Author Topic: "Obamacare"  (Read 321221 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14979
    • View Profile

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7648
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #226 on: June 20, 2013, 03:22:08 PM »

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40544
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #227 on: June 20, 2013, 11:24:53 PM »
I'm guessing you didn't read the article.

i'm guessing he did.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7648
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #228 on: June 21, 2013, 12:33:25 AM »
I'm guessing you didn't read the article.

i'm guessing he did.

He may have, but the decrease had little, or nothing, to do with Obamacare.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40544
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #229 on: June 21, 2013, 12:53:47 AM »
the decrease had little, or nothing, to do with Obamacare.

not according to the article.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14979
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #230 on: June 21, 2013, 07:30:39 AM »
http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2013/06/18/medical-costs-register-first-decline-since-1970s/

Thanks, Obama.

I'm guessing you didn't read the article.

Quote from: posted article
The effects of the federal health care overhaul — the Affordable Care Act that passed in 2010 —and constrained government payments to doctors and hospitals seems to be trickling down to consumers, both those directly purchasing insurance plans and those buying drugs and treatments.
:ck:

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7648
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #231 on: June 21, 2013, 09:16:56 AM »
Quote
In the coming year, the next phase of the health care overhaul will expand coverage and increase subsidy payments and could, in turn, push medical costs back up, Mr. Phillips said.

Quote
A number of other factors are aiding the slowdown.

Prescription prices are now down slightly from a year earlier, reflecting the latest stage in the industry cycle. Many patents are expiring and cheaper generic drugs are coming to market. Analysts expect that trend to reverse in coming years.

Meanwhile, employers are shifting the burden of health-care costs to workers. With consumers paying a greater share of costs out of their own pockets, they’re encouraged to shop for more affordable options, which puts pressure on providers to lower their costs.

I only see increases tied to obamacare. Other factors pertain to the decrease in costs.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14979
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #232 on: June 21, 2013, 09:29:29 AM »
Quote
In the coming year, the next phase of the health care overhaul will expand coverage and increase subsidy payments and could, in turn, push medical costs back up, Mr. Phillips said.

Quote
A number of other factors are aiding the slowdown.

Prescription prices are now down slightly from a year earlier, reflecting the latest stage in the industry cycle. Many patents are expiring and cheaper generic drugs are coming to market. Analysts expect that trend to reverse in coming years.

Meanwhile, employers are shifting the burden of health-care costs to workers. With consumers paying a greater share of costs out of their own pockets, they’re encouraged to shop for more affordable options, which puts pressure on providers to lower their costs.

I only see increases tied to obamacare. Other factors pertain to the decrease in costs.

That does not look like an apology for accusing me of not reading the article.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7648
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #233 on: June 21, 2013, 09:35:41 AM »
Quote
In the coming year, the next phase of the health care overhaul will expand coverage and increase subsidy payments and could, in turn, push medical costs back up, Mr. Phillips said.

Quote
A number of other factors are aiding the slowdown.

Prescription prices are now down slightly from a year earlier, reflecting the latest stage in the industry cycle. Many patents are expiring and cheaper generic drugs are coming to market. Analysts expect that trend to reverse in coming years.

Meanwhile, employers are shifting the burden of health-care costs to workers. With consumers paying a greater share of costs out of their own pockets, they’re encouraged to shop for more affordable options, which puts pressure on providers to lower their costs.

I only see increases tied to obamacare. Other factors pertain to the decrease in costs.

That does not look like an apology for accusing me of not reading the article.

I'm sorry you didn't understand the article.  :cheers:

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14979
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #234 on: June 21, 2013, 09:46:27 AM »
Quote
In the coming year, the next phase of the health care overhaul will expand coverage and increase subsidy payments and could, in turn, push medical costs back up, Mr. Phillips said.

Quote
A number of other factors are aiding the slowdown.

Prescription prices are now down slightly from a year earlier, reflecting the latest stage in the industry cycle. Many patents are expiring and cheaper generic drugs are coming to market. Analysts expect that trend to reverse in coming years.

Meanwhile, employers are shifting the burden of health-care costs to workers. With consumers paying a greater share of costs out of their own pockets, they’re encouraged to shop for more affordable options, which puts pressure on providers to lower their costs.

