goemaw.com

General Discussion => Essentially Flyertalk => Topic started by: CHONGS on April 25, 2011, 11:08:01 AM

Title: Banning of Socks
Post by: CHONGS on April 25, 2011, 11:08:01 AM
Ok guys, once again we get something from the higher ups.  I guess sitting around in oak furniture is getting boring and they want more "input" into the daily operations of the site.  I can't say too much, but there is a strong possibility that we might be getting a new "independent" super-mod to oversee this particular site.  Anyway answer away.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Johnny Wichita on April 25, 2011, 11:24:10 AM
No. 
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: WillieWatanabe on April 25, 2011, 11:24:31 AM
only the bad ones.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: TracyCat on April 25, 2011, 11:24:41 AM
No. 
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: steve dave on April 25, 2011, 11:37:45 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: The1BigWillie on April 25, 2011, 12:00:08 PM
Could you please list the socks? 
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: wetwillie on April 25, 2011, 12:11:32 PM
slippery slope here fellas, today's forecast calls for afternoon mod abuse giving way to ban's in the late evening.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: OK_Cat on April 25, 2011, 12:35:15 PM
i think we need more socks
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: I_have_purplewood on April 25, 2011, 12:41:11 PM
Can't remember the last good sock we've had?  All the way back to KSUfans I think.. :dunno: (ftp://:dunno:)
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: wes mantooth on April 25, 2011, 12:55:22 PM
time to migrate to goepaw.com.  :bracketmouse:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: CHONGS on April 25, 2011, 01:00:24 PM
Could you please list the socks?  
As of this time that would be a violation of our privacy policy.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: michigancat on April 25, 2011, 01:13:53 PM
I voted for yes and no.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on April 25, 2011, 01:43:33 PM
Everyone must wear the Jesus shoes and don't be unfashionable doing it.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: 8manpick on April 25, 2011, 03:45:15 PM
only when worn in conjunction with sandals
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: PowercatPat on April 25, 2011, 04:53:07 PM
Could you please list the socks? 


Please, the KU-Duke sock.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: kso_FAN on April 25, 2011, 04:54:49 PM
This is what this board would be like if all socks were banned:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.selectism.com%2Fnews%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F08%2Fharvard-yard-00.jpg&hash=f8844d4337a5831c7b103e77c9f90953305fddd3)
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: CHONGS on April 25, 2011, 04:56:11 PM
be sure to vote guys, we value your input

remember your vote is confidential, no one (not even the mods) can see how you voted, so there will definitely be no penalty if you vote in a manner that you think would be unpopular with the administration

 
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: 0.42 on April 25, 2011, 05:04:42 PM
:dubious:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: felix rex on April 25, 2011, 05:41:15 PM
This is what this board would be like if all socks were banned:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.selectism.com%2Fnews%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F08%2Fharvard-yard-00.jpg&hash=f8844d4337a5831c7b103e77c9f90953305fddd3)

no downside imo. looks fantastic.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Benja on April 25, 2011, 06:08:27 PM
This is what this board would be like if all socks were banned:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.selectism.com%2Fnews%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F08%2Fharvard-yard-00.jpg&hash=f8844d4337a5831c7b103e77c9f90953305fddd3)

no downside imo. looks fantastic.

that first outfit especially. my god.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Benja on April 25, 2011, 06:09:37 PM
Could you please list the socks? 
As of this time that would be a violation of our privacy policy.

lol. policies. lol.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Benja on April 25, 2011, 06:10:16 PM
be sure to vote guys, we value your input


i absolutely will not.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Benja on April 25, 2011, 06:14:44 PM
This is what this board would be like if all socks were banned:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.selectism.com%2Fnews%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F08%2Fharvard-yard-00.jpg&hash=f8844d4337a5831c7b103e77c9f90953305fddd3)

no downside imo. looks fantastic.

that first outfit especially. my god.

oh... this is a joke about literally banning socks. thought it was a post concerning shirt tucking or something.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: pike on April 25, 2011, 06:17:51 PM
This would be like the government labeling people in the general population as "terrorists" and then locking them up. So, no.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: kso_FAN on April 25, 2011, 08:52:14 PM
This is what this board would be like if all socks were banned:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.selectism.com%2Fnews%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F08%2Fharvard-yard-00.jpg&hash=f8844d4337a5831c7b103e77c9f90953305fddd3)

no downside imo. looks fantastic.

that first outfit especially. my god.

oh... this is a joke about literally banning socks. thought it was a post concerning shirt tucking or something.

