Author Topic: Squawk outting thread (VOTING FOR LEAD INVESTIGATOR OPEN!) (Read 22873 times)

pike · « **Reply #25 on:** July 06, 2011, 02:21:54 PM »

This whole thing smells like the set up to a black op.

Yes, a goEMAW 9/11 if you will, and blame it on the squawks.

Gooch · « **Reply #26 on:** July 06, 2011, 02:22:49 PM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 06, 2011, 02:19:46 PM

Quote from: steve dave on July 06, 2011, 02:12:50 PM
I nominate scoops as lead

I second that nomination

That's just what you squawks want an absentee leader.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #27 on:** July 06, 2011, 02:23:28 PM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 06, 2011, 02:19:46 PM

Quote from: steve dave on July 06, 2011, 02:12:50 PM
I nominate scoops as lead

I second that nomination

Scoops is now running unopposed.

Remember the nominating and seconding session will end tomorrow. Make sure that you are on the record, completely out in the open.

bakerman · « **Reply #28 on:** July 06, 2011, 02:41:11 PM »

I second Chingon's nomination.

wetwillie · « **Reply #29 on:** July 06, 2011, 03:16:14 PM »

It pains me to bring this to the attention of the council, but I have recently come into information I believe to be vital to the investigation. A one 'dlew12' which I suspect to be a clever rearrangement of lewd21 in reference to former KU Athletic Director Lew Perkins who now is employed by an all girls school(

) and his known affinity for younger girls. This individual has repeatedly tried to defend the blatant attempt of one John Currie to award AD monies to an under qualified architectural firm known to have ties to the University of Tennessee. These findings are very disturbing and should be monitored for further evidence.

pissclams · « **Reply #30 on:** July 06, 2011, 03:30:49 PM »

Quote from: slimz on July 06, 2011, 01:45:01 PM

1. That you demand that pissclams give you and the proper goEMAW mods the names and a complete report on all of those who were mods at KSUFANS under Bosz56, and all of those still posting at goEMAW who were listed by your mods as bad posters because of their squawk connections.

I can't do that. I wouldn't even put that suggestion on the table for consideration. That report is not being leaked, anywhere, period.

Pete · « **Reply #31 on:** July 06, 2011, 03:32:05 PM »

KU beat writer, Austin Meek.

pike · « **Reply #32 on:** July 06, 2011, 03:32:47 PM »

Quote from: Pete on July 06, 2011, 03:32:05 PM

KU beat writer, Austin Meek.

Wefald, Krause

AppleJack · « **Reply #33 on:** July 06, 2011, 03:37:25 PM »

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king. Just remember that.

pissclams · « **Reply #34 on:** July 06, 2011, 03:39:01 PM »

behind every great fortune is a great lie

DQ12 · « **Reply #35 on:** July 06, 2011, 03:39:06 PM »

Quote from: wetwillie on July 06, 2011, 03:16:14 PM

It pains me to bring this to the attention of the council, but I have recently come into information I believe to be vital to the investigation. A one 'dlew12' which I suspect to be a clever rearrangement of lewd21 in reference to former KU Athletic Director Lew Perkins who now is employed by an all girls school() and his known affinity for younger girls. This individual has repeatedly tried to defend the blatant attempt of one John Currie to award AD monies to an under qualified architectural firm known to have ties to the University of Tennessee. These findings are very disturbing and should be monitored for further evidence.

LMAO, good luck with this. Seriously. I could prove my EMAW, but seriously, I probably shouldn't/don't need to.

Keep chasing windmills, Don Squawkote

Kat Kid · « **Reply #36 on:** July 06, 2011, 03:55:02 PM »

Quote from: slimz on July 06, 2011, 01:45:01 PM

Tortuga:

(I meant to send this to you earlier this week. However, I believe much of it is still relevant.)

In the football board Thursday night I stated that goEMAW harbors a nest of squawks and squawk sympathizers who are helping to shape our message board dialogue. I further stated that I have in my possession the names of 57 squawks who are registered with goEMAW at present. A goEMAW moderator promptly denied this, claiming that there is not a single squawk at goEMAW. You can convince yourself of the falsity of the goEMAW claim very easily. You will recall that you personally appointed a board to screen goEMAW posters for the purpose of weeding out squawks—posters whom the mods considered dangerous to the security of this message board. Your board did a painstaking job, and named hundreds which had been listed as dangerous to the security of the message board, because of squawk connections.

While the records are not available to me, I know absolutely of one group of approximately 300 posters certified to the goEMAW moderators for banning because of squawkism. They have actually only banned approximately 8. I understand that this was done after lengthy consultation with the now-convicted traitor, Bosz56. I would suggest, therefore, Tortuga, that you simply pick up your phone and ask the other moderators how many of those whom your board had labeled as dangerous squawks they failed to ban. The day the KSUFANS Un-EMAW Activities Committee exposed Bosz56 as an important link in a Lawrence squawk message board ring you signed an order forbidding goEMAW from giving any information in regard to the disloyalty or the squawk connections of anyone on that board to the goEMAW posters.

Despite this goEMAW moderator black-out, we have been able to compile a list of 57 squawks at goEMAW. This list is available to you but you can get a much longer list by ordering the other goEMAW mods to give you a list of those whom your own mods listed as being squawks and who are still posting at goEMAW. I believe the following is the minimum which can be expected of you in this case.

1. That you demand that pissclams give you and the proper goEMAW mods the names and a complete report on all of those who were mods at KSUFANS under Bosz56, and all of those still posting at goEMAW who were listed by your mods as bad posters because of their squawk connections.

2. That you promptly revoke the order in which you provided under no circumstances could a goEMAW poster obtain any information or help in exposing squawks. (It appears you have begun to rectify this today.)

