Author Topic: RANKINGS...  (Read 131474 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6646
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #450 on: October 28, 2014, 06:57:03 PM »
Whatever we're paying Rece, we need to double it.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #451 on: October 28, 2014, 06:57:46 PM »
Rece is starting to embarrass himself. We get it, Rece, you really want our bods

Offline manpow5

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1886
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #452 on: October 28, 2014, 06:59:08 PM »
Rece just wants to jump on the bandwagon early before it gets too full


To EMAW or Not to EMAW

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9941
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #453 on: October 28, 2014, 07:15:55 PM »
tl;dr , will espn switch to playoff rankings now? On TV, score center, etc.
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #454 on: October 28, 2014, 07:21:20 PM »
tl;dr , will espn switch to playoff rankings now? On TV, score center, etc.

they'll use whichever ranking makes each particular matchup most appealing in a 15 second tv ad
emaw

Offline Hurricane Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1358
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #455 on: October 28, 2014, 07:37:04 PM »
tl;dr , will espn switch to playoff rankings now? On TV, score center, etc.

yes they will, already stated they'll drop the AP ratings and use playoff rankings.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44937
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #456 on: October 28, 2014, 07:44:46 PM »
tl;dr , will espn switch to playoff rankings now? On TV, score center, etc.

Their bottom line has already made the change when they have the listings for this weeks games


I like the rankings, my only beef is I think Oregon are overvalued.

Offline Trogdor

  • Hoodcat
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2985
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #457 on: October 28, 2014, 07:45:30 PM »
I am pleased
@Trogdor_gE

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22283
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #458 on: October 28, 2014, 08:29:18 PM »
Yep.  Rankings look pretty good to me. 

Glad to see the committee is not impressed with ND's schedule to this point.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17630
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #459 on: October 28, 2014, 09:37:48 PM »

tl;dr , will espn switch to playoff rankings now? On TV, score center, etc.

Their bottom line has already made the change when they have the listings for this weeks games


I like the rankings, my only beef is I think Oregon are overvalued.

Oregon so far above Arizona seems to be the only big inconsistency

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6934
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #460 on: October 28, 2014, 09:51:19 PM »
This committee could finally force ND to join a conference in football (or at the least schedule harder teams).  ND will never get in with one loss.
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #461 on: October 28, 2014, 09:52:49 PM »
Any poll that has kstate ranked lower than 1 is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #462 on: October 28, 2014, 09:53:11 PM »
Any poll that has kstate ranked lower than 1 is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

the word

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #463 on: October 28, 2014, 10:02:51 PM »
This committee could finally force ND to join a conference in football (or at the least schedule harder teams).  ND will never get in with one loss.

UConn will do cartwheels that day.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21667
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #464 on: October 28, 2014, 10:20:28 PM »
Any poll that has kstate ranked lower than 1 is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

Hey hey, some of my best KSU friends are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)  :dubious:

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12846
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #465 on: October 28, 2014, 10:35:58 PM »
Any poll that has kstate ranked lower than 1 is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

Hey hey, some of my best KSU friends are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)  :dubious:
Do you require your best friends to be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)?  Not that's there's anything wrong with that, cause retards are BFF's and seem to run in big circles around the KU campus.  :D
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21667
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #466 on: October 28, 2014, 10:37:32 PM »
Any poll that has kstate ranked lower than 1 is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

Hey hey, some of my best KSU friends are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)  :dubious:
Do you require your best friends to be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)?  Not that's there's anything wrong with that, cause retards are BFF's and seem to run in big circles around the KU campus.  :D

Leo DaV was probably a gay, did you know that?
« Last Edit: October 28, 2014, 10:47:05 PM by Spracne »

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12846
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #467 on: October 28, 2014, 10:59:40 PM »
Any poll that has kstate ranked lower than 1 is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

Hey hey, some of my best KSU friends are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)  :dubious:
Do you require your best friends to be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)?  Not that's there's anything wrong with that, cause retards are BFF's and seem to run in big circles around the KU campus.  :D

Leo DaV was probably a gay, did you know that?
I don't think he was a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) tho.
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #468 on: October 28, 2014, 11:05:36 PM »
I like how they properly evaluated an overrated PAC 12.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21667
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #469 on: October 28, 2014, 11:16:10 PM »
Any poll that has kstate ranked lower than 1 is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

Hey hey, some of my best KSU friends are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)  :dubious:
Do you require your best friends to be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)?  Not that's there's anything wrong with that, cause retards are BFF's and seem to run in big circles around the KU campus.  :D

Leo DaV was probably a gay, did you know that?
I don't think he was a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) tho.

I don't think they used that word back then, but no doubt he was . . . Touched.

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #470 on: October 29, 2014, 03:44:13 AM »
It's pretty obvious that  :billdance: is  :billdance:'ing with this committee.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #471 on: October 29, 2014, 06:27:46 AM »
It seems like the committee asked the following the questions:
1 - Are you a power 5 team with no losses?
2 - What is your best win(s)?
3 - What is your "best" loss(es)?
4 - Did you face a team close to you in head to head competition?

to me, these answered questions are, generally, why ksu is where it is, and why other teams are where they are.

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #472 on: October 29, 2014, 10:25:50 AM »
It seems like the committee asked the following the questions:
1 - Are you a power 5 team with no losses?
2 - What is your best win(s)?
3 - What is your "best" loss(es)?
4 - Did you face a team close to you in head to head competition?

to me, these answered questions are, generally, why ksu is where it is, and why other teams are where they are.

I think they are being true to the emphasis on marquee OOC matchups and that's why Auburn is at 3.  Prove to everyone that you can beat a good team out of conference and you will be ranked higher than the other teams with similar resumes.  That's probably why Oregon is ranked so high even with a loss to Arizona. 
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #473 on: October 30, 2014, 07:55:55 PM »
Being ranked high is fun.  It's one of the only reasons I even pay attention to Cats sports.

I think it's more fun to win every week and climb up a couple spots each week like in 2012. jmho. #1 heading into Waco again?  :surprised:

doubt it. FSU's dog crap schedule won't have another L on it.



 :pray:

:pray:

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12846
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #474 on: October 30, 2014, 08:00:44 PM »
Being ranked high is fun.  It's one of the only reasons I even pay attention to Cats sports.

I think it's more fun to win every week and climb up a couple spots each week like in 2012. jmho. #1 heading into Waco again?  :surprised:

doubt it. FSU's dog crap schedule won't have another L on it.



 :pray:

:pray:
This is happening!!!  :crossfingers:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.