goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: AbeFroman on March 01, 2012, 10:31:02 AM

Title: Breitbart
Post by: AbeFroman on March 01, 2012, 10:31:02 AM
 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Brock Landers on March 01, 2012, 10:44:45 AM
What now?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Brock Landers on March 01, 2012, 10:46:04 AM
Whoops, uh,  RIP I guess.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Dave Wooderson on March 01, 2012, 01:48:23 PM
The reaction to this death by the Liberals is very revealing once again.  They show how they are completely full of hate and how intolerant they are of other ideas that don't conform to their own way of thinking.  Nothing new from the Democratic Party however, as it was in the Civil War, KKK, Progressive's in the early 20th century supporting National Socialism, support of Communism and on and on with their hate today.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 01, 2012, 03:07:13 PM
yeah the resident liberals, the ones that FSD always talks about, really seem to illustrate your point

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 01, 2012, 03:09:45 PM
43 year old. That's terrible.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 01, 2012, 03:13:20 PM
way too young
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 01, 2012, 04:04:39 PM
<-- liberal

i heard him on opie and anthony when he was passing around the picture of wieners male genitals, and he sounded like a full of himself douche.

but not enough that i'd hope he was dead.  dave really has some anger issues i think.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 01, 2012, 05:56:31 PM
<-- liberal

i heard him on opie and anthony when he was passing around the picture of wieners male genitals, and he sounded like a full of himself douche.

but not enough that i'd hope he was dead.  dave really has some anger issues i think.

Having to constantly defend yourself against the media, even when you do the right thing, would tend to make you sound full of yourself. Trying to root out corruption and fraud with video proof, only to have the media question your motives and tactics would be tough, especially when you see someone like the wikileaks army douche get praised for committing treason.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 01, 2012, 07:03:03 PM
Heard he was going to release some college videos of Obama?



Then he died.





Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: steve dave on March 01, 2012, 07:06:54 PM
good grief
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 01, 2012, 07:14:41 PM
“I’ve  got video from his college days that show you why racial division and  class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008 – the  videos are going to come out,” Breitbart told a crowd during a CPAC speech  in February, adding that the video shows Obama meeting “a bunch of silver pony tails” like Bill and Bernardine Dohrn (Weather Underground members), who radicalized him.

Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: steve dave on March 01, 2012, 07:27:08 PM
the libs here have been disgusting in their reaction to this. not surprised. 
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: p1k3 on March 01, 2012, 08:39:47 PM
<-- liberal

i heard him on opie and anthony when he was passing around the picture of wieners crock, and he sounded like a full of himself douche.

but not enough that i'd hope he was dead.  dave really has some anger issues i think.

Having to constantly defend yourself against the media, even when you do the right thing, would tend to make you sound full of yourself. Trying to root out corruption and fraud with video proof, only to have the media question your motives and tactics would be tough, especially when you see someone like the wikileaks army douche get praised for committing treason.

Dont blame wikileaks for crazy crap WE do.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 01, 2012, 08:46:34 PM
the libs here have been disgusting in their reaction to this. not surprised.

I'm sorry, do you really want credit for not acting like these assclowns? (http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/03/01/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbarts-enemies-react-to-his-passing/) As Chris Rock would say, libs are always wanting credit for stuff they're supposed to do.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: michigancat on March 01, 2012, 09:08:42 PM
remember when every republican in the kansas house prayed for obama to die? Me neither.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 01, 2012, 09:18:14 PM
remember when every republican in the kansas house prayed for obama to die? Me neither.

Every republican?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: michigancat on March 01, 2012, 09:23:47 PM
EVERY 'PUB IS EXACTLY THE SAME.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 01, 2012, 09:40:27 PM
the libs here have been disgusting in their reaction to this. not surprised.

I'm sorry, do you really want credit for not acting like these assclowns? (http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/03/01/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbarts-enemies-react-to-his-passing/) As Chris Rock would say, libs are always wanting credit for stuff they're supposed to do.

i missed the part where random people on twitter are automatically "libs".
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 01, 2012, 09:45:16 PM
the libs here have been disgusting in their reaction to this. not surprised.

I'm sorry, do you really want credit for not acting like these assclowns? (http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/03/01/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbarts-enemies-react-to-his-passing/) As Chris Rock would say, libs are always wanting credit for stuff they're supposed to do.

i missed the part where random people on twitter are automatically "libs".

Did I say that? Libs ain't got no reedin comprehsun.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: michigancat on March 01, 2012, 09:46:38 PM
did I say you said that? pubs ain't got no reedin comprehsun
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 01, 2012, 09:53:19 PM
<-- liberal

i heard him on opie and anthony when he was passing around the picture of wieners male genitals, and he sounded like a full of himself douche.

but not enough that i'd hope he was dead.  dave really has some anger issues i think.

Having to constantly defend yourself against the media, even when you do the right thing, would tend to make you sound full of yourself. Trying to root out corruption and fraud with video proof, only to have the media question your motives and tactics would be tough, especially when you see someone like the wikileaks army douche get praised for committing treason.

He was the groundbreaking, hard hitting journalist all the lazy, idiot lib journalists aspired to be when they entered journalism school. They attacked him out of jealousy, how typically unproffesional.

Looking forward to the unreleased video.


Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 01, 2012, 09:55:07 PM
<-- liberal

i heard him on opie and anthony when he was passing around the picture of wieners crock, and he sounded like a full of himself douche.

but not enough that i'd hope he was dead.  dave really has some anger issues i think.

Having to constantly defend yourself against the media, even when you do the right thing, would tend to make you sound full of yourself. Trying to root out corruption and fraud with video proof, only to have the media question your motives and tactics would be tough, especially when you see someone like the wikileaks army douche get praised for committing treason.

He was the groundbreaking, hard hitting journalist all the lazy, idiot lib journalists aspired to be when they entered journalism school. They attacked him out of jealousy, how typically unproffesional.

Looking forward to the unreleased video.

I suspect we may have to wait until October.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 01, 2012, 10:04:35 PM
remember when every republican in the kansas house prayed for obama to die? Me neither.

Hadn't heard about this. Very troubling indeed. Especially for its State's actual constituents.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 02, 2012, 09:55:23 AM
was this the prayer thingy that Brownback and Perry did???
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 02, 2012, 10:15:07 AM
was this the prayer thingy that Brownback and Perry did???

No, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/13/mike-oneal-obama-death-prayer-psalm-109_n_1205059.html) is what he's talking about. Either he failed to read the scripture verse in context, or he did, in fact, intend to pray for Obama's death. Either way, quite stupid. The point remains that people should not ask for credit for not behaving this way.

Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 02, 2012, 10:19:44 AM
Also, I guess Breitbart intended to release a video of Obama palling around with Bill Ayers. The video was supposed to be released on March 1, the very day he died. This seems a little too weird to be true (http://www.infowars.com/breitbart-wait-til-they-see-what-happens-march-1st/), so take it for what its worth.

Quote
In a stunning coincidence, It appears Andrew Breitbart suffered his untimely death just hours before he was set to release damning video footage that could have sunk Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.

Around three weeks ago on February 9 during the ‘Blog Bash’ event in Washington DC, Breitbart made a prophetic comment that takes on a somewhat chilling nature given the fact that he died in the early hours of March 1st.

Speaking to Lawrence Sinclair of Sinclair News, Breitbart stated, “Wait til they see what happens March 1st.”

It’s almost certain that Breitbart was referring to his plan to release damning footage of President Obama that he had been promising to reveal throughout the month of February.

As we reported yesterday, Breitbart spoke of his intention to release the tape during his CPAC speech last month. The footage shows Obama in his college days appearing alongside former Weather Underground terrorists Bill and Bernardine Dohrn. Observers had speculated that the footage could have derailed Obama’s hopes for a second term.

“I’ve got video from his college days that show you why racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008 – the videos are going to come out,” said Breitbart, adding that Obama would be vetted.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 02, 2012, 10:39:45 AM
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/andrew-breitbart-death-of-a-douche-20120301#ixzz1nuvcvfua

Just imagine what kind of dick you have to be to say ugly things about the dead.

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/08/26/57997/breitbart-kennedy-twitter/?mobile=nc
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 02, 2012, 12:42:24 PM
Also, I guess Breitbart intended to release a video of Obama palling around with Bill Ayers. The video was supposed to be released on March 1, the very day he died. This seems a little too weird to be true (http://www.infowars.com/breitbart-wait-til-they-see-what-happens-march-1st/), so take it for what its worth.

Quote
In a stunning coincidence, It appears Andrew Breitbart suffered his untimely death just hours before he was set to release damning video footage that could have sunk Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.

Around three weeks ago on February 9 during the ‘Blog Bash’ event in Washington DC, Breitbart made a prophetic comment that takes on a somewhat chilling nature given the fact that he died in the early hours of March 1st.

Speaking to Lawrence Sinclair of Sinclair News, Breitbart stated, “Wait til they see what happens March 1st.”

It’s almost certain that Breitbart was referring to his plan to release damning footage of President Obama that he had been promising to reveal throughout the month of February.

As we reported yesterday, Breitbart spoke of his intention to release the tape during his CPAC speech last month. The footage shows Obama in his college days appearing alongside former Weather Underground terrorists Bill and Bernardine Dohrn. Observers had speculated that the footage could have derailed Obama’s hopes for a second term.

“I’ve got video from his college days that show you why racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008 – the videos are going to come out,” said Breitbart, adding that Obama would be vetted.

Read the first page.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 02, 2012, 01:06:36 PM
Why not release the video today?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: steve dave on March 02, 2012, 01:08:39 PM
Why not release the video today?

obama probably stole it after he snuck in this guys house and heart attacked him to death
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: michigancat on March 02, 2012, 01:15:53 PM
Why not release the video today?

obama probably stole it after he snuck in this guys house and heart attacked him to death

Hmm, what a coincidence.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 02, 2012, 01:27:12 PM
SEAL TEAM 6???  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 02, 2012, 01:33:46 PM
Why not release the video today?

obama probably stole it after he snuck in this guys house and heart attacked him to death

LOL, in 2012 there would be copies with his agent, friends, family, a safe deposit box, a cloud or many other sources.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: michigancat on March 02, 2012, 01:48:59 PM
Why not release the video today?

obama probably stole it after he snuck in this guys house and heart attacked him to death

LOL, in 2012 there would be copies with his agent, friends, family, a safe deposit box, a cloud or many other sources.

um, yeah, and who do you think has access to all that? You guessed it, Obama. I mean the guy gave a guy a heart attack he can get into a safe deposit box. seriously, lsoc. :lol:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 02, 2012, 02:32:07 PM
Those South American dictators had better watch out now that Obama has both a cancer ray and a heart attack machine.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 02, 2012, 05:02:29 PM
Rumblings from people that knew him that he hated sleep and loved blow.  Did obama play off these weaknesses to cause an early death?   :ohno:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 02, 2012, 05:23:56 PM
Rumblings from people that knew him that he hated sleep and loved blow.  Did obama play off these weaknesses to cause an early death?   :ohno:

sounds like they had some common ground to build a friendship upon.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 02, 2012, 06:02:22 PM
Cant wait to see the Coroner Report.

Hopefully they still release the videos.

Title: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 02, 2012, 06:43:42 PM
Rumblings from people that knew him that he hated sleep and loved blow.  Did obama play off these weaknesses to cause an early death?   :ohno:

sounds like they had some common ground to build a friendship upon.

Our president isn't W.  You know this right?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: steve dave on March 02, 2012, 06:47:03 PM
Rumblings from people that knew him that he hated sleep and loved blow.  Did obama play off these weaknesses to cause an early death?   :ohno:

sounds like they had some common ground to build a friendship upon.

are you saying Barrack does coke?  just curious what you are basing this on.  or are you saying he hates sleep?  and, again, what are you basing that on?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 02, 2012, 06:56:18 PM
Rumblings from people that knew him that he hated sleep and loved blow.  Did obama play off these weaknesses to cause an early death?   :ohno:

sounds like they had some common ground to build a friendship upon.

are you saying Barrack does coke?  just curious what you are basing this on.  or are you saying he hates sleep?  and, again, what are you basing that on?

Read his books, dickhole!
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: steve dave on March 02, 2012, 07:03:43 PM
Rumblings from people that knew him that he hated sleep and loved blow.  Did obama play off these weaknesses to cause an early death?   :ohno:

sounds like they had some common ground to build a friendship upon.

are you saying Barrack does coke?  just curious what you are basing this on.  or are you saying he hates sleep?  and, again, what are you basing that on?

