goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 02:58:50 PM

Title: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 02:58:50 PM
Can you believe that sorry SOB has the balls to give his son a coaching position?  I mean, really?!  WTF?!  Who does he think he is?!
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Kat Kid on September 17, 2011, 03:05:58 PM
Can you believe that sorry SOB has the balls to give his son a coaching position?  I mean, really?!  WTF?!  Who does he think he is?!

Beemer is a good coach who is not yet collecting Social Security.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 03:09:16 PM
Dude was born in 1946.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 17, 2011, 03:09:59 PM
Shane Beemer coached:

4 Seasons at South Carolina

3 Seasons at Mississippi State

and was a grad ass't at Tennessee prior to that.

Before joining the VT staff.

jt please compare and contrast that to Sean's resume . . . tia.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 03:18:18 PM
So, he coached for several yrs at BCS schools, and is now the associate HC at a BCS school?  Oh, he was also a long snapper at Va Tech.  Yep, that is an entirely different resume than Sean's Dax, justl ike totally different.  Oh, and he's rumored to be the HCIW.  Man, can he get any more different than Sean?!  Dude was a long snapper!
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 17, 2011, 03:21:19 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again jt, if Sean goes off and coaches somewhere else and proves himself outside of daddy's little bubble, then he certainly is a viable candidate to replace daddy.  But he's NEVER left Daddy's little bubble at K-State.

Shane Beemer has spent 7 seasons AWAY from daddy's bubble coaching at SEC schools.   Only a hyper Snyder apologist like you can't see the difference.

Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2011, 03:24:24 PM
sticking up for old ballz must be tough, godspeed JT
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: joda on September 17, 2011, 03:30:59 PM
Don't know that I'd be thrilled with handing the reigns over to the younger Beamer if I was a VT fan, but yea, at least he's been somewhere else. Seany has done absolutely nothing at any place not KStateo. Take off the blinders and pretend his last name isn't Snyder and look at his resume. Prince's resume looked like a Texas/Florida candidate compared to Seany boy's.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: PurpleSleezyE on September 17, 2011, 03:32:37 PM
So, he coached for several yrs at BCS schools, and is now the associate HC at a BCS school?  Oh, he was also a long snapper at Va Tech.  Yep, that is an entirely different resume than Sean's Dax, justl ike totally different.  Oh, and he's rumored to be the HCIW.  Man, can he get any more different than Sean?!  Dude was a long snapper!

Dude - bow out.  You are getting clowned.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 17, 2011, 03:32:51 PM
Oh, and I am not saying that it's good that Beamer hired his kid necessarily, but at least he's coached elsewhere at BCS schools.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 04:00:34 PM
I don't want Sean as our next HC, I just don't have an issue with him coaching special teams.  I am merely pointing out that lots of coaches hire their sons/brothers/dads/etc.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 04:03:58 PM
Guess I should clarify a bit-  I don't want Sean to ever be our HC.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Kat Kid on September 17, 2011, 04:06:08 PM
I don't want Sean as our next HC, I just don't have an issue with him coaching special teams.  I am merely pointing out that lots of coaches hire their sons/brothers/dads/etc.

Another observation about college football:  Head coaches get fired for sucking.  All over the place.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 04:11:05 PM
2 yrs ago we were 1 win away from playing in the CCG, last year we went to a bowl.  Not great seasons but certainly not terrible.  If you really thing Snyder sucks, well, you're an idiot.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2011, 04:17:46 PM
1 win away from playing in the CCG

I hate this talking point.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 04:22:32 PM
Yeah, who wants facts to get in the way of blind hatred?
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: catzacker on September 17, 2011, 04:25:49 PM
Dan mcarney was one game away from the ccg.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Kat Kid on September 17, 2011, 04:28:47 PM
2 yrs ago we were 1 win away from playing in the CCG, last year we went to a bowl.  Not great seasons but certainly not terrible.  If you really thing Snyder sucks, well, you're an idiot.

