goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: CNS on September 08, 2011, 04:30:01 PM

Title: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: CNS on September 08, 2011, 04:30:01 PM
Quote
BradyMcCollough Brady McCollough
Bill Self says three #kubball freshmen - McLemore, Traylor and Anderson - have not yet been cleared to play by NCAA:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 08, 2011, 04:31:36 PM
Are these academic-related or infraction-related?
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: CNS on September 08, 2011, 04:33:13 PM
Are these academic-related or infraction-related?

Quote
JayhawkSlant JayhawkSlant
by bobfescoe
Ben McLemore and Jamari started classes on Thursday. Nothing to report on Braeden Anderson. #kubball

Prob a combo depending on which player you are talking about.  :dunno:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: CNS on September 08, 2011, 04:33:38 PM
Quote
BradyMcCollough Brady McCollough
McLemore and Traylor are cleared to take classes but still waiting on participation. Anderson has not been cleared to be on scholarship.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 08, 2011, 04:35:56 PM
It's just embarrassing that our state's standards are so low that athletes can be admitted to the university but still not be cleared to play by the NCAA. It would be fun to laugh at KU for this if our standards weren't exactly the same.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: CNS on September 08, 2011, 04:36:30 PM
It's just embarrassing that our state's standards are so low that athletes can be admitted to the university but still not be cleared to play by the NCAA. It would be fun to laugh at KU for this if our standards weren't exactly the same.

As far as sports go, lower the standards the better.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 08, 2011, 04:37:33 PM
It's just embarrassing that our state's standards are so low that athletes can be admitted to the university but still not be cleared to play by the NCAA. It would be fun to laugh at KU for this if our standards weren't exactly the same.

As far as sports go, lower the standards the better.

Yeah, the standards should be the NCAA's standards for athletes. Regular students shouldn't have easier standards than the NCAA does, though.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: CNS on September 08, 2011, 04:38:35 PM
Quote
BradyMcCollough Brady McCollough
Self says not like Selby but not unlike it either. Says it's routine. McLemore and Traylor went to 3 HS. RT @CNSCasey Selbyish issues?


So no one knows about the money they have no doubt been given, but at the same time, they may not have all graduated???
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 08, 2011, 04:42:15 PM
It's just embarrassing that our state's standards are so low that athletes can be admitted to the university but still not be cleared to play by the NCAA. It would be fun to laugh at KU for this if our standards weren't exactly the same.

to be fair to ksu, when i was a frosh at ksu, they said my act score (26) was a red flag during enrollment (engineering) and they would have to closely watch my progress.

i was pissed.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: ew2x4 on September 08, 2011, 04:46:04 PM
To get into our universities are incredibly easy. To get into the colleges, much tougher. Requirements for College of Architecture when I went through was pretty high. Lots of people cut.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 08, 2011, 04:47:52 PM
It's just embarrassing that our state's standards are so low that athletes can be admitted to the university but still not be cleared to play by the NCAA. It would be fun to laugh at KU for this if our standards weren't exactly the same.

to be fair to ksu, when i was a frosh at ksu, they said my act score (26) was a red flag during enrollment (engineering) and they would have to closely watch my progress.

i was pissed.

Your ACT score would have to have been worse than 21 to actually not be allowed to enroll, though.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: hemmy on September 08, 2011, 05:21:37 PM
It's just embarrassing that our state's standards are so low that athletes can be admitted to the university but still not be cleared to play by the NCAA. It would be fun to laugh at KU for this if our standards weren't exactly the same.

to be fair to ksu, when i was a frosh at ksu, they said my act score (26) was a red flag during enrollment (engineering) and they would have to closely watch my progress.

i was pissed.

Your ACT score would have to have been worse than 21 to actually not be allowed to enroll, though.

