I really wouldn't care about this at all if the law didn't mandate that individuals purchase insurance that includes birth control. Giving a business an exemption on religious grounds when their employees aren't required to follow their religion just doesn't make sense to me. My religion says I'm not supposed to kill people. That didn't give me an exemption from filling out a draft card.
Also if your issue is that it requires men to have BC coverage its because the issue is being framed by neo-cons that way. Instead turn it around and look at it as a civil rights issue where you are preventing an insurance company from discriminating against women on the basis of sex. So in effect you the ACA doesn't mandate men have BC coverage, its mandates that plans can't prohibit companies from discriminating against women. All the more reason why
Hobby Lobby is bullshit, my companies first amendment rights which were just invented by old white guys trumps your natural rights as a human, seems fair doesn't it?
Additionally legal formalists, like K-S-U, do stupid crap like Rehnquist did G.E. v Gilbert and say that pregnancy exclusions written into things like disability coverage because its a "physical condition" not sexual discrimination because the law was written gender neutrally. So the BC coverage mandate takes this kind of logic and turns it on its head to provide coverage.