goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: EMAWmeister on July 26, 2012, 10:35:16 PM
-
Love it. Those nuggets? Fantastic. A little too hot right out of the oven though :frown:
Oh, and they are allowed to believe whatever the eff they want, and discriminating against them for religious beliefs is asanine.
-
I never really understood the obsession with Chickfila. Lotta people love it though. :dunno:
-
Had my first chick fil a ever about a month ago. was not impressed at all. just had the run of the mill chicken sandwich.
And you can't use religion as an excuse to be a bigot.
-
i love the crap out of chikfila. if i'm being serious with myself, i will probably eat it less moving forward, but i doubt i could just stop cold turkey/chicken.
-
what do you get there?
-
Had my first chick fil a ever about a month ago. was not impressed at all. just had the run of the mill chicken sandwich.
And you can't use religion as an excuse to be a bigot.
Stating that someone is a bigot for believing something over another seems a little silly to me. The statement wasn't hateful at all.
-
discriminating against a group of people is bigotry.
-
discriminating against a group of people is bigotry.
How again does chick fil a discriminate? Do they not serve gay people?
Being denied a business license because of your owner's religious beliefs, on the other hand, is discrimination.
-
http://www.snopes.com/politics/sexuality/chickfila.asp
What's it like to be on the wrong side of a civil rights movement?
-
Why yes, I agree that the students should try to get it removed from the union. First off, it is a shitty restaurant. Second, their owner is using his religion as an excuse to be a bigoted bad person.
-
Why yes, I agree that the students should try to get it removed from the union. First off, it is a shitty restaurant. Second, their owner is using his religion as an excuse to be a bigoted bad person.
i'm not sure you've had those nugget things. have you had those nugget things?
-
Love it. Those nuggets? Fantastic. A little too hot right out of the oven though :frown:
Oh, and they are allowed to believe whatever the eff they want, and discriminating against them for religious beliefs is asanine.
So it's OK for CFA to oppose people who believe gays who marry should be recognized by the government (not any religious institution), but it's not OK for people to oppose CFA for holding that belief?
That's quite the pickle.
Next you're going to tell me private citizens criticizing other private citizens infringes on their 1st Amendment rights.
-
The strip mall that the chick-fil-a is in on the east side of Wichita still has to hire off-duty cops to patrol the whole rough ridin' parking lot so that people don't park in spots 100 yards away to eat there.
-
Is it that hard to figure out how to make their chicken sandwiches? Somebody should and start Chik-fil-gay and sell the same stuff but really gay up the restaurant and have it be open on Sundays and everything.
-
guys,
instead of trying to put them out of business and thus causing them to not be able to serve their little nugget things, how about we just do stuff to hurt their bottom line. like maybe fork their grass at night and then they have to pay someone to remove the forks and thus hit them where it hurts. their bottom line.
-
I've hear you can get some fantastic Biltong from an Afrikaaner but I'm not going to go out and buy some from him.
-
http://www.snopes.com/politics/sexuality/chickfila.asp
What's it like to be on the wrong side of a civil rights movement?
I'm on the wrong side of a civil rights movement because I believe it's wrong for the mayor of Boston to block a store from competing in a market due to a difference in beliefs?
I have no problem with gay people or gay marriage. If CFA was treating gay customers differently than other customers, I would be the first to condemn it. But I believe that a business should be able to donate money to whomever they damn well please. Blocking the business from the Boston area is wrong. If the people of Boston feel that opposed to their politics, they have the right as consumers to go elsewhere.
-
you have no idea how many homo's there are in boston, it's ok most bigots are pretty naive too.
-
Love it. Those nuggets? Fantastic. A little too hot right out of the oven though :frown:
Oh, and they are allowed to believe whatever the eff they want, and discriminating against them for religious beliefs is asanine.
So it's OK for CFA to oppose people who believe gays who marry should be recognized by the government (not any religious institution), but it's not OK for people to oppose CFA for holding that belief?
That's quite the pickle.
Next you're going to tell me private citizens criticizing other private citizens infringes on their 1st Amendment rights.
shutup dumbass. they are a rough ridin' restaurant.
-
you have no idea how many homo's there are in boston, it's ok most bigots are pretty naive too.
It was the first state in the union to legalize gay marriage, there is obviously a huge homosexual population. If they are offended that the owner donates his money to certain organization, they can spend their dollars somewhere else.
-
Love it. Those nuggets? Fantastic. A little too hot right out of the oven though :frown:
Oh, and they are allowed to believe whatever the eff they want, and discriminating against them for religious beliefs is asanine.
So it's OK for CFA to oppose people who believe gays who marry should be recognized by the government (not any religious institution), but it's not OK for people to oppose CFA for holding that belief?
That's quite the pickle.
Next you're going to tell me private citizens criticizing other private citizens infringes on their 1st Amendment rights.
Jesus Christ.
-
Yeah, the Boston thing is dumb, but I still think the students should get them out of the union in favor of a Wendy's. I mean, Wendy's chicken sandwiches and nuggets (sorry daris) are like a million (1.3 million?) times better.
-
Yeah, the Boston thing is dumb, but I still think the students should get them out of the union in favor of a Wendy's. I mean, Wendy's chicken sandwiches and nuggets (sorry daris) are like a million (1.3 million?) times better.
well i'm all for rough ridin' chickfila up the ass. literally. i really do like those little nuggs though. let's just keep buying and eating those nuggs but make it really bad for them or something so maybe they have to sell them to us for what it costs them to make and sell them. :dunno:
-
Yeah, the Boston thing is dumb, but I still think the students should get them out of the union in favor of a Wendy's. I mean, Wendy's chicken sandwiches and nuggets (sorry daris) are like a million (1.3 million?) times better.
Also 5x cheaper
-
Yeah, the Boston thing is dumb, but I still think the students should get them out of the union in favor of a Wendy's. I mean, Wendy's chicken sandwiches and nuggets (sorry daris) are like a million (1.3 million?) times better.
Chick-Fil-A chicken is really good tasting. It's unique. How do they get that flavor? Wow.
-
Yeah, the Boston thing is dumb, but I still think the students should get them out of the union in favor of a Wendy's. I mean, Wendy's chicken sandwiches and nuggets (sorry daris) are like a million (1.3 million?) times better.
well i'm all for rough ridin' chickfila up the ass. literally. i really do like those little nuggs though. let's just keep buying and eating those nuggs but make it really bad for them or something so maybe they have to sell them to us for what it costs them to make and sell them. :dunno:
Maybe you could just get a Wichita goEMAWer to ship you some on a weekly basis.
-
Yeah, the Boston thing is dumb, but I still think the students should get them out of the union in favor of a Wendy's. I mean, Wendy's chicken sandwiches and nuggets (sorry daris) are like a million (1.3 million?) times better.
well i'm all for rough ridin' chickfila up the ass. literally. i really do like those little nuggs though. let's just keep buying and eating those nuggs but make it really bad for them or something so maybe they have to sell them to us for what it costs them to make and sell them. :dunno:
Maybe you could just get a Wichita goEMAWer to ship you some on a weekly basis.
oh. if we're just trying to get them out of mhk then cool. i just don't want them to go away completely.
-
wendys? GMAFB
-
Love it. Those nuggets? Fantastic. A little too hot right out of the oven though :frown:
Oh, and they are allowed to believe whatever the eff they want, and discriminating against them for religious beliefs is asanine.
So it's OK for CFA to oppose people who believe gays who marry should be recognized by the government (not any religious institution), but it's not OK for people to oppose CFA for holding that belief?
That's quite the pickle.
Next you're going to tell me private citizens criticizing other private citizens infringes on their 1st Amendment rights.
shutup dumbass. they are a rough ridin' restaurant.
:lol:
also :facepalm: to myself for the missing contraction in my post.
-
How about this. If you go to chick fil a. eat in, drink a shitload of pop, use a shitload of ice, ask for two of every sauce they have and leave a mess to clean up.
-
I won't do that because it's not very good.
-
and they promote bigotry and say it's their religion.
-
How about this. If you go to chick fil a. eat in, drink a shitload of pop, use a shitload of ice, ask for two of every sauce they have and leave a mess to clean up.
yes. also dump your left over diet coke on the floor right before you leave and dirty up a bunch of napkins.
-
Bottom line
-
i mean for fucks sakes guys, even guys that full on make out with other guys and will want to marry other guys aren't going to like stop eating there or anything cause of this. i mean i am super pro bglt and all that, but crap those nuggs are too good. eat the nuggets, don't let them make buckets.
btw, when i said buckets i was talking like buckets of money.
-
Has anyone had a platter of their breakfast sandwiches? They take the little nuggets and put them in some form of sweet biscuit.
I mean, Jesus Christ.
My wife never wants to eat there again, and I'm totally cool with just bashing the Hell out of them from here to eternity, but I'm not going to substitute CFA for Wendy's on a matter of principle. Life is too short, the chicken and milkshakes are too good, I vote against anyone who makes gay marriage an issue, and we included a gay guy in our wedding party, so I get a pass on this one.
If I'm upset about anything, it's that those nutbags refuse to make money on a Sunday.
-
Here's the deal: CFA can support whatever they want and oppose anything they want and I don't blame them at all for it. Customers can, in turn, decide to support whatever business they want and oppose any business they want and I won't blame them at all for it. Fiscally, would it have been smarter for CFA to keep their mouths shut regarding political matters? Yeah.
Am I going to stop eating at a place because I disagree with their management's political beliefs? Not in this instance. If they were funding the KKK or Neo Nazis or something super out there like that, I probably would. But, here? Eh, I don't think CFA is going to make much of a difference re. gay guys.
-
I don't think determining when bigotry is out there crazy bigotry or just normal I'll give it a pass level bigotry is a path I'm ready to venture down yet. that spicy chicken sandwich though, wow.
-
Team EMAWmeister
-
Those lines when they open chik fil a's are nuts. Neither the nuggets nor the spicy chicken is worth waiting in line for. And they apparently hate gays.
-
Has anyone had a platter of their breakfast sandwiches? They take the little nuggets and put them in some form of sweet biscuit.
I mean, Jesus Christ.
My wife never wants to eat there again, and I'm totally cool with just bashing the Hell out of them from here to eternity, but I'm not going to substitute CFA for Wendy's on a matter of principle. Life is too short, the chicken and milkshakes are too good, I vote against anyone who makes gay marriage an issue, and we included a gay guy in our wedding party, so I get a pass on this one.
If I'm upset about anything, it's that those nutbags refuse to make money on a Sunday.
Where on earth did you find one at the last minute? It was nice of you to include him in your wedding party! :cheers:
-
Here's the deal: CFA can support whatever they want and oppose anything they want and I don't blame them at all for it. Customers can, in turn, decide to support whatever business they want and oppose any business they want and I won't blame them at all for it. Fiscally, would it have been smarter for CFA to keep their mouths shut regarding political matters? Yeah.
Am I going to stop eating at a place because I disagree with their management's political beliefs? Not in this instance. If they were funding the KKK or Neo Nazis or something super out there like that, I probably would. But, here? Eh, I don't think CFA is going to make much of a difference re. gay guys.
I fully agree with your first paragraph, and strongly disagree with the second, but hey, that's just me.
-
CFA could say they're pro-Al Aqaeda and want America to burn, and I would still gobble up their delicious waffle fries and chicken sandy. :lick:
-
I don't think determining when bigotry is out there crazy bigotry or just normal I'll give it a pass level bigotry is a path I'm ready to venture down yet. that spicy chicken sandwich though, wow.
You're gonna love chik-fil-gay, sd. We'll put the spicy on sale on Sundays.
-
I don't think determining when bigotry is out there crazy bigotry or just normal I'll give it a pass level bigotry is a path I'm ready to venture down yet. that spicy chicken sandwich though, wow.
You're gonna love chik-fil-gay, sd. We'll put the spicy on sale on Sundays.
this does sound pretty great
-
Just keep eating chick-fil-a. Its only a matter of time before their CEO is caught having gay sex in a public restroom. Balance will be restored and we will all be happy.l
-
Just keep eating chick-fil-a. Its only a matter of time before their CEO is caught having gay sex in a public restroom. Balance will be restored and we will all be happy.l
you can probably see that first day at trim's new place and we will all just party and eat our chicken
-
Just keep eating chick-fil-a. Its only a matter of time before their CEO is caught having gay sex in a public restroom. Balance will be restored and we will all be happy.l
you can probably see that first day at trim's new place and we will all just party and eat our chicken
Can't you just picture it now? It's not gonna be the GPC dark kind of gay, but the super-festive goEMAW rainbow front page kind of gay. The exact same foodstuffs on the menu (I'm gonna need some help double-entendre'n the menu names) with your ethical dilemma solved in fabulous fashion for you by goEMAW's most ethical poster*.
*prolly
-
house music and everyone's in shape and expertly groomed
-
#burnitdown
-
Very smart marketing by the bigot guy. I mean, right now he is reminding people how much they love his nuggets. Pro CFA guys are praising his faith and it reminds them how much they love those delish nuggets. Anti CFA are discussing his bigotry and talking about how to counter the bigotry then secretly going for one last batch of nuggets on the way home.
-
the best part of this story isn't that the ceo is a douchey bigot, it's the batshit-crazy stuff that is happening beyond that.
jim henson company pulls the muppets stuff because of the douchey bigot, and then like the next day chick-fil-a says that they pulled the muppets stuff because it was defective.
then chick-fil-a creates a fake facebook account of a teenage girl to try and defend the douchey bigot, and they get completely embarrassed.
like, wow. maybe instead of taking off next sunday, they should make everyone there take a public relations class.