Perhaps there is a connection between tucking and socks?  :ck:

Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Benja on April 25, 2011, 09:48:27 PM
This is what this board would be like if all socks were banned:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.selectism.com%2Fnews%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F08%2Fharvard-yard-00.jpg&hash=f8844d4337a5831c7b103e77c9f90953305fddd3)

no downside imo. looks fantastic.

that first outfit especially. my god.

oh... this is a joke about literally banning socks. thought it was a post concerning shirt tucking or something.

Perhaps there is a connection between tucking and socks?  :ck:



will look into this.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Panjandrum on April 25, 2011, 10:18:52 PM
Could you please list the socks? 
As of this time that would be a violation of our privacy policy.

lol. policies. lol.

I was surprised to learn we had a policy.  Any policy.

I vote that all policies are debated in a similar fashion to the British House of Commons.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Benja on April 25, 2011, 10:43:47 PM
Could you please list the socks? 
As of this time that would be a violation of our privacy policy.

lol. policies. lol.

I was surprised to learn we had a policy.  Any policy.

I vote that all policies are debated in a similar fashion to the British House of Commons.

As was I. I vote that we adopt, as a rule, a policy to have no policies. Although, I guess that plan does in fact require a minimum of at least one policy.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Panjandrum on April 25, 2011, 10:48:22 PM
Could you please list the socks? 
As of this time that would be a violation of our privacy policy.

lol. policies. lol.

I was surprised to learn we had a policy.  Any policy.

I vote that all policies are debated in a similar fashion to the British House of Commons.

As was I. I vote that we adopt, as a rule, a policy to have no policies. Although, I guess that plan does in fact require a minimum of at least one policy.

Let the debate commence.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff178%2Fgsybe%2Fthe_british_house_of_commons_1834_1.jpg&hash=a38996e9e16d38e96e702871ac823d647235e19d)
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Benja on April 25, 2011, 10:55:58 PM
Could you please list the socks? 
As of this time that would be a violation of our privacy policy.

lol. policies. lol.

I was surprised to learn we had a policy.  Any policy.

I vote that all policies are debated in a similar fashion to the British House of Commons.

As was I. I vote that we adopt, as a rule, a policy to have no policies. Although, I guess that plan does in fact require a minimum of at least one policy.

Let the debate commence.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff178%2Fgsybe%2Fthe_british_house_of_commons_1834_1.jpg&hash=a38996e9e16d38e96e702871ac823d647235e19d)

lol. who painted a picture of the last goEMAW convention? can't tell if that's from last quarters convention pak or the one before it.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: WildCatzPhreak on April 26, 2011, 09:48:07 AM
Does this mean BSAC's sock will also get banned? :ohno:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: kougar24 on April 26, 2011, 12:21:33 PM
i vote no, seeing as how i'm a long-term sock of Stacey Dean.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: felix rex on April 26, 2011, 12:55:34 PM
i vote no, seeing as how i'm a long-term sock of Stacey Dean.

LISTEN UP I GOT THE 411 ON THE HOTTEST SOCKS LOOKING TO JOIN THE POWERCAT NATION!!!!!
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: wetwillie on April 26, 2011, 12:57:04 PM
I suppose I have been operating on the assumption there are only 10-15 real people on the site and that the rest are socks of these people. Banning them all seems silly.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: OK_Cat on April 26, 2011, 01:10:56 PM
I suppose I have been operating on the assumption there are only 10-15 real people on the site and that the rest are socks of these people. Banning them all seems silly.

15 is a little high.  more like 6 or 7 real people.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: kso_FAN on April 26, 2011, 01:17:52 PM
I suppose I have been operating on the assumption there are only 10-15 real people on the site and that the rest are socks of these people. Banning them all seems silly.

15 is a little high.  more like 6 or 7 real people.

Or posters steve dave controls using telepathy.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Benja on April 26, 2011, 01:57:41 PM
lol. being a sock seems like a lot of work you rough ridin' dorks.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: kso_FAN on April 26, 2011, 02:25:34 PM
lol. being a sock seems like a lot of work you effing dorks.

