goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: nicname on August 20, 2011, 11:21:30 AM
-
:kstategrad:
-
https://secure.ronpaul2012.com/
Damn it was at 70k last night :runaway:
-
That buys a lot of tinfoil hats.
-
That buys a lot of tinfoil hats.
:flush:
-
says it's at 0?
-
says it's at 0?
I know you have to refresh it or just close it and re load it. It's almost over 800k
-
says it's at 0?
I know you have to refresh it or just close it and re load it. It's almost over 800k
850k now, 1.5 mil is in sight.
nicname, dontated :kstategrad:
-
And people say we're in economic trouble as a country. Just look at all this frivolous spending, the economy is obviously booming if people are willing to just throw their money away.
-
I've never seen a money bonfire like this before
-
mean while obama is raking in record fundraising :zzz:
-
And people say we're in economic trouble as a country. Just look at all this frivolous spending, the economy is obviously booming if people are willing to just throw their money away.
It's our last chance. The establishment could ruin us for good in the next 5 years.
-
nicname, dontated :kstategrad:
:dubious:
-
nicname, dontated :kstategrad:
:dubious:
Don't worry I saved some for BBBS.
-
Don't worry I saved some for BBBS.
:thumbs:
-
I've never seen a money bonfire like this before
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_n2qy5NTsWX8%2FTF5sGlv0d1I%2FAAAAAAAAADA%2FDBDhyvToktk%2Fs1600%2Fjoker-money-on-fire.jpg&hash=1f06c1b21783f80e26c3df1b4379cdfa5a129ca0)
-
I've never seen a money bonfire like this before
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_n2qy5NTsWX8%2FTF5sGlv0d1I%2FAAAAAAAAADA%2FDBDhyvToktk%2Fs1600%2Fjoker-money-on-fire.jpg&hash=1f06c1b21783f80e26c3df1b4379cdfa5a129ca0)
Meh not really a money bonfire. If Paul generates enough interest then eventually the GOP establishment will absorb some of his ideas(see tea party). Your donating to elect Ron Paul your donating for the republicans to adopt a couple of his positions...
-
I think it's great. And can't hurt what needs to happen.
-
I've never seen a money bonfire like this before
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_n2qy5NTsWX8%2FTF5sGlv0d1I%2FAAAAAAAAADA%2FDBDhyvToktk%2Fs1600%2Fjoker-money-on-fire.jpg&hash=1f06c1b21783f80e26c3df1b4379cdfa5a129ca0)
Meh not really a money bonfire. If Paul generates enough interest then eventually the GOP establishment will absorb some of his ideas(see tea party). Your donating to elect Ron Paul your donating for the republicans to adopt a couple of his positions...
If that's his position, Paul needs to go independent and act like a Republican Ralph Nader.
Paul: You want me to go away and not siphon your vote and split the party? Do this, this, and this, and I'll go away.
-
Yeah, I think I'd rather him run and get like 2 percent of the vote in the primary like he did last time.
-
Yeah, I think I'd rather him run and get like 2 percent of the vote in the primary like he did last time.
Ron Paul is much more relevant than you think.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/obama_39_paul_38
-
We will see.
They said the same thing 4 years ago.
-
We will see.
They said the same thing 4 years ago.
Then go back to voting for red vs. blue, right vs. left, God vs. No God, puppet vs puppet. Cause that system has shown to be reliable.
-
Better than Sane (not Paul) vs Insane (Paul)
Have fun losing...again.
-
Better than Sane (not Paul) vs Insane (Paul)
Have fun losing...again.
If we elect another establishment candidate than we all lose, and that includes you.
But keep your :blindfold: on as you swim through the false right left paradigm, as our society stays on it's fast track to implosion.
-
You are so damn delusional.
It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.
Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.
-
You are so damn delusional.
It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.
Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.
Who are you voting for?
-
You are so damn delusional.
It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.
Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.
Who are you voting for?
This is what I was going to ask. Probably Obama or Perry. Two excellent choices, but which one will run us into the ground faster?
-
You are so damn delusional.
It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.
Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.
Who are you voting for?
I, not being Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), have not decided a full year in advance of the election.
-
You are so damn delusional.
It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.
Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.
Who are you voting for?
I, not being Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), have not decided a full year in advance of the election.
