Author Topic: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread  (Read 429287 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3450 on: September 17, 2017, 07:56:14 AM »
Fake news but if infowars said this it would be law.

https://twitter.com/cnn/status/909394039644057600

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3451 on: September 18, 2017, 08:55:18 PM »
California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) compared Trump supporters to Neanderthal-era cave-dwellers at a global warming speech in New York City.

He said the "derivation" of the term "Trump-ite" is similar to that of "troglodyte," which is the scientific term for cavemen.

"You should check out the derivation of Trump-ite and troglodyte, because they both refer to people who dwell in deep dark caves," he said, according to Politico.

The left according to Rush use this issue as the reason why the government must control every aspect of our lives and thwart individualism and liberty.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3452 on: September 18, 2017, 09:12:57 PM »
California gov Jerry brown is very perceptive
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39041
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3453 on: September 18, 2017, 09:40:58 PM »
California gov Jerry brown is very perceptive

He is a huge stud

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3454 on: September 19, 2017, 04:58:52 PM »
Well nuclear horsefarts!  I just read on the CBS news site, that a federal judge ruled against the city do-gooders by saying that can't require a beverage company to put a warning on sugary drinks that says such drinks can cause obesity.  The city is trying to figure how to get around this because they are so worried about the health of fatties (except trumplings).  Climate change to the rescue.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/global-shift-obesity-packs-serious-climate-consequences/

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3455 on: October 31, 2017, 10:18:32 PM »
Apparently this was allowed until now

https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/925500149882916865

 :facepalm:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3456 on: October 31, 2017, 10:24:00 PM »
California gov Jerry brown is very perceptive

He is a huge stud

Also, rack these fucktard posts  :love:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline camKSU

  • SLTH
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 346
  • That's just like, your opinion, man
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3457 on: November 01, 2017, 11:56:56 AM »
Apparently this was allowed until now

https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/925500149882916865

 :facepalm:

Do you live in the upside-down world at all times or just political realms? The reason I ask is because it is clear and blatant that Pruitt is expelling scientists and qualified individuals for folks with more "diverse" views and backgrounds... AKA... Oil, Gas, Extraction and Production industry insiders and stooges. His justification? The scientists that currently serve on the panels are potentially biased if they recieve EPA grants for their work... But the industry insiders aren't biased by their pay, investments, or grants from the Oil and Gas lobby. Sound logic there GOP/Koch Shills /s

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/pruitt-guts-epa-science-panels-will-appoint-new-members/2017/10/31/2a8203e8-bea6-11e7-9294-705f80164f6e_story.html?utm_term=.fe77664c5a51

ALSO** I recently came across a great graph that illustrates CO2 ppm historically over hundreds of thousands of years giving dax, ksuw, fsd, and the other knuckle-draggers an idea of the uncharted waters we are in the middle of... Not that I have any reason to believe it will break through their brainwashing/programming. But nonetheless, there it is...

https://www.ecowatch.com/greenhouse-gas-levels-2503831950.html
untuck manhattan

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3458 on: November 01, 2017, 12:43:36 PM »
better allocation of resources: abandon cities like Miami, New Orleans and Houston wholesale or build dutch delta-works like structures off their coasts?

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15097
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3459 on: November 01, 2017, 12:48:47 PM »
better allocation of resources: abandon cities like Miami, New Orleans and Houston wholesale or build dutch delta-works like structures off their coasts?

I've listened to a bunch of interesting stuff on this and experts saying you cannot even call these natural disasters anymore because we have done so much to make inhabitable places habitable just to see them predictably wiped away by storms.

Reducing the amount the federal government subsidizes flood insurance would be a great first step and seemingly a no-brainer for a Trump administration that loves to talk about saving money and ending handouts.

