1
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Pet Peeves
« on: Today at 11:18:42 AM »#LIFEHACK:what about coffee
Acids are spicy/sour
Bases(aka alkaline iykwim) are bitter
YWIA
He's wrong
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#LIFEHACK:what about coffee
Acids are spicy/sour
Bases(aka alkaline iykwim) are bitter
YWIA
Oh lordwokeness will have no chance after that
https://twitter.com/DailyLoud/status/1785473180636680251
When you read the indictment it has such a familiar theme . . .Makes you think about what?
Makes you think
I had to Google it and the texags thread was the first result after the source youtube links“You think THAT sounds ridiculous, well guess what, even more ridiculous is I can’t find any legitimate sources to back it up. What are they hiding?”The FIVE edits to this made me chuckleI liked the idea that since the only source they could find is the same as the op, it's clearly a cover up by the MSM
Faustus8:15a
Reynolds and Jackman are pissed about DEI so they refused to do 5 interviews with Behar.
Seems like a normal reaction rather than a right wing fever dream.
Googling this links me to the same video over and over from some rando that's in the OP. MSM doesn't want you to know about DEI, Reynolds, and Behar!
5 edits
Literally no one is reporting this!!
cuellar wins, affirming the wisdom of the good voters of texas 28.
When you drop the team name, you're referring to a city/club which is singular
Yeah, I addressed that and called it "slavish devotion to grade school grammar." Conceptually, it makes more sense (IMO) to treat subjects as singular or plural based on a more erudite perspective. I'll stick to the supposed "rules" of American English for professional purposes, but I do believe the English have the better of the argument as it relates to subject-verb agreement. What is the difference between "Kansas City is ..." versus "the Chiefs are ..." when referring to what a 54-man roster are doing?
The FIVE edits to this made me chuckleI liked the idea that since the only source they could find is the same as the op, it's clearly a cover up by the MSM
Faustus8:15a
Reynolds and Jackman are pissed about DEI so they refused to do 5 interviews with Behar.
Seems like a normal reaction rather than a right wing fever dream.
Googling this links me to the same video over and over from some rando that's in the OP. MSM doesn't want you to know about DEI, Reynolds, and Behar!
5 edits
Sit at the gate for 30 minutes because of some fuel paperwork issue (according to the pilot), taxi out and in line to take off, Oops now we need more fuel and have to return to the gate. It is now one hour past departure time and we haven't even got back to the gate yet.I bet if it was in Europe you'd be compensated for the inconvenience
Shifting subjects ...
Defense. Offense. If a defensive player is defending, an offensive player is ... offending?
Kinda crazy to think the day Ronald Reagan was first elected president, nobody had a sandwich on ciabatta breadWhen I read that, my first thought was "that's crazy" and my second thought was "do I really know what ciabatta bread is?"
DeSantis owning the crap out of WokeMeat:That's so rough ridin' dumb
https://x.com/JonahDispatch/status/1786104271915663789
What does the highest paid water polo person on the entire planet make for playing or coaching water polo?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
it's our last water polo season (probably) and gearing up for summer tournaments there is drama as there usually is. Since there aren't enough girls at any one club, clubs will join forces to create more competitive teams. Anyway my daughter's club and another club were merging and planned to have an A team and a B team. At least that's what one of the coaches thought. There were 3 or 4 combined tournaments with one team and eventually the other coach (who was going to lead the A team in summer tourneys) thought it was going to be one big team with a huge bench while my daughter's coach thought there would be an A and a B team (so weaker players from both clubs could play a lot at an appropriate level).
The two team would have worked brilliantly EXCEPT the A team coach and/or his weaker players decided that his weaker players would not play on the B team, despite the fact that they clearly should based on ability. Which led to my daughter's coach pressuring my daughter (who was clearly an A-teamer) into playing with the B team to guarantee the weaker players of his club would have an opportunity to play on a more competitive team. Like, he tried to tell her she were depriving the weaker players of a chance to play at all and that the A-team coach didn't want her or have space for her when the A coach flat out told her he wanted her on the team and told them that they were depriving the weaker players of a chance to play. Really not cool.
anyway she is playing with the a-team in a couple of weeks and she will have a lot of fun (hopefully)
Besides watching maybe 5 minutes of Olympic coverage of Water polo I have no idea how it works. What makes someone good a water polo?
Is it similar to football where people with all different body sizes (Lineman/receivers/etc) play at the same time in different positions?
Is it more similar to basketball where being tall is a huge advantage?