Stop steve dave!
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: felix rex on April 26, 2011, 02:56:22 PM
lol. being a sock seems like a lot of work you effing dorks.

Stop steve dave!

I heard he churns socks like he does credits cards!  :surprised:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: The Whale on April 26, 2011, 04:33:13 PM
Banning all of the socks makes it hard to keep the membership numbers up. 

Without the high membership numbers, it makes it harder for bosz56 to make another expensive mistake.


So, if anything, we need more socks.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Benja on April 26, 2011, 04:42:46 PM
lol. being a sock seems like a lot of work you effing dorks.

Stop steve dave!

No, denied.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Stevesie60 on April 26, 2011, 06:39:13 PM
lol. being a sock seems like a lot of work you effing dorks.

Stop steve dave!

Squawk outed.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Panjandrum on April 26, 2011, 09:25:35 PM
lol. being a sock seems like a lot of work you effing dorks.

Stop steve dave!

I'm having a mental breakdown here.  Who here is steve dave?  Are you steve dave?  AM I STEVE DAVE????
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Benja on April 26, 2011, 09:27:44 PM
lol. being a sock seems like a lot of work you effing dorks.

Stop steve dave!

I'm having a mental breakdown here.  Who here is steve dave?  Are you steve dave?  AM I STEVE DAVE????

steve dave is a state of mind.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: wetwillie on April 26, 2011, 09:59:32 PM
I have changed my mind. Ban all the socks.  I want to see how far down this rabbit hole goes.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: HAL 9000 on April 26, 2011, 11:44:41 PM
I'm sorry, Chingon. I'm afraid I cannot allow that to happen.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Panjandrum on April 27, 2011, 12:42:56 AM
I'm sorry, Chingon. I'm afraid I cannot allow that to happen.


:horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: OK_Cat on April 27, 2011, 09:11:53 AM
 :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: kso_FAN on April 27, 2011, 09:41:56 AM
I'm sorry, Chingon. I'm afraid I cannot allow that to happen.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F04%2Fmonolith.jpg&hash=ef4e9df6ed4d173baf1008d26f5056835e028e16)
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: bakerman on April 27, 2011, 09:42:29 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: threadrater on April 27, 2011, 11:16:34 AM
F MOTHERFUCKING MINUS
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: The Laundromat on April 27, 2011, 01:19:02 PM
 :users:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: WillieWatanabe on April 27, 2011, 02:54:15 PM
 :ck:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: jtksu on April 27, 2011, 03:29:24 PM
I always thought that Steve Dave was Saul The Jew's sock?
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: OK_Cat on April 27, 2011, 04:16:32 PM
:users:

SOCK!
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: SonofLeonPatton on April 27, 2011, 04:36:26 PM
eff 'em. Ban 'em.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Stevesie60 on April 27, 2011, 04:39:57 PM
I'm sorry, Chingon. I'm afraid I cannot allow that to happen.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F04%2Fmonolith.jpg&hash=ef4e9df6ed4d173baf1008d26f5056835e028e16)

So......

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi815.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz78%2FStevesie60%2F2001monkeys.jpg&hash=54178dd089ff8501c5011cbbdb690aced42dbe79)

 :dunno:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: OK_Cat on April 27, 2011, 04:40:53 PM
eff 'em. Ban 'em.

pffffffft
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Benja on April 27, 2011, 06:07:50 PM
wow. good job everyone.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: "storm"nut on April 28, 2011, 11:23:09 AM
Just to clear the air. I'm not a sock. I'm real
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: OK_Cat on April 28, 2011, 11:27:12 AM
Just to clear the air. I'm not a sock. I'm real

sounds like something a sock would say
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: kso_FAN on April 28, 2011, 01:23:33 PM
I'm thinking about 3 unique posters have posted in this thread. Maybe 4.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: 0.42 on April 28, 2011, 03:23:02 PM
Just to clear the air. I'm not a sock. I'm real

a poster with quotes around their name has to be a sock.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: OK_Cat on April 28, 2011, 03:56:34 PM
I'm thinking about 3 unique posters have posted in this thread. Maybe 4.

i'm a trim sock
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Panjandrum on April 28, 2011, 09:49:32 PM
I'm thinking about 3 unique posters have posted in this thread. Maybe 4.

