goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: sys on July 19, 2011, 04:00:40 AM

Title: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: sys on July 19, 2011, 04:00:40 AM
forces him to admit how much ncaa restrictions on forcing players the eff out piss him the eff off.


http://cjonline.com/sports/2011-07-18/sports-classroom-stats-tough-track#.TiVFdWGvak0
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: steve dave on July 19, 2011, 07:12:38 AM
this is a very high quality piece for a towny paper.  squawkstin beak is a very good journalist....FOR A SQUAWK!
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 19, 2011, 07:37:25 AM
Why would the A.Q. Miller alumni publication write a feature article on someone that is so clearly a squawk? 

Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: steve dave on July 19, 2011, 07:40:20 AM
Why would the A.Q. Miller alumni publication write a feature article on someone that is so clearly a squawk? 

to be fair, it was just a "where are they now" alumni blurb.  he didn't get the 14 page pictoral like D.Scott.
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: pissclams on July 19, 2011, 07:58:43 AM
Quote from: Squawkstin Beak
In a valid contract, both sides receive something of value.

hmm.  this isn't always the case.   there are a lot of contracts that don't deal with any exchange of goods or services.  looks like squawkstin should have paid better attention in his business law class.



Squawkstin Beak does get very philosophical in the article.  i bet he was wearing his mortar board and glasses when he wrote the piece.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg812.imageshack.us%2Fimg812%2F4095%2F51919141.png&hash=9f0dd918b3cc76111f7e737ceaafe04cafe7d9f8)
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: wetwillie on July 19, 2011, 08:08:37 AM
Quote
“I was a transfer student, and I worked out pretty good,” K-State basketball coach Frank Martin said. “Why do we punish (coaches) because people transfer? I don’t understand.

“The reason it got put in was to prevent coaches from running players off. To a certain extent, now the players hold the coaches hostage. So if they don’t do what they’re supposed to do, you can’t run them off or else you pay a price.”



have to wade through some pretty hardcore DNR type material to get to this nugget.
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: steve dave on July 19, 2011, 08:11:47 AM
Quote from: Squawkstin Beak
In a valid contract, both sides receive something of value.

hmm.  this isn't always the case.   there are a lot of contracts that don't deal with any exchange of goods or services.  looks like squawkstin should have paid better attention in his business law class.

I think consideration is one of the three requirements for a valid contract (at least in the US).   May need studyingforthebarcat's or currentlyonthebeachcat's or ownsaponycat's input here though.  
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: pissclams on July 19, 2011, 08:18:03 AM
Quote from: Squawkstin Beak
In a valid contract, both sides receive something of value.

hmm.  this isn't always the case.   there are a lot of contracts that don't deal with any exchange of goods or services.  looks like squawkstin should have paid better attention in his business law class.

I think consideration is one of the three requirements for a valid contract (at least in the US).   May need studyingforthebarcat's or currentlyonthebeachcat's or ownsaponycat's input here though. 

hmm, after a little research on yours truly's part it turns out you're right.  sounds like i'm a complete dumbass.   
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: austin_meek on July 19, 2011, 08:36:44 AM
Quote from: Squawkstin Beak
In a valid contract, both sides receive something of value.

hmm.  this isn't always the case.   there are a lot of contracts that don't deal with any exchange of goods or services.  looks like squawkstin should have paid better attention in his business law class.

I think consideration is one of the three requirements for a valid contract (at least in the US).   May need studyingforthebarcat's or currentlyonthebeachcat's or ownsaponycat's input here though.  

One of many life lessons imparted to me by Bob Krause.
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: steve dave on July 19, 2011, 08:38:58 AM
Quote from: Squawkstin Beak
In a valid contract, both sides receive something of value.

hmm.  this isn't always the case.   there are a lot of contracts that don't deal with any exchange of goods or services.  looks like squawkstin should have paid better attention in his business law class.

I think consideration is one of the three requirements for a valid contract (at least in the US).   May need studyingforthebarcat's or currentlyonthebeachcat's or ownsaponycat's input here though.  

One of many life lessons imparted to me by Bob Krause.

You couldn't have picked a better mentor when it comes to contract law
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 19, 2011, 09:08:59 AM
From what I understand Bob Krause literally has pre-printed contract napkins with 2 large "X" at the bottom.

Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: steve dave on July 19, 2011, 09:18:26 AM
From what I understand Bob Krause literally has pre-printed contract napkins with 2 large "X" at the bottom.



that is actually a pretty great idea for bar napkins
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: slucat on July 19, 2011, 12:19:17 PM
From what I understand Bob Krause literally has pre-printed contract napkins with 2 large "X" at the bottom.



that is actually a pretty great idea for bar napkins
:thumbsup:
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: Kat Kid on July 19, 2011, 12:42:01 PM
From what I understand Bob Krause literally has pre-printed contract napkins with 2 large "X" at the bottom.



that is actually a pretty great idea for bar napkins

When you open your elite MHK brew pub "Assemblée" I will keep bar, run trivia, karaoke, and pictionary while serving every drink on those napkins.  Now go to culinary school.
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: pissclams on July 19, 2011, 01:22:20 PM
aaron mccargo junior didn't go to culinary school, he's the next food network star.  thoughts?
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: Kat Kid on July 19, 2011, 01:31:12 PM
aaron mccargo junior didn't go to culinary school, he's the next food network star.  thoughts?

Sometimes everything isn't about you clams.  Sometimes others need to follow their dreams.  Sometimes it takes some PI'ing to get it done.  You can work Monday's and Morning shifts.
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: Dugout DickStone on July 19, 2011, 01:39:03 PM
From what I understand Bob Krause literally has pre-printed contract napkins with 2 large "X" at the bottom.



that is actually a pretty great idea for bar napkins

When you open your elite MHK brew pub "Assemblée" I will keep bar, run trivia, karaoke, and pictionary while serving every drink on those napkins.  Now go to culinary school.

Trim and I know a great trivia guy, not available mondays.
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: jtksu on July 19, 2011, 01:42:25 PM
Schollies are only for one year anyway, right?
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: Clevey 2 Times on July 20, 2011, 08:36:10 AM
Schollies are only for one year anyway, right?

Yes, they are 1 year renewable, but I'm thinking the NCAA frowns on the consistent running off of your players. As in, there may be sanctions for doing that. Anyone?
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: steve dave on July 20, 2011, 08:38:08 AM
Schollies are only for one year anyway, right?

Yes, they are 1 year renewable, but I'm thinking the NCAA frowns on the consistent running off of your players. As in, there may be sanctions for doing that. Anyone?

no (unless they have bad grades as the squawkstin beak piece points out)
Title: Re: austin squawk tricks martin
Post by: pissclams on July 20, 2011, 09:03:27 AM
Schollies are only for one year anyway, right?

Yes, they are 1 year renewable, but I'm thinking the NCAA frowns on the consistent running off of your players. As in, there may be sanctions for doing that. Anyone?

a school's academic progress rate can be effected