http://www.indexmundi.com/facts/united-states/quick-facts/kansas/hispanic-or-latino-population-percentage
There would be a pretty strong correlation between lunch subsidies and Mexicans if southeast Kansas weren't so poor.
Just because other people also use school lunch subsidies does not negate the strong correlation between non-English speakers (by and large first gen immigrants) and lunch subsidies. I can't believe you're even debating this. It is simply undeniable that illegal immigrants are heavily reliant on public services. That is the only point I was making and you just sound silly to argue otherwise.
So illegal immigrants are poor? I never would have guessed that.
Ok, so sounds like you've conceded the point that illegal immigrants, and particularly their children, are heavily reliant on public welfare. We're making progress. Now we can circle back to your idiotic arguments that illegal immigrants are really conservative and just trying to "live the American Dream" that kicked this all off.
Where is your argument that they are not? Are you claiming that a conservative would never take advantage of government money?
There's nothing wrong with playing by the rules and taking advantage of something you have a right to. For example, if you lose your job, that's what unemployment benefits are for.
The same does not apply to people who immigrate to the United States or are otherwise present here
illegally. It is neither conservative, nor the American Dream, to sneak across the border for a relatively higher paying job while relying upon taxpayer money to subsidize your children. To the compound the outrage, Mexico alone receives about $25 billion a year in remittances from the United States. It's estimated that illegal immigrants in total remit about $50 billion annually.
But I'm sure that money is just coming from illegal immigrants who are totally self supporting and not relying upon welfare in one form or another. You can't be that delusional.