Read his books, dickhole!

don't be a dumbass
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 02, 2012, 07:12:14 PM
Rumblings from people that knew him that he hated sleep and loved blow.  Did obama play off these weaknesses to cause an early death?   :ohno:

sounds like they had some common ground to build a friendship upon.

i like you, always staying positive!   :thumbs:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 02, 2012, 08:00:17 PM
Speaking to Sean Hannity, filmmaker Bannon said the footage will be revealed “in a week or two,” and that Breitbart had been “very systematic about going through this thing,” before his untimely death in the early hours of Thursday morning.

the footage shows Obama from his Harvard days fraternizing with Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, leading members of the Weather Underground terrorist group which carried out a wave of bombings against government targets in the 70?s



According to former FBI agent Larry Grathwohl, who was tasked with infiltrating the group, the Weathermen also planned to institute a Communist dictatorship within the United States and incarcerate millions of Americans in “re-education camps,” while killing those who refused to comply.

 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 02, 2012, 08:34:34 PM
Speaking to Sean Hannity, filmmaker Bannon said the footage will be revealed “in a week or two,” and that Breitbart had been “very systematic about going through this thing,” before his untimely death in the early hours of Thursday morning.

the footage shows Obama from his Harvard days fraternizing with Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, leading members of the Weather Underground terrorist group which carried out a wave of bombings against government targets in the 70?s



According to former FBI agent Larry Grathwohl, who was tasked with infiltrating the group, the Weathermen also planned to institute a Communist dictatorship within the United States and incarcerate millions of Americans in “re-education camps,” while killing those who refused to comply.

 :horrorsurprise:

BFD.   :jerk:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 02, 2012, 08:45:24 PM
ya
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 02, 2012, 08:49:36 PM
Rumblings from people that knew him that he hated sleep and loved blow.  Did obama play off these weaknesses to cause an early death?   :ohno:

sounds like they had some common ground to build a friendship upon.

are you saying Barrack does coke?  just curious what you are basing this on.  or are you saying he hates sleep?  and, again, what are you basing that on?

Read his books, dickhole!

don't be a dumbass

Conservatives have feelings, too. Don't bee so mean.  :cry:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: p1k3 on March 02, 2012, 09:15:29 PM
Not the economy, not bail outs/stimulus, nor health care but a video of Barry chillin with a couple terrorists will be his down fall.

wow
Title: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 02, 2012, 10:11:42 PM
You could find a picture of Obama having tea with bin Laden and he would still beat Santorum.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 02, 2012, 10:41:14 PM
You could find a picture of Obama having tea with bin Laden and he would still beat Santorum.

zombie bin laden?  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: wetwillie on March 02, 2012, 11:07:24 PM
I'm quite certain he did have tea with bin laden shortly before he ripped his heart out and handed it to him.
Title: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 03, 2012, 09:41:30 AM
U.S.A.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Bloodfart on March 03, 2012, 10:02:01 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdailypicksandflicks.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F05%2Fhe-is-dead.gif&hash=96857c98d760a11031ab4caf1bfde4b8e199e12a)
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 03, 2012, 10:26:39 AM
Didn't the information that led to OBL come from the Bush "torture" that libs were all crazy about?  Kinda funny how libs now celebrate Obama as the great hero for OBL's death. What a badass.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 03, 2012, 12:13:35 PM
 OBL should have been given a fair trial in a US District Court, just like the Obama, civil rights attorney, promised the libtards he'd do with all enemy combatants.  Really disappointed by this.  How can we all sit complicit as this monster commits murder and other war crimes???  You all are equally guilty!!!


Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 03, 2012, 12:18:50 PM
The faux liberal response to these tapes will be epic, hypocrical and hilarious,per usual. The real liberal response, frightening and sadistic, per usual. The gloating of the right will wrile them both up for sure.

 :bwpopcorn:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: p1k3 on March 03, 2012, 01:31:04 PM
The faux liberal response to these tapes will be epic, hypocrical and hilarious,per usual. The real liberal response, frightening and sadistic, per usual. The gloating of the right will wrile them both up for sure.

 :bwpopcorn:

It will be a lol fest unless the video is a flop. Fox news is licking their chops.
Title: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 03, 2012, 01:31:43 PM
Real response.

I don't give a crap. BFD

Outside of Paul their isn't a single republican candidate that espouses the same thoughts and ideals they have previously demonstrated. 
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: p1k3 on March 03, 2012, 01:40:55 PM
Real response.

I don't give a crap. BFD

Outside of Paul their isn't a single republican candidate that espouses the same thoughts and ideals they have previously demonstrated.

Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 03, 2012, 02:48:27 PM
You've seen the videos?  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 04, 2012, 07:20:40 AM
Real response.

I don't give a crap. BFD

Outside of Paul their isn't a single republican candidate that espouses the same thoughts and ideals they have previously demonstrated.

Didn't Reagan used to be a Democrat?

Didn't Obama used to be a Marxist?

Why cant politicians change their positions, even if it is for political purposes? Isn't all that really matters whether they will keep the promises they make to the voters?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 04, 2012, 12:06:07 PM
Real response.

I don't give a crap. BFD

Outside of Paul their isn't a single republican candidate that espouses the same thoughts and ideals they have previously demonstrated.

Didn't Reagan used to be a Democrat?

Didn't Obama used to be a Marxist?

Why cant politicians change their positions, even if it is for political purposes? Isn't all that really matters whether they will keep the promises they make to the voters?

i agree with you here.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 05, 2012, 11:48:28 AM
Real response.

I don't give a crap. BFD

Outside of Paul their isn't a single republican candidate that espouses the same thoughts and ideals they have previously demonstrated.

Didn't Reagan used to be a Democrat?

Didn't Obama used to be a Marxist?

Why cant politicians change their positions, even if it is for political purposes? Isn't all that really matters whether they will keep the promises they make to the voters?

sure absolutely.

that is my point.

and it is why whatever happened in the videos is largely meaningless.

Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: ben ji on March 05, 2012, 12:01:06 PM
Real response.

I don't give a crap. BFD

Outside of Paul their isn't a single republican candidate that espouses the same thoughts and ideals they have previously demonstrated.

Didn't Reagan used to be a Democrat?

Didn't Obama used to be a Marxist?

Why cant politicians change their positions, even if it is for political purposes? Isn't all that really matters whether they will keep the promises they make to the voters?

sure absolutely.

that is my point.

and it is why whatever happened in the videos is largely meaningless.

