goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: chum1 on May 24, 2017, 07:23:50 PM

Title: Gianforte
Post by: chum1 on May 24, 2017, 07:23:50 PM
Holy crap.

https://twitter.com/justinjm1/status/867531876315131904
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: chum1 on May 24, 2017, 07:25:49 PM
Trump voters will vote for him extra hard now.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: SdK on May 24, 2017, 07:28:25 PM
Bodyslammed?
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: chum1 on May 24, 2017, 07:28:36 PM
https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/867534821337309184
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: SdK on May 24, 2017, 07:39:32 PM
I just retweeted that so hard.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 24, 2017, 08:43:45 PM
Trump voters will vote for him extra hard now.

Doing huge deals for the Russians and having high level party apparatchiks lobbying for Russian banks and oil companies didn't stop millions from voting for Hillary and Dems.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: chum1 on May 24, 2017, 08:48:18 PM
Trump voters will vote for him extra hard now.

Doing huge deals for the Russians and having high level party apparatchiks lobbying for Russian banks and oil companies didn't stop millions from voting for Hillary and Dems.

I was thinking they'd like him for kicking the liberal media's ass.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 24, 2017, 08:50:42 PM
That guy has been a piece of crap for a long time.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: wetwillie on May 24, 2017, 09:30:36 PM
I'm not 100% sure Ben Jacobs knows what a body slam is.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: chum1 on May 24, 2017, 09:33:52 PM
I don't know. He said he was "horizontal" and then thrown to the ground.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 24, 2017, 09:47:41 PM
Yah but
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: chum1 on May 24, 2017, 09:48:41 PM
Quote
At that point, Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him. Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the man, as he moved on top the reporter and began yelling something to the effect of "I'm sick and tired of this!"

https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/867569211077472256
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: AbeFroman on May 24, 2017, 10:28:36 PM
He's guaranteed to win now. Physical violence towards the free press is what the FSD's want in a politician.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: sys on May 24, 2017, 11:50:21 PM
over half the vote is already in.  he's still going to win.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: puniraptor on May 25, 2017, 12:28:02 AM
are convicted felons allowed to serve in congress? i've never heard that they weren't. what about if the conviction is after their election? pretty interesting
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Spracne on May 25, 2017, 12:31:32 AM
are convicted felons allowed to serve in congress? i've never heard that they weren't. what about if the conviction is after their election? pretty interesting
What makes you think this was felony assault? Is his mind a deadly weapon? Or perhaps because he was clearly aggravated?

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: puniraptor on May 25, 2017, 01:00:32 AM
are convicted felons allowed to serve in congress? i've never heard that they weren't. what about if the conviction is after their election? pretty interesting
What makes you think this was felony assault? Is his mind a deadly weapon? Or perhaps because he was clearly aggravated?

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

I posted that before I read that he was cited with a misdemeanor but from now on I am working on the assumption that this glass throated lib journo someone who makes me uncomfortable will die from his injuries and the felony is murder.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: puniraptor on May 25, 2017, 01:02:09 AM
I don't know enough about the law to tell if you are making funny jokes or just saying smart stuff. I think I smelled some kind of pun or something
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: chum1 on May 25, 2017, 06:30:21 AM
https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/867696364498694144
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: chum1 on May 25, 2017, 06:31:29 AM
I'm curious to see how many people go ahead and vote for him today anyway.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: wetwillie on May 25, 2017, 06:55:20 AM
Quote
At that point, Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him. Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the man, as he moved on top the reporter and began yelling something to the effect of "I'm sick and tired of this!"

https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/867569211077472256

As I suspected, it appears Jacobs was Choke Slammed. The audio is impressive, he took it like a champ and still had his wits about him.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 25, 2017, 07:00:32 AM
My favorite part:
(Paraphrasing) Jacobs says he was never asked to the leave the office. The audio confirms Jacobs side of the story. You can Giamforte screamimg get the eff out of here multiple times before there's an audible tussle.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 25, 2017, 07:01:56 AM
I'm curious to see how many people go ahead and vote for him today anyway.

