Author Topic: CU later  (Read 21799 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CloneBroChill

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #25 on: March 09, 2011, 11:27:32 PM »
from the wisdom of Charles Barkley, "that's just turrible!"

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40554
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #26 on: March 09, 2011, 11:34:30 PM »
Same brain.

same lumpy, doughy body, same fetid cheese curd breath, same pasty skin and jet black back hair, same vapid confused gaze.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline CloneBroChill

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #27 on: March 09, 2011, 11:37:12 PM »
Same brain.

same lumpy, doughy body, same fetid cheese curd breath, same pasty skin and jet black back hair, same vapid confused gaze.
are you describing China?

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40554
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #28 on: March 09, 2011, 11:40:17 PM »
are you describing China?

der, der, der.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13768
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #29 on: March 09, 2011, 11:42:02 PM »
 :opcat:
Same brain.  :opcat:
  :opcat:

same lumpy, doughy body, same fetid cheese curd breath, same pasty skin and jet black back hair, same vapid confused gaze.
  :opcat:
are you describing China?  :opcat:
  :opcat:  :opcat:  :opcat:  :opcat:
 :opcat:



Offline TheBigHomie

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #30 on: March 09, 2011, 11:46:12 PM »
It's pretty damn hard to beat a team 3 times in one season. Cats by 12.

I would be willing to bet everything I own that if you look at every 3rd matchup between basketball teams in the same season in the last 20 years that where one team has won the first 2 games, that team will also win the 3rd game more than 50% of the time. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the team won the 3rd game more than 70% of the time. In reality, it's hard to beat a team that has already beaten you twice.

Cats win 72-60.

I did this earlier, I came up with 42-23 record that the team wins the 3rd game as well, based on Big 12 Tournament History:

1995   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1995   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1995   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1995   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1995   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1996   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1996   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1996   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1996   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1996   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1997   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1997   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1997   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1997   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1997   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1998   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1998   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1998   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1998   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1998   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1999   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1999   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1999   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1999   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1999   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2000   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2000   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2000   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2000   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2000   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2001   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2001   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2001   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2001   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2001   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2002   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2002   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2002   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2002   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2002   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2003   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2003   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2003   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2003   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2003   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2004   KU   W   Missouri   94-69
2004   Tex   W   Oklahoma   66-63
2004   OSU   W   Texas   65-49
2005   KU   W   Kansas St.   80-67
2005   MU   W   Nebraska   70-67
2005   OSU   W   Texas Tech   72-68
2006   KU   W   Nebraska   79-65
2006   Tex   W   Texas Tech   77-70
2007   KU   W   Kansas St.   67-61
2007   Tex   W   Baylor   74-69
2007   A&M   L   Oklahoma St.   57-56
2008   KU   W   Nebraska   64-54
2008   Tex   W   Oklahoma St.   66-59
2008   Tex   W   Oklahoma   77-49
2009   Tex   L   Baylor   76-70
2009   A&M   L   Texas Tech   88-83
2009   OU   L   Oklahoma St.   71-70
2010   KU   W   Kansas St.   72-64
2010   MU   L   Nebraska   75-60
2010   Bay   W   Texas   86-67

(Used Kenpom for historical results)

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44954
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #31 on: March 09, 2011, 11:47:46 PM »
I'll donate a nut if CU scores 73 points.

79-60

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37148
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #32 on: March 09, 2011, 11:51:54 PM »
It's pretty damn hard to beat a team 3 times in one season. Cats by 12.

I would be willing to bet everything I own that if you look at every 3rd matchup between basketball teams in the same season in the last 20 years that where one team has won the first 2 games, that team will also win the 3rd game more than 50% of the time. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the team won the 3rd game more than 70% of the time. In reality, it's hard to beat a team that has already beaten you twice.

Cats win 72-60.