You're only contributing to my identity crisis.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on April 29, 2011, 01:43:45 PM
I pretty much always wear socks so if they get banned I don't know what I would do.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on April 29, 2011, 07:18:36 PM
I pretty much always wear socks so if they get banned I don't know what I would do.

Same here. Shoes get really smelly without socks.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: jtksu on April 29, 2011, 07:43:32 PM
Have a pair of Steve Madden boat shoes that have some sort of special liner so you can wear them barefoot.  I've worn them like 3 times and they're now the only stinky shoes I have.  Good thing I'm so incredibly rich or I would be mad about wasting that kind of money.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: MadCat on May 02, 2011, 12:22:06 PM
You are all figments of my imagination.  In fact, I am in an asylum, staring at a wall, thinking that I'm actually typing at a keyboard...or maybe I'm a recruit staring at OB's wall.  I'm thinking of committing.  Go Cats.  :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: 8manpick on July 30, 2011, 11:40:48 AM
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on July 30, 2011, 12:14:59 PM
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

the fact that i've been able to post as steve dave and rick daris for the past three years is pretty amazing though you have to admit.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: steve dave on July 30, 2011, 12:18:23 PM
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

there really aren't as many as you think.  there are a couple obvious ones but most of the dumbasses that you think are socks are just dumbasses
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: KSUBrian on July 30, 2011, 12:25:52 PM
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

there really aren't as many as you think.  there are a couple obvious ones but most of the dumbasses that you think are socks are just dumbasses

You're right.  I am not a sock. :drink: :driving:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: 8manpick on July 30, 2011, 01:20:55 PM
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

there really aren't as many as you think.  there are a couple obvious ones but most of the dumbasses that you think are socks are just dumbasses

Oh no. This is a worse problem. My goodness.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: bubbles4ksu on July 30, 2011, 05:52:38 PM
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

there really aren't as many as you think.  there are a couple obvious ones but most of the dumbasses that you think are socks are just dumbasses

Oh no. This is a worse problem. My goodness.

So there needs to be a banning of dumbasses then. Simple as that.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: ChiComCat on July 30, 2011, 06:14:56 PM
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

there really aren't as many as you think.  there are a couple obvious ones but most of the dumbasses that you think are socks are just dumbasses

Oh no. This is a worse problem. My goodness.

So there needs to be a banning of dumbasses then. Simple as that.

Meh, thats why PI is encouraged.  And if we banned dumbasses, we would never have got the the almost platable jtksu that we now have.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Playboy X on July 30, 2011, 06:55:06 PM
man it's almost like i want to take these bitches and just put slugs in them, son.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: I_have_purplewood on July 31, 2011, 11:05:12 AM
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

there really aren't as many as you think.  there are a couple obvious ones but most of the dumbasses that you think are socks are just dumbasses


Oh no. This is a worse problem. My goodness.

So there needs to be a banning of dumbasses then. Simple as that.
:ohno: :ohno: (ftp://:ohno: :ohno:)
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: SwiftCat on July 31, 2011, 11:58:03 AM
The key to being a sock is to lay low, build up a solid number of posts without being noticed, and then go to work.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on July 31, 2011, 12:25:02 PM
scoops callahan would be a good example of someone that you might think is a sock but isn't. should change his name to scoops notasock maybe.  or maybe just have notasock as a middle name. scoops n callahan.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: wabash909 on July 31, 2011, 12:43:13 PM
scoops callahan would be a good example of someone that you might think is a sock but isn't. should change his name to scoops notasock maybe.  or maybe just have notasock as a middle name. scoops n callahan.

Good point, Daris. I mistakenly believed for the longest time that Tannoudji was a "sock", for instance, until I met him at the last goEMAW convention and totally realized he was a real person, with real thoughts, and real conservative values.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Stevesie60 on July 31, 2011, 01:46:49 PM
I didn't realize until a couple weeks ago that Trim was a sock. Good work to whoever has been maintaining that one.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on July 31, 2011, 02:09:21 PM
I didn't realize until a couple weeks ago that Trim was a sock. Good work to whoever has been maintaining that one.