Hopefully lot, because the guy he's runnimg against is a dopey #berner
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 25, 2017, 09:07:33 AM
I'm okay with MT dopey berners.  This guy is a corrupt snake.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: renocat on May 25, 2017, 12:08:03 PM
This is hilarious.  Skippyboy is peaved for being man handled in this guy's headquarters.  This is the Montana Mangler's sanctuary.  People in Montana get rid of rats in their caves.  This will garner votes.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: porky morgan on May 25, 2017, 12:57:11 PM
I've voted against this clownbarf twice before and I voted extra hard against him again today.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 25, 2017, 01:00:39 PM
He thinks retirement is anti-christian because Noah built the arc when he was 600 years old  :lol:
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 25, 2017, 01:27:24 PM
He thinks retirement is anti-christian because Noah built the arc when he was 600 years old  :lol:

He is kind of guy who says that then would seek disability for a back injury
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: SkinnyBenny on May 25, 2017, 01:34:36 PM
I've voted against this clownbarf twice before and I voted extra hard against him again today.

Porky, yes!
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: SdK on May 25, 2017, 02:07:13 PM
My friend in Idaho is calling all of her MT friends (she went to school in Helena) to encourage them to vote against. She used to work on campaigns so I hope she has a lot of connections. If I hadn't blown up all of my MT contacts, id do the same.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: ben ji on May 25, 2017, 04:23:30 PM
This is hilarious.  Skippyboy is peaved for being man handled in this guy's headquarters.  This is the Montana Mangler's sanctuary.  People in Montana get rid of rats in their caves.  This will garner votes.

Amazing nickname
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 25, 2017, 08:38:55 PM
Did you guys hear about his Ducks Unlimited snafu?
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: wetwillie on May 25, 2017, 08:49:53 PM
I had no idea how rich this cat is.   I thought he was some rough and tumble cattle guy not a bill gates type.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 25, 2017, 09:33:18 PM
He's a eff.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: puniraptor on May 25, 2017, 09:43:29 PM
I'm in favor of sending violent psychopaths with uncontrolled aggression into congress to wrekk crap
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: chum1 on May 25, 2017, 10:02:43 PM
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/867935991079632900
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: chum1 on May 25, 2017, 10:04:40 PM
Supposedly, the rural, mega Trump voter areas haven't reported nearly as many results to this point.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: The Big Train on May 25, 2017, 10:33:41 PM
this is a trump voters dream boat
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 25, 2017, 10:48:57 PM
Looking forward to reading why this comfortable win for the pubs is a "moral" victory for the 'crats. :lol:
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 25, 2017, 10:56:23 PM
folk singer? Wtf, montana

https://twitter.com/RobQuistforMT/status/867832592422260736
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 25, 2017, 11:13:13 PM
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/867935991079632900
https://twitter.com/KazeSkyz/status/867954668835491841
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Trim on May 26, 2017, 12:26:35 AM
I need to know more about this guy aside from how he got agitated and whipped some ass before I condemn him.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: dal9 on May 26, 2017, 12:40:45 AM
his wife looks like a 70 year old post-heroin recovery Hanson...
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Trim on May 26, 2017, 12:48:08 AM
his wife looks like a 70 year old post-heroin recovery Hanson...

Should/could he have done better?
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: renocat on May 26, 2017, 06:50:29 AM
Left goes beserk over the mean violent whit clan Trump supporters.  The Mangler is psychopath.  So how does the media respond to the  violence against conservative being hailed as virtuous.  Have you ever  seen this in the  CNN or MSNBC headlines?
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/05/25/berkeley-police-arrest-local-professor-for-allegedly-beating-trump-supporters-with-bike-lock/
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: puniraptor on May 26, 2017, 07:56:57 AM
Bike lock is a pretty good rumble weapon

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: chum1 on May 26, 2017, 08:02:12 AM
How do you think Hillary and Obama would have handled the situation?
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 26, 2017, 08:03:54 AM
I see a new Sergeant at Arms for the House?! :woot:

The Dem resurgence doesn't seem to be picking up steam. GOP bad person can literally beat the crap out of a snot nosed reporter and still win.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 26, 2017, 08:20:05 AM
This is disconcerting KSU.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 26, 2017, 08:39:24 AM
They love physical assault
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Institutional Control on May 26, 2017, 08:49:02 AM
This is disconcerting KSU.

