Author Topic: Rolling Stone Cover  (Read 11933 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53830
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Rolling Stone Cover
« on: July 18, 2013, 11:02:05 AM »


why are people so upset about this?


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2013, 11:03:51 AM »
I think they think he's being glorified.

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13246
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2013, 11:04:29 AM »
idk, good for rolling stone though.. first time I've thought about there magazine since listening to dr. hook and the medicine show

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53830
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2013, 11:05:35 AM »
I think they think he's being glorified.

They call him a rough ridin' monster on the cover. Good grief.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2013, 11:06:14 AM »
Just answering your question, that's all.  People are dumb ya know.

Online Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1591
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2013, 11:08:24 AM »
I think they think he's being glorified.

They call him a rough ridin' monster on the cover. Good grief.
Maybe it is the Jim Morrison sexy pose? 
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85410
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #6 on: July 18, 2013, 11:14:09 AM »
Article is very good

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2013, 11:14:47 AM »
I don't read Rolling Stone because it's awkwardly sized.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19823
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2013, 11:43:45 AM »
the reporting is generally very good but the commentary gets a little cray cray

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2013, 12:00:05 PM »
Has Rolling Stone ever put anyone else accused of terrorism on the front cover? Did they do an OBL cover? I don't read it.

The comparison is a little striking:



Both are famous, both have awesome hair, and one is a terrorist. Two things in common, one small difference!
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Stupid Fitz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4810
  • Go Cats
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2013, 12:06:19 PM »
Pretty hilarious that a)people even still read the actual magazine and b) the media is so outraged by the cover that they can't stop showing everyone the cover.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30530
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #11 on: July 18, 2013, 12:08:53 PM »
Probably jealous they didn't think of it first
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #12 on: July 18, 2013, 12:31:29 PM »
I read it for the Matt Taibbi (stud) articles

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7648
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #13 on: July 18, 2013, 12:39:47 PM »
I think he just looks too sexy. they should have used a picture of him now with his jacked up jaw and scars.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #14 on: July 18, 2013, 12:42:30 PM »
I think he just looks too sexy. they should have used a picture of him now with his jacked up jaw and scars.

me too. he will get better treatment than he deserves because he is a cutie pie.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #15 on: July 18, 2013, 12:44:00 PM »
it's like if espn put hernandez on the cover shirtless and wearing a nice smile.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14973
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #16 on: July 18, 2013, 12:45:58 PM »
I think he just looks too sexy. they should have used a picture of him now with his jacked up jaw and scars.

True but not nearly as sexy as this guy...


Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53830
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #17 on: July 18, 2013, 12:48:21 PM »
I think he just looks too sexy. they should have used a picture of him now with his jacked up jaw and scars.

me too. he will get better treatment than he deserves because he is a cutie pie.

You honestly think so?

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85410
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #18 on: July 18, 2013, 12:53:33 PM »
I think people are probably just butthurt about the ice melt stuff

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14973
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #19 on: July 18, 2013, 12:53:43 PM »
it's like if espn put hernandez on the cover shirtless and wearing a nice smile.

I'll bet Hernandez is ripped.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #20 on: July 18, 2013, 12:56:54 PM »
I think he just looks too sexy. they should have used a picture of him now with his jacked up jaw and scars.

me too. he will get better treatment than he deserves because he is a cutie pie.

You honestly think so?

i do. he's going to come off as a tender kid who was brainwashed and being hot might spare him some punishment. i don't want that to happen.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64178
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #21 on: July 18, 2013, 01:01:54 PM »
The neocons somehow think that the cover text paints him as a victim.

I personally don't see what the big rough ridin' deal is.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85410
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #22 on: July 18, 2013, 01:02:23 PM »
yeah eff it, seems like a good kid. time served. :gavel:

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29151
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #23 on: July 18, 2013, 01:04:34 PM »
probably was just standing his ground

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37136
    • View Profile
Re: Rolling Stone Cover
« Reply #24 on: July 18, 2013, 01:06:11 PM »
probably was just standing his ground

What else was he supposed to do? There were hundred of people running right at him.