Or depends on your GPA in HS. You could have like a 16 ACT and still get in.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Stevesie60 on September 08, 2011, 05:43:59 PM
MDAMW?
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: FranklyFrankYou on September 08, 2011, 05:45:40 PM
It's just embarrassing that our state's standards are so low that athletes can be admitted to the university but still not be cleared to play by the NCAA. It would be fun to laugh at KU for this if our standards weren't exactly the same.

to be fair to ksu, when i was a frosh at ksu, they said my act score (26) was a red flag during enrollment (engineering) and they would have to closely watch my progress.

i was pissed.

Your ACT score would have to have been worse than 21 to actually not be allowed to enroll, though.

Or depends on your GPA in HS. You could have like a 16 ACT and still get in.
Actually i think the minimum is a 17 in kansas.  Needless to say when I scored a 27 my sophmore year i was good to go.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Kat Kid on September 08, 2011, 08:00:47 PM
It's just embarrassing that our state's standards are so low that athletes can be admitted to the university but still not be cleared to play by the NCAA. It would be fun to laugh at KU for this if our standards weren't exactly the same.

to be fair to ksu, when i was a frosh at ksu, they said my act score (26) was a red flag during enrollment (engineering) and they would have to closely watch my progress.

i was pissed.

Your ACT score would have to have been worse than 21 to actually not be allowed to enroll, though.

Or depends on your GPA in HS. You could have like a 16 ACT and still get in.
Actually i think the minimum is a 17 in kansas.  Needless to say when I scored a 27 my sophmore year i was good to go.

Don't necessarily need an ACT score.  Can qualify through several methods:

http://www.kansasregents.org/resources/PDF/1389-88-29-5resunder21Final.pdf (http://www.kansasregents.org/resources/PDF/1389-88-29-5resunder21Final.pdf)
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: FHSU92 on September 08, 2011, 08:01:07 PM
Quote
BradyMcCollough Brady McCollough
Self says not like Selby but not unlike it either. Says it's routine. McLemore and Traylor went to 3 HS. RT @CNSCasey Selbyish issues?


So no one knows about the money they have no doubt been given, but at the same time, they may not have all graduated???

Durrel "Wut" Arthur issues?
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 08, 2011, 08:53:20 PM
man oh man, i remember taking the science part of the act and there was a question about a stick and a river and i was just like oh jesus christ, c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c,
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 08, 2011, 08:56:40 PM
All the cheating at ku is going to hurt the both of us come realignment time.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: mcmwcat on September 08, 2011, 09:03:52 PM
bill self isn't BIT mcmw B for no reason

:love:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: AbeFroman on September 09, 2011, 11:21:41 AM
Damn NCAA trying to screw over ku again. First they ruin Selby, now this! :curse:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 09, 2011, 03:45:48 PM
It's just embarrassing that our state's standards are so low that athletes can be admitted to the university but still not be cleared to play by the NCAA. It would be fun to laugh at KU for this if our standards weren't exactly the same.

What you need to consider is that in the land of delusion otherwise knows as phog/jayhawkslant/kusports.com there is still a faction of people who believe that K-State can "get anyone into school" and that it's difficult for ku to do the same.  Yet, as we've seen countless times, you pretty much only need to have a pulse in order to get into ku, at least for athletes, just like K-State.

It's also not out of the question, to ask (yet again) if a ku basketball recruits academic background is legit.

But don't worry, Coach Bumps will get them out there on the court.


Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 14, 2011, 09:27:32 AM
http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/36826/self-wants-ku-freshman-to-enjoy-festivities
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: CNS on October 14, 2011, 09:31:39 AM
This may be the first year Bill has to work at it.  I hope the other players all believe.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 14, 2011, 09:33:39 AM
http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/36826/self-wants-ku-freshman-to-enjoy-festivities

Quote from: Eamonn Brennan
If one had to guess, one would say that incoming Kansas freshmen Ben McLemore and Jamari Traylor will not be eligible to play in their freshmen season.