I did this earlier, I came up with 42-23 record that the team wins the 3rd game as well, based on Big 12 Tournament History:

1995   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1995   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1995   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1995   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1995   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1996   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1996   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1996   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1996   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1996   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1997   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1997   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1997   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1997   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1997   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1998   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1998   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1998   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1998   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1998   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1999   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1999   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1999   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1999   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1999   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2000   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2000   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2000   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2000   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2000   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2001   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2001   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2001   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2001   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2001   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2002   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2002   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2002   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2002   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2002   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2003   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2003   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2003   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2003   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2003   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2004   KU   W   Missouri   94-69
2004   Tex   W   Oklahoma   66-63
2004   OSU   W   Texas   65-49
2005   KU   W   Kansas St.   80-67
2005   MU   W   Nebraska   70-67
2005   OSU   W   Texas Tech   72-68
2006   KU   W   Nebraska   79-65
2006   Tex   W   Texas Tech   77-70
2007   KU   W   Kansas St.   67-61
2007   Tex   W   Baylor   74-69
2007   A&M   L   Oklahoma St.   57-56
2008   KU   W   Nebraska   64-54
2008   Tex   W   Oklahoma St.   66-59
2008   Tex   W   Oklahoma   77-49
2009   Tex   L   Baylor   76-70
2009   A&M   L   Texas Tech   88-83
2009   OU   L   Oklahoma St.   71-70
2010   KU   W   Kansas St.   72-64
2010   MU   L   Nebraska   75-60
2010   Bay   W   Texas   86-67

(Used Kenpom for historical results)


Thank you. If I have to listen to one more dumbass tell me we are going to win because "It's hard to beat a team 3 times," I will punch him in the face.

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42011
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #33 on: March 09, 2011, 11:58:38 PM »
I'll donate a nut if CU scores 73 points.

79-60

Thanks, bro.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #34 on: March 09, 2011, 11:59:55 PM »
Thank you. If I have to listen to one more dumbass tell me we are going to win because "It's hard to beat a team 3 times," I will punch him in the face.

I agree with this point. More often than not, the team that sweeps a season home and home is simply a lot better basketball team, usually it shows up in most statistical categories. With CU and us, that is simply not the case, though we could very well lose #3. But generally in the grand scheme of things things even out and the better teams wins. I think that will happen tomorrow.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44954
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #35 on: March 10, 2011, 12:10:37 AM »
I'll donate a nut if CU scores 73 points.

79-60

Thanks, bro.

don't really need them anymore

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #36 on: March 10, 2011, 07:54:39 AM »
don't understand the confidence against cu.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19836
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #37 on: March 10, 2011, 07:59:04 AM »
they have an NBA player on their team.  We don't.

Offline Lamesauce

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 158
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #38 on: March 10, 2011, 08:09:42 AM »
they have an NBA player on their team.  We don't.

We have a player rated a 95 on our team. They don't.
Advantage: push

Offline Jmo

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 220
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #39 on: March 10, 2011, 08:17:46 AM »
It's pretty damn hard to beat a team 3 times in one season. Cats by 12.

Seriously hate this....it can be pretty easy to beat a team three rough ridin' times...

but.....

Wabashes - 79
Burks - 74

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #40 on: March 10, 2011, 08:21:11 AM »
they have an NBA player on their team.  We don't.

exactly.

Offline 3leocat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #41 on: March 10, 2011, 08:23:50 AM »
Hope it goes a lot like this beginning of this video.





I miss Dom!

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #42 on: March 10, 2011, 08:28:15 AM »
Guys, this team barely beat Iowa State yesterday.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37148
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #43 on: March 10, 2011, 08:30:18 AM »
Guys, this team barely beat Iowa State yesterday.

Doesn't everyone barely beat ISU?

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9492
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #44 on: March 10, 2011, 08:32:46 AM »
Cats - 81
Buffs - 75
MIR - (-1 nut)

Offline PoetWarrior

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2353
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #45 on: March 10, 2011, 08:35:19 AM »
they have an NBA player on their team.  We don't.

exactly.

"It's OK to talk to yourself as long as you don't answer."

-Edwin S.

Offline bradleigh

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 416
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #46 on: March 10, 2011, 09:21:57 AM »
It's pretty damn hard to beat a team 3 times in one season. Cats by 12.

I would be willing to bet everything I own that if you look at every 3rd matchup between basketball teams in the same season in the last 20 years that where one team has won the first 2 games, that team will also win the 3rd game more than 50% of the time. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the team won the 3rd game more than 70% of the time. In reality, it's hard to beat a team that has already beaten you twice.

Cats win 72-60.

