0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
We are not good u guys
Defense had a good 2nd half. Offense is bad. We'll still win 6-7 games.
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting
Our defense looked better because OU wasn't trying as hard to score.
We have a good plan: get destroyed on defense in the first half and then play less shitty in the second = crow about adjustments.Maybe a good defense plays well the whole game?
I really hate Sean.
Quote from: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 11:18:18 AMI really hate Sean.
Quote from: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 02:13:56 PMOur defense looked better because OU wasn't trying as hard to score.No. Any time Stoops has a chance to put 50+ on Bill he does it. Our defense played well in the 2nd until that last big play. Offense was inept though so it didn't matter.
Quote from: MakeItRain on October 15, 2016, 02:38:34 PMQuote from: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 11:18:18 AMI really hate Sean. I really hate his approach to kickoffs. Our coverage typically doesn't net us any gain versus kicking it to the endzone.
Quote from: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 03:10:14 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on October 15, 2016, 02:38:34 PMQuote from: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 11:18:18 AMI really hate Sean. I really hate his approach to kickoffs. Our coverage typically doesn't net us any gain versus kicking it to the endzone.Did you not hear the broadcasters talk about the wind issues? We had multiple touchbacks last week. OU didn't have any touchbacks either.
Quote from: MakeItRain on October 15, 2016, 03:13:26 PMQuote from: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 03:10:14 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on October 15, 2016, 02:38:34 PMQuote from: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 11:18:18 AMI really hate Sean. I really hate his approach to kickoffs. Our coverage typically doesn't net us any gain versus kicking it to the endzone.Did you not hear the broadcasters talk about the wind issues? We had multiple touchbacks last week. OU didn't have any touchbacks either.Actually incorrect as the first and last drives we had started with touchbacks. http://www.espn.com/college-football/playbyplay?gameId=400869608And the announcers were pretty clear that wind should matter that much. But point is that this has been a consistent issue where his schemes out do what we can actually do on field.
Quote from: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 03:18:40 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on October 15, 2016, 03:13:26 PMQuote from: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 03:10:14 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on October 15, 2016, 02:38:34 PMQuote from: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 11:18:18 AMI really hate Sean. I really hate his approach to kickoffs. Our coverage typically doesn't net us any gain versus kicking it to the endzone.Did you not hear the broadcasters talk about the wind issues? We had multiple touchbacks last week. OU didn't have any touchbacks either.Actually incorrect as the first and last drives we had started with touchbacks. http://www.espn.com/college-football/playbyplay?gameId=400869608And the announcers were pretty clear that wind should matter that much. But point is that this has been a consistent issue where his schemes out do what we can actually do on field.When they were talking about the wind not mattering they were specifically referring to two consecutive over throws that Ertz had it wasn't in relation to kicking.No the point is that when the kicker is able to kick the ball in the endzone he can. He benched Patterson because he wasn't able to get touchbacks, now the kicker gets them when he can, I'm not sure what more you expect from a position coach.I'm also 80% confident that if you averaged the defensive field position on non touchback kicks it would be near or inside the 25 but its whatever I'm sure you would find some loophole to avoid saying you were actually wrong.