0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
is the media's job to ask the same question over and over for 8 minutes? If so, well done.
B.O.,Hillary, et al. get caught lying in their cover up operation and the goE libtards race to deflect and discredit those asking the questions. Pathetic.The media should still be there asking these questions until an actual answer is given.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning. They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 30, 2014, 09:08:35 PMB.O.,Hillary, et al. get caught lying in their cover up operation and the goE libtards race to deflect and discredit those asking the questions. Pathetic.The media should still be there asking these questions until an actual answer is given.Most of the media will provide dutiful coverage for a day or two, then quickly move on to less embarrassing topics. They won't bang the drum like they would if it was a republican admin. Just too biased. Any one of Obama's scandals (fast&furious, irs targeting, Benghazi coverup, nakedly political closing of monuments and scenic overlooks during budget battle, just to name a few) would have caused far greater damage if the MSM had applied the same level of persistence and skepticism that it applies to Republicans.
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 01, 2014, 10:12:29 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 30, 2014, 09:08:35 PMB.O.,Hillary, et al. get caught lying in their cover up operation and the goE libtards race to deflect and discredit those asking the questions. Pathetic.The media should still be there asking these questions until an actual answer is given.Most of the media will provide dutiful coverage for a day or two, then quickly move on to less embarrassing topics. They won't bang the drum like they would if it was a republican admin. Just too biased. Any one of Obama's scandals (fast&furious, irs targeting, Benghazi coverup, nakedly political closing of monuments and scenic overlooks during budget battle, just to name a few) would have caused far greater damage if the MSM had applied the same level of persistence and skepticism that it applies to Republicans.Do you have an example of a republican scandal that the media really just showed a ton of persistence and skepticism toward?
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on May 01, 2014, 10:14:26 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 01, 2014, 10:12:29 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 30, 2014, 09:08:35 PMB.O.,Hillary, et al. get caught lying in their cover up operation and the goE libtards race to deflect and discredit those asking the questions. Pathetic.The media should still be there asking these questions until an actual answer is given.Most of the media will provide dutiful coverage for a day or two, then quickly move on to less embarrassing topics. They won't bang the drum like they would if it was a republican admin. Just too biased. Any one of Obama's scandals (fast&furious, irs targeting, Benghazi coverup, nakedly political closing of monuments and scenic overlooks during budget battle, just to name a few) would have caused far greater damage if the MSM had applied the same level of persistence and skepticism that it applies to Republicans.Do you have an example of a republican scandal that the media really just showed a ton of persistence and skepticism toward?Are you serious? How about Abu Graib (sp) and Gitmo for starters. Non stop for months. I think there was some mention of Abu Graib on front cover if NYT for something like a month straight. And that's just off the top of my head.
Chris Christie's Bridgegate compared to the IRS targeting being uncovered at the same time. You can't seriously be suggesting there's an even standard applied by the MSM.
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 01, 2014, 10:27:25 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on May 01, 2014, 10:14:26 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 01, 2014, 10:12:29 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 30, 2014, 09:08:35 PMB.O.,Hillary, et al. get caught lying in their cover up operation and the goE libtards race to deflect and discredit those asking the questions. Pathetic.The media should still be there asking these questions until an actual answer is given.Most of the media will provide dutiful coverage for a day or two, then quickly move on to less embarrassing topics. They won't bang the drum like they would if it was a republican admin. Just too biased. Any one of Obama's scandals (fast&furious, irs targeting, Benghazi coverup, nakedly political closing of monuments and scenic overlooks during budget battle, just to name a few) would have caused far greater damage if the MSM had applied the same level of persistence and skepticism that it applies to Republicans.Do you have an example of a republican scandal that the media really just showed a ton of persistence and skepticism toward?Are you serious? How about Abu Graib (sp) and Gitmo for starters. Non stop for months. I think there was some mention of Abu Graib on front cover if NYT for something like a month straight. And that's just off the top of my head.The media has been covering the IRS scandal for a whole year now. Also, Abu Graib was not a republican scandal.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on May 01, 2014, 10:31:03 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 01, 2014, 10:27:25 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on May 01, 2014, 10:14:26 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 01, 2014, 10:12:29 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 30, 2014, 09:08:35 PMB.O.,Hillary, et al. get caught lying in their cover up operation and the goE libtards race to deflect and discredit those asking the questions. Pathetic.The media should still be there asking these questions until an actual answer is given.Most of the media will provide dutiful coverage for a day or two, then quickly move on to less embarrassing topics. They won't bang the drum like they would if it was a republican admin. Just too biased. Any one of Obama's scandals (fast&furious, irs targeting, Benghazi coverup, nakedly political closing of monuments and scenic overlooks during budget battle, just to name a few) would have caused far greater damage if the MSM had applied the same level of persistence and skepticism that it applies to Republicans.Do you have an example of a republican scandal that the media really just showed a ton of persistence and skepticism toward?Are you serious? How about Abu Graib (sp) and Gitmo for starters. Non stop for months. I think there was some mention of Abu Graib on front cover if NYT for something like a month straight. And that's just off the top of my head.The media has been covering the IRS scandal for a whole year now. Also, Abu Graib was not a republican scandal.If you think the media is covering the IRS scandal with same tenacity as if it were a republican admin, I can't help you. And you're right, Abu Ghraib was not a republican scandal, but tell that to the NYT and other media outlets which repeatedly linked it to Bush. You've gotta be kidding me with this crap.
