Author Topic: The Official Bracketology Thread (Read 383927 times)

Is this aggregate data any more accurate than, say, Lunardi's?

Also, I'm surprised at how many people are still leaving off KSU entirely, given the current Big 12 standings.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #1514 on:** January 24, 2017, 09:29:05 AM »

Quote from: catastrophe on January 24, 2017, 09:16:09 AM

Quote from: royals&ksu_FAN on January 24, 2017, 06:57:47 AM
http://www.bracketmatrix.com/

Is this aggregate data any more accurate than, say, Lunardi's?

Also, I'm surprised at how many people are still leaving off KSU entirely, given the current Big 12 standings.

http://www.bracketmatrix.com/rankings.html

catastrophe · « **Reply #1515 on:** January 24, 2017, 10:02:55 AM »

Quote from: royals&ksu_FAN on January 24, 2017, 09:29:05 AM

Quote from: catastrophe on January 24, 2017, 09:16:09 AM
Quote from: royals&ksu_FAN on January 24, 2017, 06:57:47 AM
http://www.bracketmatrix.com/

Is this aggregate data any more accurate than, say, Lunardi's?

Also, I'm surprised at how many people are still leaving off KSU entirely, given the current Big 12 standings.

http://www.bracketmatrix.com/rankings.html

Thanks. Did not realize Assembly Call was that legit. He has the Cats at 11 right now.

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #1516 on:** January 24, 2017, 04:50:51 PM »

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2017/1/24/14359508/bracketology-acc-big-12-big-ten-wake-forest-texas-tech-tcu-kansas-state-arizona-gonzaga

10 seed

kso_FAN · « **Reply #1517 on:** January 30, 2017, 11:35:15 AM »

I'm not sure how close some of these guys follow, but it looks like many places were updated as of yesterday and still have us in. Not a surprise, but a pair of road losses to decent teams isn't a complete killer in the eyes of most bracketologists.

http://www.bracketmatrix.com/

scottwildcat · « **Reply #1518 on:** January 30, 2017, 12:51:51 PM »

the Tennessee game as disheartening as it was, means absolutely nothing when it comes to to making the tournament, and because we beat WVU at home, the need to win in Hilton was not very high.

catastrophe · « **Reply #1519 on:** January 30, 2017, 01:36:55 PM »

Even if the games don't mean a ton on a Tournament resume, the last couple performances don't look like a Tournament team. We are trending in the wrong direction. Bigly.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #1520 on:** January 30, 2017, 01:53:05 PM »

Quote from: catastrophe on January 30, 2017, 01:36:55 PM

Even if the games don't mean a ton on a Tournament resume, the last couple performances don't look like a Tournament team. We are trending in the wrong direction. Bigly.

This is exactly what bubble teams look like.

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #1521 on:** January 30, 2017, 01:56:25 PM »

Yeah, soft field this year. We moved up to a 9 on espn.

http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology

kso_FAN · « **Reply #1522 on:** January 30, 2017, 03:35:11 PM »

Canary · « **Reply #1523 on:** January 30, 2017, 03:40:23 PM »

I would take a 9 seed, but would prefer 10 if we are in that range. I would rather we were as high as 7 but we are a long ways from that right now.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #1524 on:** January 30, 2017, 03:42:47 PM »

Quote from: Canary on January 30, 2017, 03:40:23 PM

I would take a 9 seed, but would prefer 10 if we are in that range. I would rather we were as high as 7 but we are a long ways from that right now.

Yeah, I agree. After my meltdown on Saturday, I decided to actually look at where we are at, and we're still in good shape to make it. I know oscar and all that, but I'm still going to follow K-State basketball and hope for the best.