0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: wetwillie on June 05, 2023, 09:29:27 AMIs it unusual for a class action to only have 17 claimants?I didn’t see where it said it was a class action. There’s a difference between a bunch of plaintiffs with the same claim and a handful representing an entire class.
Is it unusual for a class action to only have 17 claimants?
The distinction is still valid. It’s a bunch of plaintiffs but it would only be a class action if they’re suing on behalf of many more unnamed parties.
What is the burden of proof here? Will they have to show that Ramsey knew this service wasn’t providing what they said they would? I think he will settle for 10% of that $150M.
Quote from: wetwillie on June 05, 2023, 01:47:08 PMWhat is the burden of proof here? Will they have to show that Ramsey knew this service wasn’t providing what they said they would? I think he will settle for 10% of that $150M. Probably, unless some specific consumer protection law applies its own standard.
Oh hell ya he’s paying, it’s just a matter of how much.
Quote from: catastrophe on June 05, 2023, 02:29:24 PMQuote from: wetwillie on June 05, 2023, 01:47:08 PMWhat is the burden of proof here? Will they have to show that Ramsey knew this service wasn’t providing what they said they would? I think he will settle for 10% of that $150M. Probably, unless some specific consumer protection law applies its own standard.according to the yahoo article there were people calling in all the time letting him know how the company he was endorsing were crooks and did not provide the services they advertised. By all accounts he either ignored the feedback from all those callers, or on one occasion he lashed out at his audience for complaining. He only stopped running their ads when they stopped paying him $150k a month.