Agree, and not really sure what the video will contain, but if it does show him hanging out with people responsible for bombing's aka terrorists it would be a little different than Reagan pal'ing around with some fellow democrats.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 05, 2012, 12:39:51 PM
Real response.

I don't give a crap. BFD

Outside of Paul their isn't a single republican candidate that espouses the same thoughts and ideals they have previously demonstrated.

Didn't Reagan used to be a Democrat?

Didn't Obama used to be a Marxist?

Why cant politicians change their positions, even if it is for political purposes? Isn't all that really matters whether they will keep the promises they make to the voters?

sure absolutely.

that is my point.

and it is why whatever happened in the videos is largely meaningless.

Agree, and not really sure what the video will contain, but if it does show him hanging out with people responsible for bombing's aka terrorists it would be a little different than Reagan pal'ing around with some fellow democrats.

LOL!  I suppose some people would favorably compare terrorists to democrats.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 05, 2012, 01:07:11 PM
so like Reagan selling guns to Iranians???
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 05, 2012, 02:52:09 PM
Real response.

I don't give a crap. BFD

Outside of Paul their isn't a single republican candidate that espouses the same thoughts and ideals they have previously demonstrated.

Didn't Reagan used to be a Democrat?

Didn't Obama used to be a Marxist?

Why cant politicians change their positions, even if it is for political purposes? Isn't all that really matters whether they will keep the promises they make to the voters?

sure absolutely.

that is my point.

and it is why whatever happened in the videos is largely meaningless.

Just because people can change their minds doesn't mean they actual do. The videos may be highly relevant. If they show Obama hanging out with anti-American types, it adds to a pattern of anti-American behavior. Rev Wright, not believing in American Exceptionalism, advocating Saul Alinsky radicalism, etc. Not to mention it would prove Obama lied when he claimed to barely know Bill Ayers.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 05, 2012, 02:58:01 PM
the people that believe those things do not need another tape to convinvce them it's true.

if you believe that Obama is a sleeper agent working against the U.S.A. then i don't even really know what to say.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2012, 03:00:52 PM
I thought everyone already knew obama was best buds w/ ayers. :dunno:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 05, 2012, 04:55:17 PM
Change we NEED
Title: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 05, 2012, 05:49:33 PM
The only candidate that would even attempt to change anything will not even win his parties nomination. 

Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 05, 2012, 06:13:51 PM

the people that believe those things do not need another tape to convinvce them it's true.
[/quote]

Not so. Obama won by razor thin margin in 2008 on a state-by-state basis. Had the media properly vetted Obama - that is, given issues like Rev Wright, Bill Ayers, etc. more than a cursory amount of coverage, as they would have for a Republican candidate - it is quite likely that he would not have been elected. Conservative bloggers are simply attempting to do the work that the MSM refuses to do.

if you believe that Obama is a sleeper agent working against the U.S.A. then i don't even really know what to say.

Liberals often engage in hyperbole such as this to dodge the real point. Nobody is talking about a "sleeper agent," but Obama was, and perhaps still is, a radical progressive, who's ideology runs counter to all but the hard left.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 05, 2012, 09:30:21 PM
 If the guy was in any way involved with domestic terrorism, he should be forced to resign immediately and prosecuted to the limit of the law.  I think we can all agree on that.

If its anything less than that, the debate will be fantastic.
 :popcorn:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: p1k3 on March 05, 2012, 10:30:39 PM
The only candidate that would even attempt to change anything will not even win his parties nomination.

True. America still loses whether our next Prez is Barry, Romney, Santorum, or Newt. There is only one who can save us.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Panjandrum on March 05, 2012, 10:32:29 PM
This thread is pretty much why I want to move to Canada.

Good lord.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 05, 2012, 10:51:55 PM
Power to the People

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wos-dDxpJlQ

  :grin:



Liberty
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 05, 2012, 11:02:00 PM
This thread is pretty much why I want to move to Canada.

Good lord.

Pffft. Enjoy your taxes, snow, and hockey. You'll be back anyway if you get sick and don't wait 6 months for a doctor (I mean, assuming we dump Obama this fall). Ya hoser.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 06, 2012, 05:56:05 AM
so like Reagan selling guns to Iranians???

The Clinton Administration used the Iranians to arm the Croats . . . the Iranians probably just sent the Croats the stuff Reagan sold them.



Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 06, 2012, 09:15:42 AM
If the guy was in any way involved with domestic terrorism, he should be forced to resign immediately and prosecuted to the limit of the law.  I think we can all agree on that.

If its anything less than that, the debate will be fantastic.
 :popcorn:

Do you think the videos show him building a nail bomb?  I bet the video shows him and Ayers in the same location for a brief period of time.  BFD. 
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: felix rex on March 06, 2012, 09:27:46 AM
If the guy was in any way involved with domestic terrorism, he should be forced to resign immediately and prosecuted to the limit of the law.  I think we can all agree on that.

If its anything less than that, the debate will be fantastic.
 :popcorn:

Do you think the videos show him building a nail bomb?  I bet the video shows him and Ayers in the same location for a brief period of time.  BFD.

Maybe drawing up the plans for the heart attack bomb?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 06, 2012, 09:50:48 AM
If the guy was in any way involved with domestic terrorism, he should be forced to resign immediately and prosecuted to the limit of the law.  I think we can all agree on that.

If its anything less than that, the debate will be fantastic.
 :popcorn:

Do you think the videos show him building a nail bomb?  I bet the video shows him and Ayers in the same location for a brief period of time.  BFD.

Maybe drawing up the plans for the heart attack bomb?

So Breitbart has footage of the planning of his own demise!
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 06, 2012, 11:35:12 AM
If the guy was in any way involved with domestic terrorism, he should be forced to resign immediately and prosecuted to the limit of the law.  I think we can all agree on that.

If its anything less than that, the debate will be fantastic.
 :popcorn:

Do you think the videos show him building a nail bomb?  I bet the video shows him and Ayers in the same location for a brief period of time.  BFD.

Perhaps it simply provides more evidence that Obama ran in the same lunatic left fringe as Bill Ayers, and shared his ideology, just like Jeremiah Wright. Some might say that's not a big deal, but I kind of do if it's the President of the United States we're talking about. But more importantly, until we see it, what's the point in speculation?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 06, 2012, 04:33:31 PM
RELEASE THE F*CKING VIDEO ALREADY LOL.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 07, 2012, 02:26:59 PM
I guess it's a vid of Obama from his student protestor days. Some sort of racial thing. Not sure yet.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 07, 2012, 02:54:39 PM
Its a video of Obama hanging out with Terrorists. Literally. People who wanted to eff america up so bad China, russia, etc. Can come and occupy.