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 01, 2014, 10:32:17 AMChris Christie's Bridgegate compared to the IRS targeting being uncovered at the same time. You can't seriously be suggesting there's an even standard applied by the MSM.I haven't heard about Chris Christie's bridge since the week it happened.
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 01, 2014, 10:35:18 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on May 01, 2014, 10:31:03 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 01, 2014, 10:27:25 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on May 01, 2014, 10:14:26 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 01, 2014, 10:12:29 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 30, 2014, 09:08:35 PMB.O.,Hillary, et al. get caught lying in their cover up operation and the goE libtards race to deflect and discredit those asking the questions. Pathetic.The media should still be there asking these questions until an actual answer is given.Most of the media will provide dutiful coverage for a day or two, then quickly move on to less embarrassing topics. They won't bang the drum like they would if it was a republican admin. Just too biased. Any one of Obama's scandals (fast&furious, irs targeting, Benghazi coverup, nakedly political closing of monuments and scenic overlooks during budget battle, just to name a few) would have caused far greater damage if the MSM had applied the same level of persistence and skepticism that it applies to Republicans.Do you have an example of a republican scandal that the media really just showed a ton of persistence and skepticism toward?Are you serious? How about Abu Graib (sp) and Gitmo for starters. Non stop for months. I think there was some mention of Abu Graib on front cover if NYT for something like a month straight. And that's just off the top of my head.The media has been covering the IRS scandal for a whole year now. Also, Abu Graib was not a republican scandal.If you think the media is covering the IRS scandal with same tenacity as if it were a republican admin, I can't help you. And you're right, Abu Ghraib was not a republican scandal, but tell that to the NYT and other media outlets which repeatedly linked it to Bush. You've gotta be kidding me with this crap.Hannity has mentioned the IRS scandal at least 3 times this week. That's pretty impressive coverage, if you ask me.
Does it not?
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on May 01, 2014, 01:35:16 PMDoes it not? The only TV news outlets that count in this discussion are ABC, NBC, and CBS.
Compared to Fox/MSNBC, CNN is straight down the middle. I'm sure ABC, NBC, and CBS are also moderate. Extremists make for much better tv, though, imo. I like watching Hannity and that guy that comes on after Rachel Maddow's show. Ed something.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on May 01, 2014, 03:22:37 PMCompared to Fox/MSNBC, CNN is straight down the middle. I'm sure ABC, NBC, and CBS are also moderate. Extremists make for much better tv, though, imo. I like watching Hannity and that guy that comes on after Rachel Maddow's show. Ed something.CNN is the best of the cable news, especially Erin Burnett. Maddow and her clone Chris Hayes are hilarious. She spent 2 solid months on bridgegate as her lead story, and nothing has ever come of it.
Quote from: john "teach me how to" dougie on May 01, 2014, 03:49:38 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on May 01, 2014, 03:22:37 PMCompared to Fox/MSNBC, CNN is straight down the middle. I'm sure ABC, NBC, and CBS are also moderate. Extremists make for much better tv, though, imo. I like watching Hannity and that guy that comes on after Rachel Maddow's show. Ed something.CNN is the best of the cable news, especially Erin Burnett. Maddow and her clone Chris Hayes are hilarious. She spent 2 solid months on bridgegate as her lead story, and nothing has ever come of it.I like Ed Schultz. He comes on after Maddow and always has polls on the show and then goes on and on about how the people want whatever liberal issue he is pushing because it's winning the poll with more than 90% of the votes. Maddow is pretty good, too.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on May 01, 2014, 03:53:47 PMQuote from: john "teach me how to" dougie on May 01, 2014, 03:49:38 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on May 01, 2014, 03:22:37 PMCompared to Fox/MSNBC, CNN is straight down the middle. I'm sure ABC, NBC, and CBS are also moderate. Extremists make for much better tv, though, imo. I like watching Hannity and that guy that comes on after Rachel Maddow's show. Ed something.CNN is the best of the cable news, especially Erin Burnett. Maddow and her clone Chris Hayes are hilarious. She spent 2 solid months on bridgegate as her lead story, and nothing has ever come of it.I like Ed Schultz. He comes on after Maddow and always has polls on the show and then goes on and on about how the people want whatever liberal issue he is pushing because it's winning the poll with more than 90% of the votes. Maddow is pretty good, too.I thought he was relegated to saturday nights for some hate speech against republicans or war on women or something.