The point isn't that Snyder should be fired today (though he should) the point is that he never should have been re-hired because there is no viable exit strategy once you let him back in.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2011, 04:31:17 PM
Yeah, who wants facts to get in the way of blind hatred?

facts like the team that was 'one win away' also got beat by lala and failed to make a bowl game?
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 04:32:11 PM
Viable exit strategy?  WTF are you even talking about?
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2011, 04:47:07 PM
Yeah, who wants facts to get in the way of blind hatred?

facts like the team that was 'one win away' also got beat by lala and failed to make a bowl game?

No, he's talking about the fact that the Big 12 North was so utterly rough ridin' bad that year that a team that got beat by lala and failed to make a bowl game was somehow one ass-kicking away from getting annihilated in the dr. pepper game.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 04:53:31 PM
Yeah, because no team has ever suffered a bad early loss and was able to recover.  Truth is, you retards are so butthurt about Bill being a the coach that you refuse to even admit the success he has had and can only stew on his failures.  You must be some miserable, insufferable little bitches in real life if this is what you do for "fun."
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2011, 05:06:59 PM
At what point was there a recovery?

Quote
09/05/09   vs. Massachusetts   Manhattan, Kan.   W, 21-17
09/12/09   at Louisiana    Lafayette, Louisiana   L, 17-15
09/19/09   at UCLA    Pasadena, Calif.   L, 23-9
09/26/09   vs. Tennessee Tech   Manhattan, Kan.   W, 49-7
10/03/09   vs. Iowa State *    Kansas City, Mo.   W, 24-23
10/10/09   at Texas Tech *    Lubbock, Texas   L, 66-14
10/17/09   vs. Texas A&M *    Manhattan, Kan.   W, 62-14
10/24/09   at Colorado *    Manhattan, Kan.   W, 20-6
10/31/09   at Oklahoma *    Norman, Okla.   L, 42-30
11/07/09   vs. Kansas *    Manhattan, Kan.   W, 17-10
11/14/09   vs. Missouri *    Manhattan, Kan.   L, 38-12
11/21/09   at Nebraska *    Lincoln, Neb.   L, 17-3

I'd be fine with Bill/Sean being coach if that made us good again.  6-6 and Pinstripe Bowl and 10-7 and being an afterthought in football conference realignment talk a decade after being in the national championship picture isn't good.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 05:13:39 PM
You make absolutely zero sense.  Maybe you should stick to things you know about like hassling people you don't know for money.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Kat Kid on September 17, 2011, 05:20:14 PM
Viable exit strategy?  WTF are you even talking about?

The future of the program.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2011, 05:22:07 PM
Yeah, because no team has ever suffered a bad early loss and was able to recover.  

At what point was there a recovery?
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: FranklyFrankYou on September 17, 2011, 05:24:35 PM
Anyone who thinks we would have even been competitive had we made the CCG should take a look in the mirror and realized they, themselves, are :powerespect: :bracketmouse:
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2011, 05:27:21 PM
Anyone who thinks we would have even been competitive had we made the CCG should take a look in the mirror and realized they, themselves, are :powerespect: :bracketmouse:

Anyone who thought we'd be competitive in the game that would've gotten us in the CCG are the same people that talking points like "1 game away from the CCG" are designed for.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 05:43:06 PM
After tha LaLa game, pretty much the whole board had us losing about every game for the rest of the season.  Instead, we recovered and won 5 more games and almost made the CCG.  If we would have been competitive is a moot point as we have no way of knowing.  (How big of an underdog were we in 2003?  Sure glad we actually got to play that game rather than jjust listening to the retards on this board talk about how bad we're going to lose.)  And this year, most of this board is saying we aren't going to win another game after tonight.  I just hope you dumbasses actually bought your clownsuits cause renting them is going to get pretty expensive.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2011, 05:45:51 PM
jt, is this what you're considering one of the good things Bill has done?

