Post by: renocat on September 01, 2015, 08:30:14 AM
Post by: michigancat on September 01, 2015, 08:44:02 AM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 01, 2015, 08:45:42 AM
Post by: puniraptor on September 01, 2015, 08:50:15 AM
Why not just fire her is she is not doing her job?
yeah i dont understand why this isnt the solution. i cant imagine that if i refused to perform the duties of my job that i would be fined or jailed.
Post by: CNS on September 01, 2015, 08:56:56 AM
Also, a public employee shouldn't have the right to not serve a resident.
If you want to be a bigot, go work at Chick-fil-A.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 01, 2015, 09:22:34 AM
Why not just fire her is she is not doing her job?
yeah i dont understand why this isnt the solution. i cant imagine that if i refused to perform the duties of my job that i would be fined or jailed.
If you didn't do your job would it cause discrimination to anyone?
Post by: MakeItRain on September 01, 2015, 12:19:37 PM
Post by: sys on September 01, 2015, 12:29:47 PM
my rationale is principally (but prolly not fully), based on the idea that since the clerk hasn't even been fired, the clerk's employer likely did not fully explain to employees the job requirements and penalties for failing to fulfill their duties. if the employer can prove that it did explicitly inform employees that they have a duty to serve all citizens and what consequences for failing to do so would be, and the employee chose to disregard those instructions, then perhaps the employee should have some personal liability beyond dismissal.
all of the above is based on ethics, not law. i have no idea what the law says.
Post by: MakeItRain on September 01, 2015, 12:37:28 PM
Post by: sys on September 01, 2015, 12:37:39 PM
Post by: sys on September 01, 2015, 12:38:24 PM
I'm fairly certain this is an elected position which means she can't be fired. Being held in contempt of court is standard operating procedure for any civil servant refusing to follow the laws of the jurisdiction that they serve.
i could have saved myself some typing if i'd have read a paragraph or two before posting.
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 01, 2015, 01:24:38 PM
I'm fairly certain this is an elected position which means she can't be fired. Being held in contempt of court is standard operating procedure for any civil servant refusing to follow the laws of the jurisdiction that they serve.
In that case she should be fined, jailed, and barred from ever holding public office.
Post by: puniraptor on September 01, 2015, 01:26:17 PM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 01, 2015, 01:26:47 PM
deport her!
If possible do this too.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 01, 2015, 01:52:32 PM
deport her!
If possible do this too.
It's possible. Mexico sends their criminals here all the time.
Post by: MeatSauce on September 01, 2015, 04:19:30 PM
Post by: puniraptor on September 01, 2015, 04:22:32 PM
she is a 3x divorcee :lol:
probably shafting these gay folk hoping for brownie points from the big guy
Post by: steve dave on September 01, 2015, 06:38:50 PM
Post by: IPA4Me on September 01, 2015, 06:54:33 PM
Post by: michigancat on September 01, 2015, 07:06:26 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F15%2F09%2F01%2Faace7c98a39aebb8e86f2133ee21c6d7.jpg&hash=11a39db381fb04e5778bb8b4ae22869963436973)
lol
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 01, 2015, 07:50:52 PM
Post by: CNS on September 01, 2015, 07:51:22 PM
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 02, 2015, 07:40:14 AM
She marries Mr. A, divorces him while pregnant with twins from Mr. C, marries Mr. B, who then adopts the kids, then divorces Mr. B for Mr. C, then divorces him for Mr. D. But homos are the ones ruining the sanctity of marriage?
Post by: Unruly on September 02, 2015, 08:56:13 AM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 03, 2015, 11:25:48 AM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 11:49:29 AM
If you don't want to deal with the public, and abide by the laws of the land then don't get into public service.
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 11:53:06 AM
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 03, 2015, 11:54:44 AM
The attacks on her religious beliefs aren't really called for, people can change. However what is called for is her eventual dismissal if she fails to live up to her duties as a public servant.
If you don't want to deal with the public, and abide by the laws of the land then don't get into public service.
I think people are more attacking her obvious hypocrisy
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 12:03:16 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 12:07:29 PM
Sad
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 03, 2015, 12:08:48 PM
Lot of anger in here.
Sad
The clerk looks very angry
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 12:10:35 PM
Lot of anger in here.
Sad
The clerk looks very angry
Yeah she's angry, lib seems to be really angry (as usual) and others seem to be angry as well.
Sad
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 03, 2015, 12:11:43 PM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 03, 2015, 12:13:48 PM
Post by: puniraptor on September 03, 2015, 12:15:38 PM
Post by: Dub on September 03, 2015, 12:16:56 PM
Post by: AbeFroman on September 03, 2015, 12:18:30 PM
*Obviously not talking about people ITT, but the people defending her
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 12:20:47 PM
So if the person is Christian it's totally commendable* for her to "stand up for her religious rights"? But if they are Muslim, they are fundamentalist crazies trying to implement Sharia Law, right?