KSU is too partisan to care if the candidate is a real life POS or not.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 26, 2017, 09:03:25 AM
This is disconcerting KSU.

KSU is too partisan to care if the candidate is a real life POS or not.

Well, I'm not so sure.  He did call him an bad person.  And it's not like he voted for him.  I'm holding out hope.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: gatoveintisiete on May 26, 2017, 09:16:48 AM
All I know about Gio is that audio clip, but I like him so far.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Yard Dog on May 26, 2017, 09:18:27 AM
For everyone's sanity, Montana is a heavy "vote early" state. I think I heard more than half the ballots were in by mail before the altercation even occurred and there is no way to change that vote. So him winning isn't really a sign of anything besides how he was viewed vs the competition pre-incident.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: AbeFroman on May 26, 2017, 09:20:18 AM
Not surprised that anti-lifer KSUW encourages acts physical violence against people he disagrees with.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 26, 2017, 09:37:39 AM
Not surprised that anti-lifer KSUW encourages acts physical violence against people he disagrees with.

We don't even know the opinions of the victim, he was assaulted just for asking a legitimate question
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: SkinnyBenny on May 26, 2017, 11:40:26 AM
Bike lock is a pretty good rumble weapon


My goodness, The Word :love:
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 26, 2017, 12:20:32 PM
This is disconcerting KSU.

KSU is too partisan to care if the candidate is a real life POS or not.

Well, I'm not so sure.  He did call him an bad person.  And it's not like he voted for him.  I'm holding out hope.

Of course he's an bad person. Congress is a like a big playground for rich assholes. I'm not celebrating his win - he's a scumbag. I am pretty amused that the Dems couldn't even beat this.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Institutional Control on May 26, 2017, 12:25:32 PM
If you lived in Montana, would you have voted for him after the incident?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 26, 2017, 12:57:27 PM
If you lived in Montana, would you have voted for him after the incident?

No. It's one house seat. I wouldn't vote for this prick just to protect one seat. (Wouldn't have voted for other dude either).

He has now "apologized" to the reporter for what it's worth :rollseyes:
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Tobias on May 26, 2017, 01:22:41 PM
(https://i.imgflip.com/1ps0ne.jpg)
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: AbeFroman on May 26, 2017, 01:35:09 PM
This is disconcerting KSU.

KSU is too partisan to care if the candidate is a real life POS or not.

Well, I'm not so sure.  He did call him an bad person.  And it's not like he voted for him.  I'm holding out hope.

Of course he's an bad person. Congress is a like a big playground for rich assholes. I'm not celebrating his win - he's a scumbag. I am pretty amused that the Dems couldn't even beat this.

I guess you missed the part of the thread where it was reported that most of the voting was done prior to the assault.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 26, 2017, 01:40:30 PM
And also very popular with the type of person that would consider voting republican in the first place.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 26, 2017, 01:49:15 PM
I know nothing of the Dem candidate but Gianforte was embattled enough in his own state he shouldn't have won if the Dems put up anything better than a complete loser.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: SdK on May 26, 2017, 02:36:33 PM
I need to know more about this guy aside from how he got agitated and whipped some ass before I condemn him.
Had him a mask, you'll love him.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 26, 2017, 02:40:43 PM
This is disconcerting KSU.

KSU is too partisan to care if the candidate is a real life POS or not.

Well, I'm not so sure.  He did call him an bad person.  And it's not like he voted for him.  I'm holding out hope.

Of course he's an bad person. Congress is a like a big playground for rich assholes. I'm not celebrating his win - he's a scumbag. I am pretty amused that the Dems couldn't even beat this.

I guess you missed the part of the thread where it was reported that most of the voting was done prior to the assault.

Could this finally convince liberals we need to severely curtail early voting? Nah, probably not.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 26, 2017, 02:45:31 PM
This is disconcerting KSU.

KSU is too partisan to care if the candidate is a real life POS or not.

Well, I'm not so sure.  He did call him an bad person.  And it's not like he voted for him.  I'm holding out hope.