Quote
09/05/09   vs. Massachusetts   Manhattan, Kan.   W, 21-17
09/12/09   at Louisiana    Lafayette, Louisiana   L, 17-15
09/19/09   at UCLA    Pasadena, Calif.   L, 23-9
09/26/09   vs. Tennessee Tech   Manhattan, Kan.   W, 49-7
10/03/09   vs. Iowa State *    Kansas City, Mo.   W, 24-23
10/10/09   at Texas Tech *    Lubbock, Texas   L, 66-14
10/17/09   vs. Texas A&M *    Manhattan, Kan.   W, 62-14
10/24/09   at Colorado *    Manhattan, Kan.   W, 20-6
10/31/09   at Oklahoma *    Norman, Okla.   L, 42-30
11/07/09   vs. Kansas *    Manhattan, Kan.   W, 17-10
11/14/09   vs. Missouri *    Manhattan, Kan.   L, 38-12
11/21/09   at Nebraska *    Lincoln, Neb.   L, 17-3
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 05:56:44 PM
4 conference wins is bad?
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 17, 2011, 05:59:56 PM
62-14 against an SEC team!    :emawkid:








but seriously though, I've been as powertardy of an apologist for Bill as anyone but there's no defending Sean being here or any reason to think we'll get back to 11 win seasons with Bill.  8-4 is the absolute ceiling with this coaching staff, and we won't get there this season.  just stop jtksu.  just stop.  please.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2011, 06:04:59 PM
4 conference wins is bad?

You cited being one game away from the CCG as being one of the good things Bill's done that nobody gives him credit for.  4 conference wins that particular year was the same thing as being one win away from the CCG.  I guess my definition of good is different than just "not bad".

Being .500 and looking at being .500 for the foreseeable future under the Snyder regime is bad.

Of course, I know you already know all this.  Being contrarian - not in the funny way like chum and sys do - is just your "thing".
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 06:12:08 PM
I'm not contrarian, I'm a fan of KSU sports.  As a fan, I root for our team to be successful.  As a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), you root for us to be bad so you can look cool in front of your buddies because you said we would suck all along.  I guess I just don't understand why people like you even bother following this particular team.  Seems like you would be happier following Oregon or some team like that.  I mean hey, they have weird ass uniforms, their coach isn't old, and I don't believe he has hired any family members.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2011, 06:14:07 PM
Less than 8% of my coolness comes from having said KSU will suck and them indeed sucking.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: HeinBallz on September 17, 2011, 10:00:16 PM
who in the hell is rooting for ksu to suck?   Pretty sure everyone here that wants bill to retire wants him to be replaced by a super elite coach.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 10:03:19 PM
Yeah, because so many programs are making homerun hires right now.  Who the hell is coaching tOSU, Stanford, UTenn, etc?  crap, Miami's coach had a losing record at Temple and Brian Kelly is continuing the ND tradition of wasting talented teams.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: HeinBallz on September 17, 2011, 10:08:10 PM
atleast those guys have a chance at recruiting players or hiring quality ass. coaches without hearing talking points such as:   "where will you be when bill leaves again?"



Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 17, 2011, 10:08:52 PM
Yeah, because so many programs are making homerun hires right now.  Who the hell is coaching tOSU, Stanford, UTenn, etc?  crap, Miami's coach had a losing record at Temple and Brian Kelly is continuing the ND tradition of wasting talented teams.

bro.  you're out of your element.  let it go.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: HeinBallz on September 17, 2011, 10:14:23 PM
how did I miss stanford in there...   Real rough ridin' powerhouse you're throwing around....   stanford?   seriously?   Stanford.   that's your argument you're going with?   Stanford?   

I guess you had to clean up your argument by putting a classy school in there to make tOSU, uTenn, & Miami sound like a good option for a coach to take a job at a known football school; but ohh...  btw, you may be facing ncaa sanctions for the next 5 years.   rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: _33 on September 17, 2011, 10:19:58 PM
I'm not contrarian, I'm a fan of KSU sports.  As a fan, I root for our team to be successful.  As a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), you root for us to be bad so you can look cool in front of your buddies because you said we would suck all along.