I always thought that trim was one of the more obvious socks.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: OK_Cat on August 01, 2011, 10:40:27 AM
i know for a fact that one of the "big time" posters here is a sock of another "big time" poster.

 :horrorsurprise:

Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Panjandrum on August 01, 2011, 10:49:41 AM
i know for a fact that one of the "big time" posters here is a sock of another "big time" poster.

 :horrorsurprise:



You can't trust anyone around here.  :shakesfist:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: kim carnes on August 01, 2011, 10:50:46 AM
i know for a fact that one of the "big time" posters here is a sock of another "big time" poster.

 :horrorsurprise:



There are "big time" posters here?  Hmm...
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: OK_Cat on August 01, 2011, 10:51:48 AM
 :comeatme:  bring it, kim carnes
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: felix rex on August 01, 2011, 11:25:07 AM
the fact that i've been able to post as steve dave and rick daris for the past three years is pretty amazing though you have to admit.

pffft. pissclams/chum1 has been around since 05.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on August 01, 2011, 12:21:33 PM
the fact that i've been able to post as steve dave and rick daris for the past three years is pretty amazing though you have to admit.

pffft. pissclams/chum1 has been around since 05.

chum1 is actually russ briggs. no idea who pissclams is.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: felix rex on August 02, 2011, 06:01:44 AM
the fact that i've been able to post as steve dave and rick daris for the past three years is pretty amazing though you have to admit.

pffft. pissclams/chum1 has been around since 05.

chum1 is actually russ briggs. no idea who pissclams is.

someone told me who poetwarrior was, but i didn't believe them. not because it didn't sound right, but because i want to believe.
Title: Re: How Many Socks do you have?
Post by: chunkles on August 05, 2011, 10:01:31 PM
have you consolidated your socks?  Discuss the benefits you gain by having multiple sock accounts.  I think I'm way behind on this and need to know my options. 
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Katpappy on August 11, 2012, 11:17:50 PM
Hey guys I got something to confess... I am a sock of Katdaddy.  :gocho:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: Bloodfart on August 12, 2012, 12:34:39 AM
 :peek: I have a sock.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: BushBlister on August 12, 2012, 01:21:53 AM
what's a sock

the only socks I care about are the ones I put on right before put on my Shaq-fu Reeboc pumps and dunk on your face
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 12, 2012, 01:32:44 AM
:peek: I have a sock.
  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: HeinBallz on August 12, 2012, 08:53:14 PM
:peek: I have a sock.

Hellhammer...  big surprise.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: HeinBallz on August 12, 2012, 08:54:22 PM
the fact that i've been able to post as steve dave and rick daris for the past three years is pretty amazing though you have to admit.

pffft. pissclams/chum1 has been around since 05.

chum1 is actually russ briggs. no idea who pissclams is.

someone told me who poetwarrior was, but i didn't believe them. not because it didn't sound right, but because i want to believe.

I've often wondered if poet was a catmatt sock.
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: jtksu on August 14, 2012, 10:21:04 AM
the fact that i've been able to post as steve dave and rick daris for the past three years is pretty amazing though you have to admit.

pffft. pissclams/chum1 has been around since 05.

chum1 is actually russ briggs. no idea who pissclams is.

someone told me who poetwarrior was, but i didn't believe them. not because it didn't sound right, but because i want to believe.

I've often wondered if poet was a catmatt sock.

PW weirds me the eff out.  Smug bastard. 
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: CanConfirm on August 14, 2012, 11:54:30 AM
 :peek:


 :runaway: :runaway: :runaway:




( :confused: )
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: 8manpick on November 13, 2012, 01:43:16 PM
Can we ban all the socks that Lucas Scoopsalot has been masterminding for months in order to one day (today) tear us down with a barrage of Lukes?
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: SdK on November 13, 2012, 04:26:47 PM
i know for a fact that one of the "big time" posters here is a sock of another "big time" poster.

 :horrorsurprise:

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Banning of Socks
Post by: SdK on November 13, 2012, 04:28:40 PM
:peek:


 :runaway: :runaway: :runaway:




( :confused: )

I've also assumed this was Trim's sock just based upon the look on his face when auctioning off the MS Paint at Fatty Fest.