Good thing for Barack
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 07, 2012, 03:01:27 PM
Why cant politicians change their positions, even if it is for political purposes? Isn't all that really matters whether they will keep the promises they make to the voters?

I mean like gosh guys.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 07, 2012, 03:09:43 PM
Why cant politicians change their positions, even if it is for political purposes? Isn't all that really matters whether they will keep the promises they make to the voters?

I mean like gosh guys.

It's the pattern, dummy, the pattern. If you want to know what a candidate really believes, look for the pattern. No point in speculating further until we see the tape.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 07, 2012, 03:16:14 PM
what the fvck are you talking about?

have you been watching to much of CBS's hit show numb3rs???
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 07, 2012, 03:40:38 PM
what the fvck are you talking about?

have you been watching to much of CBS's hit show numb3rs???

If you want to know what a candidate really believes, look for a pattern of behavior. It's important to me, and many others, to know that our president is not a far left radical, especially when they're running for reflection to a second term that lacks even the accountability of another campaign.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 07, 2012, 03:47:23 PM
97% of the media is going to downplay whatever it is and maybe show parts of the video once, then let it die just like they have with Wright, Ayers, Rezco, and most of his radical czars. Nothing to see here, move on.  :flush:
Title: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 07, 2012, 03:59:07 PM
Now while we are looking at patterns. What patterns have you seen from current republican candidates that make you warm and fuzzy?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 07, 2012, 08:37:24 PM
Now while we are looking at patterns. What patterns have you seen from current republican candidates that make you warm and fuzzy?

I'm pretty sure that, with the exception of Paul, none of them have a pattern of hanging out with the most anti-American clowns in the country. So, that's a plus.

With Romney, I see a pattern of executive competence in the public and private sectors, and successfully salvaging businesses and Winter Olympic ventures.

Just kidding about Paul. You can put down the pitchforks.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 07, 2012, 08:50:02 PM
If the guy was in any way involved with domestic terrorism, he should be forced to resign immediately and prosecuted to the limit of the law.  I think we can all agree on that.

If its anything less than that, the debate will be fantastic.
 :popcorn:

Do you think the videos show him building a nail bomb?  I bet the video shows him and Ayers in the same location for a brief period of time.  BFD.

Perhaps it simply provides more evidence that Obama ran in the same lunatic left fringe as Bill Ayers, and shared his ideology, just like Jeremiah Wright. Some might say that's not a big deal, but I kind of do if it's the President of the United States we're talking about. But more importantly, until we see it, what's the point in speculation?

Or it could just show them in the same place at a point in time.

Like I said, the Weather were much better at getting high and blowing themselves up than bringing down America.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: SdK on March 07, 2012, 10:05:51 PM
97% of the media is going to downplay whatever it is and maybe show parts of the video once, then let it die just like they have with Wright, Ayers, Rezco, and most of his radical czars. Nothing to see here, move on.  :flush:

But if the video shows nothing of consequence, FOX will blow it way out of control on their own network and complain about why no one else is covering this story and how all other media outlets are lying to you and covering up.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 07, 2012, 10:23:51 PM
97% of the media is going to downplay whatever it is and maybe show parts of the video once, then let it die just like they have with Wright, Ayers, Rezco, and most of his radical czars. Nothing to see here, move on.  :flush:

But if the video shows nothing of consequence, FOX will blow it way out of control on their own network and complain about why no one else is covering this story and how all other media outlets are lying to you and covering up.

Let me guess, Wright, Ayers, and Rezco were "nothing of consequence?" Be honest, did you even know who Rezco was without googling him? Nothing to see here, move along. But we will see plenty of reportage about Romney's Mormon faith. Gotta vet these candidates, dontcha know...
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: SdK on March 07, 2012, 10:30:15 PM
That's not what I said. Don't try and fit me into a box so you're ready made talking points will stick.

I just if the video shows nothing of consequence (which to me means it reveals nothing more than we already knew about the man) that FOX will blow it the hell up and make it the biggest deal ever.


If you're still freaking out about the things we already know about Obama, he got elected anyway. Deal with it.

Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 08, 2012, 08:30:58 AM
97% of the media is going to downplay whatever it is and maybe show parts of the video once, then let it die just like they have with Wright, Ayers, Rezco, and most of his radical czars. Nothing to see here, move on.  :flush:

But if the video shows nothing of consequence, FOX will blow it way out of control on their own network and complain about why no one else is covering this story and how all other media outlets are lying to you and covering up.

Let me guess, Wright, Ayers, and Rezco were "nothing of consequence?" Be honest, did you even know who Rezco was without googling him? Nothing to see here, move along. But we will see plenty of reportage about Romney's Mormon faith. Gotta vet these candidates, dontcha know...

Do you really expect the mainstream media (other than Fox, of course) to make a big deal out of Barack Obama hanging out with one of 3 dudes that about 97% of the country would have to look up on Google to find out who they even are?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 08, 2012, 08:46:58 AM
97% of the media is going to downplay whatever it is and maybe show parts of the video once, then let it die just like they have with Wright, Ayers, Rezco, and most of his radical czars. Nothing to see here, move on.  :flush:

But if the video shows nothing of consequence, FOX will blow it way out of control on their own network and complain about why no one else is covering this story and how all other media outlets are lying to you and covering up.

Let me guess, Wright, Ayers, and Rezco were "nothing of consequence?" Be honest, did you even know who Rezco was without googling him? Nothing to see here, move along. But we will see plenty of reportage about Romney's Mormon faith. Gotta vet these candidates, dontcha know...

Do you really expect the mainstream media (other than Fox, of course) to make a big deal out of Barack Obama hanging out with one of 3 dudes that about 97% of the country would have to look up on Google to find out who they even are?

Only if he was a republican.  They have spent more time vetting Rush Limbaugh than Obama.

But that's kind of the point. 100% of the country would know everything about Wright, Ayers and Rezco if the media would have done their job.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 08, 2012, 09:01:22 AM
97% of the media is going to downplay whatever it is and maybe show parts of the video once, then let it die just like they have with Wright, Ayers, Rezco, and most of his radical czars. Nothing to see here, move on.  :flush:

But if the video shows nothing of consequence, FOX will blow it way out of control on their own network and complain about why no one else is covering this story and how all other media outlets are lying to you and covering up.