The Kansas primary is in 6 months, and the candidates are Ron Paul (at least he's honest), Perry (his strategy as Governor was to pray for rain rather than actually do something about Texas' growing water problems), Michelle Bachmann (either a liar, or very stupid, probably a little bit of both), and Mitt Romney (hypocrite). I will be voting for Ron Paul, but if he were not an option, I would probably also still be undecided.
-
Yeah Ron Paul is the only real choice. Everyone else is a corporate owned snake in the grass, and if you can't see that you are lying to yourself.
-
I assure you, Bachmann and Perry are about as unvotable as Paul in my opinion.
-
You are so damn delusional.
It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.
Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.
Who are you voting for?
This is what I was going to ask. Probably Obama or Perry. Two excellent choices, but which one will run us into the ground faster?
Gotta love the 7 ways Perry will change the Constitution. Anyone seen those?
-
You are so damn delusional.
It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.
Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.
Who are you voting for?
This is what I was going to ask. Probably Obama or Perry. Two excellent choices, but which one will run us into the ground faster?
Gotta love the 7 ways Perry will change the Constitution. Anyone seen those?
Yeah. Term limits for supreme court justices is something I could probably be convinced to get behind, but I'm not too fond of the other 6.
-
Yeah, I think I'd rather him run and get like 2 percent of the vote in the primary like he did last time.
Ron Paul is much more relevant than you think.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/obama_39_paul_38
Gallup ran a poll with Obama v. 4 GOP'ers, including Paul.
Among registered voters Obama is statistically tied with Paul, Perry, and Romney. Paul is just as relevant as any of the mainstream GOP candidates.
Obama is so awful, he's barely beating Bachman. :lol:
http://www.businessinsider.com/shock-poll-obama-tied-with-romney-perry-paul-in-new-poll-2011-8
-
Yeah, I think I'd rather him run and get like 2 percent of the vote in the primary like he did last time.
Ron Paul is much more relevant than you think.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/obama_39_paul_38
Gallup ran a poll with Obama v. 4 GOP'ers, including Paul.
Among registered voters Obama is statistically tied with Paul, Perry, and Romney. Paul is just as relevant as any of the mainstream GOP candidates.
Obama is so awful, he's barely beating Bachman. :lol:
http://www.businessinsider.com/shock-poll-obama-tied-with-romney-perry-paul-in-new-poll-2011-8
I think we are about to have a repeat of the 2008 mantra with a name change --- "Anybody but Obama"
-
Dr. Paul is putting out great campaign ads this time around. It is great to see him with a real, focused campaign. The website is top-notch too.
Ad 1 "Conviction"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUNIeOB0whI
Ad 2 "The one"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D58v4eiUuI
-
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office? Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.
<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country
-
Honestly, it's a repeat of 2008, as someone mentioned. It's just one big overreaction. I seriously doubt anything Paul is going to run on will ever happen, even if elected, (sounds a lot like Obama) because he would still need congress to agree with him. That won't happen.
-
Honestly, it's a repeat of 2008, as someone mentioned. It's just one big overreaction. I seriously doubt anything Paul is going to run on will ever happen, even if elected, (sounds a lot like Obama) because he would still need congress to agree with him. That won't happen.
Congress only has to agree with him on the social and economic issues. They don't have much say in foreign policy.
-
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office? Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.
<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country
Ok you won't be voting for Paul, which corporate owned fascist will you be voting for, clown?
-
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office? Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.
<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country
Ok you won't be voting for Paul, which corporate owned fascist will you be voting for, clown?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwonkette.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F06%2Fronpool-shorter.jpg&hash=543dd52f659289f44684316291cbf39307740853)
-
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office? Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.
<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country
Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?
-
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office? Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.
<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country
Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?
Far better
-
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office? Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.
<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country
Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?
Far better
You know this has recently been proven factually inaccurate?
-
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office? Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.
<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country
Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?
Far better
You know this has recently been proven factually inaccurate?
yes
-
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office? Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.
<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country
Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?
Far better
You know this has recently been proven factually inaccurate?
yes
Well, I'm not sure what to make of this.
Should we talk about something else now?
-
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office? Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.
<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country
Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?
Far better
You know this has recently been proven factually inaccurate?
yes
Well, I'm not sure what to make of this.
Should we talk about something else now?
no
-
Congress only has to agree with him on the social and economic issues. They don't have much say in foreign policy.