I think that would be a pretty shitty guess. There's no way Self fails to get at least one of those guys eligible.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: mcmwcat on October 14, 2011, 09:36:43 AM
Eamonn Brennan obviously doesn't know why Self is BITB
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: AbeFroman on October 14, 2011, 01:16:12 PM
They'll all be eligible by conference play no doubt.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 14, 2011, 01:25:21 PM
Fescoe made it sound like McLemore will be a no go this season. If this is true, what a horrific recruiting class for the Jayhawks!
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: pissclams on October 14, 2011, 01:47:56 PM
you would think that  a recent national championship would allow them to keep more than 8 scholarship players on the bench.

you would think
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 14, 2011, 03:40:07 PM
Quote
Kansas University basketball freshmen Ben McLemore and Jamari Traylor are ineligible for participation during the upcoming 2011-12 season, coach Bill Self told the Journal-World on Friday afternoon.

http://www2.kusports.com/news/2011/oct/14/ku-freshmen-ben-mclemore-jamari-traylor-ineligible/
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: OregonSmock on October 14, 2011, 03:48:43 PM
Will definitely be a down year for KU basketball. 


 :drink:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: WildcatNkilt on October 14, 2011, 03:50:20 PM
Will definitely be a down year for KU basketball. 


 :drink:

Meh....you'll manage to win it all again I'm sure. 
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: EMAWzified on October 14, 2011, 03:50:30 PM
Some of the wiser sqwawk fans came to the conclusion Self was told no numerous times and he just kept kicking the can. Must have though no academic rock was too low to turnover after getting Duh-rel and the mongoloid twins eligible.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 14, 2011, 03:52:14 PM
Will definitely be a down year for KU basketball. 


 :drink:

Still not doubting Self.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: kstater on October 14, 2011, 03:53:01 PM

Well not really surprising that KU's checks started bouncing.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: EMAWzified on October 14, 2011, 03:53:35 PM
Quote
Will definitely be a down year for KU basketball. 

Well, you have football.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: OregonSmock on October 14, 2011, 03:58:20 PM
Quote
Will definitely be a down year for KU basketball. 

Well, you have football.


Would love it if we also had soil judging. 
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: EMAWzified on October 14, 2011, 04:01:37 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: CNS on October 14, 2011, 04:09:00 PM
One down year is all it took for Mangino.   :ohno:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: CNS on October 14, 2011, 04:11:24 PM
If I was Bill, I would call the best kid at each position for th 2012 class and guarantee that they start next year.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: OregonSmock on October 14, 2011, 04:12:58 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: EllToPay on October 14, 2011, 04:18:45 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

Nice, beems. Always looking for that silver lining.

  :thumbs:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: wes mantooth on October 14, 2011, 04:19:01 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

pfft
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: username on October 14, 2011, 04:21:32 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

horrible argument

bottom line:
KU bball>KSU bball
KSU fball>KU fball

probably will never change
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: wes mantooth on October 14, 2011, 04:45:12 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

horrible argument

bottom line:
KU bball>KSU bball
KSU fball>KU fball

probably will never change

eff you username, you piece of crap
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: username on October 14, 2011, 04:49:33 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

horrible argument

bottom line:
KU bball>KSU bball
KSU fball>KU fball

probably will never change

eff you username, you piece of crap

you're not funny or intimidating, even in an ironic sense. good try, though.  :thumbs:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: wes mantooth on October 14, 2011, 04:53:21 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

horrible argument

bottom line:
KU bball>KSU bball
KSU fball>KU fball

probably will never change

eff you username, you piece of crap

you're not funny or intimidating, even in an ironic sense. good try, though.  :thumbs:

yeah, but i'm not a dumbfuck like you either
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: username on October 14, 2011, 04:57:06 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

horrible argument

bottom line:
KU bball>KSU bball
KSU fball>KU fball

probably will never change

eff you username, you piece of crap

you're not funny or intimidating, even in an ironic sense. good try, though.  :thumbs:

yeah, but i'm not a dumbfuck like you either

another good post. keep it up.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 14, 2011, 04:58:57 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

 :lol:

All-time series. Just like clockwork.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: OregonSmock on October 14, 2011, 05:08:36 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

 :lol:

All-time series. Just like clockwork.



