). We got blown out numerous times. In fact, it is hard to believe we even got to 5 wins. 2009 was head and shoulders a better year, and should have been a bowl season had we won in Louisiana. Went from 2-6 in conference to 4-4. No improvement, are you kidding me? Snyder did very well with the hand he was dealt in 2009. We want even more now, but you can't say things didn't improve, dumbass.
And after 2009, Snyder ran off a very sold d coordinator because he's such a terrible person to work for. It's amazing how similarly Snyder 2.0 follows the arc of Ron princes tenure. This season will tell all.
-
you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU. Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder). In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason. Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08? If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment. Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time. Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years? And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals? We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses. We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him?
But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year. Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.
We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.
2008: 5-7
2009: 6-6
2010: 7-6
2011: 2-0 w/ better defense
:dunno:
that's not improvement. That's scheduling quirks, dumbass.
I totally disagree. We sucked balls in 2008 (Prince's last year). We got blown out numerous times. In fact, it is hard to believe we even got to 5 wins. 2009 was head and shoulders a better year, and should have been a bowl season had we won in Louisiana. Went from 2-6 in conference to 4-4. No improvement, are you kidding me? Snyder did very well with the hand he was dealt in 2009. We want even more now, but you can't say things didn't improve, dumbass.
And after 2009, Snyder ran off a very sold d coordinator because he's such a terrible person to work for. It's amazing how similarly Snyder 2.0 follows the arc of Ron princes tenure. This season will tell all.
in fairness Ron Prince ran off coaches because he kept trying to eff their wives...... allegedly.......
-
Bashears is a weird last name. hth
-
And it's also important to recognize how many former Snyder assistants have nothing but praise for Bill and for having the opportunity to work for him. But you'd probably have a better idea of the working conditions though cause you like to BBS and all.