Author Topic: RANKINGS...  (Read 131283 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #350 on: October 27, 2014, 05:16:59 PM »
I think a 3 or 4 loss big 12 champ should get in over a 2 loss auburn
emaw

Offline sak

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 156
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #351 on: October 28, 2014, 01:02:54 AM »
I think a 3 or 4 loss big 12 champ should get in over a 2 loss auburn

if that 3 loss big 12 team lost all their games to top 10 teams on the road who were in playoff contention and that big 12 champ also went on the road and beat auburn in their own stadium, and the big 12 proved they were head and shoulders the best conference in the country, i would agree with you.

you suck at this.

Offline sak

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 156
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #352 on: October 28, 2014, 01:07:27 AM »
every power conf should have their champ represented in a form of playoffs.  As long as that is an odd number, the top two should be represented.

All of this is IMO, of course.

so hypothetically speaking if the SEC champion went 8-4, including a 1-3 mark in nonconference play with losses to a couple bad teams in power conferences and a head to head loss against an 11-1 power 5 runner up, you think the SEC champion should get the nod over the 11-1 team? evne if the rest of the SEC also had numerous abysmal losses to FCS teams and poor non-power 5 teams?

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7095
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #353 on: October 28, 2014, 06:03:49 AM »
Hey sak, how about you just win your conference and quit being butt hurt.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline brandochav

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 446
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #354 on: October 28, 2014, 07:42:37 AM »
8 team playoff - 5 AQ conference champs and 3 at large...done.

Sent from my Lumia 900 using Tapatalk

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #355 on: October 28, 2014, 09:06:11 AM »
being second fiddle and an afterthought in your home state must suck sak

Offline sak

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 156
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #356 on: October 28, 2014, 11:40:21 AM »
Hey sak, how about you just win your conference and quit being butt hurt.

lol at holding teams in harder conferences to a higher standard.


Offline sak

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 156
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #357 on: October 28, 2014, 11:41:37 AM »
being second fiddle and an afterthought in your home state must suck sak

you mean like kansas state? when people think of athletics programs in kansas, i assure you they don't think of kansas state football first.

as for auburn, it softens the blow being second fiddle seeing as how we are reigning SEC champions.


Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8738
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #358 on: October 28, 2014, 11:42:07 AM »
Hey sak, how about you just win your conference and quit being butt hurt.

lol at holding teams in harder conferences to a higher standard.
:confused:

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #359 on: October 28, 2014, 11:49:07 AM »
Heather Dinich ?@CFBHeather  1h1 hour ago
The @CFBPlayoff committee members have literally checked their biases at the door. Time to #hangupthehats


Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13765
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #360 on: October 28, 2014, 11:57:31 AM »
Not sure those really are biases...

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17171
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #361 on: October 28, 2014, 11:59:18 AM »
Not sure those really are biases...

Nope, that's exactly how it works.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36740
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #362 on: October 28, 2014, 11:59:56 AM »
every power conf should have their champ represented in a form of playoffs.  As long as that is an odd number, the top two should be represented.

All of this is IMO, of course.

so hypothetically speaking if the SEC champion went 8-4, including a 1-3 mark in nonconference play with losses to a couple bad teams in power conferences and a head to head loss against an 11-1 power 5 runner up, you think the SEC champion should get the nod over the 11-1 team? evne if the rest of the SEC also had numerous abysmal losses to FCS teams and poor non-power 5 teams?

Yes.  Not the champ if you aren't the conf champ.

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8738
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #363 on: October 28, 2014, 12:04:13 PM »
Heather Dinich ?@CFBHeather  1h1 hour ago
The @CFBPlayoff committee members have literally checked their biases at the door. Time to #hangupthehats


That is one of the stupidest things I've ever seen.

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #364 on: October 28, 2014, 12:13:16 PM »
being second fiddle and an afterthought in your home state must suck sak

you mean like kansas state? when people think of athletics programs in kansas, i assure you they don't think of kansas state football first.

as for auburn, it softens the blow being second fiddle seeing as how we are reigning SEC champions.

ksu football is a national brand.  this is best exemplified by our national prime time game this saturday against okie st.  you know why the best game is in the prime time slot on abc?  regardless of if you have a digital converter for old ppl that still have bunny ears, or casual fans, or hard core fans, the game on abc is available to them.  that is a national brand.