4 out of 7.  Orange Bowl.  National Championship.  Thanks for playing.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 14, 2011, 05:09:59 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

 :lol:

All-time series. Just like clockwork.



4 out of 7.  Orange Bowl.  National Championship.  Thanks for playing.

13-1

59-7
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: OregonSmock on October 14, 2011, 05:17:53 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

 :lol:

All-time series. Just like clockwork.



4 out of 7.  Orange Bowl.  National Championship.  Thanks for playing.

13-1

59-7



The fact that you think 13-1/59-7 compares favorably to an Orange Bowl and a National Championship pretty much says it all.  Thanks for playing.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 14, 2011, 05:20:57 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

 :lol:

All-time series. Just like clockwork.



4 out of 7.  Orange Bowl.  National Championship.  Thanks for playing.

13-1

59-7



The fact that you think 13-1/59-7 compares favorably to an Orange Bowl and a National Championship pretty much says it all.  Thanks for playing.

That fact that you bring up crap that happened 4 years ago and basketball accomplishments on a football board pretty much says it all.

13-1 

59-7
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: OregonSmock on October 14, 2011, 05:22:51 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

 :lol:

All-time series. Just like clockwork.



4 out of 7.  Orange Bowl.  National Championship.  Thanks for playing.

13-1

59-7



The fact that you think 13-1/59-7 compares favorably to an Orange Bowl and a National Championship pretty much says it all.  Thanks for playing.

That fact that you bring up crap that happened 4 years ago and basketball accomplishments on a football board pretty much says it all.

13-1 

59-7




This is the hoops board, squawk.  Let me know next time K-State sweeps KU in both football and basketball.  TIA.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 14, 2011, 05:26:37 PM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.

 :lol:

All-time series. Just like clockwork.



4 out of 7.  Orange Bowl.  National Championship.  Thanks for playing.

13-1

59-7



The fact that you think 13-1/59-7 compares favorably to an Orange Bowl and a National Championship pretty much says it all.  Thanks for playing.

That fact that you bring up crap that happened 4 years ago and basketball accomplishments on a football board pretty much says it all.

13-1 

59-7




This is the hoops board, squawk.  Let me know next time K-State sweeps KU in both football and basketball.  TIA.

And you started bragging about your football team?  :lol: What the hell were you thinking?
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: 0.42 on October 14, 2011, 05:55:50 PM
hello beems

how's portland?
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: wetwillie on October 14, 2011, 06:24:07 PM
http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/36826/self-wants-ku-freshman-to-enjoy-festivities

Quote from: Eamonn Brennan
If one had to guess, one would say that incoming Kansas freshmen Ben McLemore and Jamari Traylor will not be eligible to play in their freshmen season.

I think that would be a pretty shitty guess. There's no way Self fails to get at least one of those guys eligible.

o my...
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: CNS on October 14, 2011, 06:45:07 PM
I absolutely love the "we're good because we used to be good" argument.  :love:


"TRADITION DAMN IT!!!!!!"
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 14, 2011, 07:05:54 PM
Ku will take absolutely anybody.  Hilarious
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: pike on October 14, 2011, 07:20:15 PM
Ku will take absolutely anybody.  Hilarious

Remember that Darrell Arthur guy? Dumbass didn't even graduate high school  :lol:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: FHSU92 on October 14, 2011, 07:48:00 PM
So, does this affect our chances of winning again in AF west?  :pray:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: The Whale on October 14, 2011, 07:51:52 PM
NCAA Eligibility Review process explained:


Guys who went to 3 high schools:  :dubious:


Apex "van down by the river" Academy   :thumbs:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: ChiComCat on October 14, 2011, 08:34:30 PM
Meh, I still would put KU between a 3-6 seed :dunno:  Self finds a way, was only a matter of time til this recruiting caught up to him big time
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: ksucrcoop on October 14, 2011, 08:40:08 PM
Just saw this gem on facebook:

Quote
"KU Hoops is screwed. NCAA needs to let McLemore and Traylor play. Smh"
· 55 minutes ago near Kansas City, MO ·

The only Comment:
Quote
"were ok bro... were still KU. we just need bigger seasons from TRele and (cough cough) Withey"


sound reasoning there...
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 14, 2011, 09:03:19 PM
This year's ku team may average a double-double in player arrests
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: TB on October 15, 2011, 12:31:06 AM
Prolly be a better draw than your football program.



