Author Topic: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)  (Read 33541 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #100 on: May 12, 2014, 11:48:00 AM »
Per that website, Kansas outpaced Cali by an average of 2% from 08 through 11. I guess when you don't ride the lows you don't have to try and catch up from way behind.

Of course govt. spending is a component of GDP so the more the state spends the better it looks GDPwise, even if the poor are starving, and the middle class is out of work and out of a home

nice job whoever the governor was from 2008-2011.

Good question, glad to help facilitate some critical thinking.
08 Sebelius .8%
09 Sebelius/Parkinson -3.2%
10 Parkinson/Brownback 2.6%
11 Brownback 3.2%

To be fair to the Brownbacksidehurt crowd, California is about as weak a comparable as any state. So even when Sebelius was rough ridin' up Kansas, things still looked good compared to that shithole.  For a real salty comparable look to Texas or North Dakota. 

goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37123
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #101 on: May 12, 2014, 11:49:51 AM »
At no point in 2010 was Sam Brownback governor of Kansas.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53813
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #102 on: May 12, 2014, 11:51:43 AM »
Revenues down 45% in one year? Holy crap

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37123
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #103 on: May 12, 2014, 02:31:48 PM »
Revenues down 45% in one year? Holy crap

Well, the tax rate was lowered by 33% (dropped from 6% to 4%), and the tax on LLCs was dropped to zero. The economy would have to get a pretty big boost to offset that. It looks like it didn't get any boost at all. Thanks, Obama.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6071
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37123
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #105 on: May 12, 2014, 02:53:46 PM »
http://www.kansascity.com/2014/05/10/5014648/kansas-tax-revenues-fall-while.html

OBAMA!!!!!!

Quote
Joe Henchman, vice president of state projects for the conservative-leaning Tax Foundation

Joe the Plumber must have been busy, so they went and got Joe the Henchman instead.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #106 on: May 12, 2014, 03:07:53 PM »
Welocme to Brownbackistan, Obamastan. We're doing better than California.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #107 on: May 12, 2014, 03:10:27 PM »
Where a $92 million dollar shortfall on $14.6 billion budgets equals a 45% reduction in gross revenue.

#brownbacksidehurt
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37123
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #108 on: May 12, 2014, 03:44:58 PM »
Where a $92 million dollar shortfall on $14.6 billion budgets equals a 45% reduction in gross revenue.

#brownbacksidehurt

The state is currently $463,931,168 behind where they were at the end of April 2013 in total receipts. That's only a 9% drop. The 45% was for the month of April 2014 vs April 2013.

http://budget.ks.gov/cre.htm

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7643
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #109 on: May 12, 2014, 04:45:13 PM »
Brownback is trying to entice business to come to Kansas by lowering the tax burden in order to increase tax base. 1 year isn't long enough to know whether it will work or not. Let's face it, it's going to take a lot to get companies and manufacturers to set up shop in Kansas.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37123
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #110 on: May 12, 2014, 04:57:50 PM »
Brownback is trying to entice business to come to Kansas by lowering the tax burden in order to increase tax base. 1 year isn't long enough to know whether it will work or not. Let's face it, it's going to take a lot to get companies and manufacturers to set up shop in Kansas.

It's been almost two years now.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53813
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #111 on: May 12, 2014, 05:16:48 PM »
Let's face it, it's going to take a lot to get companies and manufacturers to set up shop in Kansas.

Yes, especially when you're trying to pass things like we see in the Brownback Mountain thread.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7643
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #112 on: May 12, 2014, 05:25:00 PM »
Let's face it, it's going to take a lot to get companies and manufacturers to set up shop in Kansas.

Yes, especially when you're trying to pass things like we see in the Brownback Mountain thread.

Probably true, but depends on the business and owner, I suppose.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #113 on: May 12, 2014, 07:17:09 PM »
Revenues down 45% in one year? Holy crap

Well, the tax rate was lowered by 33% (dropped from 6% to 4%), and the tax on LLCs was dropped to zero. The economy would have to get a pretty big boost to offset that. It looks like it didn't get any boost at all. Thanks, Obama.

According to the article, the reduction was largely caused (and budgeted for) by the "fiscal cliff" a consequence of the Obama tax hikes for 2013.

I would assume this consequence isn't exclusive to Kansas, and other states are experiencing similar revenue declines.

