goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Winters on July 10, 2011, 10:14:44 PM
-
I want to hear these f^3 passionate views I have been hearing all about :users:
-
:rolleyes:
-
2009 defense was better than 2010's.
-
powercatpat, what a rough ridin' treasure to this site.
-
K-State Wildcats 2009 won 4 conference games.
K-State Wildcats 2010 won 3 conference games.
K-State Wildcats 2009 was better.
-
Here's to bucking the trend: :drink:
-
K-State Wildcats 2009 won 4 conference games.
K-State Wildcats 2010 won 3 conference games.
K-State Wildcats 2009 was better.
yes. 2009 was better. 2010 team sucked.
-
powercatpat, what a effing treasure to this site.
Was my statement incorrect?
-
If freems woulda stayed the cats would have won the conference and beat boise state in the fiesta bowl. :horrorsurprise:
-
If freems woulda stayed the cats would have won the conference and beat boise state in the fiesta bowl. :horrorsurprise:
so he woulda played on defense?
-
If freems woulda stayed the cats would have won the conference and beat boise state in the fiesta bowl. :horrorsurprise:
so he woulda played on defense?
wouldnt have mattered, the beautiful would have put up fifty a game, and if you read manhatters defense thread you can see the 09 D' was solid.
-
The '09 D was better than the '10 D. They still weren't all that good. I do think K-State would have won the north with Freems, though.