-
they should make everyone there take a public relations class.
Lunch provided?
-
they should make everyone there take a public relations class.
Lunch provided?
chicken strips with chick-fil-a sauce?
-
they should make everyone there take a public relations class.
Lunch provided?
chicken strips with chick-fil-a sauce?
That'd be great. A day off to play pocket planes and bbs and sketch out plans for my new chik-fil-gay chain all while getting free chik-fil-a.
-
Yeah, the fake Facebook account was great. Unless it was an anti cfa guy that created it to make CDs look bad. Bottom line, though, is that executives of high profile companies should either not be bigots, or at least keep the bigotry to yourself.
-
I, for one, always demand to know what a fast food CEO's opinions on social and political issues are before buying their food.
-
I, for one, always demand to know what a fast food CEO's opinions on social and political issues are before buying their food.
Was Dave Thomas (RIP) a bigot? :ohno:
-
they should make everyone there take a public relations class.
Lunch provided?
chicken strips with chick-fil-a sauce?
That'd be great. A day off to play pocket planes and bbs and sketch out plans for my new chik-fil-gay chain all while getting free chik-fil-a.
will chick-fil-gay be serving those really good peach shakes?
-
they should make everyone there take a public relations class.
Lunch provided?
chicken strips with chick-fil-a sauce?
That'd be great. A day off to play pocket planes and bbs and sketch out plans for my new chik-fil-gay chain all while getting free chik-fil-a.
will chick-fil-gay be serving those really good peach shakes?
If chik-fil-a serves them, so will chik-fil-gay. Will be a blatant (gay-tant?) ripoff.
-
that was a big selling point for me.
-
everything will be a little better then regular chick-fil-a because it will be made, served and consumed without hate
-
everything will be a little better then regular chick-fil-a because it will be made, served and consumed without hate
Exactly. And customers will pay a premium for it.
-
I, for one, always demand to know what a fast food CEO's opinions on social and political issues are before buying their food.
Was Dave Thomas (RIP) a bigot? :ohno:
I don't think so, since he tried (and failed) to get the nation to embrace gingers. Therefore we can all continue to enjoy dipping fries into a Chocolate Frosty with a clear conscience. :cheers: < Chocolate Frosty
-
the boys and i were whipping around some ideas this morning for the logo for chick-fil-gay.
here's what we came up with.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi534.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fee346%2Foklahomacat%2Fcfgcopy.jpg&hash=3026f5481090e576bcc659a713ee9f3830e5265f)
-
the boys and i were whipping around some ideas this morning for the logo for chick-fil-gay.
here's what we came up with.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi534.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fee346%2Foklahomacat%2Fcfgcopy.jpg&hash=3026f5481090e576bcc659a713ee9f3830e5265f)
Perfect. Welcome to the ground floor of this burgeoning investment, OK_Cat. Also, didn't realize until having that pic right in front of me that Chick-fil-a (and Chick-fil-gay) DO include the 2nd "c" in "chick." Guess I assumed it was misspelled like the cows misspell everything in the ads.
Speaking of which, the chick-fil-gay ads... :love:
-
as the potential director of marketing for chick-fil-gay, i have this crap on lockdown, trim.
these fab ladies have been booked to do the very first chick-fil-gay commercial http://youtu.be/sO-msplukrw
-
as the potential director of marketing for chick-fil-gay, i have this crap on lockdown, trim.
these fab ladies have been booked to do the very first chick-fil-gay commercial http://youtu.be/sO-msplukrw
LOL at "potential."
-
nothing's official until i find out if we're getting sued or not.
-
nothing's official until i find out if we're getting sued or not.
We can only hope. Publicity isn't cheap.
-
i feel like this thread got off course.
we should all be talking about how ridiculous people are for defending chick-fil-a. (not affiliated with chick-fil-gay)
-
Does anyone else even sell waffle fries?
Also, they should be able to put their business wherever they can pay as long as they don't discriminate.
-
the boys and i were whipping around some ideas this morning for the logo for chick-fil-gay.
here's what we came up with.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi534.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fee346%2Foklahomacat%2Fcfgcopy.jpg&hash=3026f5481090e576bcc659a713ee9f3830e5265f)
Great (gay) sexual innuendo, OK Cat! I want in on the menu item names double entendre-ing team. I will knock that crap out of the park...er do that crap in the butt. See, homo-eroticizing it up around here already. :excited:
-
Does anyone else even sell waffle fries?
Also, they should be able to put their business wherever they can pay as long as they don't discriminate.
backyard burgers.
They are probably missing on a good opportunity to unveil a new line of chicken sandwiches
-
I, for one, always demand to know what a fast food CEO's opinions on social and political issues are before buying their food.
Was Dave Thomas (RIP) a bigot? :ohno:
IDK, but his daughter is unattractive and she doesn't move her mouth right when she speaks. It's like she's trying to ventriloquise (poorly I might add) without a dummy. Check this crap out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJPGPIxgXUY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJPGPIxgXUY). WTF is that? She needs to stay the eff out of the commercials.
-
holy crap, the PR guy for Chick-Fil-A died of a heart attack.
:lol:
-
I, for one, always demand to know what a fast food CEO's opinions on social and political issues are before buying their food.
Was Dave Thomas (RIP) a bigot? :ohno:
IDK, but his daughter is unattractive and she doesn't move her mouth right when she speaks. It's like she's trying to ventriloquise (poorly I might add) without a dummy. Check this crap out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJPGPIxgXUY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJPGPIxgXUY). WTF is that? She needs to stay the eff out of the commercials.
have thought the same thing
-
bigots gonna big i guess
-
EMAWmiester has a good point of view on this matter.
-
Don't confuse conviction with bigotry
-
Yeah, the Boston thing is dumb, but I still think the students should get them out of the union in favor of a Wendy's. I mean, Wendy's chicken sandwiches and nuggets (sorry daris) are like a million (1.3 million?) times better.
Chick-Fil-A chicken is really good tasting. It's unique. How do they get that flavor? Wow.
Pressure cooking. pressure cooking and pickles.
-
http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/417013/july-26-2012/chick-fil-a-s-anti-gay-marriage-announcement?xrs=share_copy
-
I stopped by the local chick-fil-a this morning to do some chick-fil-gay market research and came up with an idea. So c-f-g makes a bunch of money off us all and apparently donates some of their profits to anti-gay-rights groups. What if after you placed your order, you could declare "I support equal rights" or something to that effect and get 10% off your order?
Would that work until I can get chick-fil-gay off the ground?
-
I stopped by the local chick-fil-a this morning to do some chick-fil-gay market research and came up with an idea. So c-f-g makes a bunch of money off us all and apparently donates some of their profits to anti-gay-rights groups. What if after you placed your order, you could declare "I support equal rights" or something to that effect and get 10% off your order?
Would that work until I can get chick-fil-gay off the ground?
What did you get to eat?
-
I stopped by the local chick-fil-a this morning to do some chick-fil-gay market research and came up with an idea. So c-f-g makes a bunch of money off us all and apparently donates some of their profits to anti-gay-rights groups. What if after you placed your order, you could declare "I support equal rights" or something to that effect and get 10% off your order?
Would that work until I can get chick-fil-gay off the ground?
What did you get to eat?
Spicy on biscuit. Full price unfortunately.
-
I always get the spicy chicken deluxe with pepper jack. It always punishes my b-hole in my subsequent act of ritual purification. I find meaning in that.
-
I stopped by the local chick-fil-a this morning to do some chick-fil-gay market research and came up with an idea. So c-f-g makes a bunch of money off us all and apparently donates some of their profits to anti-gay-rights groups. What if after you placed your order, you could declare "I support equal rights" or something to that effect and get 10% off your order?
Would that work until I can get chick-fil-gay off the ground?
What did you get to eat?
Spicy on biscuit. Full price unfortunately.
Do you ever add the egg and pepper jack? I mean, like on a morning when you had nothing other to do than quickly digest and immediately sleep?
-
Do you ever add the egg and pepper jack? I mean, like on a morning when you had nothing other to do than quickly digest and immediately sleep?
Today was my first time to c-f-a for breakfast.
-
Do you ever add the egg and pepper jack? I mean, like on a morning when you had nothing other to do than quickly digest and immediately sleep?
Today was my first time to c-f-a for breakfast.
their chicken breakfast burrito is the best in the fast food industry
-
Do you ever add the egg and pepper jack? I mean, like on a morning when you had nothing other to do than quickly digest and immediately sleep?
Today was my first time to c-f-a for breakfast.
their chicken breakfast burrito is the best in the fast food industry
About to be the 2nd best...
-
Do you ever add the egg and pepper jack? I mean, like on a morning when you had nothing other to do than quickly digest and immediately sleep?
Today was my first time to c-f-a for breakfast.
their chicken breakfast burrito is the best in the fast food industry
Are there any competitors in the chicken bb market?
Sent from my GT-S5830M using Tapatalk 2
-
Do you ever add the egg and pepper jack? I mean, like on a morning when you had nothing other to do than quickly digest and immediately sleep?
Today was my first time to c-f-a for breakfast.
their chicken breakfast burrito is the best in the fast food industry
Are there any competitors in the chicken bb market?
Sent from my GT-S5830M using Tapatalk 2
there's about to be
-
Chick-fil-gay: our spicy chicken does bad things to your butthole, and we are 100% cool with it.
-
I was just checking on what kind of BBBS discount I'd get to take the kid to the Star Wars exhibit at Exploration Place (shoutout to Saul!) and came across this:
Chick-fil-A (7990 E Central) Matches eat free when together. Please present your blue match discount card at the front counter.
So, set aside any ethical concerns with Chick-fil-a's politics, bring the kid there (probably any kid would work) and I get free chicken? Kind of takes the wind out of my chick-fil-gay sails.
-
they support pedophiles, trim. (no offense, trim)
typical.
-
An ethical debate to be sure. Perhaps one best had while chowing down on some free c-f-a? Market research of course.
-
not really a debate at this point, it seems pretty clear.
you either hate homosexuals/love pedophiles
or you love homosexuals (no homo)/hate pedophiles
i know that i'm in #teamhomo(no homo), hope the rest of you know where you stand.
-
It's free chicken, OK_Cat. Whatever profits they'd have derived from my business are gone, and I'm actually eating their own expenses.
If anybody wants to get involved with BBBS and get a "Little" and one of these free chick-fil-a cards to stick it to the anti-gay, Sandusky-ish man, go to kansasbigs.org and find your local office's contact info.
-
just make sure you don't adopt a gay kid or you probably won't get the free food
-
WE WILL NOT TOLERATE INTOLERANCE!!!
-
http://www.glaad.org/blog/chick-fil-sued-gender-discrimination
CFA just loves families, not sure why they are getting such a bad rap
-
http://www.glaad.org/blog/chick-fil-sued-gender-discrimination
CFA just loves families, not sure why they are getting such a bad rap
Welp, looks like we're gonna need to invest in some food coloring for our premium sandwich, the Chick-Fil-Gay Deluxe.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.glaad.org%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Flarge%2Fpublic%2Fchik_400x800.jpg&hash=76c8a7874310e6641b8356363f6e40661f6b4d5e)
I plan to sell the purple patties solo at our EMAW locations.
-
looks like they have all the colors we need to expand chick-fil-gay to all of the big 12 towns.
-
WE WILL NOT TOLERATE INTOLERANCE!!!
wow, that's racist, :mlkrollingingrave:
-
WE WILL NOT TOLERATE INTOLERANCE!!!
wow, that's racist, :mlkrollingingrave:
Considering the above irony filled statement is relevant to both sides of the CFA argument, I would say it's meaning is within the eye of the beholder... You racist piece of crap.
-
:zombiemlkaliveandeatingpeople:
-
Can I make a suggestion. I don't think anyone on here is in the restaurant business. I think we all make enough :kstategrad: with our day jobs. However, everyone would like a little extra money on the side and I think you guys have a good idea with CFA style sandwichs available on Sunday in a pro-LGBT setting. May I suggest that once you break the CFA recipe you start a joint-venture with Hamburger Mary's? Maybe some goemawers supply the recipe, seed money, and idea while Hamburger Mary's does the restaurant leg-work. Maybe extend on their brand as "Chicken Mary's" as a fast food alternative?
-
Can I make a suggestion. I don't think anyone on here is in the restaurant business. I think we all make enough :kstategrad: with our day jobs. However, everyone would like a little extra money on the side and I think you guys have a good idea with CFA style sandwichs available on Sunday in a pro-LGBT setting. May I suggest that once you break the CFA recipe you start a joint-venture with Hamburger Mary's? Maybe some goemawers supply the recipe, seed money, and idea while Hamburger Mary's does the restaurant leg-work. Maybe extend on their brand as "Chicken Mary's" as a fast food alternative?
We're gonna steal chick-fil-a employees too. I bet there's some closeted gay ones there who'd love get down with the c-f-g.
-
Offering Trim and other business partners 25K and all my goEMAW.com stock (about 15,000 shares) for a 51% stake in Chick-Fil-Gay.
Worked in a restaraunt for 1.5 years before I was laid off (total bullshit, by the way) for drinking beer from the tap as a minor.
-
Offering Trim and other business partners 25K and all my goEMAW.com stock (about 15,000 shares) for a 51% stake in Chick-Fil-Gay.
