goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: opcat on July 06, 2011, 09:40:57 PM

Title: Steele
Post by: opcat on July 06, 2011, 09:40:57 PM
http://www.610sports.com/episode_download.php?contentType=36&contentId=5371149
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: deputy dawg on July 07, 2011, 08:38:19 AM
Picks 'Cats to win 5 to 7 games.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: KITNfury on July 07, 2011, 09:46:52 AM
Picks 'Cats to win 5 to 7 games.
Actually, 5-9 games. Expects 6-7.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 07, 2011, 10:51:46 AM
Picks 'Cats to win 5 to 7 games.
Actually, 5-9 games. Expects 6-7.

Maybe Bill can coach the team up to 8. :drool:
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Winters on July 07, 2011, 03:45:25 PM
Picks 'Cats to win 5 to 7 games.
Actually, 5-9 games. Expects 6-7.

Maybe Bill can coach the team up to 8. :drool:
lol
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Pete on July 07, 2011, 04:03:12 PM
Picks 'Cats to win 5 to 7 games.
Actually, 5-9 games. Expects 6-7.

 :bracketmouse:
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: DQ12 on July 07, 2011, 04:08:10 PM
Seems about right to me.  7 in the regular season is definitely doable.  8 with a bowl game?  Could be!
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: KITNfury on July 07, 2011, 04:10:04 PM
Question: If you were guaranteed 8 wins, how would you divvy them up between OOC and conference wins?

Assume 8 wins in conference doesn't crown us champs.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 07, 2011, 04:13:17 PM
Question: If you were guaranteed 8 wins, how would you divvy them up between OOC and conference wins?

Assume 8 wins in conference doesn't crown us champs.

Miami
UT
OU
A&M
Tech
Baylor
Missouri
OSU
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: wetwillie on July 07, 2011, 04:15:41 PM
Question: If you were guaranteed 8 wins, how would you divvy them up between OOC and conference wins?

Assume 8 wins in conference doesn't crown us champs.

Miami
UT
OU
A&M
Tech
Baylor
Missouri
OSU

i'd do horrible disgusting things to win those games
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: MadCat on July 07, 2011, 04:16:15 PM
Question: If you were guaranteed 8 wins, how would you divvy them up between OOC and conference wins?

Assume 8 wins in conference doesn't crown us champs.

Moo
TexTech
ukans
paperclip
paperclip state
aTm
Texas
Farmageddon

We would be decently ranked at that point.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 07, 2011, 04:19:40 PM
Question: If you were guaranteed 8 wins, how would you divvy them up between OOC and conference wins?

Assume 8 wins in conference doesn't crown us champs.

Miami
UT
OU
A&M
Tech
Baylor
Missouri
OSU

i'd do horrible disgusting things to win those games

After season opening losses to Eastern Kentucky and Kent State, to finish the season with those wins would just be phenomenal.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Emo EMAW on July 07, 2011, 04:35:58 PM
You've got to be crazy (or emotionally detached) if KU isn't on your list.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 07, 2011, 04:39:02 PM
You've got to be crazy (or emotionally detached) if KU isn't on your list.

I don't know about you, but I don't typically circle the worst team on the schedule.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: deputy dawg on July 07, 2011, 04:41:49 PM
You've got to be crazy (or emotionally detached) if KU isn't on your list.

What losers would give up a win in Lawrence?  I'd rather lose to the fighting Havs.   Sheesh!
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: wetwillie on July 07, 2011, 04:49:00 PM
You've got to be crazy (or emotionally detached) if KU isn't on your list.

What losers would give up a win in Lawrence?  I'd rather lose to the fighting Havs.   Sheesh!

Losing to KU would be much more palatable than losing farmageddon
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 07, 2011, 05:00:18 PM
You've got to be crazy (or emotionally detached) if KU isn't on your list.

What losers would give up a win in Lawrence?  I'd rather lose to the fighting Havs.   Sheesh!