*Obviously not talking about people ITT, but the people defending her
Well . . . it seems that vast majority of modern Western Christianity is pretty tolerant as opposed to Sharia Law, so, there's that. Otherwise, fantastic post and great analogy.
Post by: AbeFroman on September 03, 2015, 12:23:38 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 12:23:48 PM
Some of Modern Western Christianity ='s We don't believe Gay people should be allowed legally marry.
Is this even a things that are the same yet different? That's a pretty wide gap.
Post by: AbeFroman on September 03, 2015, 12:29:19 PM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 03, 2015, 12:33:02 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 12:33:44 PM
It's still implementing "religious laws" to govern people of a defined area, 'grats to Christians that don't want to kill gay people (just abortion doctors), but in a country that separates Church and State, yeah it is the same. No religious laws.
So Modern Western Christian beliefs ='s Sharia Law
Check . . . got it.
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 12:46:26 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 12:52:38 PM
Gay Marriage:
Some Modern Christians-Disagree
Sharia Law-Death
Sex outside of marriage:
Most Modern Christians-Not a good idea
Sharia Law-Death, a good beaten, but probably death, maybe just loss of body parts, but probably death
Gay People:
Some Modern Christians-Change your ways
Sharia Law-Death
Modest Clothing:
Some Christians-A good idea
Sharia Law-If women aren't covered from head to toe, a good beaten, or maybe death, but probably death after a good beaten, or stoning
Yeah, I can certainly see the similarities.
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 12:54:40 PM
Luckily we live in a country where religion is usually held separate from the law
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 12:56:28 PM
Like I said, more committed.
Luckily we live in a country where religion is usually held separate from the law
You're a regular Col. Kilgore lib.
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 12:57:12 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 12:59:09 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 01:07:25 PM
Any Muslim that admits they want sharia law can drink from my canteen any day
Particularly if they're going to kill the Christians, right Lib?
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 01:08:39 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 01:10:31 PM
I do love a good Christian slaughter
But then after that they come for the non believers, sorry lib.
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 01:11:47 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 01:12:50 PM
There are plenty of Christians for them before they get to me
Nope, your fate is in stone. You chose . . . death, over a difference of opinion.
Thoughts and dare I say, prayers.
Sorry, again.
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 01:15:19 PM
You are one weirdo dude dax
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 01:16:36 PM
I don't even know where you have been going here dax. Somehow because I think the diluted christian sharia law is stupid, that means I approve of full strength sharia law.
You are one weirdo dude dax
I'm not weird because you have no sense of humor and it takes you 12 posts to figure out you're getting trolled.
Me: Not weird
You: Kind of slow
Diluted Sharia Law :lol:
No context . . . sad
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 01:17:51 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 01:18:19 PM
I don't think you "get" me dax
Yeah, I do.
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 01:18:48 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 01:19:54 PM
Nuh Uh
There's no recovering now.
Post by: star seed 7 on September 03, 2015, 01:22:04 PM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 03, 2015, 01:23:05 PM
All you have to do is say you're sorry and it's all good 'stone
I'd forgive her and feel sorry for her if she would just tell the gay couple she's sorry, issue them their license, and wish them the best.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 01:23:32 PM
Tap out noted
So soon? :confused:
Post by: AbeFroman on September 03, 2015, 01:59:46 PM
It's still implementing "religious laws" to govern people of a defined area, 'grats to Christians that don't want to kill gay people (just abortion doctors), but in a country that separates Church and State, yeah it is the same. No religious laws.
So Modern Western Christian beliefs ='s Sharia Law
Check . . . got it.
Not all but,
implementing Christian laws based on personal beliefs = implementing Sharia Laws based on personal beliefs
Not the punishments dumbass
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 03, 2015, 02:20:52 PM
Post by: Institutional Control on September 03, 2015, 02:24:51 PM
Post by: IPA4Me on September 03, 2015, 03:25:39 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F15%2F09%2F03%2Fae1bad280956e3b3bbb0691281c53546.jpg&hash=ea6309c3c44ccc473e169981f4d215493b9fc8c4)
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on September 03, 2015, 03:56:36 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 03, 2015, 04:00:50 PM
It's still implementing "religious laws" to govern people of a defined area, 'grats to Christians that don't want to kill gay people (just abortion doctors), but in a country that separates Church and State, yeah it is the same. No religious laws.
So Modern Western Christian beliefs ='s Sharia Law
Check . . . got it.
Not all but,
implementing Christian laws based on personal beliefs = implementing Sharia Laws based on personal beliefs
Not the punishments dumbass
Sharia Law has punishment on earth as its foundation, thus the implementation of Sharia Law is the implementation of physical punishment and/or physical death on this earth. The punishment is the law . . . dumbass.
