goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: OregonSmock on July 06, 2011, 01:50:28 PM
-
Please enjoy.
http://hoopmixtape.ning.com/video/top-ten-dunkers-in-the-class?xg_source=shorten_twitter (http://hoopmixtape.ning.com/video/top-ten-dunkers-in-the-class?xg_source=shorten_twitter)
:bracketmouse:
-
:flush:
-
Wasn't selby a pretty good dunker?
-
Wasn't selby a pretty good dunker?
pretty great...not as good as wally judge though
-
Wasn't selby a pretty good dunker?
Pretty sure his dunking capabilities were of Tea-bagging status
-
Wasn't selby a pretty good dunker?
Pretty sure his dunking capabilities were of Tea-bagging status
McLemore probably would have tea-bagged all sorts of dudes if Ben hadn't dropped his patented hex on him.
-
great, i always loved kenny gregory's slam dunks. not a great player by any measure, but he could jump.
-
great, i always loved kenny gregory's slam dunks. not a great player by any measure, but he could jump.
remember that 2-handed dunk he had against KSU (or maybe it was MU) when he went up super high? he played above the rim.
-
great, i always loved kenny gregory's slam dunks. not a great player by any measure, but he could jump.
i've reported this, but i encourage all of the rest of you to do the same. excess in the defense of emaw is no vice.
-
Wasn't selby a pretty good dunker?
Pretty sure his dunking capabilities were of Tea-bagging status
McLemore probably would have tea-bagged all sorts of dudes if Ben hadn't dropped his patented hex on him.
His threads usually turn out so well... :flush:
-
Surely one of you loyal 'cat fans can find a list of the Top 10 Cubans in the class of 2011. There's gotta be one out there... somewhere.
:kstategrad:
-
Surely one of you loyal 'cat fans can find a list of the Top 10 Cubans in the class of 2011. There's gotta be one out there... somewhere.
:kstategrad:
this sounds like tea party racism
-
Surely one of you loyal 'cat fans can find a list of the Top 10 Cubans in the class of 2011. There's gotta be one out there... somewhere.
1) Paco Gomez Gonzalez
2) Javier Sancho
3) Jose Jose
4) Guillermo Martinez
5) Rocco Mommo Fako
Sorry guys, there's only 5 Cubans in the class of 2011. The rest of the Cuban dudes are out banging the beautiful Cuban señoritas.
OMFG, :lol:
Thanks guys
PBX
-
:eek: PBX bringing it strong! el toro!
-
Beems used to brag about having signed kids in the top 10 overall, now he brags about having good dunkers. Since the 5* kids have soured on Self and KU maybe they can check into remaining eligibility of the Mixtape players?
-
Beems used to brag about having signed kids in the top 10 overall, now he brags about having good dunkers. Since the 5* kids have soured on Self and KU maybe they can check into remaining eligibility of the Mixtape players?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi259.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fhh289%2FEMBiZZLExBABY%2FProfessor-1.jpg&hash=9d582175ec67e126618bde120b43b858eb3b81e9)
-
in all seriousness. this thread is a very positive sign from a k-state fan perspective.
-
Serious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit?
-
Now he's hyping top 35 recruits! :lol:
-
Serious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit?
Two years ago. He was a big-time dunker too. Shows you how relevant that is to being a big-time player.
-
Serious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the-mainboard.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2Fdefault%2FW8vNc.gif&hash=8fb762cde1ad5d5570d6aa968a3ffc2285d5ac2f)
-
Serious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit?
Dude. You are getting pounded. Just quit on this one.
-
Serious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the-mainboard.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2Fdefault%2Fkutard.png&hash=652fd32057cbb0bfd6bfafb308bc5cc138731f50)
-
omg :lol:
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gifsoup.com%2Fimager.php%3Fid%3D2325880%26amp%3Bt%3Do&hash=d9b52e6599d36dc6dd463b9df7c1fed9e5152422) (http://www.gifsoup.com/view/2325880/sad-bill-cosby.html)
-
Serious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit?
Two years ago. He was a big-time dunker too. Shows you how relevant that is to being a big-time player.
Shows you what happens to highly ranked prospects when they commit to K-State. No wonder your coaching staff had to cancel their elite camp.
-
Serious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit?
Dude. You are getting pounded. Just quit on this one.
Get to work on that top 10 Cubans of 2011 list. TIA.
-
Serious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit?
Dude. You are getting pounded. Just quit on this one.
Get to work on that top 10 Cubans of 2011 list. TIA.
Can you help me with a Top 10 Canadians who lied about offers from real schools list?
-
Any updates on that list of Rican junior national team members who will play for KU next year? TIA.
-
Serious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit?
Two years ago. He was a big-time dunker too. Shows you how relevant that is to being a big-time player.
Shows you what happens to highly ranked prospects when they commit to K-State. No wonder your coaching staff had to cancel their elite camp.
Didn't you guys turn last year's number 1 recruit into a 1 and done second rounder?