I only see increases tied to obamacare. Other factors pertain to the decrease in costs.

That does not look like an apology for accusing me of not reading the article.

I'm sorry you didn't understand the article.  :cheers:

I'll take it.  :shakesfist:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85418
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #235 on: June 21, 2013, 09:56:57 AM »
obamacare seems to be, like, whipping ass

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27125
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #236 on: June 21, 2013, 11:34:03 AM »

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37138
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #237 on: June 21, 2013, 11:39:06 AM »
obamacare seems to be, like, whipping ass

Slow down there partner. http://reason.com/blog/2013/06/21/survey-finds-that-41-percent-of-small-bu

If that's the price of cheaper healthcare, then I'm willing to pay it. The market would have weeded out those crappy below average businesses eventually, anyway.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27125
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #238 on: June 21, 2013, 11:40:24 AM »
obamacare seems to be, like, whipping ass

Slow down there partner. http://reason.com/blog/2013/06/21/survey-finds-that-41-percent-of-small-bu

If that's the price of cheaper healthcare, then I'm willing to pay it. The market would have weeded out those crappy below average businesses eventually, anyway.

yeah. 41% of small businesses is just a drop in the bucket.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14979
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #239 on: June 21, 2013, 11:42:04 AM »
obamacare seems to be, like, whipping ass

Slow down there partner. http://reason.com/blog/2013/06/21/survey-finds-that-41-percent-of-small-bu

If that's the price of cheaper healthcare, then I'm willing to pay it. The market would have weeded out those crappy below average businesses eventually, anyway.

yeah. 41% of small businesses is just a drop in the bucket.

When you consider 61% of small businesses have fewer than 4 employees, it is.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37138
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #240 on: June 21, 2013, 11:42:25 AM »
obamacare seems to be, like, whipping ass

Slow down there partner. http://reason.com/blog/2013/06/21/survey-finds-that-41-percent-of-small-bu

If that's the price of cheaper healthcare, then I'm willing to pay it. The market would have weeded out those crappy below average businesses eventually, anyway.

yeah. 41% of small businesses is just a drop in the bucket.

50% of businesses are below average, fwiw, and average isn't that great.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53839
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #241 on: June 21, 2013, 11:43:42 AM »
My survey says 41% of small businesses need to get off their lazy asses and work harder

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37138
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #242 on: June 21, 2013, 11:44:27 AM »
My survey says 41% of small businesses need to get off their lazy asses and work harder

More like 60%, but yeah, 41% would be a nice start.

Offline GCJayhawker

  • Point Plank'r
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 845
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #243 on: June 21, 2013, 11:50:56 AM »
Well 60% of the time I think 41% is a small number.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53839
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #244 on: June 21, 2013, 11:55:36 AM »
My survey says 41% of small businesses need to get off their lazy asses and work harder

More like 60%, but yeah, 41% would be a nice start.

how dare you question my survey

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37138
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #245 on: June 21, 2013, 11:58:00 AM »
My survey says 41% of small businesses need to get off their lazy asses and work harder

More like 60%, but yeah, 41% would be a nice start.

how dare you question my survey

No survey, needed, mich. Just take a look at a bell curve.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7648
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #246 on: June 21, 2013, 07:45:44 PM »
Considering that companies with 50 or fewer employees are exempt from offering health insurance, the 41% must be companies with more than 50 employees.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40544
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #247 on: June 21, 2013, 09:15:29 PM »
the per worker penalty is really relatively small.  if the employees those businesses say they won't hire wouldn't have produced a crap ton more profit per head than that, then they're better off having not hired them.

or the small business owners are stupid or lying.  i mean i can understand that they'd be pissed about forgoing some profit per worker.  but to not hire based on that - shitty business, stupid or lying.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7648
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #248 on: June 21, 2013, 10:29:02 PM »
I think there's still a lot of wait and see attitude since no one is sure what the final total cost will be. The taxes are yet to arrive.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40544
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #249 on: June 21, 2013, 10:36:38 PM »
I think there's still a lot of wait and see attitude since no one is sure what the final total cost will be. The taxes are yet to arrive.

for sure.  the dumbass reporter should be talking to experts instead of polling people that don't know what they're talking about.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."