Post by: OK_Cat on September 03, 2015, 04:12:06 PM
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 03, 2015, 04:56:11 PM
Can a mod do the mod stuff and get rid of all the Dax and Lib stupid stuff?
You're in the pit bub, mods are powerless down here
Post by: OK_Cat on September 03, 2015, 04:57:02 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on September 03, 2015, 07:57:12 PM
There is no way these religious freedom people would feel the same way if this was someone in the Nation of Islam denying wedding licenses to white Christians under the guise of religion. Dax surprise us and admit that I'm right, I don't think you have it in you.
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 03, 2015, 09:05:38 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 04, 2015, 08:18:33 AM
But the implication that Modern Western Christian Beliefs are the same as Sharia Law are absurd.
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 04, 2015, 08:27:38 AM
Post by: star seed 7 on September 04, 2015, 08:38:08 AM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 04, 2015, 08:43:21 AM
I have a FB friend who suggested that they should have a gay marriage clerk to issue marriage licenses to gay people in a separate gay marriage office. :facepalm:
sounds expensive
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 04, 2015, 08:45:35 AM
I have a FB friend who suggested that they should have a gay marriage clerk to issue marriage licenses to gay people in a separate gay marriage office. :facepalm:
sounds expensive
It will create more jobs, so that is ok.
Post by: Yard Dog on September 04, 2015, 08:46:54 AM
It's still implementing "religious laws" to govern people of a defined area, 'grats to Christians that don't want to kill gay people (just abortion doctors), but in a country that separates Church and State, yeah it is the same. No religious laws.
So Modern Western Christian beliefs ='s Sharia Law
Check . . . got it.
Not all but,
implementing Christian laws based on personal beliefs = implementing Sharia Laws based on personal beliefs
Not the punishments dumbass
Sharia Law has punishment on earth as its foundation, thus the implementation of Sharia Law is the implementation of physical punishment and/or physical death on this earth. The punishment is the law . . . dumbass.
#blessed
Post by: Yard Dog on September 04, 2015, 08:53:11 AM
Okay forget about the Sharia Law thing, dax is clearly wrong and he knows it but I have a better example.
There is no way these religious freedom people would feel the same way if this was someone in the Nation of Islam denying wedding licenses to white Christians under the guise of religion. Dax surprise us and admit that I'm right, I don't think you have it in you.
You are not entirely wrong, but your premise and stated purpose are incorrect. The same people would not be happy with it, but a similar number of American citizens might support it. The thing about these laws and how they should work is we don't pick and choose when it is convenient. Like when you vote for Bernie because his insane tax levy wont hurt you too much, don't come bitching to me when you triple your income but you still have the same take home pay after taxes you now pay.
It is easy to structure an argument to sound right but you are just saying things that are dissimilar. Christianity as a whole has always had an issue with gay marriage. That is a surprise to NO ONE. It would be completely against character for the Nation of Islam person in your scenario to act in the way you describe. You remind me of an ex who would always ask me stupid questions like "If I turned into a zombie and we were married would you divorce me?" To which I would reply "You are never going to turn into a zombie."
Post by: nicname on September 04, 2015, 08:56:35 AM
I have a FB friend who suggested that they should have a gay marriage clerk to issue marriage licenses to gay people in a separate gay marriage office. :facepalm:
Gay water fountains.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 04, 2015, 08:59:29 AM
Okay forget about the Sharia Law thing, dax is clearly wrong and he knows it but I have a better example.
There is no way these religious freedom people would feel the same way if this was someone in the Nation of Islam denying wedding licenses to white Christians under the guise of religion. Dax surprise us and admit that I'm right, I don't think you have it in you.
You are not entirely wrong, but your premise and stated purpose are incorrect. The same people would not be happy with it, but a similar number of American citizens might support it. The thing about these laws and how they should work is we don't pick and choose when it is convenient. Like when you vote for Bernie because his insane tax levy wont hurt you too much, don't come bitching to me when you triple your income but you still have the same take home pay after taxes you now pay.
It is easy to structure an argument to sound right but you are just saying things that are dissimilar. Christianity as a whole has always had an issue with gay marriage. That is a surprise to NO ONE. It would be completely against character for the Nation of Islam person in your scenario to act in the way you describe. You remind me of an ex who would always ask me stupid questions like "If I turned into a zombie and we were married would you divorce me?" To which I would reply "You are never going to turn into a zombie."
You're really working hard to make a point, I admire that, but when you have to work that hard, well . . .
Post by: star seed 7 on September 04, 2015, 09:00:22 AM
Post by: Yard Dog on September 04, 2015, 09:09:14 AM
I bet yard dog thinks the separate but equal gay marriage office is a great idea
No I do not.