Worked in a restaraunt for 1.5 years before I was laid off (total bullshit, by the way) for drinking beer from the tap as a minor.
Keep your money. goEMAW is littered with angel investors.
Interested in front line work? Now fanning's resume indicated he worked at Carlos O'Kelly's and he'll probably be looking for a job in the "biz" as soon as he's done over at UofP. Plus, he tends to wear his shirts almost completely unbuttoned, which, once I clear it with the health inspector, will probably appeal to our base. So, you've got a lot to overcome if you want to beat him out for the job.
-
Keep your money. goEMAW is littered with angel investors.
Interested in front line work? Now fanning's resume indicated he worked at Carlos O'Kelly's and he'll probably be looking for a job in the "biz" as soon as he's done over at UofP. Plus, he tends to wear his shirts almost completely unbuttoned, which, once I clear it with the health inspector, will probably appeal to our base. So, you've got a lot to overcome if you want to beat him out for the job.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.starpulse.com%2Fnews%2Fbloggers%2F684225%2Fblog_images%2Fshark-tank.jpg&hash=6df736c8fb83a320ab4e032acc29d6a9271d0bf5)
-
Keep your money. goEMAW is littered with angel investors.
Interested in front line work? Now fanning's resume indicated he worked at Carlos O'Kelly's and he'll probably be looking for a job in the "biz" as soon as he's done over at UofP. Plus, he tends to wear his shirts almost completely unbuttoned, which, once I clear it with the health inspector, will probably appeal to our base. So, you've got a lot to overcome if you want to beat him out for the job.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.starpulse.com%2Fnews%2Fbloggers%2F684225%2Fblog_images%2Fshark-tank.jpg&hash=6df736c8fb83a320ab4e032acc29d6a9271d0bf5)
:peek:
-
make a chicken sandwich w/ a fried egg on it.
-
make a chicken sandwich w/ a fried egg on it.
What kind of maniac gets a chicken sandwich w/a fried egg on it?
-
we already had a big c-f-g board of directors meeting and decided that all "visible employees" (front desk, cooks, etc) must be pretty gay people. fanning-like, but with more muscle definition and a better tan.
-
"waffle" fries with extra "transfat"
-
Time to get the lawyers out...
http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2012/07/30/opinion-why-im-celebrating-chick-fil-gay-appreciation-day/?hpt=hp_bn11
Opinion: Why I’m celebrating Chick-fil-Gay Appreciation Day
-
:dubious:
-
THEY WILL ALL BE SUED HAHAHAHA
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.someecards.com%2Fsomeecards%2Fusercards%2F1343828615878_9121915.png&hash=0b726bd8f2a271a2c69b13a2e4f3f80ae5f45b27)
-
Looks like you guys will have some pretty stiff competition.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/304657_10151978940515541_6920221_n.jpg)
-
what in the world
-
the more of that they shovel in their dumb asses, the quicker society can evolve and grow. :dance:
-
'lotta romney votes in that picture.
-
'lotta romney votes in that picture.
'lotta white folks in that picture as well.
-
Chik-Fil-A in Olathe is busy as crap today. My word.
-
C-f-g welcomes the challenge.
-
'lotta romney votes in that picture.
'lotta white folks in that picture as well.
I've never met a Romney voter that wasn't white and exactly like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrIDHNqUTPM
-
Support Chick Fil A day. All the Fox news viewers in one place at one time.
Support Chic Fil Gay will have a similar turn out but with less fanny packs, cell phone holsters, and love handles.
-
'lotta romney votes in that picture.
'lotta white folks in that picture as well.
I've never met a Romney voter that wasn't white and exactly like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrIDHNqUTPM
Those guys weren't very effective (police state, pffft). She kind of won that debate, what there was of it. Sad.
-
Support Chick Fil A day. All the Fox news viewers in one place at one time.
Support Chic Fil Gay will have a similar turn out but with less fanny packs, cell phone holsters, and love handles.
This is an anti-lesbian post. No Chick-fil-gay for you.
-
Support Chick Fil A day. All the Fox news viewers in one place at one time.
Support Chic Fil Gay will have a similar turn out but with less fanny packs, cell phone holsters, and love handles.
C-f-g won't need a special day. Party SEVEN days a week.
-
'lotta romney votes in that picture.
'lotta white folks in that picture as well.
I've never met a Romney voter that wasn't white and exactly like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrIDHNqUTPM
Those guys weren't very effective (police state, pffft). She kind of won that debate, what there was of it. Sad.
Wasn't much of a debate... Mostly a "we're going to poke and prod until you make an ass of yourself" and all she could get out was "you offend me"
Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.
-
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/384750_3500817526174_471574466_n.jpg)
-
That was produced with absolutely no knowledge of Christianity.
Their intelligence would be devastated by this fact.
-
is anything in that graphic false? i'm not attacking you, but please expand on your thought.
-
is anything in that graphic false? i'm not attacking you, but please expand on your thought.
I'm assuming P-Dub believes that the New Testament claims that the rules of the Old Testament are no longer necessary (this is a very, very dumbed down version of the theology).
-
Is there anything against homosexuality in the new testament though?
-
Anything prohibiting food coloring, or am I gonna need to hire a 3rd shift to pray up those patties into rainbow colors?
-
Is there anything against homosexuality in the new testament though?
No, I think that PW was just referencing the poster.
-
Jakesie60 is not far off. There are many things in the Old Testament that, with the arrival, crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus, become irrelevant, and are expressly addressed in the New Testament. This is one of them. People like to quote the Old Testament, out of context, assuming that this instruction applies to us as it did to men thousands of years ago. It doesn't. It's glib to do so.
Mark 7:14-23: "And he (Jesus) called the people to him again and said to them, “Hear me, all of you, and understand: 15 There is nothing outside a person that by going into him can defile him, but the things that come out of a person are what defile him.” 17 And when he had entered the house and left the people, his disciples asked him about the parable. 18 And he said to them, “Then are you also without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him, 19 since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.) 20 And he said, “What comes out of a person is what defiles him. 21 For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, 22 coveting, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride, foolishness. 23 All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”
-
Rainbow chicken is a go!
-
Is there anything against homosexuality in the new testament though?
Yes.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
"9 Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."
1 Timothy 1:9-11
"8 Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, 9 understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, 10 the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, 11 in accordance with the gospel of the glory of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted."
Romans 1:26-27
"26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error."
It's sad that something can be so clear, yet people willfully dismiss it. (i.e. gay "Christians" - an impossibility) Homosexuality is no different than a desire to lie, steal, have sex with an animal, or have sex with a man/woman outside of marriage. It's a simple temptation that people give in to.
-
PoetWarrior acknowledged me! :love:
He won't agree with me on this though: Jesus never mentioned homosexuality. It seems silly to waste time on it. Love your God, love your neighbor. Those were Jesus' commandments. I'm pretty sure that what Chick-Fil-A did could not be considered loving their neighbor. Chick-Fil-Gay sounds much more in line with the ideology of Jesus. And it will be interesting to see how Trim reacts to that statement....
-
Mark 7:14-23: Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him
:dunno:
-
:lol:
-
Mark 7:14-23: Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him
:dunno:
Food, man. Context.
-
He won't agree with me on this though: Jesus never mentioned homosexuality. It seems silly to waste time on it. Love your God, love your neighbor. Those were Jesus' commandments. I'm pretty sure that what Chick-Fil-A did could not be considered loving their neighbor.
There's a lot wrong with the idea that we should rip the pages out of our Bible that are not printed in red (they print Jesus' quotes in red). If Jesus was God, a God who would have the ability to allow a Bible, which communicates from him to his people, that included items that were fallible, what sense would this make? Whether or not he ever used the word "homosexuality", is irrelevant. He has allowed it to be included in his message to us that has survived for thousands of years, unchanged. Also, Jesus acknowledges that we should not commit adultery (sexual activity, and lust, outside of marriage between one man and woman), so, it seems fairly simple that he did mention it and frankly makes my previous explanation unnecessary.
All Chick-fil-a did was state that they believe in marriage between one man and one woman. That doesn't mean they won't serve "gays".
-
And it will be interesting to see how Trim reacts to that statement....
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi709.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fww92%2FTommyRoanoke%2FTayDidNotRead.gif&hash=f0e294bddeffe97e7e6c409ea70442646b3ed9ae)
-
Rocky: I wanna know how come!
Mickey: Ya don't wanna know!
Rocky: I wanna know how come!
Mickey: Ya wanna know?
Rocky: I WANNA KNOW HOW!
I feel this. Do you?
-
What about polyester and round haircuts?
-
I always find it funny that Jesus is constantly schooling his disciples and telling them how they were getting crap wrong - yet people are basically taking Paul and assuming he's saying homosexuality is wrong, when it's just as likely that translated texts could just as easily be describing non-consensual sex between older men & younger boys and grouping all homosexuality within that context. The reason I describe it as non-consensual sex as rape was often used as display of dominance and this "perverse" behavior was not restricted to male or female. Some argue the reason there is a much more negative context surrounding male on male, is women were not worthy and basically no one gave a crap if people raped them. In fact, it was common practice to offer your daughter or even wife to "lay" with house guest and considered bad manors to not do so.
My thoughts, and I would like to hear some thoughts from anyone interested; If god is so vehemently against homosexuality, why did he create the common reed frog that is often observed to change their sex when population control is needed? There have been studies that link homosexuality within larger families - especially within the youngest kids of large families; Would it not be divine design to allow such restriction of population to conserve resources and prevent over-crowding?
-
I always find it funny that Jesus is constantly schooling his disciples and telling them how they were getting crap wrong - yet people are basically taking Paul and assuming he's saying homosexuality is wrong, when it's just as likely that translated texts could just as easily be describing non-consensual sex between older men & younger boys and grouping all homosexuality within that context. The reason I describe it as non-consensual sex as rape was often used as display of dominance and this "perverse" behavior was not restricted to male or female. Some argue the reason there is a much more negative context surrounding male on male, is women were not worthy and basically no one gave a crap if people raped them. In fact, it was common practice to offer your daughter or even wife to "lay" with house guest and considered bad manors to not do so.
My thoughts, and I would like to hear some thoughts from anyone interested; If god is so vehemently against homosexuality, why did he create the common reed frog that is often observed to change their sex when population control is needed? There have been studies that link homosexuality within larger families - especially within the youngest kids of large families; Would it not be divine design to allow such restriction of population to conserve resources and prevent over-crowding?
that frog has free will, and since it decided to change genders it shall be burned at the stake
-
even if the bible is pro-hating people (in either testament) I don't think it's a good reason to hate people.
-
1. Again, marriage=one man&woman=sex.
2. Common for some = uncommon for others.
3. If we began to describe the difference between men and frogs, where would we begin?
-
even if the bible is pro-hating people (in either testament) I don't think it's a good reason to hate people.
The only difference between myself and a "gay" person, is that they are unrepentant of their sin. I don't hate them. I relate to them. We experience the same things. We both give in, at times. I recognize this and am sorry and want to improve. They are not. This is the only Christian perspective.
-
Yeah. The swine poster is disappointingly dumb. I always ask anti-gay marriage folks why they also don't want laws against adultery and lying. That seems like a bigger threat to "traditional marriage" than two dudes minding their own business. Thats what makes the whole crusade seem glaringly homophobic to me.
-
Deuteronomy 22:28-29
Biblical definition of marriage.
-
I just hang the whole issue on "thou shall not judge."
Pheewww, doesn't that feel better everybody!? YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT. It's not your job to judge others. :dance:
-
even if the bible is pro-hating people (in either testament) I don't think it's a good reason to hate people.
The only difference between myself and a "gay" person, is that they are unrepentant of their sin. I don't hate them. I relate to them. We experience the same things. We both give in, at times. I recognize this and am sorry and want to improve. They are not. This is the only Christian perspective.
Do you think it's necessary for states to legislate against sins like homosexuality?
-
even if the bible is pro-hating people (in either testament) I don't think it's a good reason to hate people.
The only difference between myself and a "gay" person, is that they are unrepentant of their sin. I don't hate them. I relate to them. We experience the same things. We both give in, at times. I recognize this and am sorry and want to improve. They are not. This is the only Christian perspective.
Do you think it's necessary for states to legislate against sins like homosexuality?
yeah, adultery seems like it would be better to legislate against. Hurts far more people.
-
For a guy that's not gay and only has a few tangential gay friends, I've become an oddly fervent defender of gay marriage. Mostly because of the attitudes of people back in the SEK.
-
1. Again, marriage=one man&woman=sex.
2. Common for some = uncommon for others.
3. If we began to describe the difference between men and frogs, where would we begin?
My wife read over my previous statement which prompted her to make assumptions I did not intend, so I would like to clarify that the when I said rape was common practice, I was referring to the stories of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Frogs aside, do you think perspective could be slanted in any way for the purpose of building a christian empire? I think it's entirely possible that Sin is grossly misrepresented, and the original context of the word Hell or "sheol" could have been more like dirt/under the ground and changed to the word Hell because there was no translation of sheol as it was an actual name of a thing/place. I feel that the concept of eternal life was a statement that is true for all souls - regardless of their status of sinner or saint.
I believe that the concept of "Sin" is something that defiles YOU as a person and not God; and thinking of it this way, I can think of sin as actually representing things that don't bring you happiness and therefor lead you into a life, and subsequent afterlife, filled with guilt and void of happiness.
This concept is often met with disgust and I feel that it's due to a initial confusion of happiness and pleasure - and therefore people describe scenarios where "sin" is okay because it makes you feel good. On the contrary, Sex is pleasure; Love is happiness. One is quickly fleeting, the other is eternal.
In reality, we're all on equal footing - and Jesus was teaching people how to love themselves and know happiness and one way to fill our lives with happiness is to strive to make others happy. That makes me feel a lot better about society and allows me to be tolerant of religions that are not my own, lifestyles that are not my own, & opinions that are not my own - yet still defend my own beliefs when persecuted.
If by creating a definition of what something is or isn't & therefor telling a person what they can and can't have - I am filling my life and theirs with the opposite of happiness.
-
even if the bible is pro-hating people (in either testament) I don't think it's a good reason to hate people.
The only difference between myself and a "gay" person, is that they are unrepentant of their sin. I don't hate them. I relate to them. We experience the same things. We both give in, at times. I recognize this and am sorry and want to improve. They are not. This is the only Christian perspective.
Is it the Christian perspective to persecute others for their sin? Again, I don't believe that sin is representative in the context that most religious people hold it - so this drives me towards curiosity. If someone was living their life with gluttony, Is it acceptable from a Christian perspective to humiliate and protest those that are obese? Or could you accept that their sin or lifestyle is preventing them from deep happiness and essentially holds no effect on your happiness. Could you even compare Homosexuality to gluttony - as one is a result of seeking pleasure and the other is being true to themselves to find happiness? Do you think Homosexuality is a Choice?
-
I just hang the whole issue on "thou shall not judge."
Pheewww, doesn't that feel better everybody!? YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT. It's not your job to judge others. :dance:
:thumbs:
-
Conviction does not mean bigotry. Believing someone's actions are immoral is not a 1 to 1 correlation with hating that person.
-
Do whatever you want.
That applies to both sexing up and taking liberties with a so-called "trademark holder" when making a super-gay version of their restaurant.
-
Conviction does not mean bigotry. Believing someone's actions are immoral is not a 1 to 1 correlation with hating that person.
Agree entirely - but this whole Chick-Fil-A thing has become an opportunity for people to voice their disgust with others lifestyle. I could really give a crap how CFA feels. Boycotting them seems just as shallow and narrow sighted as posting on face-book how you went to CFA today for no other purpose but to let people know that you also support the views of CFA. Who the eff cares? It's hate mongering. Why do people have to sign petitions or drive half an hour out of their way to eat there JUST so they can tell everyone that they ate there. If you want to eat there, eat there because it's rough ridin' good food or you don't think that government should be used to force people to think a certain way. If you don't want to eat there, DON'T rough ridin' EAT THERE, but signing a petition to have them removed is equally forcing your views on people that disagree with you.
-
Conviction does not mean bigotry. Believing someone's actions are immoral is not a 1 to 1 correlation with hating that person.
Agree entirely - but this whole Chick-Fil-A thing has become an opportunity for people to voice their disgust with others lifestyle. I could really give a crap how CFA feels. Boycotting them seems just as shallow and narrow sighted as posting on face-book how you went to CFA today for no other purpose but to let people know that you also support the views of CFA. Who the eff cares? It's hate mongering. Why do people have to sign petitions or drive half an hour out of their way to eat there JUST so they can tell everyone that they ate there. If you want to eat there, eat there because it's rough ridin' good food or you don't think that government should be used to force people to think a certain way. If you don't want to eat there, DON'T rough ridin' EAT THERE, but signing a petition to have them removed is equally forcing your views on people that disagree with you.
this is such a bullshit argument. CFA isn't just "disagreeing" - they are supporting legislation to deny a group of people rights that other people enjoy. Those opposing Chick-fil-a and encouraging boycotts are doing nothing to deny the chick-fil-a executives rights that other people enjoy.
-
I boycotted cfa years ago after they fired a muslim for not participating in a prayer. The whole closed on Sundays thing is sketchy too.
-
Conviction does not mean bigotry. Believing someone's actions are immoral is not a 1 to 1 correlation with hating that person.
Agree entirely - but this whole Chick-Fil-A thing has become an opportunity for people to voice their disgust with others lifestyle. I could really give a crap how CFA feels. Boycotting them seems just as shallow and narrow sighted as posting on face-book how you went to CFA today for no other purpose but to let people know that you also support the views of CFA. Who the eff cares? It's hate mongering. Why do people have to sign petitions or drive half an hour out of their way to eat there JUST so they can tell everyone that they ate there. If you want to eat there, eat there because it's rough ridin' good food or you don't think that government should be used to force people to think a certain way. If you don't want to eat there, DON'T rough ridin' EAT THERE, but signing a petition to have them removed is equally forcing your views on people that disagree with you.
this is such a bullshit argument. CFA isn't just "disagreeing" - they are supporting legislation to deny a group of people rights that other people enjoy. Those opposing Chick-fil-a and encouraging boycotts are doing nothing to deny the chick-fil-a executives rights that other people enjoy.
Are they vocally supporting it or financially supporting it? Because there's a huge difference and either scenario illustrates perfectly why government should stay out of social issues... and most issues for that matter.
-
Conviction does not mean bigotry. Believing someone's actions are immoral is not a 1 to 1 correlation with hating that person.
Agree entirely - but this whole Chick-Fil-A thing has become an opportunity for people to voice their disgust with others lifestyle. I could really give a crap how CFA feels. Boycotting them seems just as shallow and narrow sighted as posting on face-book how you went to CFA today for no other purpose but to let people know that you also support the views of CFA. Who the eff cares? It's hate mongering. Why do people have to sign petitions or drive half an hour out of their way to eat there JUST so they can tell everyone that they ate there. If you want to eat there, eat there because it's rough ridin' good food or you don't think that government should be used to force people to think a certain way. If you don't want to eat there, DON'T rough ridin' EAT THERE, but signing a petition to have them removed is equally forcing your views on people that disagree with you.
this is such a bullshit argument. CFA isn't just "disagreeing" - they are supporting legislation to deny a group of people rights that other people enjoy. Those opposing Chick-fil-a and encouraging boycotts are doing nothing to deny the chick-fil-a executives rights that other people enjoy.
Are they vocally supporting it or financially supporting it? Because there's a huge difference and either scenario illustrates perfectly why government should stay out of social issues... and most issues for that matter.
financially and vocally
-
Oh, well eff those guys then.
-
PoetWarrior acknowledged me! :love:
He won't agree with me on this though: Jesus never mentioned homosexuality. It seems silly to waste time on it. Love your God, love your neighbor. Those were Jesus' commandments. I'm pretty sure that what Chick-Fil-A did could not be considered loving their neighbor. Chick-Fil-Gay sounds much more in line with the ideology of Jesus. And it will be interesting to see how Trim reacts to that statement....
It's much too complicated for simple proof-texting. The greek word paul used that was translated as "homosexuality" was the first instance of the word in ancient greek lit. He made it up basically. It most probably was a condemnation of homosexual acts such as male prostitution, pederasty and master/slave forced sexual activity. Sexual identity is a recent phenomenon and as such was foreign to the 1st century greek individual.
The condemnation's against homosexual acts always appeared within a greater list that included adultery, prostitution, incest, etc.. The sinfulness of each was similar in kind. It seems that Catholics and Evangelicals in our generation have elevated the sinfulness of homosexuality above the others.
Divorce, adultery and pre-marital sex were condemned to the same degree, and are rampant in both the Catholic and Evangelical populations. The greater focus on homosexuality vis à vis the other issues seems off balance and leads to claims of bigotry and hatred.
Christians* should seek to understand before they rigidly quote texts they most assuredly do not fully understand.
*Not a dig at PW. I also am a Christian, and should take my own advice.
-
ell oh ell
Sent from my GT-S5830M using Tapatalk 2
-
Divorce, adultery and pre-marital sex were condemned to the same degree, and are rampant in both the Catholic and Evangelical populations. The greater focus on homosexuality vis à vis the other issues seems off balance and leads to claims of bigotry
Selective enforcement is a pretty reliable indicator of prejudice.
-
Divorce, adultery and pre-marital sex were condemned to the same degree, and are rampant in both the Catholic and Evangelical populations. The greater focus on homosexuality vis à vis the other issues seems off balance and leads to claims of bigotry
Selective enforcement is a pretty reliable indicator of prejudice.
I'm totally going to use that and not credit you.
-
1. Again, marriage=one man&woman=sex.
2. Common for some = uncommon for others.
3. If we began to describe the difference between men and frogs, where would we begin?
My wife read over my previous statement which prompted her to make assumptions I did not intend, so I would like to clarify that the when I said rape was common practice, I was referring to the stories of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Frogs aside, do you think perspective could be slanted in any way for the purpose of building a christian empire? I think it's entirely possible that Sin is grossly misrepresented, and the original context of the word Hell or "sheol" could have been more like dirt/under the ground and changed to the word Hell because there was no translation of sheol as it was an actual name of a thing/place. I feel that the concept of eternal life was a statement that is true for all souls - regardless of their status of sinner or saint.
I believe that the concept of "Sin" is something that defiles YOU as a person and not God; and thinking of it this way, I can think of sin as actually representing things that don't bring you happiness and therefor lead you into a life, and subsequent afterlife, filled with guilt and void of happiness.
This concept is often met with disgust and I feel that it's due to a initial confusion of happiness and pleasure - and therefore people describe scenarios where "sin" is okay because it makes you feel good. On the contrary, Sex is pleasure; Love is happiness. One is quickly fleeting, the other is eternal.
In reality, we're all on equal footing - and Jesus was teaching people how to love themselves and know happiness and one way to fill our lives with happiness is to strive to make others happy. That makes me feel a lot better about society and allows me to be tolerant of religions that are not my own, lifestyles that are not my own, & opinions that are not my own - yet still defend my own beliefs when persecuted.
If by creating a definition of what something is or isn't & therefor telling a person what they can and can't have - I am filling my life and theirs with the opposite of happiness.
I have begun to think for some time now that Heaven/Hell probably isn't a concrete place so much as a state of being. C.S. Lewis described hell as locked from the inside, and I find that really palatable. Basically, God gave human beings great dignity and free choice. Through our choices, we choose our fates. And I take very seriously Jesus warning against those who "knew my name and prophesied in my name but did not know me..depart from me evildoers." Love God and love your neighbor as yourself is the most difficult thing to practice in our day-to-day lives. Selfishness is easy. The alternative is not.
-
Divorce, adultery and pre-marital sex were condemned to the same degree, and are rampant in both the Catholic and Evangelical populations. The greater focus on homosexuality vis à vis the other issues seems off balance and leads to claims of bigotry
Selective enforcement is a pretty reliable indicator of prejudice.
I'm totally going to use that and not credit you.
No worries on my part. I imagine someone else already said it somewhere.
-
Divorce, adultery and pre-marital sex were condemned to the same degree, and are rampant in both the Catholic and Evangelical populations. The greater focus on homosexuality vis à vis the other issues seems is absolutely off balance and leads to claims of bigotry
Selective enforcement is a pretty reliable indicator of prejudice.
fmp.
-
Divorce, adultery and pre-marital sex were condemned to the same degree, and are rampant in both the Catholic and Evangelical populations. The greater focus on homosexuality vis à vis the other issues seems off balance and leads to claims of bigotry
Selective enforcement is a pretty reliable indicator of prejudice.
It's all hung on their saying "sorry" for their gluttony, pre-marital sex, adultery, divorce, etc while in church. Their entire argument seems to swing around the fact that Homosexuals aren't sorry for being homosexual. I mean, they say that it also is that they continue to practice homosexuality, but that can't really be it since the haters keep practicing the other above listed "sins". Gay guys should just do what the other religious folk do, go to church once every 4 months and on xmas and easter(but never during football season) and say sorry. Then they could keep on keeping on and be on the same page with those trying to legislate against them now.
-
Divorce, adultery and pre-marital sex were condemned to the same degree, and are rampant in both the Catholic and Evangelical populations. The greater focus on homosexuality vis à vis the other issues seems off balance and leads to claims of bigotry
Selective enforcement is a pretty reliable indicator of prejudice.
It's all hung on their saying "sorry" for their gluttony, pre-marital sex, adultery, divorce, etc while in church. Their entire argument seems to swing around the fact that Homosexuals aren't sorry for being homosexual. I mean, they say that it also is that they continue to practice homosexuality, but that can't really be it since the haters keep practicing the other above listed "sins". Gay guys should just do what the other religious folk do, go to church once every 4 months and on xmas and easter(but never during football season) and say sorry. Then they could keep on keeping on and be on the same page with those trying to legislate against them now.
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
-
Yeah, I know. I live in KS too. It was mostly tongue in cheek.
I hate it when stuff like this comes up in the news. Then I find out that the three or four people I recently met at work, or whatevs, are actually closet bigots rather than nice people. It amazes me. News breaks, then it's time to get on facebook, twitter, or email and start forwarding a bunch of outlandishly hateful crap.
-
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
So, is anyone who is against gay marriage a bigot and hateful?
-
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
So, is anyone who is against gay marriage a bigot and hateful?
I suppose some of the bigots could be more ignorant than hateful. Dumb or mean. Take your pick.
-
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
So, is anyone who is against gay marriage a bigot and hateful?
Whether they know it or not.
-
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
So, is anyone who is against gay marriage a bigot and hateful?
Dumb, mean, scared, closeted, etc. I don't like to speak in absolutes.
So, normally I'd say yes. There may be instances where I'd reconsider but it'd have to be a pretty good reason. The "marriage is between one man and one woman as defined in the bible" is a bad reason because it imposes a person's religious beliefs on 2 consenting adults. Also not valid, the slippery slope argument.
-
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
So, is anyone who is against gay marriage a bigot and hateful?
if you're against gay marriage, then you're either a bigot and hateful, or you're stupid and naive. take your pick.
-
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
So, is anyone who is against gay marriage a bigot and hateful?
yes.
-
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
So, is anyone who is against gay marriage a bigot and hateful?
I suppose some of the bigots could be more ignorant than hateful. Dumb or mean. Take your pick.
There's also the chance they are opposed to the government being involved in ANY marriage or civil union, but I'm not sure those people really exist.
-
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
So, is anyone who is against gay marriage a bigot and hateful?
I suppose some of the bigots could be more ignorant than hateful. Dumb or mean. Take your pick.
There's also the chance they are opposed to the government being involved in ANY marriage or civil union, but I'm not sure those people really exist.
Not really. They like government involvement in certain areas, some of the time. Especially when a homosexual person wants to marry the person they love. Then is time for the gov to get in there and stop it.
-
I am fine with someone holding bigot beliefs. Just don't impose them on others. If you don't believe in gay marriage, don't go marry a d00d.
If you think gambling is the devil, stay out of casinos.
I love the argument that some bigots have the freedom to do as they wish without punishment, then they turn around and donate to political campaigns running on a platform of limiting freedom of others. Quit trying to legislate religious beliefs.
-
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
So, is anyone who is against gay marriage a bigot and hateful?
I suppose some of the bigots could be more ignorant than hateful. Dumb or mean. Take your pick.
There's also the chance they are opposed to the government being involved in ANY marriage or civil union, but I'm not sure those people really exist.
Those people are for gay marriage, though, because if the government is not involved, there is nothing stopping two gay people from getting married.
-
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
So, is anyone who is against gay marriage a bigot and hateful?
I suppose some of the bigots could be more ignorant than hateful. Dumb or mean. Take your pick.
There's also the chance they are opposed to the government being involved in ANY marriage or civil union, but I'm not sure those people really exist.
Those people are for gay marriage, though, because if the government is not involved, there is nothing stopping two gay people from getting married.
Yeah, you're right. Anyone opposed to gay marriage is a hateful bigot.
-
you're either a bigot and hateful, or you're stupid and naive.
Dumb, mean, scared, closeted, etc.
some of the bigots could be more ignorant than hateful. Dumb or mean.
Anyone opposed to gay marriage is a hateful bigot.
Whether they know it or not.
(if reference to original question)
I think differently, but that's ok.
-
you're either a bigot and hateful, or you're stupid and naive.
Dumb, mean, scared, closeted, etc.
some of the bigots could be more ignorant than hateful. Dumb or mean.
Anyone opposed to gay marriage is a hateful bigot.
Whether they know it or not.
(if reference to original question)
I think differently, but that's ok.
it's not ok, dumbass hick. you probably think "the gays" choose their "lifestlye"
dumbass
-
Welp, there is a laundry list of rights provided to married couples ranging from tax benefits to property rights, but hey, those people that love each other can't procreate, and its not the way some old book said it should be, so eff them, don't give them those rights. If you are against government giving any of those things to any married couple that is fine.
-
Boy, this thread got Aurora-ed up pretty quickly.
Trim, I think CFG needs its own thread. If the restaraunt is to do well, it cannot be in the shadow of a sexuality/religion debate. I have been thinking of ideas for launching CFG. You know how CFA has the cows and they dress an employee up in the cow suit and dance around in front of the restaraunt when it opens and stuff? Well, CFG will have similar cows but on their bellies we will write their names to give some more association with CFG. Adam and Steve. Those are the first two names that come to mind.
-
Boy, this thread got Aurora-ed up pretty quickly.
Trim, I think CFG needs its own thread. If the restaraunt is to do well, it cannot be in the shadow of a sexuality/religion debate. I have been thinking of ideas for launching CFG. You know how CFA has the cows and they dress an employee up in the cow suit and dance around in front of the restaraunt when it opens and stuff? Well, CFG will have similar cows but on their bellies we will write their names to give some more association with CFG. Adam and Steve. Those are the first two names that come to mind.
I like the way you think, TibIdmnbc, when you're not thinking of serial killing.
-
When the cows light up the lights in a building and it says "eat mor chikin" we could add "and cok"
-
When the cows light up the lights in a building and it says "eat mor chikin" we could add "and cok"
To steal from the tv shows thread, "... and vag"
-
Boy, this thread got Aurora-ed up pretty quickly.
To be fair, it is in the D-K Dome...
C-F-G needs its own thread, perhaps its own board.
-
Boy, this thread got Aurora-ed up pretty quickly.
To be fair, it is in the D-K Dome...
C-F-G needs its own thread, perhaps its own board.
C-F-G planted its rainbow flag here first. All the people trying to Pit it up and can go elsewhere.
-
When the cows light up the lights in a building and it says "eat mor chikin" we could add "and cok"
To steal from the tv shows thread, "... and vag"
to cover both put "and azz"
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jku_4IVJ5ik
-
you probably think "the gays" choose their "lifestlye"
I don't actually.
there is a laundry list of rights provided to married couples ranging from tax benefits to property rights,
I'm for anyone and everyone having these benefits.
There's also the chance they are opposed to the government being involved in ANY marriage or civil union, but I'm not sure those people really exist.
I'm not TOO far from this actually.
I think marriage is best a function of religious (and/or secular, depending on one's beliefs) communities, and the gov. should stay out. If a couple wants to have a union that allows for legal benefits to be given (hospital rights, tax benefits, etc.), then have at it. If two non-romantic friends want to have those benefits, then sure, have at it. But don't call it marriage. If a baptist church decides to marry one couple, but not another, great, that's their 1st amendment right. If another church wants to marry only gay people, go for it, that's their 1st amendment right.
All I was saying was I don't think everyone opposed to gay marriage is a hateful bigot.
-
you probably think "the gays" choose their "lifestlye"
I don't actually.
there is a laundry list of rights provided to married couples ranging from tax benefits to property rights,
I'm for anyone and everyone having these benefits.
There's also the chance they are opposed to the government being involved in ANY marriage or civil union, but I'm not sure those people really exist.
I'm not TOO far from this actually.
I think marriage is best a function of religious (and/or secular, depending on one's beliefs) communities, and the gov. should stay out. If a couple wants to have a union that allows for legal benefits to be given (hospital rights, tax benefits, etc.), then have at it. If two non-romantic friends want to have those benefits, then sure, have at it. But don't call it marriage. If a baptist church decides to marry one couple, but not another, great, that's their 1st amendment right. If another church wants to marry only gay people, go for it, that's their 1st amendment right.
All I was saying was I don't think everyone opposed to gay marriage is a hateful bigot.
Why, is that word reserved for only heterosexuals?
-
If two non-romantic friends want to have those benefits, then sure, have at it. But don't call it marriage.
If another church wants to marry only gay people, go for it, that's their 1st amendment right.
But can they call it marriage?
-
you probably think "the gays" choose their "lifestlye"
I don't actually.
there is a laundry list of rights provided to married couples ranging from tax benefits to property rights,
I'm for anyone and everyone having these benefits.
There's also the chance they are opposed to the government being involved in ANY marriage or civil union, but I'm not sure those people really exist.
I'm not TOO far from this actually.
I think marriage is best a function of religious (and/or secular, depending on one's beliefs) communities, and the gov. should stay out. If a couple wants to have a union that allows for legal benefits to be given (hospital rights, tax benefits, etc.), then have at it. If two non-romantic friends want to have those benefits, then sure, have at it. But don't call it marriage. If a baptist church decides to marry one couple, but not another, great, that's their 1st amendment right. If another church wants to marry only gay people, go for it, that's their 1st amendment right.
All I was saying was I don't think everyone opposed to gay marriage is a hateful bigot.
I get what you are saying, A lot of people in their 80's and 90's feel the same way about negros and whites mixing.
-
Why, is that word reserved for only heterosexuals?
Not what I meant.
I meant don't call ANY of the gov. unions marriage. Call it marriage because your church or religious institution married you. I would prefer the gov. not designate ANYONE as married. Just unions for legal purposes. Leave marriage as a function of religious communities etc.
And if one church wants to marry gay people, go for it. If another doesn't want to, that's their 1st amendment right.
-
not allowing someone to call marriage, marriage because of who they love is pretty hateful IMO.
-
I meant don't call ANY of the gov. unions marriage. Call it marriage because your church or religious institution married you. I would prefer the gov. not designate ANYONE as married. Just unions for legal purposes. Leave marriage as a function of religious communities etc.
You would fight for governments no longer calling anything "marriage" if that's what you really cared about. But we all know it's not.
-
Why, is that word reserved for only heterosexuals?
Not what I meant.
I meant don't call ANY of the gov. unions marriage. Call it marriage because your church or religious institution married you. I would prefer the gov. not designate ANYONE as married. Just unions for legal purposes. Leave marriage as a function of religious communities etc.
Historically, in several different unrelated cultures and societies they had marriages that had nothing to do with a church or religion.
-
Why, is that word reserved for only heterosexuals?
Not what I meant.
I meant don't call ANY of the gov. unions marriage. Call it marriage because your church or religious institution married you. I would prefer the gov. not designate ANYONE as married. Just unions for legal purposes. Leave marriage as a function of religious communities etc.
So we agree the Chik Fil A guy is pretty mumped out. Cool, I thought we didn't agree.
-
Boy, this thread got Aurora-ed up pretty quickly.
To be fair, it is in the D-K Dome...
C-F-G needs its own thread, perhaps its own board.
C-F-G planted its rainbow flag here first. All the people trying to Pit it up and can go elsewhere.
Ok, I've had it. Let's compile this list of ideas and take it somewhere where we don't have to be judged. I doubt when that dude wanted to open that restaraunt "The Patio" in Manhattan he had a bunch of people arguing about sexuality in the background of his gay idea.
:dance: :dance: <--- Mods, can we make them grind?
-
And FTR, the Chik Fil A guy and company can say whatever on earth he wants. And people who agree can go eat his food, and people who don't can avoid the place. Or they can still go there because they like the food regardless of his anti-gay marriage position. And the city of Boston or Chicago should have no role in treating their businesses differently.
-
And FTR, the Chik Fil A guy and company can say whatever on earth he wants. And people who agree can go eat his food, and people who don't can avoid the place. Or they can still go there because they like the food regardless of his anti-gay marriage position. And the city of Boston or Chicago should have no role in treating their businesses differently.
Yeah
-
Historically, in several different unrelated cultures and societies they had marriages that had nothing to do with a church or religion.
Probably. My plan probably has holes I'd need to think about.
You would fight for governments no longer calling anything "marriage" if that's what you really cared about. But we all know it's not.
If you're indicating I don't actively do anything to get the government to change their marriage policies, you are 100% correct.
If you're indicating I'm using this as a cover to save face here on goEMAW, that's incorrect. I voted NO on this FWIW. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_Proposed_Amendment_1_(2005) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_Proposed_Amendment_1_(2005))
-
Bullshit. The bigots would still find a reason to hate, they'd cook up a new excuse/misinterpreted bible verse while at the same time turning a blind eye to all the other sins the don't pressure the government to legislate. Bigots gonna bigot.
So, is anyone who is against gay marriage a bigot and hateful?
I suppose some of the bigots could be more ignorant than hateful. Dumb or mean. Take your pick.
There's also the chance they are opposed to the government being involved in ANY marriage or civil union, but I'm not sure those people really exist.
lol. My dad is in this camp. Thought of him while writing that post. He's not anti-gay marriage at all. He just thinks there's no good reason for the government to be involved in it in the first place.
-
Historically, in several different unrelated cultures and societies they had marriages that had nothing to do with a church or religion.
Probably. My plan probably has holes I'd need to think about.
You would fight for governments no longer calling anything "marriage" if that's what you really cared about. But we all know it's not.
If you're indicating I don't actively do anything to get the government to change their marriage policies, you are 100% correct.
If you're indicating I'm using this as a cover to save face here on goEMAW, that's incorrect. I voted NO on this FWIW. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_Proposed_Amendment_1_(2005) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_Proposed_Amendment_1_(2005))
Geez, than what on earth are we discussing? If you shot down a Constitutional amendment we seem to be pretty eye-to-eye
-
Geez, than what on earth are we discussing? If you shot down a Constitutional amendment we seem to be pretty eye-to-eye
Hate the name calling. Hate it. Hate the "he's a bigot! he's hateful!" accusations made to anyone who disagrees with them. It is so counter productive to shaping the opinions of others. That was my original point.
EMAW, FTB ect.
-
Why, is that word reserved for only heterosexuals?
Not what I meant.
I meant don't call ANY of the gov. unions marriage. Call it marriage because your church or religious institution married you. I would prefer the gov. not designate ANYONE as married. Just unions for legal purposes. Leave marriage as a function of religious communities etc.
And if one church wants to marry gay people, go for it. If another doesn't want to, that's their 1st amendment right.
Why do you care what someone calls their relationship?
-
Geez, than what on earth are we discussing? If you shot down a Constitutional amendment we seem to be pretty eye-to-eye
Hate the name calling. Hate it. Hate the "he's a bigot! he's hateful!" accusations made to anyone who disagrees with them. It is so counter productive to shaping the opinions of others. That was my original point.
EMAW, FTB ect.
Well, can you give one reason not related to being a bigot that a person could reasonably want the government to give gay people less rights than straight people?
-
Why, is that word reserved for only heterosexuals?
Not what I meant.
I meant don't call ANY of the gov. unions marriage. Call it marriage because your church or religious institution married you. I would prefer the gov. not designate ANYONE as married. Just unions for legal purposes. Leave marriage as a function of religious communities etc.
And if one church wants to marry gay people, go for it. If another doesn't want to, that's their 1st amendment right.
Why do you care what someone calls their relationship?
I don't. Call your relationship whatever you want.
-
Geez, than what on earth are we discussing? If you shot down a Constitutional amendment we seem to be pretty eye-to-eye
Hate the name calling. Hate it. Hate the "he's a bigot! he's hateful!" accusations made to anyone who disagrees with them. It is so counter productive to shaping the opinions of others. That was my original point.
EMAW, FTB ect.
I suppose, but sometimes you gotta jar people out of their cover. It's like flushing a pheasant. Not referring to you in particular, just closeted bigots who use the bible or some other semantics to explain why they believe the government should get involved in preventing one class of people from doing something that another large class of people can do, (multiple times for horrible reasons) totally legally.
-
Bigot is not really a name-calling thing... more of applying the dictionary definition of a noun to a person who is acting in an according manner.
-
Well, can you give one reason not related to being a bigot that a person could reasonably want the government to give gay people less rights than straight people?
Your and my definition of bigot is probably very different. Mostly I think its ok to have religious convictions, and try to shape the culture around you, even my convictions aren't the same.
-
Well, can you give one reason not related to being a bigot that a person could reasonably want the government to give gay people less rights than straight people?
Your and my definition of bigot is probably very different. Mostly I think its ok to have religious convictions, and try to shape the culture around you, even my convictions aren't the same.
Definition of BIGOT
: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance
-
Geez, than what on earth are we discussing? If you shot down a Constitutional amendment we seem to be pretty eye-to-eye
Hate the name calling. Hate it. Hate the "he's a bigot! he's hateful!" accusations made to anyone who disagrees with them. It is so counter productive to shaping the opinions of others. That was my original point.
Thanks, Dad, I'll keep that in mind.
However, if someone vocally opposes something like blacks voting, they aren't just disagreeing with me, they are racist. Why shouldn't I call these people racists?
-
people defending bigotry are awful
-
Thanks, Dad, I'll keep that in mind.
However, if someone vocally opposes something like blacks voting, they aren't just disagreeing with me, they are racist. Why shouldn't I call these people racists?
Can't think of a reason.
-
Correct me if I'm wrong CF3 but I think what he's trying to say is that bullying people into believing the same thing as you is likely to be counterproductive and make people stick to their guns more, which is a valid point.
-
And FTR, the Chik Fil A guy and company can say whatever on earth he wants. And people who agree can go eat his food, and people who don't can avoid the place. Or they can still go there because they like the food regardless of his anti-gay marriage position. And the city of Boston or Chicago should have no role in treating their businesses differently.
The mayors can do whatever they want.
-
Well, can you give one reason not related to being a bigot that a person could reasonably want the government to give gay people less rights than straight people?
Your and my definition of bigot is probably very different. Mostly I think its ok to have religious convictions, and try to shape the culture around you, even my convictions aren't the same.
I don't call people who go to Church bigots. I call people who don't want gays to marry bigots.
-
There's also the chance they are opposed to the government being involved in ANY marriage or civil union, but I'm not sure those people really exist.
:thumbs:
Not sure those people exist on the anti-gay marriage front.
-
And FTR, the Chik Fil A guy and company can say whatever on earth he wants. And people who agree can go eat his food, and people who don't can avoid the place. Or they can still go there because they like the food regardless of his anti-gay marriage position. And the city of Boston or Chicago should have no role in treating their businesses differently.
The mayors can do whatever they want.
Kick all of the minorities out of town?
-
Correct me if I'm wrong CF3 but I think what he's trying to say is that bullying people into believing the same thing as you is likely to be counterproductive and make people stick to their guns more, which is a valid point.
Yeah. It makes productive dialogue an impossibility. We've lost the ability to meet in the public square and have respectful conversations. It's either "you're a naive, hateful bigot" or "you're going to hell."
-
There's also the chance they are opposed to the government being involved in ANY marriage or civil union, but I'm not sure those people really exist.
:thumbs:
Not sure those people exist on the anti-gay marriage front.
c43 and i both think the government has no place in recognizing or not recognizing marriage. they should give every co-habitating couple the same legal rights and benefits imo. but churches need to have the right to choose to marry who they want/not want. there is no shortage of churches on either side.
-
Correct me if I'm wrong CF3 but I think what he's trying to say is that bullying people into believing the same thing as you is likely to be counterproductive and make people stick to their guns more, which is a valid point.
Yeah. It makes productive dialogue an impossibility. We've lost the ability to meet in the public square and have respectful conversations. It's either "you're a naive, hateful bigot" or "you're going to hell."
There is no middle ground here. "Agreeing to disagree" leaves the naive, hateful bigot with access to marriage. The homosexual still can't marry.
-
Correct me if I'm wrong CF3 but I think what he's trying to say is that bullying people into believing the same thing as you is likely to be counterproductive and make people stick to their guns more, which is a valid point.
Yeah. It makes productive dialogue an impossibility. We've lost the ability to meet in the public square and have respectful conversations. It's either "you're a naive, hateful bigot" or "you're going to hell."
People (including many in this thread) have rationally articulated why those opposed to gay marriage are bigots.
-
There's also the chance they are opposed to the government being involved in ANY marriage or civil union, but I'm not sure those people really exist.
:thumbs:
Not sure those people exist on the anti-gay marriage front.
c43 and i both think the government has no place in recognizing or not recognizing marriage. they should give every co-habitating couple the same legal rights and benefits imo. but churches need to have the right to choose to marry who they want/not want. there is no shortage of churches on either side.
Who is disagreeing with this?
-
Correct me if I'm wrong CF3 but I think what he's trying to say is that bullying people into believing the same thing as you is likely to be counterproductive and make people stick to their guns more, which is a valid point.
Yeah. It makes productive dialogue an impossibility. We've lost the ability to meet in the public square and have respectful conversations. It's either "you're a naive, hateful bigot" or "you're going to hell."
There is no middle ground here. "Agreeing to disagree" leaves the naive, hateful bigot with access to marriage. The homosexual still can't marry.
Productive dialogue does not mean agree to disagree. As a christian, i (and c43) am definitely in the minority in wishing the government to stay out of defining "marriage" and grant equal rights to all couples regardless of gender. My hope is that the majority of christians stop trying to legislate christian faith/beliefs.
-
Correct me if I'm wrong CF3 but I think what he's trying to say is that bullying people into believing the same thing as you is likely to be counterproductive and make people stick to their guns more, which is a valid point.
Yeah. It makes productive dialogue an impossibility. We've lost the ability to meet in the public square and have respectful conversations. It's either "you're a naive, hateful bigot" or "you're going to hell."
To be fair, I don't think we have ever had the ability to meet in the public square and have respectful conversations regarding civil rights issues. If anything, we have a much better ability to do so now than we did in the '60s, when a lot of people were outright militant with their beliefs.
-
And FTR, the Chik Fil A guy and company can say whatever on earth he wants. And people who agree can go eat his food, and people who don't can avoid the place. Or they can still go there because they like the food regardless of his anti-gay marriage position. And the city of Boston or Chicago should have no role in treating their businesses differently.
The mayors can do whatever they want.
This isn't true.
-
Correct me if I'm wrong CF3 but I think what he's trying to say is that bullying people into believing the same thing as you is likely to be counterproductive and make people stick to their guns more, which is a valid point.
Yeah. It makes productive dialogue an impossibility. We've lost the ability to meet in the public square and have respectful conversations. It's either "you're a naive, hateful bigot" or "you're going to hell."
To be fair, I don't think we have ever had the ability to meet in the public square and have respectful conversations regarding civil rights issues. If anything, we have a much better ability to do so now than we did in the '60s, when a lot of people were outright militant with their beliefs.
yeah. fair point.
-
Remember when B.O. was a BIGOT??????
All those people boycotting the democrat party????
Phony liberal partisan outrage is so disingenuous. :zzz:
-
Correct me if I'm wrong CF3 but I think what he's trying to say is that bullying people into believing the same thing as you is likely to be counterproductive and make people stick to their guns more, which is a valid point.
Yeah. It makes productive dialogue an impossibility. We've lost the ability to meet in the public square and have respectful conversations. It's either "you're a naive, hateful bigot" or "you're going to hell."
People (including many in this thread) have rationally articulated why those opposed to gay marriage are bigots.
Saddening how many people don't know what the word "bigot" means. This board is embarrassing.
-
Correct me if I'm wrong CF3 but I think what he's trying to say is that bullying people into believing the same thing as you is likely to be counterproductive and make people stick to their guns more, which is a valid point.
Yeah. It makes productive dialogue an impossibility. We've lost the ability to meet in the public square and have respectful conversations. It's either "you're a naive, hateful bigot" or "you're going to hell."
People (including many in this thread) have rationally articulated why those opposed to gay marriage are bigots.
Saddening how many people don't know what the word "bigot" means. This board is embarrassing.
the dictionary definition was actually posted in this thread.
-
Correct me if I'm wrong CF3 but I think what he's trying to say is that bullying people into believing the same thing as you is likely to be counterproductive and make people stick to their guns more, which is a valid point.
Yeah. It makes productive dialogue an impossibility. We've lost the ability to meet in the public square and have respectful conversations. It's either "you're a naive, hateful bigot" or "you're going to hell."
People (including many in this thread) have rationally articulated why those opposed to gay marriage are bigots.
Saddening how many people don't know what the word "bigot" means. This board is embarrassing.
the dictionary definition was actually posted in this thread.
shut up, bigot
-
Thick skin is a trait that is in short supply these days.
-
and yeah, obama should have done more for gay marriage sooner, and I criticized him for it. He's a reformed bigot.
-
and yeah, obama should have done more for gay marriage sooner, and I criticized him for it. He's a reformed bigot.
shut up, bigot
-
and yeah, obama should have done more for gay marriage sooner, and I criticized him for it. He's a reformed bigot.
shut up, bigot
kimmie's gonna kimmie
-
and yeah, obama should have done more for gay marriage sooner, and I criticized him for it. He's a reformed bigot.
Bigot apalogists are worse than bigots Imo. You disgust me.
FYI, the fact that you don't understand the meaning of the word "bigot" only accounts for 13% of that disgust.
-
and yeah, obama should have done more for gay marriage sooner, and I criticized him for it. He's a reformed bigot.
Reformed may be a stretch - He doesn't give a crap about anyone but himself. Supporting gay marriage was always, and will always be about Him - to show off what an "enlightened soul" he sees himself as.
-
and yeah, obama should have done more for gay marriage sooner, and I criticized him for it. He's a reformed bigot.
shut up, bigot
kimmie's gonna kimmie
you're not making any sense michigancat
-
Michigancat believes in separate but equal gendered basketball.
BIGOT!!!!!!!
-
JFC, we need a sub-pit.
-
JFC, we need a sub-pit.
Good idea. A separate but equal board.
rough ridin' bigots all over the place. Sickening.
-
and yeah, obama should have done more for gay marriage sooner, and I criticized him for it. He's a reformed bigot.
Reformed may be a stretch - He doesn't give a crap about anyone but himself. Supporting gay marriage was always, and will always be about Him - to show off what an "enlightened soul" he sees himself as.
"Him" is capitalized, because He thinks He is God.
-
rough ridin' BIGOTS EVERYWHERE!!!
-
So are we going to have triangle chicken patties and nuggets or what?
-
So are we going to have triangle chicken patties and nuggets or what?
No. Other than the rainbow food-coloring and some tweaks to the names, we're not mod'ing the c-f-a menu at all.
-
NEWSFLASH!
Fake Sugar Dick surprises the masses, announces he hates gays.
No one is shocked.
-
So are we going to have triangle chicken patties and nuggets or what?
No. Other than the rainbow food-coloring and some tweaks to the names, we're not mod'ing the c-f-a menu at all.
Alright, I see where you're coming from, Trim. Just hear me out. As the primary owner of c-f-g (51% stake in company), I think we should change the menu up a bit.
Idea- You know how you can get a double cheese burger, with two patties and stuff? Why the hell has no one done this for a chicken sandwich? Also, why are there no weights on the chicken sandwiches? Wendy's tells me the cheeseburger I'm ordering weighs 1/2 lb. At c-f-g, size matters.
Let's discuss at the next board meeting. I moved our HQ from Manhattan to San Fran., seemed reasonable to me.
-
C-f-g isn't for fatasses, TibIdmnbc. The entire concept here is to offer exact c-f-a, but without the bigotry. That's it. JFC, where's fanning?
-
C-f-g isn't for fatasses, TibIdmnbc. The entire concept here is to offer exact c-f-a, but without the bigotry. That's it. JFC, where's fanning?
Still throwing up. 'Clams told him he's been eating ketchup off the bad person of a fast food tray.
Healthy restraraunts tailored towards homosexuals are a dime a dozen. Panera Bread? Yeah, eff that. Everyone has a guilty pleasure, and besides male genitals in the ass, c-f-g is our market's guilty pleasure.
-
C-f-g isn't for fatasses, TibIdmnbc. The entire concept here is to offer exact c-f-a, but without the bigotry. That's it. JFC, where's fanning?
Still throwing up. 'Clams told him he's been eating ketchup off the bad person of a fast food tray.
Healthy restraraunts tailored towards homosexuals are a dime a dozen. Panera Bread? Yeah, eff that. Everyone has a guilty pleasure, and besides male genitals in the ass, c-f-g is our market's guilty pleasure.
I'm not 100% sure you and I share the same vision for c-f-g.
-
I like Panera, BTK.
-
I'm not 100% sure you and I share the same vision for c-f-g.
See you in court.
-
I'm not 100% sure you and I share the same vision for c-f-g.
See you in court.
If I had a chicken sandwich for every time I've heard that, well, I'd be pretty rough ridin' sick of chicken sandwiches at this point and would probably abandon this whole venture. 'grats on the new name.
-
I like Panera, BTK.
Cool. Maybe you and that peanut oil chicken diet tard Trimjob can go into business together?
-
I'm not 100% sure you and I share the same vision for c-f-g.
See you in court.
If I had a chicken sandwich for every time I've heard that, well, I'd be pretty rough ridin' sick of chicken sandwiches at this point and would probably abandon this whole venture. 'grats on the new name.
:lol:
-
Just spitballing here, but I do think a "Santorum Shake" might be a nice addition to the menu.
-
what terry pierce isn't understanding is that the vision of c-f-g is to be exactly like c-f-a, but without being huge bigots.
carry on, trim. we're all with you on this one, except for terry pierce.
-
I'm not 100% sure you and I share the same vision for c-f-g.
See you in court.
If I had a chicken sandwich for every time I've heard that, well, I'd be pretty rough ridin' sick of chicken sandwiches at this point and would probably abandon this whole venture. 'grats on the new name.
:lol:
can't believe i voted fanning for most pi'd. boz/btk/etc.. has taken over.
-
Trying out some KFC nuggets and they taste very c-f-a-like. You don't think they're trying to beat us to the punch with GayFC?
-
Trying out some KFC nuggets and they taste very c-f-a-like. You don't think they're trying to beat us to the punch with GayFC?
yes.
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/e86050c415/kfc-loves-gays-with-john-goodman
-
Trying out some KFC nuggets and they taste very c-f-a-like. You don't think they're trying to beat us to the punch with GayFC?
yes.
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/e86050c415/kfc-loves-gays-with-john-goodman
eff.
-
Trying out some KFC nuggets and they taste very c-f-a-like. You don't think they're trying to beat us to the punch with GayFC?
yes.
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/e86050c415/kfc-loves-gays-with-john-goodman
eff.
Glad I got out of the gay restaraunt spoof business before it crashed. Suck it, Trim.
-
change his name to captain stockmarket
-
change his name to captain stockmarket
:dubious: One name change a day, please.
-
change his name to captain stockmarket
:dubious: One name change a day, please.
Thanks for taking the heat off me, friend. Life on goEMAW has been smooth sailing these days. Thanks, Bosz!
-
Absolutely power corrupts absolutely, Trim :shakesfist:
-
America: PLEASE don't make this an issue come voting time.
(wishful thinking)
-
change his name to captain stockmarket
:dubious: One name change a day, please.
Thanks for taking the heat off me, friend. Life on goEMAW has been smooth sailing these days. Thanks, Bosz!
Is SPBT still around? Hope he doesn't read this, fanning.
-
>:D
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
-
C-f-g isn't for fatasses, TibIdmnbc. The entire concept here is to offer exact c-f-a, but without the bigotry. That's it. JFC, where's fanning?
Still throwing up. 'Clams told him he's been eating ketchup off the bad person of a fast food tray.
Healthy restraraunts tailored towards homosexuals are a dime a dozen. Panera Bread? Yeah, eff that. Everyone has a guilty pleasure, and besides crock in the ass, c-f-g is our market's guilty pleasure.
:dubious: wrong
edit: Not entirely wrong. I did start the ball rolling though.
-
C-f-g isn't for fatasses, TibIdmnbc. The entire concept here is to offer exact c-f-a, but without the bigotry. That's it. JFC, where's fanning?
Still throwing up. 'Clams told him he's been eating ketchup off the bad person of a fast food tray.
Healthy restraraunts tailored towards homosexuals are a dime a dozen. Panera Bread? Yeah, eff that. Everyone has a guilty pleasure, and besides crock in the ass, c-f-g is our market's guilty pleasure.
:dubious: wrong
edit: Not entirely wrong. I did start the ball rolling though.
Done debating this. I retired from the homosexual restaraunt business.
-
I was just checking on what kind of BBBS discount I'd get to take the kid to the Star Wars exhibit at Exploration Place (shoutout to Saul!) and came across this:
Chick-fil-A (7990 E Central) Matches eat free when together. Please present your blue match discount card at the front counter.
So, set aside any ethical concerns with Chick-fil-a's politics, bring the kid there (probably any kid would work) and I get free chicken? Kind of takes the wind out of my chick-fil-gay sails.
Welp, in a bizarre turn of events, I've confirmed tonight that I get free chick-fil-a.
-
May have a lawsuit on your hands guys. Or someone here works for the Collegian.
Sent from my GT-S5830M using Tapatalk 2
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNq8r4S5jSk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNq8r4S5jSk)
-
May have a lawsuit on your hands guys. Or someone here works for the Collegian.
Sent from my GT-S5830M using Tapatalk 2
Hey man, in America, anyone can sue anyone for anything.
-
May have a lawsuit on your hands guys. Or someone here works for the Collegian.
Sent from my GT-S5830M using Tapatalk 2
Well, everyone reads goEMAW, and yes, they will be sued.
-
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/09/20/chick-fil-a-gay-issue/70000764/1#.UFtpoI2PXLg
Chick fil a is tapping out.
https://www.facebook.com/ChickfilA
the comments section is entertaining.
-
On that note, I'm hungry. I guess there is a Chick-fil-A in Topeka and I've ever been to one.
What should I get folks?
-
Good to know we can help make the world a better place
-
spicy chicken NOM NOM NOM NOM
-
On that note, I'm hungry. I guess there is a Chick-fil-A in Topeka and I've ever been to one.
What should I get folks?
I dunno, i've never eaten there. I imagine even though now they are pro-gay they are still extremely anti-semitic.
-
Bigots love money too!
-
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/09/20/chick-fil-a-gay-issue/70000764/1#.UFtpoI2PXLg
Chick fil a is tapping out.
https://www.facebook.com/ChickfilA
the comments section is entertaining.
wow, that's fantastic.
-
On that note, I'm hungry. I guess there is a Chick-fil-A in Topeka and I've ever been to one.
What should I get folks?
I dunno, i've never eaten there. I imagine even though now they are pro-gay they are still extremely anti-semitic.
I was planning on going before they flipped their stance. Suggestions people? :D
-
Your decision to CAVE on your biblical principles that has made your business such a success...LEAVES ME SPEECHLESS !!! I WILL NO LONGER BE PATRONIZING YOUR BUSINESS ANY LONGER !! HOMOSEXUALITY IS WRONG PERIOD ! TOO BAD YOU ARE TOO WEAK TO SEE IT !
:sdeek:
-
some of these are too good to let go by unnoticed...
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
f
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
1 more for now
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
oh man, those are great
-
:sdeek:
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
I've never eaten at Chick-Fil-A, but I'm starting to think that maybe their chicken just isn't that good and they are only in business because bigots use them as a way to get a free meal out of their anti-gay donations.
-
in the midst of it all...OBLIVIOUS CISSY IS OBLIVIOUS!
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
in the midst of it all...OBLIVIOUS CISSY IS OBLIVIOUS!
She should probably just change her name to Sissy since she couldn't take the spicy chicken heat.
-
in the midst of it all...OBLIVIOUS CISSY IS OBLIVIOUS!
Regular is sooooooo gay.
-
Pro-tip: They fry in peanut oil. :lick:
-
more saul more!
-
:driving:
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
in the midst of it all...OBLIVIOUS CISSY IS OBLIVIOUS!
OK_Cat's co-worker.
-
"Best Chicken Sandwich Ever!"
-
IT'S A TRAP
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
IT'S A TRAP
Oh, this is my favorite one so far.
-
wait, only liberals are gay?
-
I'm anxiously awaiting to see which of my 8 Facebook friends that currently "like" CFA will "unlike" them in the next few days.
-
last one, gotta go. This guy is :curse: :curse: :curse:
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
"Love thy neighbor, but hate the crap out of gays"
I just don't get it.
-
Tina Russell Hester
My whole family supported you and now its like you slapped us in the face. So if you cave into these people we will not eat at your restaurant any more. See how much money you make just feeding liberals.
Vincent Andries How hard was the slap?
3 minutes ago via mobile · Like
Matthew W. Ewing Lol your face is cute when your mad
:lol:
-
it's so great that anti-gay people griped that they had freedom of speech and that boycotting was hypocritical, and now we've all switched sides but with the same argument. :lol:
chick fil a trolled the whole country
-
i'm still onboard for a chick fil a off-shoot.
Chick Fil Jesus?
We won't let those leftie pinkos eat at our joint, and we serve all chicken sammies in the shape of our lord and savior.
-
I hate religion. What is wrong with those people.
-
man. that katie dickson is all over the place and pretty fantastic. saul, see if you can get her to post here.
-
"Love thy neighbor, but hate the crap out of gays"
I just don't get it.
Also, it's freedom of speech for chic fil a to hate on the gays, but when people protest chic for doing that, they are bullies?
-
"Love thy neighbor, but hate the crap out of gays"
I just don't get it.
It's because they're a bunch of rough ridin' retards.
-
Benet Langston ^ Scott Mcmullin your post just gave me cancer.... not sure if stupid or just religious.... OR!!!!!! both...
-
my word. i laughed at Cissy's post for a food 5 minutes.
what's up with that? so disappointed.
that just cracks me up
:lol:
-
It was fantastic
-
Not sure what's going on here...
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
"Forrest Grump"...is going to do some research on that.
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
"Forrest Grump"...is going to do some research on that.
Who uses an alias on Facebook?
-
"Forrest Grump"...is going to do some research on that.
:thumbs:
-
"Forrest Grump"...is going to do some research on that.
Who uses an alias on Facebook?
real life steve dave apparently. i called facebook last week and reported him.
-
"Forrest Grump"...is going to do some research on that.
Who uses an alias on Facebook?
real life steve dave apparently. i called facebook last week and reported him.
:curse:
-
"Forrest Grump"...is going to do some research on that.
My god that's fantastic.
-
Christy Lee says, "...we have the highest median income. Tolerance pays off."
Chrisity is brilliant. we've been going about this economy thing all wrong. :facepalm:
-
The videos. :lol:
http://gawker.com/a-southern-fried-sleepover-at-new-york-s-first-chick-fi-1734762719
-
https://twitter.com/bonerhitler/status/1020314722745241605
-
God bless that Chick-Fil-A.
-
Gotta remember to use the drive-thru if I ever go to one of these things again.
-
I mean, they're pretty popular for a reason.
<iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FWhistleSports%2Fvideos%2F2017504141629200%2F&show_text=0&width=380" width="380" height="476" style="border:none;overflow:hidden" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" allowFullScreen="true"></iframe>
-
https://twitter.com/barstoolsports/status/1020341312199905281
-
https://twitter.com/bonerhitler/status/1020314722745241605
Pffffffffffft, those comments.
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180720/265afcdc5c58ec4e63566e47be0b71ae.jpg)
President ObeyMe :lol:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
lol
trump voter : trump supporter :: tuck : maga chud
-
https://twitter.com/kellisrobinett/status/1025449482475978752?s=21
-
https://twitter.com/kellisrobinett/status/1025449482475978752?s=21
That’s great. My daughter can buy Chick-fil-a at her school cafeteria.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
BREAKING NEWS
-
:runaway:
(https://i.imgur.com/s3ubq6T.png)
-
Chick-Fil-A grilled nuggets are the biggest rip off ever.
A littly tiny thing of breast parts, fries and a drink is $10 bucks. GTFOH
-
https://twitter.com/GregAbbott_TX/status/1152013402102878208
-
Texas protects religious liberty so much that you have to swear allegiance to Isreal in order to do business with the state
-
Texas protects religious liberty so much that you have to swear allegiance to Isreal in order to do business with the state
So :curse: :curse: :curse:
-
The back story on this bill is that the city of San Antonio tried to exclude Chick-fil-a to be opened in the airport because of their history of LGBTQ discrimination and because they're not open on Sunday's when 15% of the concession sales are generated. Noted criminal and Texas AG, Ken Paxton of course fought this. And patronizing Dan Patrick and Greg Abbott were quick to jump on board. For the record, they would be ok with Chik-fil-a refusing service to someone because they were gay.
-
it still tickles my funny bone that there is a chick fil a in the falcons stadium
-
it still tickles my funny bone that there is a chick fil a in the falcons stadium
:lol:
-
The back story on this bill is that the city of San Antonio tried to exclude Chick-fil-a to be opened in the airport because of their history of LGBTQ discrimination and because they're not open on Sunday's when 15% of the concession sales are generated. Noted criminal and Texas AG, Ken Paxton of course fought this. And patronizing Dan Patrick and Greg Abbott were quick to jump on board. For the record, they would be ok with Chik-fil-a refusing service to someone because they were gay.
Link
-
The back story on this bill is that the city of San Antonio tried to exclude Chick-fil-a to be opened in the airport because of their history of LGBTQ discrimination and because they're not open on Sunday's when 15% of the concession sales are generated. Noted criminal and Texas AG, Ken Paxton of course fought this. And patronizing Dan Patrick and Greg Abbott were quick to jump on board. For the record, they would be ok with Chik-fil-a refusing service to someone because they were gay.
Link
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/politics/texas/article/Texas-defends-actions-of-Colorado-cake-baker-in-12181445.php&cmpid=fb-premium
-
The back story on this bill is that the city of San Antonio tried to exclude Chick-fil-a to be opened in the airport because of their history of LGBTQ discrimination and because they're not open on Sunday's when 15% of the concession sales are generated. Noted criminal and Texas AG, Ken Paxton of course fought this. And patronizing Dan Patrick and Greg Abbott were quick to jump on board. For the record, they would be ok with Chik-fil-a refusing service to someone because they were gay.
Link
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/politics/texas/article/Texas-defends-actions-of-Colorado-cake-baker-in-12181445.php&cmpid=fb-premium
That request was for a custom service. Requests for custom services get denied by nearly every service organization and business every single day, all day.
-
oof
-
oof
Reality, it kinda sucks sometimes.
-
I have no idea what you would know about reality.
-
I have no idea what you would know about reality.
A lot
-
It feels like people here create socks that they can try to go 8 seconds on Dax the bull with.
-
The back story on this bill is that the city of San Antonio tried to exclude Chick-fil-a to be opened in the airport because of their history of LGBTQ discrimination and because they're not open on Sunday's when 15% of the concession sales are generated. Noted criminal and Texas AG, Ken Paxton of course fought this. And patronizing Dan Patrick and Greg Abbott were quick to jump on board. For the record, they would be ok with Chik-fil-a refusing service to someone because they were gay.
I think the Colorado Baker thing was bad, but it is quite a stretch to consider that equivalent to a fast food chain denying service to someone based on their sexual orientation.
The only real valid criticism I’ve heard for this bill is it is written to address a problem that does not exist.
-
Wait so is the ATL CFA only open for MNF?
-
Wait so is the ATL CFA only open for MNF?
They host some non-falcons events too but yes, it is very odd.
-
When I was with my manager for training a month ago in ATL, everyone spoke about Chick-Fil-A like it was the second coming. They couldn't believe KC had them. I believe they think they're unique to the south around there. Also, the one we went to was rough ridin' nuts. Not an open seat in the place.
-
When I was with my manager for training a month ago in ATL, everyone spoke about Chick-Fil-A like it was the second coming. They couldn't believe KC had them. I believe they think they're unique to the south around there. Also, the one we went to was rough ridin' nuts. Not an open seat in the place.
I go there fairly regularly because they're all over the place, but outside of a tasty chicken sandwich it ain't that great. Many of their other items are pretty marginal IMO.
-
When I was with my manager for training a month ago in ATL, everyone spoke about Chick-Fil-A like it was the second coming. They couldn't believe KC had them. I believe they think they're unique to the south around there. Also, the one we went to was rough ridin' nuts. Not an open seat in the place.
Yeah you should see how much they rake in for an average location versus the average of all of the other fast food chains. It's unbelievable the difference...and they are only open 6 days a week.
-
Wait so is the ATL CFA only open for MNF?
They host some non-falcons events too but yes, it is very odd.
On Sundays a different restaurant uses the space. I think it's like a gourmet french fry stand or something.
-
Because it's delish
-
I've had to take my chicken sandwich business back to CFL. McD pulled the classic chicken sandwich in my area. :curse: those lines!
Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
-
the best part about chic-fil-a (other than the spicy chicky) is trading in your kids toy for ice cream, and then eating their ice cream while they play in the indoor playground area.
-
I used to get a spicy chicken bagel for breakfast and then they tell me that they can’t do that anymore.
You have a spicy sandwich, why can’t you flop that spicy meat between my bagel? Because Jesus?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
the best part about chic-fil-a (other than the spicy chicky) is trading in your kids toy for ice cream, and then eating their ice cream while they play in the indoor playground area.
Wait...what?
-
the best part about chic-fil-a (other than the spicy chicky) is trading in your kids toy for ice cream, and then eating their ice cream while they play in the indoor playground area.
Wait...what?
toy for ice cream is a game changer
-
Wendy's has an excellent spicy chicken sandwich too. A formidable number 2 to CFA's top spot.
-
https://www.wibw.com/content/news/Kansas-faculty-protests-higher-visibility-for-Chick-fil-A-558606341.html
people who get upset about chicken vendors are strange
-
Is there anything KU people aren’t trying to boycott?
-
Recently signed up for the chick-fil-a rewards app on a tip that I'd get a free 15 nugget. This thing gives me a free reward every other day. Highly recommended. Had a four piece of something called chicken minis today for free. Fantastic!
-
Chicken mini's are so delicious.
They are remodeling the one next to my house and it won't be up again for 7 weeks :cry:
-
Since there's no Hobby Lobby thread
https://twitter.com/lindyli/status/1625094453038927872
https://twitter.com/MarkIKendrick/status/1624782755744874497
-
The term christofacist has rocketed into my awareness
-
We reserve the right to unilaterally declare (and then meltdown about) everything we don't like as: Discriminatory, Russian Disinformation and/or Nazi's
-
Chick fil A is absolute garbage. Give me a McChicken or Wendys Chicken any day of the week over that crap
-
:confused:
-
Chick fil A is absolute garbage. Give me a McChicken or Wendys Chicken any day of the week over that crap
A McChicken is chopped up chicken parts pressed into a patty and you prefer it to an actual chicken breast sand?
-
no way that is real
-
Meh, my gripe against those assholes (chik-fil-a) is how they have lured everyone into thinking their line works so much better than everyone else. It's a pure dog and pony show, no real stuff, just cause you pull forward and someone puts crap into your bag for you that could've been done back in the freaking kitchen does not speed up the line, what speeds up the line is the kitchen actually fulfilling orders. It just appears faster cause there is less waiting between talking to people.
-
Chick fil A is absolute garbage. Give me a McChicken or Wendys Chicken any day of the week over that crap
A McChicken is chopped up chicken parts pressed into a patty and you prefer it to an actual chicken breast sand?
Yes, convenient you left off Wendys!
-
Now you done it, I'm heading out to get a chopped-up chicken parts McChicken and see if Sams has an animal parts hotdog! :D
-
Could have given 30k people a chic fil a combo meal every day for a year for 100M, smdh.
-
my opinion of jesus is exactly the same
-
Popeyes >
He gets us ads are great
-
Popeyes >
He gets us ads are great
I thought they were fine, was even willing to overlook them both siding white supremacy rallies and social justice protests, but them using false pretenses to rally support is a bridge I can't cross
-
:lol:
-
(https://i.redd.it/5vfeqbi2p6ia1.png)
-
Popeyes >
He gets us ads are great
I thought they were fine, was even willing to overlook them both siding white supremacy rallies and social justice protests, but them using false pretenses to rally support is a bridge I can't cross
what do you mean the both siding. legit asking.
-
Popeyes >
He gets us ads are great
I thought they were fine, was even willing to overlook them both siding white supremacy rallies and social justice protests, but them using false pretenses to rally support is a bridge I can't cross
what do you mean the both siding. legit asking.
Did you see the ad I'm referring to? It was a lot of contrasting images of people yelling at each other, the theme was, I presume that belief in God could help us move past that. I don't have an issue with that message, at all, I do have an issue with placing images of people protesting for civil rights with those yelling at marching white supremacists and presenting them as if they are the same. The ultimate irony is we know they're are plenty of bigots who rally in the name of God.
The message of those ads need to be a strong rebuke of hate, in the name of God, instead of this everybody love everybody garbage. Christianity has been hijacked by bigots and those stoking division, if you're going to spend $100 million on an ad campaign, instead of feeding the hungry, your campaign must take a stand. This is a marketing campaign for anti abortion support dressed up as a call for unity. I have to tell you, it almost worked on me, I visited hegetsus.com. They will absolutely get some supporters and by extension more funders, but it won't be in the name of pushing past division by insisting on equity.
-
Popeyes >
He gets us ads are great
I thought they were fine, was even willing to overlook them both siding white supremacy rallies and social justice protests, but them using false pretenses to rally support is a bridge I can't cross
what do you mean the both siding. legit asking.
Did you see the ad I'm referring to? It was a lot of contrasting images of people yelling at each other, the theme was, I presume that belief in God could help us move past that. I don't have an issue with that message, at all, I do have an issue with placing images of people protesting for civil rights with those yelling at marching white supremacists and presenting them as if they are the same. The ultimate irony is we know they're are plenty of bigots who rally in the name of God.
The message of those ads need to be a strong rebuke of hate, in the name of God, instead of this everybody love everybody garbage. Christianity has been hijacked by bigots and those stoking division, if you're going to spend $100 million on an ad campaign, instead of feeding the hungry, your campaign must take a stand. This is a marketing campaign for anti abortion support dressed up as a call for unity. I have to tell you, it almost worked on me, I visited hegetsus.com. They will absolutely get some supporters and by extension more funders, but it won't be in the name of pushing past division by insisting on equity.
:love: (ftp://:love:)
-
Popeyes >
He gets us ads are great
I thought they were fine, was even willing to overlook them both siding white supremacy rallies and social justice protests, but them using false pretenses to rally support is a bridge I can't cross
what do you mean the both siding. legit asking.
Did you see the ad I'm referring to? It was a lot of contrasting images of people yelling at each other, the theme was, I presume that belief in God could help us move past that. I don't have an issue with that message, at all, I do have an issue with placing images of people protesting for civil rights with those yelling at marching white supremacists and presenting them as if they are the same. The ultimate irony is we know they're are plenty of bigots who rally in the name of God.
The message of those ads need to be a strong rebuke of hate, in the name of God, instead of this everybody love everybody garbage. Christianity has been hijacked by bigots and those stoking division, if you're going to spend $100 million on an ad campaign, instead of feeding the hungry, your campaign must take a stand. This is a marketing campaign for anti abortion support dressed up as a call for unity. I have to tell you, it almost worked on me, I visited hegetsus.com. They will absolutely get some supporters and by extension more funders, but it won't be in the name of pushing past division by insisting on equity.
:love: (ftp://:love:)
Thanks, glad you agree
-
I saw the ad. I don't love the campaign or the money being spent but I thought that particular spot was interesting and thought provoking at least. Didn't quite see it the same as you MIR.
-
I saw the ad. I don't love the campaign or the money being spent but I thought that particular spot was interesting and thought provoking at least. Didn't quite see it the same as you MIR.
How did you see it?
-
I saw the ad. I don't love the campaign or the money being spent but I thought that particular spot was interesting and thought provoking at least. Didn't quite see it the same as you MIR.
How did you see it?
Sorry, forgot to respond to this. When I saw the spot I assumed it was going to end with "Jesus was spat on and hated too" or something like that. To make it a spot about loving enemies I thought was good, IMO.
-
I think the campaign shouldn't exist.
I think that what I know of Jesus' message is not well represented by the current faction of his followers that are loud in the public arena right now. As a non-believer, that isn't 100% up to date on the bible, I think that some of these people are the least christ like that they could be. I also feel like churches of the christian religion would do well to police their own before trying to do anything else. Clean up your house before you try to impose your cleanliness standards on mine.
Again, I am a non-believer. I recognize what faith has done for some ppl that were close to me when tragedy struck them and I saw that as useful at that time. However, I have seen many more negative things come from it, outside looking in. So, maybe all of the above is just my ignorance talking while tempered by my distaste.
-
there is a lot of unspeakable cruelty done in Jesus' name...which i think is what he would have wanted.
-
I think the campaign shouldn't exist.
I think that what I know of Jesus' message is not well represented by the current faction of his followers that are loud in the public arena right now. As a non-believer, that isn't 100% up to date on the bible, I think that some of these people are the least christ like that they could be. I also feel like churches of the christian religion would do well to police their own before trying to do anything else. Clean up your house before you try to impose your cleanliness standards on mine.
Again, I am a non-believer. I recognize what faith has done for some ppl that were close to me when tragedy struck them and I saw that as useful at that time. However, I have seen many more negative things come from it, outside looking in. So, maybe all of the above is just my ignorance talking while tempered by my distaste.
I think I agree about the campaign not existing because I don’t understand it’s purpose at all, which indicates it’s not effective.
As far as bad people screaming in Jesus’s name, I think that’s just part of the human condition. Major religions will always attract bad people looking to exploit them to advance their own agendas.
-
I think the campaign shouldn't exist.
I think that what I know of Jesus' message is not well represented by the current faction of his followers that are loud in the public arena right now. As a non-believer, that isn't 100% up to date on the bible, I think that some of these people are the least christ like that they could be. I also feel like churches of the christian religion would do well to police their own before trying to do anything else. Clean up your house before you try to impose your cleanliness standards on mine.
Again, I am a non-believer. I recognize what faith has done for some ppl that were close to me when tragedy struck them and I saw that as useful at that time. However, I have seen many more negative things come from it, outside looking in. So, maybe all of the above is just my ignorance talking while tempered by my distaste.
I think I agree about the campaign not existing because I don’t understand it’s purpose at all, which indicates it’s not effective.
As far as bad people screaming in Jesus’s name, I think that’s just part of the human condition. Major religions will always attract bad people looking to exploit them to advance their own agendas.
The campaign exists to bring nonbelievers who care about social injustices into the faith. It falls flat when those people look into the group and figure out that they spend money to perpetuate social injustices.