They hold the purse strings, and thus have a pretty damn good hold on Foreign policy as well. The President is not our Foreign Policy master.
-
Congress only has to agree with him on the social and economic issues. They don't have much say in foreign policy.
They hold the purse strings, and thus have a pretty damn good hold on Foreign policy as well. The President is not our Foreign Policy master.
Every war since WWII disagrees, as does the war powers act.
-
So glad Bush set a precedent of just invading without congressional approval.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_war_by_the_United_States
There is a nice list of conflicts after the list of declared wars that have been authorized by Congress.
-
Congress only has to agree with him on the social and economic issues. They don't have much say in foreign policy.
They hold the purse strings, and thus have a pretty damn good hold on Foreign policy as well. The President is not our Foreign Policy master.
LOL at Congress holding the purse strings on a man who wants to cut the budget anyway. What are they going to do, not fund the planes to fly the troops home?
-
Congress only has to agree with him on the social and economic issues. They don't have much say in foreign policy.
They hold the purse strings, and thus have a pretty damn good hold on Foreign policy as well. The President is not our Foreign Policy master.
LOL at Congress holding the purse strings on a man who wants to cut the budget anyway. What are they going to do, not fund the planes to fly the troops home?
Who is this man?
-
Congress only has to agree with him on the social and economic issues. They don't have much say in foreign policy.
They hold the purse strings, and thus have a pretty damn good hold on Foreign policy as well. The President is not our Foreign Policy master.
LOL at Congress holding the purse strings on a man who wants to cut the budget anyway. What are they going to do, not fund the planes to fly the troops home?
Who is this man?
Obama and Pelosi, of course.
-
So glad Bush set a precedent of just invading without congressional approval.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_war_by_the_United_States
There is a nice list of conflicts after the list of declared wars that have been authorized by Congress.
You just proved my point. We haven't formally declared war since WWII. Congressional approval for everything else is practically meaningless. For instance, the president can just pull some bull crap like this: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/16/us/politics/16powers.html?pagewanted=all
-
Your point was that the President is the soul master of foreign affairs...which is just wrong.
But let's look at the idiots more zany idea.
He want to cut FEMA funding....here's a nice little quote about Aid to people who were effected by Mississippi River flooding.
“If it’s too dangerous (for people to live there), why dump the responsibility on the taxpayer,”
eff that, you ignorant old baffoon. I guess we should all move away from the West Coast, due to the danger of earth quakes, everyone must leave Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas due to tornadoes....don't even get him started on the entire state of Hawaii.
-
Congress only has to agree with him on the social and economic issues. They don't have much say in foreign policy.
They hold the purse strings, and thus have a pretty damn good hold on Foreign policy as well. The President is not our Foreign Policy master.
LOL at Congress holding the purse strings on a man who wants to cut the budget anyway. What are they going to do, not fund the planes to fly the troops home?
Who is this man?
Obama and Pelosi, of course.
Ohhhhhh, my sarcasm meter must be broken. :lol:
-
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2090364,00.html
TIME MAGAZINE
-
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2090364,00.html
TIME MAGAZINE
post the whole thing, taint free
-
Your point was that the President is the soul master of foreign affairs...which is just wrong.
But let's look at the idiots more zany idea.
He want to cut FEMA funding....here's a nice little quote about Aid to people who were effected by Mississippi River flooding.
“If it’s too dangerous (for people to live there), why dump the responsibility on the taxpayer,”
eff that, you ignorant old baffoon. I guess we should all move away from the West Coast, due to the danger of earth quakes, everyone must leave Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas due to tornadoes....don't even get him started on the entire state of Hawaii.
I think you're missing the point. It's because the government fucks everything up, even disaster relief. Ask hurricane Katrina. It's another chance for the government to hire incompetent people with no accountability. Sometimes throwing more money at something doesn't make it better. Look at public schools. They suck. Besides that's why we have things like the Red Cross.
Not to mention, FEMA is the epitome of "big government". They have the power to displace entire populations, and can override the constitution for whatever reason they want, enact their own executive orders, among other things. It has bad news written all over it.
As far as the President and foreign policy, the job has just become a puppet for the corporations. Or, as George Carline would say, the "owners" of the country:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q&NR=1
EDIT: Ron Paul on FEMA in the first part of this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzzOxK1Z_BA&feature=player_embedded
Makes some really good points