KU's football program owns the all-time series vs. K-State by a wide margin and has won three bowls (including an Orange Bowl) since K-State's last bowl win in 2002.  Thanks for playing.


 :lol:

All-time series. Just like clockwork.



4 out of 7.  Orange Bowl.  National Championship.  Thanks for playing.

I must have missed that year when KU won a national championship in football.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: mcmwcat on October 15, 2011, 12:46:11 AM
BITB  :confused:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: wes mantooth on October 15, 2011, 12:58:13 AM
BITB  :confused:

Batteries in the butt
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: FHSU92 on October 15, 2011, 07:22:12 AM
Wonder how long the AD knew as the creation of the minpacks of 7 tix is getting pushed hard.   Seems to me they knew this was going to be a down year and we're trying to sell as many tix as poss before the news broke.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 15, 2011, 09:28:50 AM
Sucks for KU.  The first year they actually schedule some real ooc games in bball, is their worst team in over a decade.

That lineup is looking awfully thin (and devoid of anyone with a brain).  Imagine if someone gets injured :surprised:


Backcourt:  two identical bipolar losers who are turnover prone and cant shoot

frontcourt:  the biggest pussy since chenowith at C, and a guy who can't do anything but dunk and foul in the post

bench:  white guys from kansas

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 15, 2011, 11:07:30 AM
Sucks for KU.  The first year they actually schedule some real ooc games in bball, is their worst team in over a decade.

That lineup is looking awfully thin (and devoid of anyone with a brain).  Imagine if someone gets injured :surprised:


Backcourt:  two identical bipolar losers who are turnover prone and cant shoot

frontcourt:  the biggest pussy since chenowith at C, and a guy who can't do anything but dunk and foul in the post

bench:  white guys from kansas

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Taylor will beat up another girl so he might have to miss the FHS game.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: KSUBrian on October 15, 2011, 11:18:37 AM
Fox 4 in KC reported that Braeden Anderson was also ruled a partial qualifier.  No mention of this ruling in any other reports.  True or false?
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: EMAWzified on October 15, 2011, 11:44:43 AM
I'm calling it right here and now: KU misses the torn-a-ment. Sorry all you Self apologists, there's not four or five first-rounders to carry him, especially after TR's injured.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 15, 2011, 11:50:05 AM
I'm calling it right here and now: KU misses the torn-a-ment. Sorry all you Self apologists, there's not four or five first-rounders to carry him, especially after TR's injured. arrrested again


FYP
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: EMAWzified on October 15, 2011, 12:03:53 PM
When did an arrest ever keep a sqwawk off the court?
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 15, 2011, 12:31:47 PM
When did an arrest ever keep a sqwawk off the court?

you win this one EMAWzified.   :D
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Jackstraw on October 15, 2011, 01:51:08 PM
I'm calling it right here and now: KU misses the torn-a-ment. Sorry all you Self apologists, there's not four or five first-rounders to carry him, especially after TR's injured.


And you're an idiot.  They aren't missing the tournament. 
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: CNS on October 15, 2011, 02:51:21 PM
I'm calling it right here and now: KU misses the torn-a-ment. Sorry all you Self apologists, there's not four or five first-rounders to carry him, especially after TR's injured.


And you're an idiot.  They aren't missing the tournament.
Agreed.

Its a selection, not a play in.  They will get selected no matter what
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: jtksu on October 15, 2011, 03:30:30 PM
Braden Anderson is gone for good.  Not sure how dumb you have to be to ruled completely ineligible like that.  Couldn't the dude just go to a juco for 2 yrs or something?  Strong rumblings that Anderson may actually be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 16, 2011, 03:10:22 AM
I'm calling it right here and now: KU misses the torn-a-ment. Sorry all you Self apologists, there's not four or five first-rounders to carry him, especially after TR's injured.