It's really easy to cheer for KSU to win every game and also hate LHC Bill Snyder. Probably the easiest thing I've ever done.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 10:27:58 PM
Stanford isn't a quality job?  since when?  Last time I checked they were like #5 in the nation and had future #1 draft pick Andrew Luck.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: felix rex on September 17, 2011, 10:33:18 PM
stanford is not a great job
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: HeinBallz on September 17, 2011, 10:39:38 PM
 :dubious:

you're an idiot jt.   
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 17, 2011, 10:44:20 PM
I never said Stanford was a great job but it's certainly a better job than KState and they hired someone I had never heard of.  When we hire a new coach it's going to be some Turner Gill type or an unproven cooridinator.  You idiots seem to think we're going to replace a HOF coach with some total badass candidate but that's not very likely.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: HeinBallz on September 17, 2011, 10:46:10 PM
no hope....   sounds like loser talk.   Not surprised.  :dubious:
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 17, 2011, 10:50:10 PM
As a rule whichever side of the argument that 33 is on is the wrong side.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: _33 on September 17, 2011, 11:01:44 PM
I never said Stanford was a great job but it's certainly a better job than KState and they hired someone I had never heard of.  When we hire a new coach it's going to be some Turner Gill type or an unproven cooridinator.  You idiots seem to think we're going to replace a HOF coach with some total badass candidate but that's not very likely.

all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: OregonSmock on September 18, 2011, 03:13:03 PM
jtksu stands for JohnTuckKSUfans.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: OregonSmock on September 18, 2011, 03:16:55 PM
Yeah, because so many programs are making homerun hires right now.  Who the hell is coaching tOSU, Stanford, UTenn, etc?  crap, Miami's coach had a losing record at Temple and Brian Kelly is continuing the ND tradition of wasting talented teams.



I said this exact same thing like two years ago when you guys made fun of KU for hiring Turner Gill. 


 :ck:
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 18, 2011, 06:36:32 PM
How's that hire working out for you?
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: OregonSmock on September 18, 2011, 06:41:04 PM
How's that hire working out for you?


Recruiting better talent/more speed than Mangino. 


 :ck:
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 18, 2011, 06:41:46 PM
Losing to FCS schools and giving up 768 yds to Ga Tech.  :ck:
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: wetwillie on September 18, 2011, 06:45:29 PM
I guess we will find out if Gill can find and keep quality AC's but id much rather be in the position of KU with a young black head coach that has proven he can recruit. 
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 18, 2011, 06:45:39 PM
THEY SCHEMED US!!
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: OregonSmock on September 18, 2011, 07:06:19 PM
Losing to FCS schools and giving up 768 yds to Ga Tech.  :ck:



Beat #15 Ga Tech at home last year and beat an FCS team this year.


 :ck:
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: wes mantooth on September 18, 2011, 07:12:49 PM
Losing to FCS schools and giving up 768 yds to Ga Tech.  :ck:



Beat #15 Ga Tech at home last year and beat an FCS team this year.


 :ck:

pfft
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: kitten_mittons on September 18, 2011, 09:37:25 PM
Losing to FCS schools and giving up 768 yds to Ga Tech.  :ck:



Beat #15 Ga Tech at home last year and beat an FCS team this year.


 :ck:
New name for Memorial Stadium?
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 18, 2011, 09:39:36 PM
I guess we will find out if Gill can find and keep quality AC's but id much rather be in the position of KU with a young black head coach that has proven he can recruit. 

I would take that over Snyder, but I'd really just like to be looking for a new coach after this season, assuming we are in some kind of BCS conference and football still actually matters here. There are a lot of good unemployed coaches out there right now.
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: jtksu on September 18, 2011, 09:47:21 PM
I'd rather have 59 than 7.  :ck:
Title: Re: Beemer
Post by: Bookcat on September 18, 2011, 10:08:17 PM
Losing to FCS schools and giving up 768 yds to Ga Tech.  :ck:



Beat #15 Ga Tech at home last year and beat an FCS team this year.


 :ck:

I'm with you bro. Also, make sure Gill signs a secret deal with your AD that assures him of millions if he were to get fired...if, say...he were to get his hullabaloo rocked against Kstate (again).....and then on the way home go effing ballistic on the team and coaches.