Failure on your part will label goEMAW as being the bedfellow of international squawkism. Certainly this label is not deserved by the hundreds of loyal EMAW posters throughout the board, and by the sizable number of able loyal EMAWs in goEMAW management.

Sincerely,

slimz

Excuse me. I have never taken ultimatums and I don't think I'll start now. Process and truth will rule the day. If you don't like the investigation, then nominate yourself and run for the position. Once a lead investigator is chosen by the people, whatever substantiated evidence you have should be submitted to the proper authorities.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #37 on:** July 06, 2011, 03:56:13 PM »

Quote from: Toupe Tactics Always Fail on July 06, 2011, 02:41:11 PM

I second Chingon's nomination.

Chingon is now running against Scoops. Scoops, however, will need to accept his nomination before he appears on the ballot.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #38 on:** July 06, 2011, 04:03:03 PM »

Quote from: Tortuga on July 06, 2011, 03:56:13 PM

Quote from: Toupe Tactics Always Fail on July 06, 2011, 02:41:11 PM
I second Chingon's nomination.

Chingon is now running against Scoops. Scoops, however, will need to accept his nomination before he appears on the ballot.

Damn it, Scoops hasn't been seen for awhile. . . I nominate Dlew12.

sys · « **Reply #39 on:** July 06, 2011, 04:08:28 PM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 06, 2011, 04:03:03 PM

Damn it, Scoops hasn't been seen for awhile. . . I nominate Dlew12.

dlew12 is not eligible for nomination, as he is currently under investigation. if you want to help dlew12, i suggest you think and pray.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #40 on:** July 06, 2011, 04:12:09 PM »

Quote from: sys on July 06, 2011, 04:08:28 PM

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 06, 2011, 04:03:03 PM
Damn it, Scoops hasn't been seen for awhile. . . I nominate Dlew12.

dlew12 is not eligible for nomination, as he is currently under investigation. if you want to help dlew12, i suggest you think and pray.

How is he under investigation when there isn't even an investigator yet? If you are referring to private investigations, everyone here is under investigation. I suggest you and everyone else tread lightly.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #41 on:** July 06, 2011, 04:30:47 PM »

Quote from: sys on July 06, 2011, 04:08:28 PM

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 06, 2011, 04:03:03 PM
Damn it, Scoops hasn't been seen for awhile. . . I nominate Dlew12.

dlew12 is not eligible for nomination, as he is currently under investigation. if you want to help dlew12, i suggest you think and pray.

sys, your adjudication has no standing in the court of public opinion.

CHONGS · « **Reply #42 on:** July 06, 2011, 04:32:01 PM »

This process is broken, I think I should just be named Lead Investigator for the time being and if necessary we can take a vote to remove me from power.

DQ12 · « **Reply #43 on:** July 06, 2011, 04:37:00 PM »

Quote from: sys on July 06, 2011, 04:08:28 PM

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 06, 2011, 04:03:03 PM
Damn it, Scoops hasn't been seen for awhile. . . I nominate Dlew12.

dlew12 is not eligible for nomination, as he is currently under investigation. if you want to help dlew12, i suggest you think and pray.

I regretfully accept my investigation and will do what I can to clear my name.

Like Sys said, keep me in your prayers.

Emo EMAW · « **Reply #44 on:** July 06, 2011, 04:39:03 PM »

Quote from: Dlew12 on July 06, 2011, 04:37:00 PM

Quote from: sys on July 06, 2011, 04:08:28 PM
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 06, 2011, 04:03:03 PM
Damn it, Scoops hasn't been seen for awhile. . . I nominate Dlew12.

dlew12 is not eligible for nomination, as he is currently under investigation. if you want to help dlew12, i suggest you think and pray.
I regretfully accept my investigation and will do what I can to clear my name.

Like Sys said, keep me in your prayers.

Just don't go all Budd Dwyer on us, mmmkay?

sys · « **Reply #45 on:** July 06, 2011, 04:50:44 PM »

Quote from: Chingon on July 06, 2011, 04:32:01 PM

This process is broken, I think I should just be named Lead Investigator for the time being and if necessary we can take a vote to remove me from power.

chingon, i support naming you as lead investigator.

also, i would like to report tortuga as a suspected squawk. please keep my report anon. to tortuga, but be sure to let the committee know that i was among those reporting him.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #46 on:** July 06, 2011, 04:58:29 PM »

Quote from: Chingon on July 06, 2011, 04:32:01 PM

This process is broken, I think I should just be named Lead Investigator for the time being and if necessary we can take a vote to remove me from power.

Sage words. The logic of squawks permeates even this thread. You are hereby designated. Commence your work to bringing squawks to the light. Wherever this investigation shall lead.

The process for selecting your deputy shall continue as planned. Should your work be called in to question by a reputable source, there will be recall procedures available.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #47 on:** July 06, 2011, 05:00:08 PM »

And democracy has failed.

Pete · « **Reply #48 on:** July 06, 2011, 05:12:01 PM »

Also, that guy who has an avatar of Luis Colon on an elephant. He's a total squawk.

And Dooley. Big ass squawk.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #49 on:** July 06, 2011, 05:12:15 PM »

Our most pressing investigation has been exposed. Chingon, Godspeed.

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on July 06, 2011, 05:02:35 PM

First off, you stay out of this SquawkClams, isn't about time for you to take a "trip" or something, or better yet, go hang out with your friends.

www.kusports.com

www.jayhawkslant.com

www.phog.net

Yeah, you know you want to click on each of those right now, to go home again.

Poll

Who should be the lead investigator for outting squawks?

Author Topic: Squawk outting thread (VOTING FOR LEAD INVESTIGATOR OPEN!) (Read 22873 times)