goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: wiley on February 25, 2010, 11:52:36 AM

Title: Lamark...gone
Post by: wiley on February 25, 2010, 11:52:36 AM
 :bawl: or   :blah:
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: RTB on February 25, 2010, 12:13:12 PM
Unfortunate. Wish best of luck to him where ever he ends up!
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: get_HIT on February 25, 2010, 12:17:14 PM
didn't live up to his hype, and couldnt take snyder workin his ass off
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: RTB on February 25, 2010, 12:18:33 PM
didn't live up to his hype, and couldnt take snyder workin his ass off

I'm assuming you know him personally then. . .  :dunno:
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: PowercatPat on February 25, 2010, 12:19:01 PM
Does the GPC article say why he is leaving?
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: kso_FAN on February 25, 2010, 12:22:39 PM
didn't live up to his hype, and couldnt take snyder workin his ass off

I'm assuming you know him personally then. . .  :dunno:

Have heard (reliable) that this is at least part of it.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: WildcatNkilt on February 25, 2010, 12:28:29 PM
Bout time.  Now rumors can be put to rest, and I no longer have to be mad at how much of a waste of talent he is.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: steve dave on February 25, 2010, 12:42:49 PM
And the curse of Poetwarrior lives on.  Expect Chris Harper to suck balls and/or quit.  I had really high hopes for Chris too.   :cry:
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: chum1 on February 25, 2010, 12:44:14 PM
Sad day.  The Lamark saga was one of the best things the team had going for itself.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: pissclams on February 25, 2010, 12:55:19 PM
Lamarks should change his name to Lamark "Scrub" Brown.  The "Scrub" part that I'm suggesting is only a nickname so it probably wouldn't need to go to court for the official change but then again, why not? 
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Dr. tylerhughes on February 25, 2010, 01:28:57 PM
And the curse of Poetwarrior lives on.  Expect Chris Harper to suck balls and/or quit.  I had really high hopes for Chris too.   :cry:

Give him a break...this will be a tough day for him.

On the other hand, it would be nice if fatty made Lamark a nice send off vid.   :barf:
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: PandaXpanda on February 25, 2010, 01:30:01 PM
Don't really care about football right now.  This won't register until the end of summer.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 25, 2010, 01:35:06 PM
 :cry: :morelikeslumped,defeated,existentialshoulders:

Talent and K-State football just don't mix. We see that clearly now.

They quit. They transfer. They leave early. They're arrested. They're kicked off the team.

But most of all, they are handled poorly by coaches.  Mentally and physically.

There is no curse and this is not a consequence of over-hype.

Kansas State simply can't handle it.


Only Jordy Nelson survives.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 25, 2010, 01:36:11 PM
:cry: :morelikeslumped,defeated,existentialshoulders:

Talent and K-State football just don't mix. We see that clearly now.

They quit. They transfer. They leave early. They're arrested. They're kicked off the team.

But most of all, they are handled poorly by coaches.  Mentally and physically.

There is no curse and this is not a consequence of over-hype.

Kansas State simply can't handle it.


Only Jordy Nelson survives.

every PW post is like a God damn masterpiece. Wow.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 25, 2010, 01:38:10 PM
LaMark,

Choose wisely, dude.

Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: KITNfury on February 25, 2010, 02:12:56 PM
I tell that guy to his face that I loved him and he does this. I say eff you, Lamark.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 25, 2010, 02:20:18 PM
Why does PW always seem to latch on to FP types??

Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: pissclams on February 25, 2010, 02:21:01 PM
LaScrub
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: chum1 on February 25, 2010, 03:20:35 PM
Je suis LeMarc.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Thread Killer on February 25, 2010, 04:00:55 PM
Ron Princes second highest rated recruit...what a fizzle.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Scary Smart on February 25, 2010, 04:24:48 PM
I'll always remember the SoD (Series of Dominance) that you had in the KU game last year, Lamark. Thank you for that.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 25, 2010, 06:16:00 PM
Ron Princes second highest rated recruit...what a fizzle.

#1
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Thread Killer on February 25, 2010, 06:20:01 PM
Ron Princes second highest rated recruit...what a fizzle.

#1

You forgot Freemy
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 25, 2010, 06:22:14 PM
Off the top of my head Freeman was #93 and LaMark was #71.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 25, 2010, 06:22:55 PM
Oops, Freeman was #92.

My bad.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: OK_Cat on February 25, 2010, 06:40:56 PM
we only want players that really want to be here.  We'll reload, no prob.


/italics
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: jtksu on February 25, 2010, 08:55:42 PM
:cry: :morelikeslumped,defeated,existentialshoulders:

Talent and K-State football just don't mix. We see that clearly now.

They quit. They transfer. They leave early. They're arrested. They're kicked off the team.

But most of all, they are handled poorly by coaches.  Mentally and physically.

There is no curse and this is not a consequence of over-hype.

Kansas State simply can't handle it.


Only Jordy Nelson survives.

Lord I would love to kick you square in the vulva right now.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 25, 2010, 09:38:19 PM
Damn now who is going to look like a legit D1 football player coming off of the bus?  :dunno:
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: kcchiefdav on February 25, 2010, 09:54:49 PM
Damn now who is going to look like a legit D1 football player coming off of the bus?  :dunno:

Joe Bob?
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Cire on February 25, 2010, 10:01:01 PM
snyder is such a piece of shlt.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 26, 2010, 08:13:31 AM
We had Attrail Snipes playing in front of him, for crying out loud!!!