Let me guess, Wright, Ayers, and Rezco were "nothing of consequence?" Be honest, did you even know who Rezco was without googling him? Nothing to see here, move along. But we will see plenty of reportage about Romney's Mormon faith. Gotta vet these candidates, dontcha know...

Do you really expect the mainstream media (other than Fox, of course) to make a big deal out of Barack Obama hanging out with one of 3 dudes that about 97% of the country would have to look up on Google to find out who they even are?

Only if he was a republican.  They have spent more time vetting Rush Limbaugh than Obama.

But that's kind of the point. 100% of the country would know everything about Wright, Ayers and Rezco if the media would have done their job.

Exactly.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 08, 2012, 09:22:53 AM
vetting Rush Limbaugh?

what?

Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 08, 2012, 11:10:10 AM
vetting Rush Limbaugh?

what?

Media Matters follows Rush's every utterance, then disseminates it to the MSM, which dutifully reports it. Media Matters recently bragged that they're responsible for about half of MSNBC's content these days.

The issue is not whether public figures should be vetted, but that there is a gross inadequacy in the vetting of liberal politicians, commentators, etc. Conservative bloggers are trying to pick up the slack. That's really all there is to it.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 08, 2012, 11:45:39 AM
vetting Rush Limbaugh?

what?

Media Matters follows Rush's every utterance, then disseminates it to the MSM, which dutifully reports it. Media Matters recently bragged that they're responsible for about half of MSNBC's content these days.

The issue is not whether public figures should be vetted, but that there is a gross inadequacy in the vetting of liberal politicians, commentators, etc. Conservative bloggers are trying to pick up the slack. That's really all there is to it.

If Rush Limbaugh isn't part of the MSM, then I don't know who is.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 08, 2012, 12:34:51 PM
vetting Rush Limbaugh?

what?

Media Matters follows Rush's every utterance, then disseminates it to the MSM, which dutifully reports it. Media Matters recently bragged that they're responsible for about half of MSNBC's content these days.

The issue is not whether public figures should be vetted, but that there is a gross inadequacy in the vetting of liberal politicians, commentators, etc. Conservative bloggers are trying to pick up the slack. That's really all there is to it.

If Rush Limbaugh isn't part of the MSM, then I don't know who is.

MSM is just conservative parlance for liberal establishment media, such as the major networks, newspapers, and periodicals. It's just easier to say MSM. You know this.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 08, 2012, 02:00:38 PM
vetting Rush Limbaugh?

what?

Media Matters follows Rush's every utterance, then disseminates it to the MSM, which dutifully reports it. Media Matters recently bragged that they're responsible for about half of MSNBC's content these days.

The issue is not whether public figures should be vetted, but that there is a gross inadequacy in the vetting of liberal politicians, commentators, etc. Conservative bloggers are trying to pick up the slack. That's really all there is to it.

If Rush Limbaugh isn't part of the MSM, then I don't know who is.

It seems we have come to the point that entertainers/actors and the press/news have become one in the same.  :flush:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 08, 2012, 02:16:09 PM
vetting Rush Limbaugh?

what?

Media Matters follows Rush's every utterance, then disseminates it to the MSM, which dutifully reports it. Media Matters recently bragged that they're responsible for about half of MSNBC's content these days.

The issue is not whether public figures should be vetted, but that there is a gross inadequacy in the vetting of liberal politicians, commentators, etc. Conservative bloggers are trying to pick up the slack. That's really all there is to it.

If Rush Limbaugh isn't part of the MSM, then I don't know who is.

It seems we have come to the point that entertainers/actors and the press/news have become one in the same.  :flush:

We reached that point over a decade ago.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: michigancat on March 08, 2012, 04:33:31 PM
http://defendrush.org/
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: OK_Cat on March 08, 2012, 04:33:53 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 09, 2012, 08:51:19 AM
I've watched the first video (apparently, there are more on the way). It's a video of Obama as a Harvard law student leading a "strike" in favor of Derrick Bell, a black radical and former Harvard professor. Obama praised Bell for "speaking the truth" and encouraged the protesters to "open their hearts and minds" to Bell's teachings, which include:
- America is a "racist nation" carrying out a "quasi-genocide in the inner cities"
- Socialism. "The whole (classical) liberal worldview of private rights and public sovereignty mediated by the rule of law needed to be exploded."
- Marxism.
- "Black people are the magical faces at the bottom of society's well.  Even the poorest whites, those who must live their lives only a few levels above, gain their self-esteem by gazing down on us.  Surely, they must know that their deliverance depends on letting down their ropes.  Only by working together is escape possible.  Over time, many reach out, but most simply watch, mesmerized into maintaining their unspoken commitment to keeping us where we are, at whatever cost to them or to us."
- "Space Traders" (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2012/03/08/schlichter-space-traders) Not making this up.

At the end of the day, this is hardly something that will derail Obama's candidacy. Just another radical friend and mentor of our President, along with Wright, Ayers, etc. The pattern continues.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 09, 2012, 09:15:46 AM

Good Lord I see it now,

Obama was also fighting for equal opportunities for Blacks and Women at the same time.  This completes the pattern and cements him as the anti-christ of the conservative movement.

It all makes sense now.  It all makes sense.


"Bell was the first black tenured professor at the school, and a pioneer of "critical race theory," which insisted, controversially, on reading issues of race and power into legal scholarship. His protest that spring was occasioned by Harvard's denial of tenure to a black woman professor, Regina Austin, at a time when only three of the law school's professors were black and only five women. He told Harvard he would take a leave of absence — a kind of academic strike — "until a woman of color is offered and accepted a tenured position on this faculty," and he launched a hunger strike to dramatize his point."

Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: mortons toe on March 09, 2012, 09:56:35 AM

Good Lord I see it now,

Obama was also fighting for equal opportunities for Blacks and Women at the same time.  This completes the pattern and cements him as the anti-christ of the conservative movement.

It all makes sense now.  It all makes sense.


"Bell was the first black tenured professor at the school, and a pioneer of "critical race theory," which insisted, controversially, on reading issues of race and power into legal scholarship. His protest that spring was occasioned by Harvard's denial of tenure to a black woman professor, Regina Austin, at a time when only three of the law school's professors were black and only five women. He told Harvard he would take a leave of absence — a kind of academic strike — "until a woman of color is offered and accepted a tenured position on this faculty," and he launched a hunger strike to dramatize his point."

