goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: kso_FAN on September 13, 2013, 01:49:55 PM

Title: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: kso_FAN on September 13, 2013, 01:49:55 PM: http://goEMAW.com/blog/?p=2956
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: _33 on September 13, 2013, 02:07:33 PM: I've always known that Sams should be the guy, but it's nice to see some irrefutable stats back it up. Thank you _FAN.
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: CNS on September 13, 2013, 02:10:15 PM: I straight to bottom'ed and felt justified in my stance.

Thanks FAN!
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: MadCat on September 13, 2013, 02:14:12 PM: Very Samsteresting if true.
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: IPA4Me on September 13, 2013, 02:14:49 PM: Thanks for the breakdown.
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: Trim on September 13, 2013, 02:28:57 PM: T-Y.

Prior to staight-to-the-bottom'n, I control-F'd "dink."
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: kso_FAN on September 13, 2013, 02:29:53 PM: Quote from: Trim on September 13, 2013, 02:28:57 PM
T-Y.

Prior to staight-to-the-bottom'n, I control-F'd "dink."

:D
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: steve dave on September 13, 2013, 02:32:57 PM: Nice job fan.
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: Gooch on September 13, 2013, 02:35:40 PM: I hope the Mods are paying _Fan appropriately so he does not get lured away by the competition.
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: danholke on September 13, 2013, 03:08:47 PM: Nice breakdown, thanks for the analysis. I would even compare Jake's best 7 drives to Daniel's only 7, and would not be surprised if they are still in favor of Sams. However, there is so much potential to have them both involved in drives to confuse the defense - reverses/sweeps/screen passes to Sams, or pitch to Waters for a pass, double pass plays, etc.
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: _33 on September 13, 2013, 03:22:05 PM: Quote from: danholke on September 13, 2013, 03:08:47 PM
However, there is so much potential to have them both involved in drives to confuse the defense - reverses/sweeps/screen passes to Sams, or pitch to Waters for a pass, double pass plays, etc.

The only problem I can potentially see with these is that we will never, ever do any of them.
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: danholke on September 13, 2013, 03:46:55 PM: Quote from: _33 on September 13, 2013, 03:22:05 PM
Quote from: danholke on September 13, 2013, 03:08:47 PM
However, there is so much potential to have them both involved in drives to confuse the defense - reverses/sweeps/screen passes to Sams, or pitch to Waters for a pass, double pass plays, etc.

The only problem I can potentially see with these is that we will never, ever do any of them.

"So you're telling me there's a chance..."
-Dumb & Dumber
Or was that #hcrp?
Title: Re: Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 13, 2013, 05:36:14 PM: I get much more excited for the brutha package, than the honkey package.