Of course he's an bad person. Congress is a like a big playground for rich assholes. I'm not celebrating his win - he's a scumbag. I am pretty amused that the Dems couldn't even beat this.

I guess you missed the part of the thread where it was reported that most of the voting was done prior to the assault.

Could this finally convince liberals we need to severely curtail early voting? Nah, probably not.

And wreck the gateway to voter fraud?
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Institutional Control on May 26, 2017, 02:50:06 PM
Oh, I've never heard this talking point before.  I didn't realize early voting was frowned upon by the right. How is it more susceptible to voter fraud?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 26, 2017, 02:54:56 PM
Oh, I've never heard this talking point before.  I didn't realize early voting was frowned upon by the right. How is it more susceptible to voter fraud?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Based on this thread, it sounds like early voting is actually been a talking point of the left.

But, words
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 26, 2017, 02:59:03 PM
Early voting is fine, voting for pieces of crap is the problem, but republicans love voting for pieces of crap
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 26, 2017, 03:06:45 PM
Early voting is fine, voting for pieces of crap is the problem, but Dems love voting for pieces of crap, like the 10's of millions who voted for Hillary

Couldn't agree more lib, spot on  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: wetwillie on May 26, 2017, 03:19:41 PM
Keep your grubby hands off my early voting.  I am not slumming it with the common folk on Election Day.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Gooch on May 26, 2017, 03:24:03 PM
Keep your grubby hands off my early voting.  I am not slumming it with the common folk on Election Day.
No crap. I would more than likely not bother voting here (R's when anyways) if i had to do it in person. It's already a big enough hassle to fill out the ballet and then walk to the end of the cul-de-sac to put it in the mail box.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 26, 2017, 03:26:49 PM
My poll place is across the street and I'd rather early vote, but Missouri is pretty regresocon
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: renocat on May 26, 2017, 04:31:20 PM
If you lived in Montana, would you have voted for him after the incident?
HELL YES!!!  We need a pissed off cowboy  in DC.  We need to  erect a confederate type statue for him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 26, 2017, 06:31:48 PM
Oh, I've never heard this talking point before.  I didn't realize early voting was frowned upon by the right. How is it more susceptible to voter fraud?


Other than giving the fraudsters more time to operate, it isn't. The problem isn't outright voter fraud, but what I refer to as vote harvesting - rounding up dumbasses who otherwise wouldn't vote and either  busing them in or gathering absentee ballots. Again, this happens on Election Day, too, but early voting allows a much larger window.

The Dems love this because liberal voters are by their nature more prone to be lazy/disengaged. The Dems would not favor making it as easy and as early to vote as possible if they didn't see an advantage. They've been perfecting vote harvesting since the old Tammany Hall days. The GOP is catching up but that's not the point - vote harvesting dumbs down the voting pool and undermines Democracy.

And no, that doesn't mean early voting isn't a convenience for many intelligent people - of course it is. So would voting online, and it would be an even worse idea for the same reason.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 26, 2017, 06:34:39 PM
Republicans hate the will of the people, sad but predictable
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on May 26, 2017, 06:49:42 PM
Republicans hate the will of the people, sad but predictable

Campaigns canvassing communities a month in advance to collect as many absentee ballots as possible from disengaged and lazy people = "will of the people." Sad but predicable.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: AbeFroman on May 27, 2017, 12:50:30 AM
Nothing wrong with early voting, but it shoots down KSUw's point that the Dems couldn't beat a guy with an assault charge. Most people voted already by the time he did it. It still shows that Trumpers love violence by some of these cheerleading comments
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: SkinnyBenny on May 27, 2017, 04:59:40 AM

Quote from: K-S-U
Voting is great except when it's someone who wasn't probably gonna vote. People who maybe weren't gonna vote shouldn't be allowed to vote! Voting should be hard to do. :curse:

Also lol @ "fraudsters." I mean, my god. :lol:
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 06:44:16 AM
He's no Ted Kennedy (2x dem presidential candidate and hooker murderer), that's for sure.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 07:11:22 AM
Quote
North Carolina Congressman Bob Etheridge, a seven-term elected Democrat, was asked by a student reporter if he supported the “Obama agenda.” Etheridge promptly attempted to grab the reporter’s cell phone camera, then grab the reporter’s wrist, demanding, “Who are you! Tell me who you are… I have a right to know who you are!” One of the student’s friends, who caught the incident on camera, said, “We’re just here for a project.” When the student in Etheridge’s grip asked to be released, Etheridge instead grabbed him by the neck.

