LOL, Chamberlain was significantly better than Russell. They best part is that they played the same position and played each other basically every year in the Finals, so it's easy to see. How embarrassing for you.
Then why does Russell have 11 rings and Wilt only 2?
Teams, I guess. Wilt averaged over 30 PPG, throughout his career. At one point he averaged 50. Russell never got over 20. Wilt also averaged 54% FG% in his career while Russell averaged 44% FG%.
Rebounds, you say? How about in head-to-head competition. In 142 games against each other, Wilt averaged 5 RPG more than Russell.
Confirmed. Russell was drafted by a loaded Celtics team. Hell, his first year in the league one of his teammates won MVP and another won Rookie of the Year. He played alongside 3 players other players who are now in the Hall of Fame. Wilt only ever played with one other teammate who is now in the Hall of Fame. (Wilt also won MVP and Rookie of the Year his first year in the league).
False. Very, very false. Baylor, West, Goodrich, and Cunningham are all in the HoF. Russell may have had better teammates, but you can't use the argument that Wilt didn't have any help.
You can have Wilt's statistics...Give me Russell's rings.
Sorry, I was just looking at the Warriors who drafted him. Didn't realize he played for basically every NBA team in existence.
But man, Wilt had 11 rebounding titles, 7 scoring titles, even led the league in assists for one season. He still has the record for highest PPG in a season and highest RPG in a season. If we're only counting rings, then Michael Jordan would be the 10th best player to ever play, and Scottie Pippen has the same number he does.