Are you swimming/treading water the whole time or can you touch the bottom when the ball is on the other side of the pool?
do the coaches have daughters on these teams?it's our last water polo season (probably) and gearing up for summer tournaments there is drama as there usually is. Since there aren't enough girls at any one club, clubs will join forces to create more competitive teams. Anyway my daughter's club and another club were merging and planned to have an A team and a B team. At least that's what one of the coaches thought. There were 3 or 4 combined tournaments with one team and eventually the other coach (who was going to lead the A team in summer tourneys) thought it was going to be one big team with a huge bench while my daughter's coach thought there would be an A and a B team (so weaker players from both clubs could play a lot at an appropriate level).
The two team would have worked brilliantly EXCEPT the A team coach and/or his weaker players decided that his weaker players would not play on the B team, despite the fact that they clearly should based on ability. Which led to my daughter's coach pressuring my daughter (who was clearly an A-teamer) into playing with the B team to guarantee the weaker players of his club would have an opportunity to play on a more competitive team. Like, he tried to tell her she were depriving the weaker players of a chance to play at all and that the A-team coach didn't want her or have space for her when the A coach flat out told her he wanted her on the team and told them that they were depriving the weaker players of a chance to play. Really not cool.
anyway she is playing with the a-team in a couple of weeks and she will have a lot of fun (hopefully)
I forgot to add that for many kids and parents NONE OF THEM had any of this communicated to them at all until rosters were sent out TWO WEEKS before they needed to be locked for the ENTIRE SUMMER. Everyone just thought there would be some clear communication from them but it never came. These two bozos are some of the worst communicators I've ever seen. They're trying to be diplomatic while also being petty and trying to be competitive while also protecting their own clubs. I also forgot to mention that the A-team coach brought in some ringers from outside the region (which didn't bump my daughter from A but definitely bumped some others)
This whole situation sucks. You know who it sucks the most for? The kids that these idiots think they are looking out for.
Great questions! I will answer later!it's our last water polo season (probably) and gearing up for summer tournaments there is drama as there usually is. Since there aren't enough girls at any one club, clubs will join forces to create more competitive teams. Anyway my daughter's club and another club were merging and planned to have an A team and a B team. At least that's what one of the coaches thought. There were 3 or 4 combined tournaments with one team and eventually the other coach (who was going to lead the A team in summer tourneys) thought it was going to be one big team with a huge bench while my daughter's coach thought there would be an A and a B team (so weaker players from both clubs could play a lot at an appropriate level).
The two team would have worked brilliantly EXCEPT the A team coach and/or his weaker players decided that his weaker players would not play on the B team, despite the fact that they clearly should based on ability. Which led to my daughter's coach pressuring my daughter (who was clearly an A-teamer) into playing with the B team to guarantee the weaker players of his club would have an opportunity to play on a more competitive team. Like, he tried to tell her she were depriving the weaker players of a chance to play at all and that the A-team coach didn't want her or have space for her when the A coach flat out told her he wanted her on the team and told them that they were depriving the weaker players of a chance to play. Really not cool.
anyway she is playing with the a-team in a couple of weeks and she will have a lot of fun (hopefully)
Besides watching maybe 5 minutes of Olympic coverage of Water polo I have no idea how it works. What makes someone good a water polo?
Is it similar to football where people with all different body sizes (Lineman/receivers/etc) play at the same time in different positions?
Is it more similar to basketball where being tall is a huge advantage?
Are you swimming/treading water the whole time or can you touch the bottom when the ball is on the other side of the pool?
it's our last water polo season (probably) and gearing up for summer tournaments there is drama as there usually is. Since there aren't enough girls at any one club, clubs will join forces to create more competitive teams. Anyway my daughter's club and another club were merging and planned to have an A team and a B team. At least that's what one of the coaches thought. There were 3 or 4 combined tournaments with one team and eventually the other coach (who was going to lead the A team in summer tourneys) thought it was going to be one big team with a huge bench while my daughter's coach thought there would be an A and a B team (so weaker players from both clubs could play a lot at an appropriate level).
The two team would have worked brilliantly EXCEPT the A team coach and/or his weaker players decided that his weaker players would not play on the B team, despite the fact that they clearly should based on ability. Which led to my daughter's coach pressuring my daughter (who was clearly an A-teamer) into playing with the B team to guarantee the weaker players of his club would have an opportunity to play on a more competitive team. Like, he tried to tell her she were depriving the weaker players of a chance to play at all and that the A-team coach didn't want her or have space for her when the A coach flat out told her he wanted her on the team and told them that they were depriving the weaker players of a chance to play. Really not cool.
anyway she is playing with the a-team in a couple of weeks and she will have a lot of fun (hopefully)