Soooo, the administration at Harvard was racist AND sexist. Cool... Thanks!

It all makes sense now.  It all makes sense.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 09, 2012, 10:10:22 AM
were the protests about something other than equal opportunities for african americans and women?

 :confused:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: ChiComCat on March 09, 2012, 10:19:50 AM
This crap is so stupid.  Obama defended a guy so instantly, he was defending the most radical things the guy ever said.  I've said stupid crap in my day, and if someone says I am a good guy, they are not necessarily agreeing with everything I've ever said.

Also, Obama has not been giving the country a false sense of security for 4 years to put radicals in charge after reelection.  He has, in fact, put together one of the most bi-partisan staffs.

Debate about his politics and policies.  Debating this crap just ruins political discourse.  Likewise, I don't give a crap about what Rush says.  I don't give a crap if Republicans like Rush.  As long as they don't explicitly endorse his stupidest statements, I have enough faith that they know where the line is.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 09, 2012, 11:12:31 AM
were the protests about something other than equal opportunities for african americans and women?

 :confused:

Yes. It was actually a "strike" in support of Bell himself. The "professor" went on unpaid leave to, ironically, protest the lack of affirmative-action hiring at Harvard. Bell did this in response to being summoned to the university president's office to explain why he had sent the president "a letter filled with violent fantasies — including their own death from a bomb planted in his office by white racists. Bell explained that such extremism is what it would take to get the administration to agree to grant more affirmative-action programs."

You can spin Bell all you want as nothing more than a "legal scholar" and "a pioneer of critical race theory." The man was a radical and a nut, just like Jeremiah Wright. This is the diseased mind that spawned "Space Traders." And yet, again and again, Obama is proven to have cozied up to these lunatics. I look forward to the next tape. Who knows what other nut job "friends of Barack" will be revealed?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 09, 2012, 12:30:18 PM


Yes. It was actually a "strike" in support of Bell himself. The "professor" went on unpaid leave to, ironically, protest the lack of affirmative-action hiring at Harvard. Bell did this in response to being summoned to the university president's office to explain why he had sent the president "a letter filled with violent fantasies — including their own death from a bomb planted in his office by white racists. Bell explained that such extremism is what it would take to get the administration to agree to grant more affirmative-action programs."
[/quote]

oh so it was about equal opportunities for africa americans.

[/quote]
You can spin Bell all you want as nothing more than a "legal scholar" and "a pioneer of critical race theory." The man was a radical and a nut, just like Jeremiah Wright. This is the diseased mind that spawned "Space Traders." And yet, again and again, Obama is proven to have cozied up to these lunatics. I look forward to the next tape. Who knows what other nut job "friends of Barack" will be revealed?
[/quote]

Who Knows? :dunno:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 09, 2012, 05:26:56 PM
were the protests about something other than equal opportunities for african americans and women?

 :confused:

Yes. It was actually a "strike" in support of Bell himself. The "professor" went on unpaid leave to, ironically, protest the lack of affirmative-action hiring at Harvard. Bell did this in response to being summoned to the university president's office to explain why he had sent the president "a letter filled with violent fantasies — including their own death from a bomb planted in his office by white racists. Bell explained that such extremism is what it would take to get the administration to agree to grant more affirmative-action programs."

You can spin Bell all you want as nothing more than a "legal scholar" and "a pioneer of critical race theory." The man was a radical and a nut, just like Jeremiah Wright. This is the diseased mind that spawned "Space Traders." And yet, again and again, Obama is proven to have cozied up to these lunatics. I look forward to the next tape. Who knows what other nut job "friends of Barack" will be revealed?

so is the point proven that the video is nothing, and only extremists like you will read anything into it?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Panjandrum on March 12, 2012, 12:22:33 AM
This crap is so stupid.  Obama defended a guy so instantly, he was defending the most radical things the guy ever said.  I've said stupid crap in my day, and if someone says I am a good guy, they are not necessarily agreeing with everything I've ever said.

Also, Obama has not been giving the country a false sense of security for 4 years to put radicals in charge after reelection.  He has, in fact, put together one of the most bi-partisan staffs.

Debate about his politics and policies.  Debating this crap just ruins political discourse.  Likewise, I don't give a crap about what Rush says.  I don't give a crap if Republicans like Rush.  As long as they don't explicitly endorse his stupidest statements, I have enough faith that they know where the line is.

ChiCat restores my faith in discourse on this board.

The K-S-U guy seems like most of the dudes on the weird neo-con conspiracy board over at GPC.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: MakeItRain on March 12, 2012, 04:32:45 AM
Still no rough ridin' video.  I guess the fat homeless looking crap stain didn't have a chance to Shirley Sherrod the video before he ate himself to death.  I guess we'll never see whatever boring ass raw video Andrew attempted to alter.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 12, 2012, 10:21:44 AM
Obama probably used his heart attack ray on the videos.

 :shakesfist:
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 12, 2012, 11:51:51 AM
This crap is so stupid.  Obama defended a guy so instantly, he was defending the most radical things the guy ever said.  I've said stupid crap in my day, and if someone says I am a good guy, they are not necessarily agreeing with everything I've ever said.

Also, Obama has not been giving the country a false sense of security for 4 years to put radicals in charge after reelection.  He has, in fact, put together one of the most bi-partisan staffs.

Debate about his politics and policies.  Debating this crap just ruins political discourse.  Likewise, I don't give a crap about what Rush says.  I don't give a crap if Republicans like Rush.  As long as they don't explicitly endorse his stupidest statements, I have enough faith that they know where the line is.

I'm with you on most of what you say, but this is perplexing. His staff seems to be mostly radical far left wingnuts. Can you name off some conservatives on his staff, cabinet, and czars? And what about his supreme court noms? Seem pretty radical.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: michigancat on March 12, 2012, 12:02:20 PM
Robert Gates and Ray LaHood are both republicans.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 12, 2012, 12:18:54 PM
Robert Gates and Ray LaHood are both republicans.

Obama must like federal highways more than you.  ;)
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 12, 2012, 01:15:31 PM
Still really curious about this damning video.  What is the timeline for its release?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: ChiComCat on March 12, 2012, 01:23:19 PM
Robert Gates and Ray LaHood are both republicans.