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 04, 2015, 09:09:42 AM
Post by: AbeFroman on September 04, 2015, 09:26:45 AM
"OOPS honey I think we just got gay married!"
"Sam! How could you?!?"
"Bazinga!" *looks at the camera*
Post by: renocat on September 04, 2015, 10:30:55 AM
Post by: lopakman on September 04, 2015, 10:37:38 AM
I have a FB friend who suggested that they should have a gay marriage clerk to issue marriage licenses to gay people in a separate gay marriage office. :facepalm:
B.
Post by: MakeItRain on September 04, 2015, 10:38:36 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fwebroot%2Fanimatedgifs1%2F1357165_o.gif&hash=942571d7d97f1cd07fa407e5b6dd40f054c0ebe9)Okay forget about the Sharia Law thing, dax is clearly wrong and he knows it but I have a better example.
There is no way these religious freedom people would feel the same way if this was someone in the Nation of Islam denying wedding licenses to white Christians under the guise of religion. Dax surprise us and admit that I'm right, I don't think you have it in you.
You are not entirely wrong, but your premise and stated purpose are incorrect. The same people would not be happy with it, but a similar number of American citizens might support it. The thing about these laws and how they should work is we don't pick and choose when it is convenient. Like when you vote for Bernie because his insane tax levy wont hurt you too much, don't come bitching to me when you triple your income but you still have the same take home pay after taxes you now pay.
It is easy to structure an argument to sound right but you are just saying things that are dissimilar. Christianity as a whole has always had an issue with gay marriage. That is a surprise to NO ONE. It would be completely against character for the Nation of Islam person in your scenario to act in the way you describe. You remind me of an ex who would always ask me stupid questions like "If I turned into a zombie and we were married would you divorce me?" To which I would reply "You are never going to turn into a zombie."
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 04, 2015, 10:39:47 AM
I have a FB friend who suggested that they should have a gay marriage clerk to issue marriage licenses to gay people in a separate gay marriage office. :facepalm:
B.
LOL, no it is neither. It is actually a guy from Cameroon which is in Africa.
Post by: mocat on September 04, 2015, 11:58:53 AM
Imagine the hijinks when straight/gay couples walked into the wrong office.
"OOPS honey I think we just got gay married!"
"Sam! How could you?!?"
"Bazinga!" *looks at the camera*
*like*
Post by: renocat on September 04, 2015, 12:56:21 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on September 04, 2015, 01:00:05 PM
Post by: ednksu on September 04, 2015, 01:15:10 PM
you will recognize people's human rights and you will like it! /tyranny of the court
Post by: SdK on September 04, 2015, 01:22:46 PM
Imagine the hijinks when straight/gay couples walked into the wrong office.Haha
"OOPS honey I think we just got gay married!"
"Sam! How could you?!?"
"Bazinga!" *looks at the camera*
Post by: MakeItRain on September 04, 2015, 02:54:06 PM
The general thought expressed in this thread is that if you are a representative of the state you have to do what the state says. We now have the people who issues licenses under the court's death strangle of freedom, and now the prowhatever marriage crowd can go after agents of the state who sign marriage licenses, preachers. Drip, drip, drip.
Everyone who has a job has to work within the confines of a job description. If, as a agent of the government, she doesn't want to her job she is well within her rights to quit.
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 04, 2015, 02:57:22 PM
Quote
Gay people waited 200+ years to get the right ruled by the supreme court, what is 4years compare to 200+ years...
Post by: MakeItRain on September 04, 2015, 03:12:13 PM
That FB friend just said that they shouldn't have jailed her. They should have just waited until her term was over. I pointed out that is 4 years.QuoteGay people waited 200+ years to get the right ruled by the supreme court, what is 4years compare to 200+ years...
Christ. I would tell you to inform that idiot that she was thrown in jail because she refused to follow the law that she was elected to and swore that she would uphold but I fear this person would be too stupid to understand that.
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 04, 2015, 03:13:08 PM
That FB friend just said that they shouldn't have jailed her. They should have just waited until her term was over. I pointed out that is 4 years.QuoteGay people waited 200+ years to get the right ruled by the supreme court, what is 4years compare to 200+ years...
Christ. I would tell you to inform that idiot that she was thrown in jail because she refused to follow the law that she was elected to and swore that she would uphold but I fear this person would be too stupid to understand that.
Well I already did.
Post by: renocat on September 04, 2015, 03:52:07 PM
Post by: CNS on September 04, 2015, 03:57:34 PM
But was gay marriage the law of the land when the clerk did her swearing?
I was a kansan far before Brownback and the current crew were elected. Can I ignore any new legislation that they come up with, and better yet, do what I can to keep you from benefiting from it?