Here’s the footage:



http://www.dailywire.com/news/16876/flashback-democratic-congressman-attacked-student-ben-shapiro

AMAZE
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Institutional Control on May 27, 2017, 09:26:32 AM
He's no Ted Kennedy (2x dem presidential candidate and hooker murderer), that's for sure.
Hooker?  Are you saying Mary Jo Kopechne was a hooker or did he kill someone else?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: SkinnyBenny on May 27, 2017, 10:16:18 AM
He's no Ted Kennedy (2x dem presidential candidate and hooker murderer), that's for sure.


Teflon Ted was BITB
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 27, 2017, 10:51:10 AM
Quote
North Carolina Congressman Bob Etheridge, a seven-term elected Democrat, was asked by a student reporter if he supported the “Obama agenda.” Etheridge promptly attempted to grab the reporter’s cell phone camera, then grab the reporter’s wrist, demanding, “Who are you! Tell me who you are… I have a right to know who you are!” One of the student’s friends, who caught the incident on camera, said, “We’re just here for a project.” When the student in Etheridge’s grip asked to be released, Etheridge instead grabbed him by the neck.

Here’s the footage:



http://www.dailywire.com/news/16876/flashback-democratic-congressman-attacked-student-ben-shapiro

AMAZE

Weird, that guy lost the election as a like 6 time incumbent.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 11:11:30 AM
Quote
North Carolina Congressman Bob Etheridge, a seven-term elected Democrat, was asked by a student reporter if he supported the “Obama agenda.” Etheridge promptly attempted to grab the reporter’s cell phone camera, then grab the reporter’s wrist, demanding, “Who are you! Tell me who you are… I have a right to know who you are!” One of the student’s friends, who caught the incident on camera, said, “We’re just here for a project.” When the student in Etheridge’s grip asked to be released, Etheridge instead grabbed him by the neck.

Here’s the footage:



http://www.dailywire.com/news/16876/flashback-democratic-congressman-attacked-student-ben-shapiro

AMAZE

Weird, that guy lost the election as a like 6 time incumbent.

He didn't lose you stupid rat, he was immediately appointed agency head in the democrat governor's administration and then ran for governor.

Claiming Gio is "infit" for office when the democrat option is a neerdowell folk singer is pretty lol
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 27, 2017, 11:23:38 AM
You love to be wrong.

Quote
Etheridge was re-elected in 2008 with 67 percent of the vote.

Quote
On election day Ellmers was elected with 50 percent of the vote to Etheridge's 49 percent, while Rose received 2 percent.[36] On November 4, 2010, Etheridge had yet to concede despite the Associated Press declaring Ellmers the winner.[37] On November 12 Etheridge confirmed he would seek a recount,[38] after which he conceded on November 19.[39] Ellmers was again re-elected in 2012[40] and 2014.[41] Etheridge unsuccessfully ran for Governor of North Carolina in 2012.

So weird, the guy lost 20 points after attacking someone. Republicans actually gain more votes when they do it.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 27, 2017, 11:34:32 AM
Oh, I figured it out! this guy lost because he apologized and said there was no excuse for his actions, that Montana guy said the reporter was lying and deserved it anyway
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 12:46:58 PM
2010 was a great year for democrat congressmen. Just as good as 2008.  :lol:

Appoint him to a cabinet position and run him for governor. No hypocrisy to there.

It's a race to the bottom and the libtards are setting the precedent. 

Hyperpartisan lib is blind to all things democrat.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 12:57:44 PM
Dear libtards,

If you're going to be a huge stupid hypocrite all of the time, you probably shouldn't get so butthurt when you get drilled for being a hypocrite.