Snipes!

Not since Brandon Clark has a receiver with so little talent played significantly...maybe Daniel Gonzalez...

Do we blame Snyder or those two other old dudes?
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 26, 2010, 09:30:06 AM
Freed up a 'ship so Tate can bring one of his buddies along for the all-expense paid ride.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: jtksu on February 26, 2010, 02:39:21 PM
We had Attrail Snipes playing in front of him, for crying out loud!!!

Snipes!

Not since Brandon Clark has a receiver with so little talent played significantly...maybe Daniel Gonzalez...

Do we blame Snyder or those two other old dudes?

Dude, Brandon Clark was pretty damn talented.  He would have had a much greater impact in games if he had not had so many nagging injuries.  Maybe you should stay away from player evaluations and stick with what you know.  Namely, homo-erotic video montages of high school boys.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 26, 2010, 03:07:16 PM
We had Attrail Snipes playing in front of him, for crying out loud!!!

Snipes!

Not since Brandon Clark has a receiver with so little talent played significantly...maybe Daniel Gonzalez...

Do we blame Snyder or those two other old dudes?

Dude, Brandon Clark was pretty damn talented. 

No, dude, he wasn't.

He is the reason we were awful in 2001.

Him.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: michigancat on February 26, 2010, 03:18:35 PM
We had Attrail Snipes playing in front of him, for crying out loud!!!

Snipes!

Not since Brandon Clark has a receiver with so little talent played significantly...maybe Daniel Gonzalez...

Do we blame Snyder or those two other old dudes?

Dude, Brandon Clark was pretty damn talented.  He would have had a much greater impact in games if he had not had so many nagging injuries.  Maybe you should stay away from player evaluations and stick with what you know.  Namely, homo-erotic video montages of high school boys.

this dude really sucks as a poster (and a human).  Ignore him, PW.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Bill Clarahan on February 26, 2010, 03:39:04 PM
Brandon Clark and Lamark Brown were exactly alike as football players


well almost
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: chum1 on February 26, 2010, 04:28:02 PM
I think it's funny to think that Lamark would be beaten out by scrubs like Attrail Snipes, Brandon Clark, and Daniel Gonzalez. 

LaMARK?  More like LaFLUSH!  La :flush:!

 :lol:
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Thread Killer on February 26, 2010, 10:20:08 PM
snyder is such a piece of shlt.

Shut you're whore mouth cire...you dont know crap...

Even tate snyder could whip your ass...and you know it...
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Cire on February 26, 2010, 10:35:58 PM
snyder is such a piece of shlt.

Shut you're whore mouth cire...you dont know crap...

Even tate snyder could whip your ass...and you know it...

wow
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: scottwildcat on February 27, 2010, 09:25:04 AM
I'll always remember the SoD (Series of Dominance) that you had in the KU game last year, Lamark. Thank you for that.

out side of this i don't think him not being there has any neg effect on the team. he looked good but didn't play real well...so good luck where ever you go
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Andy on February 27, 2010, 12:07:50 PM
I'll always remember the SoD (Series of Dominance) that you had in the KU game last year, Lamark. Thank you for that.

had a pretty big catch in farmaggedon.  prob his best play during his whole time here.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: jtksu on February 28, 2010, 12:09:18 AM
We had Attrail Snipes playing in front of him, for crying out loud!!!

Snipes!

Not since Brandon Clark has a receiver with so little talent played significantly...maybe Daniel Gonzalez...

Do we blame Snyder or those two other old dudes?

Dude, Brandon Clark was pretty damn talented. 

No, dude, he wasn't.

He is the reason we were awful in 2001.

Him.

Maybe if he had written more poems during his KSU career, we would have won more games?
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Pete on February 28, 2010, 10:03:02 AM
I agree with PW on most football related matters...but we aren't going to miss Lamark.  Not at all.

However, we SHOULD be missing Lamark.  If Prince hadn't squandered Lamark's talent, we would be missing Lamark now.  As it stands, it makes zero impact on us.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: steve dave on February 28, 2010, 10:13:20 AM
He made half our ST tackles though. Somebody will have to step up there.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Pete on February 28, 2010, 10:34:51 AM
He made half our ST tackles though. Somebody will have to step up there.

Tate.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: steve dave on February 28, 2010, 10:38:41 AM
He made half our ST tackles though. Somebody will have to step up there.

Tate.

Nailed it
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: felix rex on February 28, 2010, 10:52:03 AM
However, we SHOULD be missing Lamark.  If Prince hadn't squandered Lamark's talent, we would be missing Lamark now.  As it stands, it makes zero impact on us.

This is a pretty good point. It was prolly prince's idea for him to cut those beautiful dreds, too.

FWIW, Lamark, I'll miss moving you to TE on NCAA 2010 and destroying mismatched LBs and Safeties.
Title: Re: Lamark...gone
Post by: Poonhound69 on March 02, 2010, 03:43:53 PM
L. Brown is RP trash, good riddance.