Also, Kansas experienced gdp growth despite reductions in government spending, so your "not any at all" is just more pathetic Brownbacksidehurt
« Last Edit: May 12, 2014, 07:37:33 PM by Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) »
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #114 on: May 12, 2014, 07:42:34 PM »
By way of example, Cali budgeted for over $3 billion in lost income tax revenue from 2012 to 2013, and that included increased income tax rates.  Not sure why the article was so deliberately misleading.  Probably some big time Brownbacksidehurt
« Last Edit: May 12, 2014, 08:05:55 PM by Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) »
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6071
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #115 on: May 12, 2014, 09:46:07 PM »
These are the 10 states that saw revenue declines in the first half of the current fiscal year, which started July 1.

Alaska 31.9 percent

Kansas 7.3 percent

New Hampshire 6.4 percent

Arizona 5.2 percent

Kentucky 2.9 percent

Oklahoma 1.9 percent

Wyoming 1.3 percent

Delaware 0.9 percent

West Virginia 0.6 percent

New York 0.1 percent

« Last Edit: May 12, 2014, 09:50:00 PM by LickNeckey »

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #116 on: May 15, 2014, 04:02:19 PM »
Kansas UE down to 4.8%.  WOW
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37123
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #117 on: June 02, 2014, 04:49:34 PM »
Revenues were $217 million below projections in May.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #118 on: June 02, 2014, 04:57:19 PM »
Revenues were $217 million below projections in May.

I'm surprised they've already recouped $257 million of the $464 million shortfall from April. Well done, Sam.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37123
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #119 on: June 02, 2014, 05:02:29 PM »
Revenues were $217 million below projections in May.

I'm surprised they've already recouped $257 million of the $464 million shortfall from April. Well done, Sam.

The $464 million figure was 2013 vs 2014. The projected figure, which is used to set the state budget, only saw a $92 million shortfall. Things are getting worse, not better. Revenues in May are not down $257 million from last year. That is how much they missed projections by. A few more months of this and the state is going to come up a billion dollars short next fiscal year.

http://m.cjonline.com/news/2014-05-30/state-revenue-dips-217m-below-estimate-may

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36704
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #120 on: June 02, 2014, 05:04:58 PM »
McKee, the sky is not falling. Just yesterday, I heard on the radio that the state doesn't expect the shortfalls to continue after May. 

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37123
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #121 on: June 02, 2014, 05:05:45 PM »
McKee, the sky is not falling. Just yesterday, I heard on the radio that the state doesn't expect the shortfalls to continue after May.

Oh, well that's good.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36704
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #122 on: June 02, 2014, 05:09:33 PM »
Radio didn't say if that expectation was from the same portion of the govt that made the failing projections or not, but you should definitely feel relieved.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #123 on: June 02, 2014, 07:28:17 PM »
Revenues were $217 million below projections in May.

I'm surprised they've already recouped $257 million of the $464 million shortfall from April. Well done, Sam.

The $464 million figure was 2013 vs 2014. The projected figure, which is used to set the state budget, only saw a $92 million shortfall. Things are getting worse, not better. Revenues in May are not down $257 million from last year. That is how much they missed projections by. A few more months of this and the state is going to come up a billion dollars short next fiscal year.

http://m.cjonline.com/news/2014-05-30/state-revenue-dips-217m-below-estimate-may

The fiscal year ends next month.  I don't think a 1% miss in revenue projections implicates billions of dollars of shortfall  in subsequent years.    Its actually not bad considering the pathetic economic conditions nationwide, including GDP contraction of 1% 1Q.  But, please continue projecting your Brownbacksidehurt on the blog, it's good rhetoric.

« Last Edit: June 02, 2014, 07:39:55 PM by Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) »
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37123
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Governor watch (early polling)
« Reply #124 on: June 03, 2014, 09:00:49 AM »
Revenues were $217 million below projections in May.

I'm surprised they've already recouped $257 million of the $464 million shortfall from April. Well done, Sam.

The $464 million figure was 2013 vs 2014. The projected figure, which is used to set the state budget, only saw a $92 million shortfall. Things are getting worse, not better. Revenues in May are not down $257 million from last year. That is how much they missed projections by. A few more months of this and the state is going to come up a billion dollars short next fiscal year.

http://m.cjonline.com/news/2014-05-30/state-revenue-dips-217m-below-estimate-may

The fiscal year ends next month.  I don't think a 1% miss in revenue projections implicates billions of dollars of shortfall  in subsequent years.    Its actually not bad considering the pathetic economic conditions nationwide, including GDP contraction of 1% 1Q.  But, please continue projecting your Brownbacksidehurt on the blog, it's good rhetoric.

Yeah, I said next fiscal year. Coming up more than $300 million short during the first 3 or 4 months of the next fiscal year would put us on pace to come up about a billion dollars short, even if things get better and we start hitting predicted revenues.