goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:14:53 PM
-
You gave in to the infatuation of a guard that can't shoot for crap, can't guard a lick and looks really neat driving to the basket. Nice.
-
You gave in to the infatuation of a guard that can't shoot for cac, can't guard a lick and looks really neat driving to the basket. Nice.
When he bulldozed the CU defender :love:
-
Irving should have been in there in the 2nd half of Peterson. Can not believe Frank left him in there when he played like absolute cac
-
yeah, where the eff was Irving? annoying.
-
and the best offensive weapon of the 3 is on the bench. At this point I won't blame Nick for leaving.
This game plan looked terrible. Copy of what we did at CU and it failed.
-
Hate Frank right now. Hate him
-
Why didn't we feed it to :ck: EVERY time??? Freakin idiots!!!!!!!!
I seriously want to puke in Frank's face.
-
3-for-4 now in first round losses.
-
It's called a 3-2 zone FRANK. Even if you don't use it much, it still gives the offense something else to think about.
1. They use mainly dribble drives.
2. No post up game.
Try it once in a while against these hippies.
-
There were alot of things that Frank should have tried. I would have liked to see JHR in there guarding the rim. JamSam did nothing helpful for the last 10 minutes of the game. How about a rough ridin' zone? When Higgins is shooting 90% from the lane, maybe the smart move is to let them shoot 3s, even if they're shooting 66% from there. It's pretty obvious that Frank hates the P66.
-
rough ridin' horrible......95 must have eaten 50 rough ridin' pancakes b/f this game.....eff you frank
-
franks totally lol'ing at all of you. its all apart of his plan, all apart of the plan.
-
is bitching about Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) stuff a byproduct of being a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)? or, are you idiots trying?
-
franks totally lol'ing at all of you. its all apart of his plan, all apart of the plan.
if it's apart of the plan, it's not in the plan.
dumbass.
-
is bitching about Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) stuff a byproduct of being a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)? or, are you idiots trying?
when something is that obvious its more of a statement than a bitching point
-
is bitching about Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) stuff a byproduct of being a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)? or, are you idiots trying?
is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?
-
franks totally lol'ing at all of you. its all apart of his plan, all apart of the plan.
if it's apart of the plan, it's not in the plan.
dumbass.
you just dont see the big picture
-
franks totally lol'ing at all of you. its all apart of his plan, all apart of the plan.
if it's apart of the plan, it's not in the plan.
dumbass.
you just dont see the big picture
He's correcting your use of "apart" It should have been "a part"
-
merge w/ transparency thread
-
is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?
it's my default comment for when retards pick out some insignificant detail and bitch about it as if it mattered.
-
is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?
it's my default comment for when retards pick out some insignificant detail and bitch about it as if it mattered.
...and again...
-
is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?
it's my default comment for when retards pick out some insignificant detail and bitch about it as if it mattered.
...and again...
stop being obtuse. if there is a thread dedicated to saying peterson played poorly and was the reason kstate lost and i jump in to call thread participants retards, then it obvious that i do not think peterson played horribly and/or that his play was not particularly crucial to the outcome of the game. in fact it is obvious that i think such statements are so incorrect than only a "Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)" would entertain them.
-
peterson didn't cost us the game. Poor pick n roll help from the bigs hurt us, as well as staying in the same failing defensive scheme the whole game.
We just didn't come close to outshooting them, which "might" have given us a chance.
-
is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?
it's my default comment for when retards pick out some insignificant detail and bitch about it as if it mattered.
...and again...
stop being obtuse. if there is a thread dedicated to saying peterson played poorly and was the reason kstate lost and i jump in to call thread participants retards, then it obvious that i do not think peterson played horribly and/or that his play was not particularly crucial to the outcome of the game. in fact it is obvious that i think such statements are so incorrect than only a "Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)" would entertain them.
I don't think sys watched the game.
-
is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?
it's my default comment for when retards pick out some insignificant detail and bitch about it as if it mattered.
...and again...
stop being obtuse. if there is a thread dedicated to saying peterson played poorly and was the reason kstate lost and i jump in to call thread participants retards, then it obvious that i do not think peterson played horribly and/or that his play was not particularly crucial to the outcome of the game. in fact it is obvious that i think such statements are so incorrect than only a "Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)" would entertain them.
check the thread title again, then get back with me.
-
check the thread title again, then get back with me.
saying kstate lost because martin played peterson is the same thing as saying kstate lost because of peterson.
-
agreed, sys.
-
check the thread title again, then get back with me.
saying kstate lost because martin played peterson is the same thing as saying kstate lost because of peterson.
no, it's clearly not.
-
I remember back in the day when Peterson would have saved us @CU.
Good times.
-
Defensively one of the strengths of the Cats in our win streak was forcing teams to drive. Higgins and Burks exploited that same thing, but to their credit they made a lot of hard shots yo do that. It happens.
The rebounding and inability to hit good, open shots by us were bigger issues today.
-
The rebounding and inability to hit good, open shots by us were bigger issues today.
Not hitting good, open shots is always going to happen at one point or another. Having personnel in the game that haven't shown one ounce of playing average defense this year is entirely different.