goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: kougar24 on September 03, 2011, 08:43:11 PM

Title: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: kougar24 on September 03, 2011, 08:43:11 PM
  :dubious:
Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: jtksu on September 03, 2011, 09:20:43 PM
Reverse crown?!
Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: CNS on September 03, 2011, 09:21:20 PM
Quote from: jtksu on September 03, 2011, 09:20:43 PM
Reverse crown?!


Only bowl we will make this year.
Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: TellurideCatbacker on September 03, 2011, 10:57:31 PM
the top story of this game is how pimp that field looked....and thats all there is to discuss
Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: kso_FAN on September 03, 2011, 10:59:09 PM
Quote from: TellurideCatbacker on September 03, 2011, 10:57:31 PM
the top story of this game is how pimp that field looked....and thats all there is to discuss

Add in the flame thrower things on top of Vanier.
Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: 06wildcat on September 04, 2011, 12:41:44 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on September 03, 2011, 10:59:09 PM
Quote from: TellurideCatbacker on September 03, 2011, 10:57:31 PM
the top story of this game is how pimp that field looked....and thats all there is to discuss

Add in the flame thrower things on top of Vanier.

Somewhat disappointed they didn't get their own thread.
Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 04, 2011, 08:32:55 AM
Someone who would know said that it's likely Bill had them dump to much rubber infill into the field, just like the old field.

Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: hemmy on September 04, 2011, 08:41:35 AM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on September 04, 2011, 08:32:55 AM
Someone who would know said that it's likely Bill had them dump to much rubber infill into the field, just like the old field.



The white was very not-white.
Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: felix rex on September 04, 2011, 08:51:52 AM
Quote
It looks as good as any field K-State has ever played on

Love this high praise for the new field turf.
Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: bonercat on September 04, 2011, 09:38:21 AM
Quote from: felix rex on September 04, 2011, 08:51:52 AM
Quote
It looks as good as any field K-State has ever played on

Love this high praise for the new field turf.


Don't forget about the shitty discolored turf past the end zone!!
Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: pc5k on September 04, 2011, 12:44:19 PM
Quote from: bonercat on September 04, 2011, 09:38:21 AM
Quote from: felix rex on September 04, 2011, 08:51:52 AM
Quote
It looks as good as any field K-State has ever played on

Love this high praise for the new field turf.


Don't forget about the shitty discolored turf past the end zone!!

Hey! that shitty discolored turf saved chris harper's life last night!
Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: wabash909 on September 04, 2011, 01:42:25 PM
Quote from: hemmy on September 04, 2011, 08:41:35 AM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on September 04, 2011, 08:32:55 AM
Someone who would know said that it's likely Bill had them dump to much rubber infill into the field, just like the old field.



The white was very not-white.

Improper amount of rubber pellets applied.


Title: Re: New turf doesn't seem to agree with us
Post by: jtksu on September 04, 2011, 03:16:33 PM
The radio guys actually said pretty much the opposite last night.  Something about how the new field looked much greener and nnot nearly as much rubberized filling material.  Also, who ever said Bill overrode the company who installed the previous turf?  Link?  Dax being a bitter squawk again?  The turf seemed pretty cool during the 2003 season.