Author Topic: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!  (Read 106625 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #525 on: October 19, 2015, 01:19:25 PM »
they'll finish sub100, kenpom.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2541
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #526 on: October 19, 2015, 02:19:41 PM »
they'll finish sub100, kenpom.

they finished 88th last year and this year the bottom falls out. highly unlikely.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #527 on: October 19, 2015, 04:06:40 PM »
the bottom is not going to fall out.  they'll be boringly mediocre, not incendiarily bad.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20444
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #528 on: October 19, 2015, 07:08:40 PM »
the bottom is not going to fall out.  they'll be boringly mediocre, not incendiarily bad.

What is the evidence for this?

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #529 on: October 19, 2015, 08:59:42 PM »
the bottom is not going to fall out.  they'll be boringly mediocre, not incendiarily bad.

What is the evidence for this?

the quality of the players in the program.  although i am using mediocre in the sense of really bad for a big 12 team.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #530 on: October 19, 2015, 09:36:05 PM »
Sometimes it's hard to tell what is meant by being ranked higher/lower/sub.

Is higher than 25th good or bad?
Is sub 100 good or bad?
Is lower than 50 good or bad?

Not always clear which way you're going. It can be read both ways.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #531 on: October 19, 2015, 09:37:00 PM »
That said, I agree we'll likely be ranked better than kenpom 100
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41955
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #532 on: October 19, 2015, 10:43:15 PM »
Finally got back into this thread from where I left it in early '13 and oh man.  :frown:

I love rankings threads!  :dance:


gunna miss it next year.

We will start unranked but will spend the entire season ranked once we break in, just like this season. You are going to get eviscerated on this board doubting an Angel led team. We will be returning essentially 4 starters.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #533 on: October 19, 2015, 11:37:22 PM »
Finally got back into this thread from where I left it in early '13 and oh man.  :frown:

I love rankings threads!  :dance:


gunna miss it next year.

We will start unranked but will spend the entire season ranked once we break in, just like this season. You are going to get eviscerated on this board doubting an Angel led team. We will be returning essentially 4 starters.

I'm so pissed we never got a chance to see MB2 and ART share a backcourt. Damnit oscar :shakesfist:

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2541
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #534 on: October 26, 2015, 09:59:25 AM »
That said, I agree we'll likely be ranked better than kenpom 100


Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2541
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #535 on: October 26, 2015, 10:06:57 AM »
damn, just realized i outed myself as having k-state listed as my "fav team" in kenpom.  :frown:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #536 on: October 26, 2015, 10:12:43 AM »
only 11 spots to go, kstate.  you can do this.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #537 on: October 26, 2015, 05:42:53 PM »
damn, just realized i outed myself as having k-state listed as my "fav team" in kenpom.  :frown:

Lemme get your log in and password, statsheet is gone and I don't want to pay for kenpom

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20444
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #538 on: October 26, 2015, 07:14:54 PM »
That said, I agree we'll likely be ranked better than kenpom 100

I hope this is true for the sake of my eyeballs, but I don't know if I believe that based on my hunches and limited info on the roster.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30235
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #539 on: October 26, 2015, 07:31:02 PM »
That said, I agree we'll likely be ranked better than kenpom 100

I hope this is true for the sake of my eyeballs, but I don't know if I believe that based on my hunches and limited info on the roster.

if you aren't sold on this team being top 100 after reading brettgpc's scrimmage review, then well i don't know what to tell you
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29139
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #540 on: October 26, 2015, 07:38:33 PM »
That said, I agree we'll likely be ranked better than kenpom 100

I hope this is true for the sake of my eyeballs, but I don't know if I believe that based on my hunches and limited info on the roster.


Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #541 on: October 26, 2015, 08:33:54 PM »
if you aren't sold on this team being top 100 after reading brettgpc's scrimmage review, then well i don't know what to tell you

he shook my confidence a little, i'll admit.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #542 on: October 26, 2015, 10:54:28 PM »
That said, I agree we'll likely be ranked better than kenpom 100



Not that anyone cares, but I meant better than kenpom 100 by the end of the season. The first month is going to be ugly.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #543 on: December 07, 2015, 03:22:31 PM »
RV!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85174
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #544 on: December 07, 2015, 03:25:23 PM »
RV!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 :emawkid:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #545 on: December 07, 2015, 03:26:06 PM »
That was extremely nice of Mark Fox.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #546 on: December 07, 2015, 04:03:49 PM »
I don't think even the most optimistic of fans would have predicted this  :emawkid:

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36547
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #547 on: December 07, 2015, 04:07:13 PM »
 :Woot:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #548 on: December 07, 2015, 04:13:14 PM »
74.   :)
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline ksu101

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 570
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings thread, yeah I said it!
« Reply #549 on: October 20, 2016, 08:36:20 PM »
http://sportspolls.usatoday.com/ncaa/basketball-men/polls/coaches-poll/2016/1/

Others Receiving Votes
Florida State 65; Iowa State 56; California 43; Miami (Fla.) 35; Dayton 34; Oklahoma 33; Seton Hall 24; Texas A&M 22; Notre Dame 18; San Diego State 17; Virginia Tech 16; Wichita State 15; Southern California 14; Butler 14; Ohio State 12; Florida 11; Clemson 11; Colorado 11; Michigan 10; Pittsburgh 7; Georgia 6; Virginia Commonwealth 6; Yale 6; Chattanooga 5; Washington 4; Nevada 3; Kansas State 3; Arkansas 2; Davidson 2; Valparaiso 2; Southern Methodist 1; Utah 1.

 :sdeek: :sdeek: