0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: bleedpurple on February 22, 2010, 09:29:46 AMI don't see Samuels starting. We already tried that this year. He makes a bigger impact on the game coming from the bench, plus I'm not sure how long Samuels would play on a game to game basis if he started due to the difficulty he has staying out of foul trouble. Also, if Samuels starts at the 4 and kelly is at the 5 we have a SMALL team, 6' 7" and 6' 8" and skinny at the 4-5. Dominique will NEVER start at the 2. We would have the nations worst ball handling starting 5 period. All you'd have to do is press us and we'd turn it over every other trip down the court. I think pullen, mcgruder, sutton, kelly, asprilla is the most likely combo, but I think you could see pullen stay at the 2 and either russell or more likely irving at the 1. I've heard quite a few rumblings of Asprilla being an NBA prospect, not to mention he averaged 14 and 9 as a freshman. Like a guy posted earlier, if Colon starts now, then a much better Asprilla starts next year.I agree. However, I haven't seen Irving doing a great job as the 1. I just don't know any other option besides Russel, and I haven't seen him play a significant amount of time in a while.
I don't see Samuels starting. We already tried that this year. He makes a bigger impact on the game coming from the bench, plus I'm not sure how long Samuels would play on a game to game basis if he started due to the difficulty he has staying out of foul trouble. Also, if Samuels starts at the 4 and kelly is at the 5 we have a SMALL team, 6' 7" and 6' 8" and skinny at the 4-5. Dominique will NEVER start at the 2. We would have the nations worst ball handling starting 5 period. All you'd have to do is press us and we'd turn it over every other trip down the court. I think pullen, mcgruder, sutton, kelly, asprilla is the most likely combo, but I think you could see pullen stay at the 2 and either russell or more likely irving at the 1. I've heard quite a few rumblings of Asprilla being an NBA prospect, not to mention he averaged 14 and 9 as a freshman. Like a guy posted earlier, if Colon starts now, then a much better Asprilla starts next year.
Quote from: Stevesie60 on February 22, 2010, 09:36:48 AMQuote from: bleedpurple on February 22, 2010, 09:29:46 AMI don't see Samuels starting. We already tried that this year. He makes a bigger impact on the game coming from the bench, plus I'm not sure how long Samuels would play on a game to game basis if he started due to the difficulty he has staying out of foul trouble. Also, if Samuels starts at the 4 and kelly is at the 5 we have a SMALL team, 6' 7" and 6' 8" and skinny at the 4-5. Dominique will NEVER start at the 2. We would have the nations worst ball handling starting 5 period. All you'd have to do is press us and we'd turn it over every other trip down the court. I think pullen, mcgruder, sutton, kelly, asprilla is the most likely combo, but I think you could see pullen stay at the 2 and either russell or more likely irving at the 1. I've heard quite a few rumblings of Asprilla being an NBA prospect, not to mention he averaged 14 and 9 as a freshman. Like a guy posted earlier, if Colon starts now, then a much better Asprilla starts next year.I agree. However, I haven't seen Irving doing a great job as the 1. I just don't know any other option besides Russel, and I haven't seen him play a significant amount of time in a while.Alright, I'm game.I agree, with what you said being the only reason i could see pullen moving to the 1 because if he is at the 2 then irving or russell have to be there. So I see the most likely combo being 1=pullen, 2=mac.
What about Wes Welker at the point?
Wish that Seward Juco guy hadn't quit his team.
hopefully Asprilla can get up and down the floor better than I think he will. because he doesn't appear to be fleet of foot.
Quote from: pissclams on February 22, 2010, 09:39:45 AMhopefully Asprilla can get up and down the floor better than I think he will. because he doesn't appear to be fleet of foot.pittman part deux ???
Quote from: mcmwcat on February 22, 2010, 11:33:20 AMQuote from: pissclams on February 22, 2010, 09:39:45 AMhopefully Asprilla can get up and down the floor better than I think he will. because he doesn't appear to be fleet of foot.pittman part deux ???colon part 1.5
Quote from: pissclams on February 22, 2010, 12:15:56 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on February 22, 2010, 11:33:20 AMQuote from: pissclams on February 22, 2010, 09:39:45 AMhopefully Asprilla can get up and down the floor better than I think he will. because he doesn't appear to be fleet of foot.pittman part deux ???colon part 1.5 -1
Quote from: bleedpurple on February 22, 2010, 12:25:44 PMQuote from: pissclams on February 22, 2010, 12:15:56 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on February 22, 2010, 11:33:20 AMQuote from: pissclams on February 22, 2010, 09:39:45 AMhopefully Asprilla can get up and down the floor better than I think he will. because he doesn't appear to be fleet of foot.pittman part deux ???colon part 1.5 lol....+1-1colon part .5
Quote from: pissclams on February 22, 2010, 12:15:56 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on February 22, 2010, 11:33:20 AMQuote from: pissclams on February 22, 2010, 09:39:45 AMhopefully Asprilla can get up and down the floor better than I think he will. because he doesn't appear to be fleet of foot.pittman part deux ???colon part 1.5 lol....+1-1