I have been driving for longer than the current fuel tax schedule was created. I will probably start short changing QT now because eff the changes in tax that happened since approx 1995.
Post by: MakeItRain on September 04, 2015, 05:03:54 PM
But was gay marriage the law of the land when the clerk did her swearing?
Are you serious? You're sworn to uphold the law, there isn't individual swearings for each law that exists.
Post by: renocat on September 04, 2015, 07:30:14 PM
Post by: SdK on September 04, 2015, 08:05:28 PM
Post by: mocat on September 04, 2015, 08:06:58 PM
Renocat is the Rex Hudler of goEMAW.
how's that?
Post by: SdK on September 04, 2015, 08:13:44 PM
Entertaining in small doses. An idiot. Shitty analogies and catch phrases.Renocat is the Rex Hudler of goEMAW.
how's that?
Post by: wetwillie on September 04, 2015, 08:16:14 PM
Entertaining in small doses. An idiot. Shitty analogies and catch phrases.Renocat is the Rex Hudler of goEMAW.
who is the Ryan L. of goEMAW
how's that?
Post by: SdK on September 04, 2015, 08:17:44 PM
Post by: mocat on September 04, 2015, 08:18:22 PM
Entertaining in small doses. An idiot. Shitty analogies and catch phrases.Renocat is the Rex Hudler of goEMAW.
how's that?
rex would never in a billion years tell you to admire someone who takes joy out of people's lives
Post by: wetwillie on September 04, 2015, 08:28:57 PM
I'll have to think on that one a bit. Ryan L alone? Or Ryan L working with Rex?
im looking for answers, not more questions.
Post by: sys on September 04, 2015, 08:33:59 PM
Renocat is the Rex Hudler of goEMAW.
that's a good observation.
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 04, 2015, 08:57:06 PM
Post by: mocat on September 04, 2015, 08:59:59 PM
The judge asked if she would just let the other clerks in the office do their job of issuing licenses and she said no. So he did make it so she didn't have to do it and she still wouldn't comply.
classic Rex Hudler move
Post by: sys on September 04, 2015, 09:06:38 PM
The judge asked if she would just let the other clerks in the office do their job of issuing licenses and she said no. So he did make it so she didn't have to do it and she still wouldn't comply.
classic Rex Hudler move
reno is rex, mocat. the clerk sounds more ryanlike. good grief.
Post by: SdK on September 04, 2015, 09:17:20 PM
Hence not saying "sounds like something Rex Hudler would say"Entertaining in small doses. An idiot. Shitty analogies and catch phrases.Renocat is the Rex Hudler of goEMAW.
how's that?
rex would never in a billion years tell you to admire someone who takes joy out of people's lives
Post by: SdK on September 04, 2015, 09:17:53 PM
Trim.I'll have to think on that one a bit. Ryan L alone? Or Ryan L working with Rex?
im looking for answers, not more questions.
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 04, 2015, 11:04:49 PM
Okay forget about the Sharia Law thing, dax is clearly wrong and he knows it but I have a better example.
There is no way these religious freedom people would feel the same way if this was someone in the Nation of Islam denying wedding licenses to white Christians under the guise of religion. Dax surprise us and admit that I'm right, I don't think you have it in you.
You are not entirely wrong, but your premise and stated purpose are incorrect. The same people would not be happy with it, but a similar number of American citizens might support it. The thing about these laws and how they should work is we don't pick and choose when it is convenient. Like when you vote for Bernie because his insane tax levy wont hurt you too much, don't come bitching to me when you triple your income but you still have the same take home pay after taxes you now pay.
It is easy to structure an argument to sound right but you are just saying things that are dissimilar. Christianity as a whole has always had an issue with gay marriage. That is a surprise to NO ONE. It would be completely against character for the Nation of Islam person in your scenario to act in the way you describe. You remind me of an ex who would always ask me stupid questions like "If I turned into a zombie and we were married would you divorce me?" To which I would reply "You are never going to turn into a zombie."
Christians have always had an issue with divorce and adultery too. But it's apparently optional to hate depending on what you feel like that afternoon.
Post by: renocat on September 05, 2015, 11:42:57 AM
Post by: Yard Dog on September 05, 2015, 10:28:43 PM
Judge IN Washington will not marry same thing teams. Who will find him in contemp?