Offline passranch

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1107
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3460 on: November 01, 2017, 01:22:49 PM »
boy, I sure could go for a little "global warming" today!  Amirite fellas?   :Keke:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3461 on: November 01, 2017, 02:58:56 PM »
Apparently this was allowed until now

https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/925500149882916865

 :facepalm:

Do you live in the upside-down world at all times or just political realms? The reason I ask is because it is clear and blatant that Pruitt is expelling scientists and qualified individuals for folks with more "diverse" views and backgrounds... AKA... Oil, Gas, Extraction and Production industry insiders and stooges. His justification? The scientists that currently serve on the panels are potentially biased if they recieve EPA grants for their work... But the industry insiders aren't biased by their pay, investments, or grants from the Oil and Gas lobby. Sound logic there GOP/Koch Shills /s

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/pruitt-guts-epa-science-panels-will-appoint-new-members/2017/10/31/2a8203e8-bea6-11e7-9294-705f80164f6e_story.html?utm_term=.fe77664c5a51

ALSO** I recently came across a great graph that illustrates CO2 ppm historically over hundreds of thousands of years giving dax, ksuw, fsd, and the other knuckle-draggers an idea of the uncharted waters we are in the middle of... Not that I have any reason to believe it will break through their brainwashing/programming. But nonetheless, there it is...

https://www.ecowatch.com/greenhouse-gas-levels-2503831950.html

I don't think you are fully appreciatinh the egregious conflicts of interest and obvious self dealing.

No amount of "big oil" paranoia can justify that
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3462 on: November 01, 2017, 03:14:38 PM »
Most of these big thinker scientists advising EPA on global warmed up hogbunk work for organizations that advocate about global warming.  So Pruitt has ended this incestuous relationship.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3463 on: November 01, 2017, 03:16:56 PM »
Better to have advisors that make more money when they don't have to worry about hurting the environment  :thumbs:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3464 on: November 01, 2017, 03:33:46 PM »
So Jerry Brown.  I was reminded to look at the latest on Jerry’s bullet train project. Now I’m an advocate of public works, that’s what governments are for. 

But still troubling:  Now projected (if completed in total) to come in $40 billion over budget.

But even more concerning for Warmist Alamists. 

All those diesel powered Frazier’s and Nile’s and their little cousins.  The steel mills, concrete plants and particulate in the air.   The horror.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3465 on: November 01, 2017, 03:37:45 PM »
 :lol:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3466 on: November 01, 2017, 03:40:54 PM »
Bullet Train on the back of Big Fossil Fuel.

$100 Billion for old technology.

SMDH


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3467 on: November 01, 2017, 06:27:27 PM »
I'm a fan on cutting flood subsidies that make insurance companies profits.

Also in favor of better planning for cities that allow for adequate drainage and/or absorption.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3468 on: November 01, 2017, 08:52:05 PM »
i was working on jerry's bullet train today.  second time in the last five years dax has mentioned a project i was working on.  makes me feel very relevant.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3469 on: November 02, 2017, 02:47:12 PM »
i was working on jerry's bullet train today.  second time in the last five years dax has mentioned a project i was working on.  makes me feel very relevant.

Cool project, but an unbelievable carbon footprint.

Carbon based energy:  Building a greener tomorrow


The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3470 on: November 02, 2017, 03:22:38 PM »
Dax you seem excited

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3471 on: November 03, 2017, 07:07:54 AM »
Sys:  What’s the projected time span before the bullet train (very inefficiently) offsets it’s construction?

I mean $100 Billion for a train when Hyperloop is nearly here.  SMDH

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3472 on: November 03, 2017, 09:12:42 AM »
they don't go over the budget with us during tailgate meetings, dax.

it is prolly the most mumped up and wtf is going on here project i've ever worked on, so it would amaze me if their budget wasn't totally mumped and on track to get more mumped (disclaimer - the project is broken up and bid out into different segments, which are theoretically independent or mostly so of other construction segments, so it's possible the segment i'm working on is uniquely mumped up).
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline camKSU

  • SLTH
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 346
  • That's just like, your opinion, man
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3473 on: November 03, 2017, 01:40:07 PM »
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/03/climate/us-climate-report.html

 :horrorsurprise:

The Trump admin. (& 13 federal agencies) put out a climate change report that implicates humans as the overwhelming cause of global climate change... How are the knuckle-draggers going to try and wiggle out of this one!?!

 :bwpopcorn:
untuck manhattan

Offline EMAWican

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1202
  • 'Murica
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3474 on: November 03, 2017, 01:58:01 PM »
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/03/climate/us-climate-report.html

 :horrorsurprise:

The Trump admin. (& 13 federal agencies) put out a climate change report that implicates humans as the overwhelming cause of global climate change... How are the knuckle-draggers going to try and wiggle out of this one!?!

 :bwpopcorn:

It's important to note this determination is only since the "mid-20th century" aka the 1950s.