Sorry squawks, we refuse to be your rival.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Winters on July 07, 2011, 05:08:43 PM
You've got to be crazy (or emotionally detached) if KU isn't on your list.

What losers would give up a win in Lawrence?  I'd rather lose to the fighting Havs.   Sheesh!

Sorry squawks, we refuse to be your rival.
Two more outed
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Emo EMAW on July 08, 2011, 08:33:48 AM
I'll take those mentioned 8 wins and a loss to KU if it means we get a new coach?
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: MadCat on July 08, 2011, 12:00:53 PM
I'll take those mentioned 8 wins and a loss to KU if it means we get a new coach?

That would be like Xristmas for me.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: The Manhatter on July 11, 2011, 01:58:18 PM
Steele on Petro this morning.  "this will be the best team Snyder's had in a while"

what classifies as "in a while"?

calls Mizzou game a "toss-up".

that is a game I think Snyder wins this season.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: wetwillie on July 11, 2011, 02:00:06 PM
Steele on Petro this morning.  "this will be the best team Snyder's had in a while"

what classifies as "in a while"?

calls Mizzou game a "toss-up".

that is a game I think Snyder wins this season.

Confidence Rising :excited:
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: KITNfury on July 11, 2011, 02:07:52 PM
Steele on Petro this morning.  "this will be the best team Snyder's had in a while"

what classifies as "in a while"?

calls Mizzou game a "toss-up".

that is a game I think Snyder wins this season.
This is particularly strange considering how much weight Steele gives to returning starts on the OL. Must think a lot of our other issues from last year will be addressed to overlook the OL inexperience.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: DQ12 on July 11, 2011, 02:13:15 PM
Steele on Petro this morning.  "this will be the best team Snyder's had in a while"

what classifies as "in a while"?

calls Mizzou game a "toss-up".

that is a game I think Snyder wins this season.
This is particularly strange considering how much weight Steele gives to returning starts on the OL. Must think a lot of our other issues from last year will be addressed to overlook the OL inexperience.
An average (~60th, national) defense with numbers close to last year's offense, would win 7 or 8 games.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 11, 2011, 02:16:41 PM
Steele on Petro this morning.  "this will be the best team Snyder's had in a while"

what classifies as "in a while"?

calls Mizzou game a "toss-up".

that is a game I think Snyder wins this season.
This is particularly strange considering how much weight Steele gives to returning starts on the OL. Must think a lot of our other issues from last year will be addressed to overlook the OL inexperience.
An average (~60th, national) defense with numbers close to last year's offense, would win 7 or 8 games.

Last year's offense combined with last year's shitty defense won 7 games.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: DQ12 on July 11, 2011, 02:20:45 PM
Steele on Petro this morning.  "this will be the best team Snyder's had in a while"

what classifies as "in a while"?

calls Mizzou game a "toss-up".

that is a game I think Snyder wins this season.
This is particularly strange considering how much weight Steele gives to returning starts on the OL. Must think a lot of our other issues from last year will be addressed to overlook the OL inexperience.
An average (~60th, national) defense with numbers close to last year's offense, would win 7 or 8 games.

Last year's offense combined with last year's shitty defense won 7 games.
Ok, well if we played last year's schedule this year you may have a relevant point, dumbass.
Title: Re: Steele
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 11, 2011, 02:23:09 PM
Steele on Petro this morning.  "this will be the best team Snyder's had in a while"

what classifies as "in a while"?

calls Mizzou game a "toss-up".

that is a game I think Snyder wins this season.
This is particularly strange considering how much weight Steele gives to returning starts on the OL. Must think a lot of our other issues from last year will be addressed to overlook the OL inexperience.
An average (~60th, national) defense with numbers close to last year's offense, would win 7 or 8 games.

Last year's offense combined with last year's shitty defense won 7 games.
Ok, well if we played last year's schedule this year you may have a relevant point, dumbass.

This year's schedule isn't that much tougher. Last year's team would have still won 6 games this year.