same thing teams
:lol:
Post by: BrokenSky1113 on September 05, 2015, 11:51:34 PM
Post by: renocat on September 06, 2015, 01:22:19 PM
Post by: SdK on September 06, 2015, 05:10:19 PM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 08, 2015, 02:58:36 PM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 08, 2015, 03:17:51 PM
Post by: CNS on September 08, 2015, 03:18:45 PM
(https://scontent-dfw1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/21906_10153550049611153_2875166164841732946_n.jpg?oh=08a5e766dd9a19f032281b4447c608f7&oe=5670FF28)
:lol:
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 08, 2015, 03:25:08 PM
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 08, 2015, 04:39:14 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffunnyoroffensive.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F09%2FScreen-Shot-2015-09-03-at-11.36.48-PM-300x295.png&hash=4e6d22b0b7ac04d86b4cdbc8881ad8aaf25397c9)
b/b
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 08, 2015, 04:40:24 PM
Post by: renocat on September 08, 2015, 04:44:30 PM
Post by: renocat on September 09, 2015, 09:42:29 AM
Post by: CNS on September 09, 2015, 10:15:03 AM
Post by: Yard Dog on September 09, 2015, 10:51:20 AM
http://www.afa.net/the-stand/christian-persecution/clerk-the-only-one-obeying-the-law/
Post by: Institutional Control on September 09, 2015, 11:16:11 AM
eff off.
Post by: 0.42 on September 09, 2015, 11:38:57 AM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 09, 2015, 11:51:29 AM
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 09, 2015, 11:53:24 AM
Wait...she walked out to her press conference to "Eye of the Tiger"? WTF.
Did you see it? She absolutely did all of this on purpose knowing her 15 minutes were coming. It's like trump saying the Bible is his favorite book. He knows that is literally all he has to do and the rubes will come running
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 09, 2015, 11:56:17 AM
Wait...she walked out to her press conference to "Eye of the Tiger"? WTF.
Did you see it? She absolutely did all of this on purpose knowing her 15 minutes were coming. It's like trump saying the Bible is his favorite book. He knows that is literally all he has to do and the rubes will come running
Just watched it, with her holding her arms up and then Huckabee and whoever that other guy was holding her arms....that is really stupid.
Post by: star seed 7 on September 09, 2015, 12:04:43 PM
Quote
sodomy-based marriage
Interesting
Post by: star seed 7 on September 09, 2015, 12:06:42 PM
Quote
When she took her oath of office, it was an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of Kentucky. She did not take an oath to uphold the rulings of the Supreme Court, especially when submitting to such rulings would require her to violate her oath to uphold the Constitution.
Interesting
Post by: star seed 7 on September 09, 2015, 12:08:29 PM
Quote
The braying hounds of the homosexual lobby
Interesting
Post by: star seed 7 on September 09, 2015, 12:09:35 PM
Quote
Is Mrs. Davis guilty of fomenting anarchy? Hardly. The lawless ones in this sorry business are the five members of the Supreme Court who imposed their moral views about sexual deviancy on the entire nation. Anarchy already exists, because of an out-of-control judiciary.
Interesting
Post by: michigancat on September 09, 2015, 12:10:36 PM
Post by: CNS on September 09, 2015, 12:12:08 PM
Post by: Canary on September 09, 2015, 12:12:33 PM
Interesting to see if they know the definition of sodomy.Quotesodomy-based marriage
Interesting
Post by: CNS on September 09, 2015, 12:13:21 PM
Post by: renocat on September 09, 2015, 12:21:35 PM
Interesting article:Laws don't trump the Constitution, especially the rights afforded to citizens in many of the amendments. This guy might know how many hairs are in his butt crack, but he is kind of ignorant. The court of supremacy said same team marriage thing is a right that cannot be abridged by any law. I think this is wrong and I can go into my backyard and scream and whizz on pictures of liberal judges, but it doesn't matter. My concern now is the revenge assult by militants towards my beliefs.
http://www.afa.net/the-stand/christian-persecution/clerk-the-only-one-obeying-the-law/
Post by: star seed 7 on September 09, 2015, 12:26:44 PM
Post by: puniraptor on September 09, 2015, 01:05:05 PM
Post by: puniraptor on September 09, 2015, 01:08:11 PM
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 09, 2015, 01:11:29 PM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 09, 2015, 01:13:02 PM
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on September 09, 2015, 01:13:12 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on September 09, 2015, 01:16:46 PM
I am going to enjoy watching her try and monetize this
Nothing in the Bible against making a quick buck
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 09, 2015, 01:17:53 PM
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 09, 2015, 01:18:39 PM
I am going to enjoy watching her try and monetize this
Nothing in the Bible against making a quick buck
there is also nothing in the Bible about hating gay marriage
Post by: puniraptor on September 09, 2015, 01:22:21 PM
Post by: Yard Dog on September 09, 2015, 01:34:01 PM
Unfortunately, instead of acting like a grown adult and stating this, she is instead acting like PennsylTucky from Orange is the New Black.
Post by: puniraptor on September 09, 2015, 01:34:52 PM
I heard from a source that she didn't just flat out refuse to issue marriage licenses. She instead submitted a request that her signature not be necessary for the issuance of the licenses. That way people could still be married but she wouldn't be actively condoning it.