Offline TCUHornedFrog

  • Cocaine is a helluva drug
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1074
  • Cocaine is a helluva drug
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #365 on: October 28, 2014, 12:18:48 PM »
ksu football is a national brand.  this is best exemplified by our national prime time game this saturday against okie st.  you know why the best game is in the prime time slot on abc?  regardless of if you have a digital converter for old ppl that still have bunny ears, or casual fans, or hard core fans, the game on abc is available to them.  that is a national brand.

It's not so much a national brand.  It is more of a diploma mill with tons of graduates cleaning floors all over the country.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #366 on: October 28, 2014, 12:22:34 PM »
ksu football is a national brand.  this is best exemplified by our national prime time game this saturday against okie st.  you know why the best game is in the prime time slot on abc?  regardless of if you have a digital converter for old ppl that still have bunny ears, or casual fans, or hard core fans, the game on abc is available to them.  that is a national brand.

It's not so much a national brand.  It is more of a diploma mill with tons of graduates cleaning floors all over the country.

It IS a national brand... It just kills you that over half the people filling AGCS on Nov. 8 will be K-State backers, doesn't it?
bears are fast...

Offline TCUHornedFrog

  • Cocaine is a helluva drug
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1074
  • Cocaine is a helluva drug
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #367 on: October 28, 2014, 12:25:47 PM »


It IS a national brand... It just kills you that over half the people filling AGCS on Nov. 8 will be K-State backers, doesn't it?

If by half, you mean less than a fourth, then yes it pains me so much. 

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #368 on: October 28, 2014, 12:28:24 PM »


It IS a national brand... It just kills you that over half the people filling AGCS on Nov. 8 will be K-State backers, doesn't it?

If by half, you mean less than a fourth, then yes it pains me so much.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

We had roughly 2/3 last time.  Will be no less than 50% again.

 :buh-bye:
bears are fast...

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16765
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #369 on: October 28, 2014, 12:28:44 PM »
"less than a fourth"

:lol:

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64182
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #370 on: October 28, 2014, 12:31:37 PM »
TCU fans are going to be surprised at the amount of purple around town that week
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline TCUHornedFrog

  • Cocaine is a helluva drug
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1074
  • Cocaine is a helluva drug
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #371 on: October 28, 2014, 12:33:14 PM »


 :lol: :lol: :lol:

We had roughly 2/3 last time.  Will be no less than 50% again.

 :buh-bye:

You should lay off the bath salts because I was at that game and the pud purple fans (just so you're clear, the diploma mill known as kstate) were no where close to being 2/3 of the stadium.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64182
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #372 on: October 28, 2014, 12:35:05 PM »


 :lol: :lol: :lol:

We had roughly 2/3 last time.  Will be no less than 50% again.

 :buh-bye:

You should lay off the bath salts because I was at that game and the pud purple fans (just so you're clear, the diploma mill known as kstate) were no where close to being 2/3 of the stadium.

2/3 of the crowd, the stadium was only 2/3 full
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #373 on: October 28, 2014, 12:38:47 PM »
Ft. Worth Bar owner told me last time I was there, that he just loved it when we came to town. He said the weekends K-State are in town (Cotton bowl, TCU, etc.) his bar sales almost triple from any other weekend. He said after the Cotton bowl, he made sure to make his bar a "K-State home bar" for the TCU game weekend, even tho he was a TCU grad.  :lol:  :kstategrad:

Offline TCUHornedFrog

  • Cocaine is a helluva drug
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1074
  • Cocaine is a helluva drug
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #374 on: October 28, 2014, 12:46:41 PM »
Ft. Worth Bar owner told me last time I was there, that he just loved it when we came to town. He said the weekends K-State are in town (Cotton bowl, TCU, etc.) his bar sales almost triple from any other weekend. He said after the Cotton bowl, he made sure to make his bar a "K-State home bar" for the TCU game weekend, even tho he was a TCU grad.  :lol:  :kstategrad:

A Manhattan, Ks bar owner told me last time I was there that people in Manhattan are dumb and he couldn't wait until TCU was a member of the Big 12 so he could make his bar a TCU home bar for the TCU game weekend even though he was a diploma mill recipient.