-
Shows you what happens to highly ranked prospects when they commit to K-State.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FtSIWU.jpg&hash=ead3f2ad76475f8c3660f28b86e692919553868a)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fj9Zu5.jpg&hash=0a1d95f985afe95cc715594af4b30de568fef25e)
-
Shows you what happens to highly ranked prospects when they commit to K-State.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FtSIWU.jpg&hash=ead3f2ad76475f8c3660f28b86e692919553868a)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fj9Zu5.jpg&hash=0a1d95f985afe95cc715594af4b30de568fef25e)
:lol:
-
Kansas: Four lottery picks in two years
K-State: Nothing
:lol:
-
Kansas: Four lottery picks in two years
K-State: Nothing
:lol:
Why don't you just edit your posts rather than deleting and having to retype the whole thing for minor modifications?
-
Kansas: Four lottery picks in two years
K-State: Nothing
:lol:
Why don't you just edit your posts rather than deleting and having to retype the whole thing for minor modifications?
:confused:
-
12-1 has got Ben reeling.
Meanwhile Cats fans are partying like Hope and Abbie.
-
12-1 has got Ben reeling.
Meanwhile Cats fans are partying like Hope and Abbie.
12-1... wasn't that KU's record in football the year they won the Orange Bowl? Has K-State ever had a 12-win season before?
:users:
-
Even a time machine can't "win the north!"
-
ouch.
-
Even a time machine can't "win the north!"
Neither can K-State.
-
Kansas: Four lottery picks in two years
K-State: Nothing
:lol:
Why don't you just edit your posts rather than deleting and having to retype the whole thing for minor modifications?
:confused:
You make a post, immediately decide to alter something in it and delete it entirely and post something virtually identical right away. Sometimes you just delete it entirely though.
-
:surprised:
-
Even a time machine can't "win the north!"
Neither can K-State.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Football_Championship_Game (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Football_Championship_Game)
3 North titles vs. 0, you're really killing it today dumbass :flush:
-
Even a time machine can't "win the north!"
Neither can K-State.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Football_Championship_Game (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Football_Championship_Game)
3 North titles vs. 0, you're really killing it today dumbass :flush:
Yes, I realize that K-State had a nice little ten year stretch in football where you guys didn't suck total balls. Still, that doesn't change the fact that K-State hasn't even come close to winning the North, or a bowl game for that matter, in almost a decade.
-
yeah we lost the pinstripe bowl by a pretty sizable margin :shakesfist:
-
Even a time machine can't "win the north!"
Neither can K-State.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Football_Championship_Game (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Football_Championship_Game)
3 North titles vs. 0, you're really killing it today dumbass :flush:
Yes, I realize that K-State had a nice little ten year stretch in football where you guys didn't suck total balls. Still, that doesn't change the fact that K-State hasn't even come close to winning the North, or a bowl game for that matter, in almost a decade.
If we would have beat Nebraska in 2009 we would have won the north. :dunno:
-
Even a time machine can't "win the north!"
Neither can K-State.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Football_Championship_Game (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Football_Championship_Game)
3 North titles vs. 0, you're really killing it today dumbass :flush:
Yes, I realize that K-State had a nice little ten year stretch in football where you guys didn't suck total balls. Still, that doesn't change the fact that K-State hasn't even come close to winning the North, or a bowl game for that matter, in almost a decade.
If we would have beat Nebraska in 2009 we would have won the north. :dunno:
This is hilarious but true
-
I kinda feel bad for beems in this thread
-
I kinda feel bad for beems in this thread
His sports IQ is surprisingly low for someone who stalks this board.
-
When all else fails, cling to semantics.
:thumbsup:
-
When all else fails, cling to semantics.
:thumbsup:
Poor people tend to use words wrong...like you just did.
-
When all else fails, cling to semantics.
:thumbsup:
Poor people tend to use words wrong...like you just did.
No, I used "semantics" correctly. They must not teach English/writing at K-State. No wonder you guys are so poor.
-
13-1 has made you dumber. So desparately poor
-
Man, Beems is getting worked like a cheap whore in this thread.
-
Idiot
semantics [Gr.,=significant] in general, the study of the relationship between words and meanings. The empirical study of word meanings and sentence meanings in existing languages is a branch of linguistics; the abstract study of meaning in relation to language or symbolic logic systems is a branch of philosophy. Both are called semantics. The field of semantics has three basic concerns: the relations of words to the objects denoted by them, the relations of words to the interpreters of them, and, in symbolic logic, the formal relations of signs to one another (syntax).
In linguistics, semantics has its beginnings in France and Germany in the 1820s when the meanings of words as significant features in the growth of language was recognized. Among the foremost linguistic semanticists of the 20th cent. are Gustaf Stern, Jost Trier, B. L. Whorf, Uriel Weinreich, Stephen Ullmann, Thomas Sebeok, Noam Chomsky, Jerrold Katz, and Charles Osgood. In the linguistics of recent years an offshoot of transformational grammar theory has reemphasized the role of meaning in linguistic analysis. This new theory, developed largely by George Lakoff and James McCawley, is termed generative semantics. In anthropology a new theoretical orientation related to linguistic semantics has been developed. Its leading proponents include W. H. Goodenough, F. G. Lounsbury, and Claude Lévi-Strauss.