Unfortunately, instead of acting like a grown adult and stating this, she is instead acting like PennsylTucky from Orange is the New Black.
a super secret source that only yarddog has access to and not the MSM?
Post by: CNS on September 09, 2015, 01:35:21 PM
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 09, 2015, 01:37:08 PM
I heard from a source that she didn't just flat out refuse to issue marriage licenses. She instead submitted a request that her signature not be necessary for the issuance of the licenses. That way people could still be married but she wouldn't be actively condoning it.
Unfortunately, instead of acting like a grown adult and stating this, she is instead acting like PennsylTucky from Orange is the New Black.
I heard something like this. also heard that she wouldn't let her employees give out the licenses though
Post by: CNS on September 09, 2015, 01:37:46 PM
I heard from a source that she didn't just flat out refuse to issue marriage licenses. She instead submitted a request that her signature not be necessary for the issuance of the licenses. That way people could still be married but she wouldn't be actively condoning it.
Unfortunately, instead of acting like a grown adult and stating this, she is instead acting like PennsylTucky from Orange is the New Black.
I heard something like this. also heard that she wouldn't let her employees give out the licenses though
Same
Post by: MakeItRain on September 09, 2015, 01:43:31 PM
I heard from a source that she didn't just flat out refuse to issue marriage licenses. She instead submitted a request that her signature not be necessary for the issuance of the licenses. That way people could still be married but she wouldn't be actively condoning it.
Unfortunately, instead of acting like a grown adult and stating this, she is instead acting like PennsylTucky from Orange is the New Black.
Is your source every person who has reported on this case ever? She didn't want her name on the licenses, unfortunately for all involved her name has to be on the licenses issued in that county because that's the law in Kentucky. The irony in all of this is that her name is going to appear on a lot more licenses issued to gay couples than previously would because people are going there to get married because of this.
Did you guys miss my note about her unknowingly marrying a transgendered man before all of this crap happened? Apparently the MSM missed this because it would call for some interesting questions asked of her, Mike Huckabee, and Ted Cruz.
Post by: puniraptor on September 09, 2015, 01:52:24 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on September 09, 2015, 01:55:59 PM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 09, 2015, 01:56:44 PM
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 09, 2015, 02:42:18 PM
Post by: puniraptor on September 09, 2015, 02:46:38 PM
This is why the government needs to get out of the "marriage" business and into contractual cohabitation business. After you sign your contract you can go have a marriage ceremony of your choice, if you want.
thats what marriage is! its just a word! jesus christ words mean different things to different people all the time and people seem to make it out OK except in this one example.
Post by: puniraptor on September 09, 2015, 02:48:48 PM
This is why the government needs to get out of the "marriage" business and into contractual cohabitation business. After you sign your contract you can go have a marriage ceremony of your choice, if you want.
thats what marriage is! its just a word! jesus christ words mean different things to different people all the time and people seem to make it out OK except in this one example.
the same people who have a problem with what's happening now, would have a problem with that. gay people are a sin and must not be allowed to coexist peacefully.
Post by: puniraptor on September 09, 2015, 02:50:07 PM
This is why the government needs to get out of the "marriage" business and into contractual cohabitation business. After you sign your contract you can go have a marriage ceremony of your choice, if you want.
thats what marriage is! its just a word! jesus christ words mean different things to different people all the time and people seem to make it out OK except in this one example.
the same people who have a problem with what's happening now, would have a problem with that. gay people are a sin and must not be allowed to coexist peacefully.
you can call it a cohab contract, but god, jesus, huck, and me all know it's marriage.
Post by: puniraptor on September 09, 2015, 02:51:14 PM
This is why the government needs to get out of the "marriage" business and into contractual cohabitation business. After you sign your contract you can go have a marriage ceremony of your choice, if you want.
thats what marriage is! its just a word! jesus christ words mean different things to different people all the time and people seem to make it out OK except in this one example.
the same people who have a problem with what's happening now, would have a problem with that. gay people are a sin and must not be allowed to coexist peacefully.
you can call it a cohab contract, but god, jesus, huck, and me all know it's marriage.
oh, and kim.
