goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: KITNfury on February 03, 2011, 09:37:14 AM

Title: So how come we didn't beat those cyclone schlubs in recruiting ranking?
Post by: KITNfury on February 03, 2011, 09:37:14 AM: Larger class, more 3*s, higher average recruit rank.
Title: Re: So how come we didn't beat those cyclone schlubs in recruiting ranking?
Post by: O-town Kat on February 03, 2011, 09:52:03 AM: They are proud.
Title: Re: So how come we didn't beat those cyclone schlubs in recruiting ranking?
Post by: KITNfury on February 03, 2011, 09:54:39 AM: Quote from: O-town Kat on February 03, 2011, 09:52:03 AM
They are proud.
Ohhh. rough ridin' intangibles.
Title: Re: So how come we didn't beat those cyclone schlubs in recruiting ranking?
Post by: W.Churchill on February 03, 2011, 09:59:52 AM: Edged them out on Scout: 65th to their 70th. Say, aren't there only 65 BCS schools?
Title: Re: So how come we didn't beat those cyclone schlubs in recruiting ranking?
Post by: Rams on February 03, 2011, 10:27:05 AM: 'Grats, Havs.
Title: Re: So how come we didn't beat those cyclone schlubs in recruiting ranking?
Post by: AbeFroman on February 03, 2011, 12:34:43 PM: Quote from: W.Churchill on February 03, 2011, 09:59:52 AM
Edged them out on Scout: 65th to their 70th. Say, aren't there only 65 BCS schools?
Yeah but TCU, Boise, Utah, BYU, and half a dozen other non-BCS schools are killing it in recruiting, right? RIGHT?????
Title: Re: So how come we didn't beat those cyclone schlubs in recruiting ranking?
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 03, 2011, 12:54:22 PM: ESPN said we beat them.
Title: Re: So how come we didn't beat those cyclone schlubs in recruiting ranking?
Post by: KITNfury on February 03, 2011, 02:35:00 PM: Quote from: Saulbadguy on February 03, 2011, 12:54:22 PM
ESPN said we beat them.
I feel better knowing that we are taint swabbing the hell out of their faces.