Author Topic: RANKINGS...  (Read 130571 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #425 on: October 28, 2014, 06:36:04 PM »
#9

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29302
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #426 on: October 28, 2014, 06:36:10 PM »
9, better than AP.  Will take

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #427 on: October 28, 2014, 06:36:22 PM »
Can't wait to pass pud tcu

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #428 on: October 28, 2014, 06:36:33 PM »
Like, win and we are in, you guys

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #429 on: October 28, 2014, 06:37:17 PM »
Ahead of Notre Dame. Hell ya! These rough ridin' guys get it!

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #430 on: October 28, 2014, 06:38:58 PM »
This is a really good scenario for the wild wildcats.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17600
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #431 on: October 28, 2014, 06:39:03 PM »
Committee killed it. Head to head puts Bama back which is right. ND and Georgia lower with their no good wins. Auburn high which helps excuse our loss

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #432 on: October 28, 2014, 06:40:20 PM »
A qatz win @ TCU could really eff some crap up!  :Woot:

Offline pvegs

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #433 on: October 28, 2014, 06:41:26 PM »
9 seems right to me.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #434 on: October 28, 2014, 06:41:32 PM »
Condi Rice is a certified studette and friend of KSU

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17600
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #435 on: October 28, 2014, 06:43:48 PM »
I love the committee. It was necessary change moving to 4 teams. Just an absolutely perfect ranking.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #436 on: October 28, 2014, 06:43:58 PM »
 My god, Rece Davis can't keep our name out of his mouth. He really knows who the elites are

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #437 on: October 28, 2014, 06:45:04 PM »
I love the committee. It was necessary change moving to 4 teams. Just an absolutely perfect ranking.
They get it! It showed with where Notre dame, Georgia, and Ohio State were ranked. I might be off the fence now.

Offline BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1409
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #438 on: October 28, 2014, 06:48:05 PM »
This is going to be fun every week.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #439 on: October 28, 2014, 06:48:27 PM »
Also, it's now very clear that if Matt McCrane was our kicker against Auburn then we are top 4.

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6337
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #440 on: October 28, 2014, 06:50:50 PM »
hello everyone (how are you?) I have a dumb question. Do these rankings mean anything after the first 4? As in, at the end of the season, does being 5,6 or 7 get you to a better bowl?  :dunno:
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Offline millertime

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 287
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #441 on: October 28, 2014, 06:51:44 PM »
Also, it's now very clear that if Matt McCrane was our kicker against Auburn then we are top 4.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17600
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #442 on: October 28, 2014, 06:52:37 PM »
Strength of conference is bullshit criteria and Rece needs to stop mentioning it. If the SEC West is good and Georgia doesn't play them, why should anyone give a crap. Strength of schedule is important. You have to actually play the teams

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6573
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #443 on: October 28, 2014, 06:53:13 PM »
Good golly...by the end of the regular season we will have played 5 games against current top 20 teams. That's like, almost half of our games. What a murderer's row!

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #444 on: October 28, 2014, 06:53:38 PM »
they did a good job. we're super well positioned. just keep winning bros.
emaw

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #445 on: October 28, 2014, 06:54:31 PM »
I don't get how you can justify Michigan State being at eight. Blown out by Oregon and only one decent win. 
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #446 on: October 28, 2014, 06:55:17 PM »
This whole thing feels like the SEC inviting us to join them

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17600
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #447 on: October 28, 2014, 06:55:32 PM »

hello everyone (how are you?) I have a dumb question. Do these rankings mean anything after the first 4? As in, at the end of the season, does being 5,6 or 7 get you to a better bowl?  :dunno:
Top ranked teams + conference champs + 1 mid major get what were the BCS spots no matter what, from my understanding

Offline manpow5

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1886
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #448 on: October 28, 2014, 06:56:07 PM »
I don't get how you can justify Michigan State being at eight. Blown out by Oregon and only one decent win.

Don't have a problem with MSU being at 8. Just glad Ohio State finally got put in their place.


To EMAW or Not to EMAW

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #449 on: October 28, 2014, 06:56:35 PM »
My god, Rece Davis can't keep our name out of his mouth. He really knows who the elites are
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.