Post by: star seed 7 on September 09, 2015, 03:00:54 PM
Post by: puniraptor on September 09, 2015, 03:04:43 PM
The government does do contractual cohabitation already, it's called marriage :dunno:
huckabees should be forced to call their marriage "christian marriage" so gay (the religion clerks will sign off on it
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 09, 2015, 04:35:45 PM
what if a starbux barista converted to mormons and refused to hand out mocha lattes
That is sort of like this, actually.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/05/travel/muslim-flight-attendant-feat/
Post by: MakeItRain on September 09, 2015, 05:16:27 PM
what if a starbux barista converted to mormons and refused to hand out mocha lattes
That is sort of like this, actually.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/05/travel/muslim-flight-attendant-feat/
Yeah they need to fire her ass, slinging drinks is an essential job function freedom of religion does not extend to "I'll do whatever the eff in the name of GOD!" For some reason though I'm sure we won't be seeing fuckface Mike Huckabee grandstanding for this woman.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 09, 2015, 05:59:36 PM
what if a starbux barista converted to mormons and refused to hand out mocha lattes
That is sort of like this, actually.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/05/travel/muslim-flight-attendant-feat/
Yeah they need to fire her ass, slinging drinks is an essential job function freedom of religion does not extend to "I'll do whatever the eff in the name of GOD!" For some reason though I'm sure we won't be seeing fuckface Mike Huckabee grandstanding for this woman.
I agree.
Post by: renocat on September 09, 2015, 11:23:44 PM
Post by: Yard Dog on September 10, 2015, 08:33:41 AM
what if a starbux barista converted to mormons and refused to hand out mocha lattes
That is sort of like this, actually.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/05/travel/muslim-flight-attendant-feat/
Or like this?
http://www.teaparty.org/isnt-dc-police-chief-jail-issuing-gun-permits-117986/
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 10, 2015, 08:41:55 AM
what if a starbux barista converted to mormons and refused to hand out mocha lattes
That is sort of like this, actually.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/05/travel/muslim-flight-attendant-feat/
Or like this?
http://www.teaparty.org/isnt-dc-police-chief-jail-issuing-gun-permits-117986/
Quote
A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction in May stopping her from denying the permits - See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/isnt-dc-police-chief-jail-issuing-gun-permits-117986/#sthash.y1Zai8bx.dpuf
Yeah, pretty much.
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2015, 09:45:10 AM
what if a starbux barista converted to mormons and refused to hand out mocha lattes
That is sort of like this, actually.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/05/travel/muslim-flight-attendant-feat/
Or like this?
http://www.teaparty.org/isnt-dc-police-chief-jail-issuing-gun-permits-117986/
Jesus Christ, you're rough ridin' dim. Did you even read the article you linked? You clearly did not read that article.
Post by: star seed 7 on September 10, 2015, 10:25:06 AM
what if a starbux barista converted to mormons and refused to hand out mocha lattes
That is sort of like this, actually.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/05/travel/muslim-flight-attendant-feat/
Or like this?
http://www.teaparty.org/isnt-dc-police-chief-jail-issuing-gun-permits-117986/
Jesus Christ, you're rough ridin' dim. Did you even read the article you linked? You clearly did not read that article.
Oh he read it, and found it interesting
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 15, 2015, 07:58:55 AM
Post by: Institutional Control on September 15, 2015, 08:02:09 AM
Post by: CNS on September 15, 2015, 08:04:58 AM
(https://scontent-dfw1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtp1/v/t1.0-9/11150588_10153112766897596_2544276164858756658_n.jpg?oh=82603468e96bdf2e6b44fcbee3c0355b&oe=56A63DAC)Oh man!
The world is a better place for it too.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: Canary on September 15, 2015, 08:14:58 AM
Yes, it is.(https://scontent-dfw1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtp1/v/t1.0-9/11150588_10153112766897596_2544276164858756658_n.jpg?oh=82603468e96bdf2e6b44fcbee3c0355b&oe=56A63DAC)Oh man!
The world is a better place for it too.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: MakeItRain on September 15, 2015, 10:48:59 PM
Post by: 8manpick on September 16, 2015, 06:41:48 PM
That's a great fb post but I didn't realize that Freddie was so horrific looking.
Comically bad teeth/mouth... Incredible voice
Post by: renocat on September 25, 2015, 09:40:30 PM
Gays agitators want to destroy the clerk who won't issue marriage licenses to anyone. Put her in jail and fine her until she is bankrupt. Why not just fire her is she is not doing her job?I am so pissed I am turning whizz yellow. Damn agitating same thing team buddies who are trying to harm this woman. They are demanding she sign their gaytificate that was issued to them when she was in jail. They said they would petition the judge to throw her in the clink until she signs. You can't tell me this ilk is not trying to damage any one of faith. This is about love they chant, bull manure. If they put this in front of me, I would crap a big truck driver turd on it.
Post by: Yard Dog on October 08, 2015, 08:59:48 AM
https://i.imgur.com/YRY9am7.webm
Post by: star seed 7 on October 08, 2015, 09:03:42 AM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on October 08, 2015, 10:09:02 AM
Halloween costume anyone?
https://i.imgur.com/YRY9am7.webm
Not ugly enough.
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 08, 2015, 11:48:15 AM
Post by: mocat on December 06, 2017, 11:49:11 PM
https://twitter.com/ColeLedford11/status/938554320496324609
Post by: renocat on December 07, 2017, 12:09:55 AM