In philosophy, semantics has generally followed the lead of symbolic logic, and many philosophers do not make a distinction between logic and semantics. In this context, semantics is concerned with such issues as meaning and truth, meaning and thought, and the relation between signs and what they mean. The leading practitioners have been Gottlob Frege, Lady Welby, Bertrand Russell, Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap, Alonzo Church, Alfred Tarski, C. I. Lewis, Ludwig Wittgenstein, J. L. Austin, W. V. Quine, P. F. Strawson, Steven Schiffer, John Searle, H. P. Grice, Saul Kripke, Donald Davidson, and Gilbert Harman.
Since the publication of the influential The Meaning of Meaning (1925) by C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards, semantics has also become important to literary criticism and stylistics, in which the way that metaphors evoke feelings is investigated and differences between ordinary and literary language are studied. A related discipline, general semantics (so called to distinguish it from semantics in linguistics or philosophy), studies the ways in which meanings of words influence human behavior. General semantics was developed by Alfred Korzybski. The key term in Korzybski's system is evaluation, the mental act that is performed by the hearer when a word is spoken. Among the most prominent followers of Korzybski are Stuart Chase, S. I. Hayakawa, and H. L. Weinberg.
Bibliography
A useful introduction to general semantics is H. L. Weinberg, Levels of Knowing and Existence (1959) and F. R. Palmer, Semantics (1981). For semantics in linguistics, see S. Ullman, Semantics (1962) and The Principles of Semantics (1957, repr. 1967); N. Chomsky, Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar (1972); G. Leach, Semantics (1974); and J. Lyons, Language, Meaning, and Context (1981). For semantics in philosophy, see R. Carnap, Meaning and Necessity (2d ed. 1956); K. and A. Lehrer, The Theory of Meaning (1970); J. F. Rosenberg and C. Travis, ed., Readings in the Philosophy of Language (1971); and D. Davidson and G. Harman, ed., Semantics of Natural Language (2d ed. 1973). For semantics in literary criticism, see K. Burke, A Rhetoric of Motives (1950) and A Grammar of Motives (1955) and the works of W. Empson and P. Wheelwright.
-
Semantics = the relationship between words and meanings.
Clinging to semantics = getting caught up on the fact that I wrote "K-State hasn't come close to winning a bowl game or Big 12 North title in almost a decade."
- "close" being the interpretive term.
There's your lesson for the day, dumbass.
:flush:
-
You have to be joking. No one is so dumb.
-
You have to be joking. No one is so dumb.
It's official. They don't teach English at K-State.
:facepalm:
-
Semantics (from Greek s?mantiká, neuter plural of s?mantikós)[1][2] is the study of meaning. It focuses on the relation between signifiers, such as words, phrases, signs and symbols, and what they stand for, their denotata.
Linguistic semantics is the study of meaning that is used by humans to express themselves through language. Other forms of semantics include the semantics of programming languages, formal logics, and semiotics.
The word "semantics" itself denotes a range of ideas, from the popular to the highly technical. It is often used in ordinary language to denote a problem of understanding that comes down to word selection or connotation. This problem of understanding has been the subject of many formal inquiries, over a long period of time, most notably in the field of formal semantics. In linguistics, it is the study of interpretation of signs or symbols as used by agents or communities within particular circumstances and contexts.[3] Within this view, sounds, facial expressions, body language, proxemics have semantic (meaningful) content, and each has several branches of study. In written language, such things as paragraph structure and punctuation have semantic content; in other forms of language, there is other semantic content.[3]
Go back to school, son.
-
You have to be joking. No one is so dumb.
It's official. They don't teach English at K-State.
:facepalm:
So you just admit you used the wrong word? You aren't helping yourself. No wonder you are poor.
More semantics?
-
You have to be joking. No one is so dumb.
It's official. They don't teach English at K-State.
:facepalm:
So you just admit you used the wrong word? You aren't helping yourself. No wonder you are poor.
More semantics?
Hey, at least you learned a new word today.
:kstategrad:
-
Tapout
-
Semantics = the relationship between words and meanings.
Clinging to semantics = getting caught up on the fact that I wrote "K-State hasn't come close to winning a bowl game or Big 12 North title in almost a decade."
- "close" being the interpretive term.
There's your lesson for the day, dumbass.
:flush:
So one game away from winning the North title two years ago does not equal being close in almost a decade?
Which word do you not understand? Close or Decade?
-
it's a new area of study in the philosophy of the english language. hypersemanticbole. :kstategrad:
-
I am not a fan of the U Mad? usage around here, but JFC, this one is marvelous.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi825.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz177%2Fcnscasey%2FBeazumad.jpg%3Ft%3D1310741988&hash=30620f0716fef13798beae4a6ba324a9fe02c4c7)
-
using that logic, ku wasn't close to winning the north in '07.