goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: Powercat Posse on March 04, 2011, 12:59:30 AM
-
Even though aTm beat us in their own back yard and have less total losses. I think our resume is just as good..... and probably just slightly better right now. I think both of us are 6 seeds right now, but think we viewed as the 3rd best team with 1 game left to play B12 tourney action
Non conf=
1. aTm played 3 teams in the top 100 and went 2-1. 2 pretty good wins (over 29 Temple and 41 Wash). Lost to BC (rpi 38 8-7 in ACC)
2. Ksu played 7 teams in the top 100 and went 4-3. 3 pretty decent wins (at 70 Wazzu, 63 VT, 68 Gonz). Lost to Duke 5, Fla 11 and Unlv 26. The committe should factor in that we had 2 guys suspended for that unlv loss
Conf play=
1. Both teams are 9-6
2. Ksu has 6 wins over top 100, aTm has only 5
3. Ksu has 3 top 50 wins (including wins over 2 best teams). Ags have 2 wins over top 50.
4. Neither team has a bad conf loss
Overall =
Ksu Rpi 21 SOS 6
aTm Rpi 30 Sos 44
-
Would like another shot at them in the Phillips 66 if it's even possible still, we would roll :emawkid:
-
4. Neither team has a bad conf loss
osu was a really, really, really bad loss.
-
Am I the only one who thinks Colorado at :doom: is a bad loss? :dunno:
-
OSU has an RPI of 53 Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). And CU is a top 100 RPI team so I don't think the commmitee would consider that a bad loss.
-
The Aggies have a worse kenpom than Doc. :horrorsurprise:
-
The Aggies have a worse kenpom than Doc. :horrorsurprise:
:surprised:
-
Am the only one who thinks Colorado at :doom: is a bad loss? :dunno:
Worst of the year. In order of badness.
1 CU
2 @OSU
3 @CU
4 @aTm
5 @UF
6 UNLV*
7 @MU
8 Duke
9 @KU
*Could even be last, without Jake and Curt factors in.
And we have a better resume than aTm now.
-
We got swept by CU
aTm got swept by Baylor
Both had RPIs in the 70s this week.
-
Am the only one who thinks Colorado at :doom: is a bad loss? :dunno:
Worst of the year. In order of badness.
1 CU
2 @OSU
3 @CU
4 @aTm
5 @UF
6 UNLV*
7 @MU
8 Duke
9 @KU
*Could even be last, without Jake and Curt factors in.
And we have a better resume than aTm now.
Why only * the loss where both Jake and Curt were out how about Curt only games as well? :ck:
-
Why only * the loss where both Jake and Curt were out how about Curt only games as well? :ck:
CU at home and @OSU were still bad without him.
-
Curt is our 3rd best player, so the committee might not pay attention as much to him being gone from the losses to OK St and Cu. The Unlv loss they will realize that we were far from full strength and barely lost
Well, Lunardi had us as a 6 and aTm as a 7 today....... so he must also think as of right now our resume is just slightly better