Obama must like federal highways more than you.  ;)

Huntsman was the ambassador to China.  Thats a pretty big role.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 12, 2012, 01:59:24 PM
Robert Gates and Ray LaHood are both republicans.

Obama must like federal highways more than you.  ;)

Huntsman was the ambassador to China.  Thats a pretty big role.

I'd say speaking Mandarin was probably a bigger factor than party affiliation, but good start, guys.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 12, 2012, 02:03:32 PM
you don't think there are any "radical liberals" that speak mandarin?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 12, 2012, 02:25:22 PM
you don't think there are any "radical liberals" that speak mandarin?

Yes, but then who's interests would they be promoting? Ours or the Chinese? I know many radical liberals see Mao as a hero.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 12, 2012, 02:40:42 PM
so then why wouldn't Obama appoint one if he was a radical liberal?

i mean if he appointed them to the rest of his cabinet spots wouldn't this be the best appointment for a radical liberal?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: ChiComCat on March 12, 2012, 02:55:33 PM
I'm not a repub but I actually like Huntsman as a candidate.  Shame he didn't really have a shot.

And I do not believe that you know many radical liberals that see Mao as a hero.  If somehow you do, you are hanging out with a strange crowd
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 12, 2012, 03:20:45 PM
I'm not a repub but I actually like Huntsman as a candidate.  Shame he didn't really have a shot.

And I do not believe that you know many radical liberals that see Mao as a hero.  If somehow you do, you are hanging out with a strange crowd

I think it was White House communications director Anita Dunn who infamously stated Mao was one of her favorite philosophers.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 12, 2012, 05:29:35 PM
Quote
"The Mao quote is one I picked up from the late Republican strategist Lee Atwater from something I read in the late 1980s, so I hope I don't get my progressive friends mad at me," Dunn told CNN

Quote
"The third lesson and tip actually comes from two of my favorite political philosophers: Mao Tse-tung and Mother Theresa -- not often coupled with each other, but the two people I turn to most to basically deliver a simple point which is 'you're going to make choices; you're going to challenge; you're going to say why not; you're going to figure out how to do things that have never been done before."

http://articles.cnn.com/2009-10-16/politics/beck.dunn_1_mao-mein-kampf-lee-atwater?_s=PM:POLITICS


glad to see you outed yourself as one of beck's mindless minions though.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 12, 2012, 05:39:29 PM
Quote
"The Mao quote is one I picked up from the late Republican strategist Lee Atwater from something I read in the late 1980s, so I hope I don't get my progressive friends mad at me," Dunn told CNN

Quote
"The third lesson and tip actually comes from two of my favorite political philosophers: Mao Tse-tung and Mother Theresa -- not often coupled with each other, but the two people I turn to most to basically deliver a simple point which is 'you're going to make choices; you're going to challenge; you're going to say why not; you're going to figure out how to do things that have never been done before."

http://articles.cnn.com/2009-10-16/politics/beck.dunn_1_mao-mein-kampf-lee-atwater?_s=PM:POLITICS


glad to see you outed yourself as one of beck's mindless minions though.

I have never listened to or watched a glen beck show of any kind, but I did watch the video in question and she said one of her favorite political philosophers is Mao. Not sure what your point is.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 12, 2012, 05:44:57 PM
you're giving it a different context than what she said.

kinda like k-s-u is saying obama is a radical terrorist because he supported a law professor's hunger strike.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 12, 2012, 05:45:56 PM
I hope Obama gets JFK'd.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 12, 2012, 05:51:17 PM
you're giving it a different context than what she said.

kinda like k-s-u is saying obama is a radical terrorist because he supported a law professor's hunger strike.

The best I can do for her is assume she doesn't know the full extent of Mao's reign of terror. Just stupid.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 12, 2012, 05:55:11 PM
you're giving it a different context than what she said.

kinda like k-s-u is saying obama is a radical terrorist because he supported a law professor's hunger strike.

The best I can do for her is assume she doesn't know the full extent of Mao's reign of terror. Just stupid.

this is why you're my favorite conservative on this board.

i assume that it's one of those things that shouldn't have been said in today's political climate because it IS so easily taken out of context (maybe she really does believe in re-educations camps, who knows), but is harmless given the sentence it was contained in.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: ChiComCat on March 12, 2012, 06:17:49 PM
I'm not a repub but I actually like Huntsman as a candidate.  Shame he didn't really have a shot.

And I do not believe that you know many radical liberals that see Mao as a hero.  If somehow you do, you are hanging out with a strange crowd

I think it was White House communications director Anita Dunn who infamously stated Mao was one of her favorite philosophers.

I just misinterpreted your original statement.  I thought you said that you know them, as in hang out with them, not know of them.  My bad
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 12, 2012, 06:26:48 PM
I'm not a repub but I actually like Huntsman as a candidate.  Shame he didn't really have a shot.

And I do not believe that you know many radical liberals that see Mao as a hero.  If somehow you do, you are hanging out with a strange crowd

I think it was White House communications director Anita Dunn who infamously stated Mao was one of her favorite philosophers.

I just misinterpreted your original statement.  I thought you said that you know them, as in hang out with them, not know of them.  My bad

I do hang out with libs, but none of them would be dumb enough to quote Mao and say he was one of there favorite political philosophers.
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 12, 2012, 06:50:44 PM
you're giving it a different context than what she said.

kinda like k-s-u is saying obama is a radical terrorist because he supported a law professor's hunger strike.

The best I can do for her is assume she doesn't know the full extent of Mao's reign of terror. Just stupid.

this is why you're my favorite conservative on this board.

i assume that it's one of those things that shouldn't have been said in today's political climate because it IS so easily taken out of context (maybe she really does believe in re-educations camps, who knows), but is harmless given the sentence it was contained in.

Haha. Re-education camps. He had 3-5 million executed in town squares and starved another 70 million to death. How stupid do you have to be to mention him as a favorite philosopher in ANY context. Maybe she was referring to his softer side.
Title: Breitbart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 12, 2012, 07:36:35 PM
I hope Obama gets JFK'd.

Is this a euphemism for getting pilled up and bangin fillys?
Title: Re: Breitbart
Post by: kstatefreak42 on March 12, 2012, 09:14:01 PM
I hope Obama gets JFK'd.

Is this a euphemism for getting pilled up and bangin fillys?
lol