Self would be fired if that happened. It would never happen, though. KU will probably still win the Big 12.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 16, 2011, 09:04:27 AM
Braden Anderson is gone for good.  Not sure how dumb you have to be to ruled completely ineligible like that.  Couldn't the dude just go to a juco for 2 yrs or something?  Strong rumblings that Anderson may actually be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).

Is that the canadian kid who overtly lied about having an Arizona offer?
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 27, 2011, 10:38:32 PM
Robinson hyperextended his knee. Will "hopefully" not miss significant time.

http://college-basketball-blog.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/26283066/32965711 (http://college-basketball-blog.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/26283066/32965711)
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 27, 2011, 11:32:06 PM
Robinson hyperextended his knee. Will "hopefully" not miss significant time.

http://college-basketball-blog.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/26283066/32965711 (http://college-basketball-blog.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/26283066/32965711)

It begins.  Seff gonna keep that boy here for senior year.  Yes suh. 
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: jtksu on October 27, 2011, 11:43:51 PM
Self is an absolute monster.  Someone needs to step-up and stop him before any more kids have their lives ruined.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: wetwillie on October 27, 2011, 11:54:29 PM
"You wouldn't want your sister to suffer for your sins now would you boy?"
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: mcmwcat on October 28, 2011, 07:31:58 AM
hopefully he's ok.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2011, 07:44:01 AM
prayers T-Rob
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: EllToPay on October 30, 2011, 06:35:48 PM
http://www2.kusports.com/news/2011/oct/30/kansas-guards-tyshawn-taylor-elijah-johnson-suspen/

Good start to the season, guys.  :thumbs:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: EllToPay on October 30, 2011, 06:37:12 PM
Quote
“Tyshawn and Elijah have both been terrific since school began in August,” Self said. “They’ve not only performed well, they have been very responsible and disciplined the first few months of the school year. But during the offseason they violated a rule that I told them, because of some past experiences, their punishment was going to be severe and I was going to hold them out of the two exhibition games. They have been aware of this for several months and also are disappointed, but have had very positive attitudes about it.”

Atta boy, Seff.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 30, 2011, 06:42:30 PM
lmao
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: PowercatPat on October 30, 2011, 06:47:37 PM
Pfffffft

 :lol:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: OregonSmock on October 30, 2011, 06:57:14 PM
KU is going to lose to Pitt State. 


 :lol:
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 30, 2011, 08:38:24 PM
If I were a ku fan, and I'm not, I would be completely excited about these suspensions.



Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: FHSU92 on October 30, 2011, 10:00:25 PM
KU is going to lose to Pitt State. 


 :lol:

Seriously??  did you see the clown suit MU put on MizzSo (preseez #1 in MIAA. FHSU #3 fwiw)?
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: felix rex on October 31, 2011, 09:52:44 AM
Quote
Not that it would be such a gigantic upset if Pittsburg State should happen to win Tuesday night’s exhibition against a mix of walk-ons and scholarship players wearing Kansas uniforms in Allen Fieldhouse.
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Gooch on October 31, 2011, 09:58:57 AM
Quote
Not that it would be such a gigantic upset if Pittsburg State should happen to win Tuesday night’s exhibition against a mix of walk-ons and scholarship players wearing Kansas uniforms in Allen Fieldhouse.
If this were to happen with the mob already assembled calling for Gill's head things would get ugly in Larry town.


 (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi7.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fy267%2Ftheonlyrossaroni%2Fmob.jpg&hash=c82194f7de93ee02181912f36ae26842730673da)
Title: Re: KU and eligibility...again
Post by: Bookcat on October 31, 2011, 08:47:58 PM
they violated the team rule so they wouldn't have to play in the two exhibition games. Pretty obvious.