Your Pal,
Sugar Dick
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: SdK on May 27, 2017, 01:02:08 PM
Quote
North Carolina Congressman Bob Etheridge, a seven-term elected Democrat, was asked by a student reporter if he supported the “Obama agenda.” Etheridge promptly attempted to grab the reporter’s cell phone camera, then grab the reporter’s wrist, demanding, “Who are you! Tell me who you are… I have a right to know who you are!” One of the student’s friends, who caught the incident on camera, said, “We’re just here for a project.” When the student in Etheridge’s grip asked to be released, Etheridge instead grabbed him by the neck.

Here’s the footage:



http://www.dailywire.com/news/16876/flashback-democratic-congressman-attacked-student-ben-shapiro

AMAZE
Did this actually happen? Dax, just use one account
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 01:04:49 PM
There's video of it. But it wasn't newsworthy then, nor did it make him "unfit" and he was staunchly defended by dems as being "in the right" and continues to receive dem support.

AMAZE
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 27, 2017, 01:15:09 PM
Quote
North Carolina Congressman Bob Etheridge, a seven-term elected Democrat, was asked by a student reporter if he supported the “Obama agenda.” Etheridge promptly attempted to grab the reporter’s cell phone camera, then grab the reporter’s wrist, demanding, “Who are you! Tell me who you are… I have a right to know who you are!” One of the student’s friends, who caught the incident on camera, said, “We’re just here for a project.” When the student in Etheridge’s grip asked to be released, Etheridge instead grabbed him by the neck.

Here’s the footage:



http://www.dailywire.com/news/16876/flashback-democratic-congressman-attacked-student-ben-shapiro

AMAZE
Did this actually happen? Dax, just use one account

It happened. He hasn't won an election since.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 03:59:01 PM
No need to get elected when you your dem hombres keep appointing you head of state admin agencies.

Tough break NC broke red, or he'd be senator.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 27, 2017, 04:46:28 PM
Has fsd admitted he was wrong about the NC guy when he said the guy didn't lose any elections?
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 05:39:42 PM
Lib7 is losing his crap over the fact his dems ran a guy for congress in 2010 who choked a reporter 4 months before the election but remained on the ticket.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 05:43:54 PM
But but but he lost 50-49* so dems didnt support him!

*highest percentage to vote dem this decade in the NC-2

What a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 27, 2017, 05:46:43 PM
so you were wrong?
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 05:59:56 PM
Poor lib7 and his gross hypocrisy, ITT:

They love physical assault

Not surprised that anti-lifer KSUW encourages acts physical violence against people he disagrees with.

We don't even know the opinions of the victim, he was assaulted just for asking a legitimate question

And also very popular with the type of person that would consider voting republican in the first place.

Early voting is fine, voting for pieces of crap is the problem, but republicans love voting for pieces of crap
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 06:02:16 PM
Assault is totally cool...if you're a dem shill
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 27, 2017, 06:02:29 PM
so you were wrong?
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 06:08:06 PM
Pwn3d°5

Repent your hypocrisy, lib7. It will help heal your butthurt
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 27, 2017, 06:12:15 PM
Weird, that guy lost the election as a like 6 time incumbent.

He didn't lose you stupid rat

maybe you can point out where you're not wrong :confused:


Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2017, 06:51:06 PM
Poor lib7 and his gross hypocrisy, ITT:

They love physical assault

Not surprised that anti-lifer KSUW encourages acts physical violence against people he disagrees with.

We don't even know the opinions of the victim, he was assaulted just for asking a legitimate question

And also very popular with the type of person that would consider voting republican in the first place.

Early voting is fine, voting for pieces of crap is the problem, but republicans love voting for pieces of crap

The admissions of a hypocrite in deep, dark denial
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 27, 2017, 08:00:01 PM
How could the dems lose to this fuckstick?  That's the question.  He was roundly hated before he choke slammed that guys.   Im betting some sort of election fraud.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: wetwillie on May 27, 2017, 08:32:17 PM
What's with your hard on for this guy? 
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: star seed 7 on May 27, 2017, 10:27:22 PM
How could the dems lose to this fuckstick?  That's the question.  He was roundly hated before he choke slammed that guys.   Im betting some sort of election fraud.