I did this earlier, I came up with 42-23 record that the team wins the 3rd game as well, based on Big 12 Tournament History:

1995   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1995   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1995   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1995   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1995   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1996   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1996   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1996   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1996   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1996   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1997   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1997   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1997   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1997   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1997   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1998   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1998   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1998   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1998   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1998   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1999   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1999   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1999   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1999   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1999   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2000   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2000   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2000   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2000   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2000   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2001   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2001   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2001   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2001   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2001   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2002   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2002   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2002   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2002   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2002   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2003   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2003   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2003   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2003   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2003   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2004   KU   W   Missouri   94-69
2004   Tex   W   Oklahoma   66-63
2004   OSU   W   Texas   65-49
2005   KU   W   Kansas St.   80-67
2005   MU   W   Nebraska   70-67
2005   OSU   W   Texas Tech   72-68
2006   KU   W   Nebraska   79-65
2006   Tex   W   Texas Tech   77-70
2007   KU   W   Kansas St.   67-61
2007   Tex   W   Baylor   74-69
2007   A&M   L   Oklahoma St.   57-56
2008   KU   W   Nebraska   64-54
2008   Tex   W   Oklahoma St.   66-59
2008   Tex   W   Oklahoma   77-49
2009   Tex   L   Baylor   76-70
2009   A&M   L   Texas Tech   88-83
2009   OU   L   Oklahoma St.   71-70
2010   KU   W   Kansas St.   72-64
2010   MU   L   Nebraska   75-60
2010   Bay   W   Texas   86-67

(Used Kenpom for historical results)


Looks like only complete crap teams get beat three times in one season, and it's usually by KU.  This chart confirms the theory!
 :emawkid:


2/8/11 - Never Forget

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #47 on: March 10, 2011, 09:25:03 AM »
It's pretty damn hard to beat a team 3 times in one season. Cats by 12.

I would be willing to bet everything I own that if you look at every 3rd matchup between basketball teams in the same season in the last 20 years that where one team has won the first 2 games, that team will also win the 3rd game more than 50% of the time. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the team won the 3rd game more than 70% of the time. In reality, it's hard to beat a team that has already beaten you twice.

Cats win 72-60.

I did this earlier, I came up with 42-23 record that the team wins the 3rd game as well, based on Big 12 Tournament History:

1995   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1995   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1995   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1995   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1995   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1996   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1996   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1996   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1996   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1996   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1997   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1997   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1997   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1997   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1997   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1998   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1998   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1998   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1998   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1998   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
1999   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
1999   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
1999   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
1999   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
1999   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2000   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2000   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2000   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2000   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2000   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2001   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2001   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2001   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2001   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2001   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2002   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2002   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2002   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2002   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2002   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2003   KU   W   Iowa St.   89-74
2003   KU   L   Missouri   68-63
2003   MU   W   Nebraska   70-61
2003   Tex   L   Texas Tech   92-81
2003   OU   W   Texas Tech   67-60
2004   KU   W   Missouri   94-69
2004   Tex   W   Oklahoma   66-63
2004   OSU   W   Texas   65-49
2005   KU   W   Kansas St.   80-67
2005   MU   W   Nebraska   70-67
2005   OSU   W   Texas Tech   72-68
2006   KU   W   Nebraska   79-65
2006   Tex   W   Texas Tech   77-70
2007   KU   W   Kansas St.   67-61
2007   Tex   W   Baylor   74-69
2007   A&M   L   Oklahoma St.   57-56
2008   KU   W   Nebraska   64-54
2008   Tex   W   Oklahoma St.   66-59
2008   Tex   W   Oklahoma   77-49
2009   Tex   L   Baylor   76-70
2009   A&M   L   Texas Tech   88-83
2009   OU   L   Oklahoma St.   71-70
2010   KU   W   Kansas St.   72-64
2010   MU   L   Nebraska   75-60
2010   Bay   W   Texas   86-67

(Used Kenpom for historical results)


Looks like only complete cac teams get beat three times in one season, and it's usually by KU.  This chart confirms the theory!
 :emawkid:




Did you just call K-State '09-'10 a "complete crap team?"   :facepalm:

Offline bradleigh

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 416
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #48 on: March 10, 2011, 09:37:50 AM »
Did you just call K-State '09-'10 a "complete crap team?"   :facepalm:

there are exceptions to every rule, Emo EMAW.
2/8/11 - Never Forget

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #49 on: March 10, 2011, 09:43:10 AM »
Duly noted.