goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: steve dave on February 18, 2010, 07:55:17 AM

Title: Stats (weird)
Post by: steve dave on February 18, 2010, 07:55:17 AM: NU
58.3% FG
66.7% 3P

KSU
46.3% FG
40.9% 3P

Is that some sort of record for shooting disparity and still winning?
Title: Re: Stats (weird)
Post by: kso_FAN on February 18, 2010, 08:04:27 AM: eFG% of 72.9 for the Huskers. That is an unbelievable eFG%.

But we still ended up with a higher offensive efficiency, 123 to 117.6, b/c of our FT rate/%-age. And we had a solid (but not great) eFG% of 54.6.

For comparisons sake, we had an eFG% of 71.4 @ UNLV.
Title: Re: Stats (weird)
Post by: michigancat on February 18, 2010, 08:13:10 AM: Only 1 of the 4 factors.
Title: Re: Stats (weird)
Post by: kso_FAN on February 18, 2010, 08:19:31 AM: Quote from: michigancat on February 18, 2010, 08:13:10 AM
Only 1 of the 4 factors.

True, just sayin'. The ORB%, TO%, and FTR all ended up in our favor.

We had our 2nd best DRB% at 77% last night as well. Of course, most people have their best DR% against NU.
Title: Re: Stats (weird)
Post by: steve dave on February 18, 2010, 08:21:12 AM: Should have seen this coming.....

:combofan:
Title: Re: Stats (weird)
Post by: kcchiefdav on February 18, 2010, 08:25:35 AM: It's pretty obvious to me that Frank used a "rope-a-dope" strategy tonight so as to have something to motivate the team this week. Probably didn't feel like the team could keep it's head going into OU coming off 3 straight blowouts.

Frank = Brilliant
Title: Re: Stats (weird)
Post by: Trim on February 18, 2010, 08:27:49 AM: Quote from: steve dave on February 18, 2010, 08:21:12 AM
Should have seen this coming.....

:combofan:

I was pretty disappointed when I saw you started this thread. You know better.

:combofan:
Title: Re: Stats (weird)
Post by: kso_FAN on February 18, 2010, 09:02:37 AM: http://uponfurtherreview.kansascity.com/?q=node/1913 (http://uponfurtherreview.kansascity.com/?q=node/1913)
Title: Re: Stats (weird)
Post by: mcmwcat on February 18, 2010, 09:28:46 AM: pace #s for Nebraska ... highest of the year: http://kenpom.com/expsked.php?team=Nebraska

kstate plummets in kenpoms rankings: http://kenpom.com/rate.php
Title: Re: Stats (weird)
Post by: steve dave on February 18, 2010, 09:39:12 AM: Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 18, 2010, 09:02:37 AM
http://uponfurtherreview.kansascity.com/?q=node/1913 (http://uponfurtherreview.kansascity.com/?q=node/1913)

This strange news place is becoming pretty elite
Title: Re: Stats (weird)
Post by: kso_FAN on February 18, 2010, 09:43:53 AM: Quote from: steve dave on February 18, 2010, 09:39:12 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 18, 2010, 09:02:37 AM
http://uponfurtherreview.kansascity.com/?q=node/1913 (http://uponfurtherreview.kansascity.com/?q=node/1913)

This strange news place is becoming pretty elite

Yeah, that was actually some pretty good stuff in there. Much better than anything they put out in the regular paper.
Title: Re: Stats (weird)
Post by: mcmwcat on February 18, 2010, 09:51:02 AM: Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 18, 2010, 09:02:37 AM
http://uponfurtherreview.kansascity.com/?q=node/1913 (http://uponfurtherreview.kansascity.com/?q=node/1913)

so Henriquez actually underperformed relative to his season EFF but not near as bad as the other bigs