Montana
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: michigancat on May 27, 2017, 10:44:12 PM
What's with your hard on for this guy?
I'm 99% sure it has something to do with land management
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: renocat on May 28, 2017, 12:49:35 AM
How could the dems lose to this fuckstick?  That's the question.  He was roundly hated before he choke slammed that guys.   Im betting some sort of election fraud.

Montana
God and hatred against ultleft heathens.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 28, 2017, 12:39:38 PM
What's with your hard on for this guy?

He secretly bought some land through some shell companies and then tried to shut down a public access to a popular river.  Then he sued the state through this secret company.  Then he was found out, and a long time writer for a conservation organization wrote a piece critical of him.  As he was a large donor he used his leverage to get the writer fired.  He has very obviously been shown to say one thing, what conservative Montanans want to hear, and then do the exact opposite.  He's not even a native.  And now he's taken his money there and is trying to fundamentally change the state to the detriment of its citizens. 
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Tobias on May 28, 2017, 01:02:14 PM
What's with your hard on for this guy?
I'm 99% sure it has something to do with land management

:thumbs:
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: porky morgan on May 28, 2017, 03:05:24 PM
Emo pretty much summed it up. Extreme fundamental religious views are part of his story too. It's disappointing the Dems didn't do better in finding a challenger, not sure why, maybe they were intimidated by GOP PAC money pouring into the election. But the term is up in 18 months and eyes across the state were opened and the guy will be out on his ass before he can do much damage.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: wetwillie on May 28, 2017, 03:19:40 PM
A motivated incumbent with boat loads of cash might not be easily dispatched.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 28, 2017, 03:37:48 PM
Quote
Despite limited support from the national party – some $600,000 – Quist was not cash-poor. The party's grassroots kept Montana in play by raising an eye-popping $6 million in small-dollar donations. Quist outraised Gianforte, who had to lend his own campaign $1.5 million.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: puniraptor on May 30, 2017, 07:51:18 AM
There's just not Dems there. It's not much of a brain teaser.

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Yard Dog on May 30, 2017, 08:30:54 AM

Quote from: K-S-U
Voting is great except when it's someone who wasn't probably gonna vote. People who maybe weren't gonna vote shouldn't be allowed to vote! Voting should be hard to do. :curse:

Also lol @ "fraudsters." I mean, my god. :lol:

I think this was brushed by a little too quickly. As an American, I would prefer the people who are the most informed, most engaged, and with the most desire to get to a polling place to be a voice in our elections. I would rather the guy or gal who doesn't understand how government works / what their candidate is really capable of whom just votes the party line stayed at home.

Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 30, 2017, 11:12:00 AM
There's just not Dems there. It's not much of a brain teaser.

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

The governor is a D so hmmm.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Katpappy on May 30, 2017, 01:02:51 PM
There's just not Dems there. It's not much of a brain teaser.

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

The governor is a D so hmmm.
Pubs aways get a Dem to bail the county/state out when they eff it up.  Then when times get better, idiots vote Pubs back in.  #lifeinUSA
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Institutional Control on May 30, 2017, 01:39:43 PM

Quote from: K-S-U
Voting is great except when it's someone who wasn't probably gonna vote. People who maybe weren't gonna vote shouldn't be allowed to vote! Voting should be hard to do. :curse:

Also lol @ "fraudsters." I mean, my god. :lol:

I think this was brushed by a little too quickly. As an American, I would prefer the people who are the most informed, most engaged, and with the most desire to get to a polling place to be a voice in our elections. I would rather the guy or gal who doesn't understand how government works / what their candidate is really capable of whom just votes the party line stayed at home.
What an elitist opinion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 30, 2017, 02:02:41 PM
Not sure who puni is talking to, but Max Baucus was an influential Montana senator for like 90 years and Jon Tester is currently serving his second term.

Given the current whack-a-do regressionary neo-fascist police state platform of the dnc, I could see more and more states abandoning the party forever, though.
Title: Re: Gianforte
Post by: renocat on May 30, 2017, 04:03:26 PM
How should he be installed?  Wrasslin match with a prissy congressman from California?   So many juicy possibilities we can suggest.  What would he your choice?