Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 4750975 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37148
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1200 on: April 25, 2012, 08:38:04 AM »
I'm not sure I entirely believe the "Glass doesn't want to win talking point." They pay a ridiculously low team salary, but there just aren't a ton of good free agents worth paying a lot of money in a typical offseason, and the good ones always get megadeals. Sure, the bottom line is better by not paying the players competitive wages, but only a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) would look at running a professional baseball team that way. Just look at the New York Yankees. George Steinbrenner purchased that team for $10 million in 1973. They are now worth more than $1 billion (according to Forbes). Even if Steinbrenner operates at a loss every year, it's worth it. The Royals will never gain value the way the Yankees have due to the disparity in market sizes, but winning is much more important than saving short-term money.

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1201 on: April 25, 2012, 12:16:29 PM »
Got this today
Quote
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Sommer Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:
 
Interested in All-Star tickets?
 
We have a limited number of All-Star strips still available, and we are now offering access to these with the purchase of a Full or Half Season, 20-Game Plan or 15-Game Plan until the remaining strips sell out.
 
For the first time, we are allowing 15-Game Plans to have access to All-Star strips.  15-Game Plans allow you to choose any 15 games you would like to go to, and they start as low as $165.  See the attached flyer for details.
 
If you would like to take advantage of this opportunity, give me a call on my direct line at 816.504.4172 and I will secure your seats today!

Quote
From: me
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:52 AM
To: Sommer Henderson
Subject: Re: Limited Time All-Star Strip Opportunity! CRM:0072072
 
Yeah that 12 game losing streak has me SUPER STOKED to jump on the deal..... not.

Quote
Sommer Henderson
12:12 PM (3 minutes ago)

to me
It’s not every year that the All-Star Game is in KC!
 
Sommer Henderson

This is seriously all the have. PLEASE BUY TICKETS DURRRR ALL STAR GAME

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1202 on: April 25, 2012, 09:04:38 PM »
 :thumbs:

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15902
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1203 on: April 25, 2012, 09:06:36 PM »
Finally.  Pretty cool to see that power surge.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
The Royals
« Reply #1204 on: April 25, 2012, 09:10:01 PM »
#itsabouttime

Go Royals!

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19316
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1205 on: April 25, 2012, 09:34:30 PM »
IT WAS ALL WORTH IT!
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6337
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1206 on: April 25, 2012, 09:42:31 PM »
 :driving:
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27136
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1207 on: April 25, 2012, 09:51:30 PM »

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37148
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1208 on: April 25, 2012, 11:38:13 PM »
Hopefully this game improved their Wins Above Replacement metric.

Offline Rams

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3384
  • Worst poster on this board by far
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1209 on: April 26, 2012, 08:20:15 AM »
you wanna know why the royals suck balls every year?  guys like this idiot.



oh man  :lol:

we don't care if you read a book or take a nap or whatever, just please keep buying/using tickets and watching us on tv and talking about us.  thnx guise.

all my love,

david glass
"Son. This is why we are wildcats. Hard work, pride, the heart of this country. And if that's not enough for you, you can just move to California with your punk friends."

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36755
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1210 on: April 26, 2012, 09:47:39 AM »
I feel cheated.  I just don't know if 158 loses will deliver the full needed effect.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39235
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1211 on: April 26, 2012, 01:04:48 PM »
you wanna know why the royals suck balls every year?  guys like this idiot.



oh man  :lol:

we don't care if you read a book or take a nap or whatever, just please keep buying/using tickets and watching us on tv and talking about us.  thnx guise.

all my love,

david glass


Meh, look at the catcher. That fan obviously knew it was an intentional walk situation. Great chance to finish a couple paragraphs of A Matter of Honor by Jeffrey Archer.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27136
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1212 on: April 26, 2012, 01:08:24 PM »
I hate games that aren't on TV

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1213 on: April 26, 2012, 02:16:23 PM »
Streak!

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6337
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1214 on: April 26, 2012, 02:36:39 PM »
 :comeatme:
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13252
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1215 on: April 26, 2012, 04:19:04 PM »
Its OUR TIME!

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1216 on: April 26, 2012, 09:14:30 PM »
Guise-  do you think the Royals will ever lose another game this year?  Looking at the schedule, i just don't see any losses there.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53554
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1217 on: April 27, 2012, 06:49:11 AM »
The AL Central is pretty meh.

After 20 games, and you're playing .263 baseball, and your only 5 games back, you gotta feel pretty good about a turnaround.

If it really is "our time" than there's no reason not to be competing in the AL Central deep into the year . . . if not, than you do really, really suck.

.529 leads the Central, the leaders of the rest of the divisions in the MLB are .632, .789, .737, .632, .684.



« Last Edit: April 27, 2012, 06:52:05 AM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39235
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1218 on: April 27, 2012, 09:00:03 AM »
LOL dax. The Tigers are going to rampage this division. Just rip it to pieces. As soon as their lineup, which was amazing last year and only added PRINCE rough ridin' FIELDER, gets going it's not going to be close.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53554
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1219 on: April 27, 2012, 09:03:36 AM »
Look up the word "compete" . . . I didn't say win, but there's simply no excuse to mired in last place if it's "our time".

Outside of Detroit, the Central pretty much sucks.


Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 11657
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1220 on: April 27, 2012, 09:10:29 AM »
Look up the word "compete" . . . I didn't say win, but there's simply no excuse to mired in last place if it's "our time".

Outside of Detroit, the Central pretty much sucks.

Indians are very similar to the royals in that they have alot of good young players, they are about 2 years ahead of us developmentally though. White Sox are no slouches either, the only terrible team is the Twins.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53554
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1221 on: April 27, 2012, 09:13:44 AM »
So they should change "our time" to "maybe in 4 years".




Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37148
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1222 on: April 27, 2012, 09:19:25 AM »
So they should change "our time" to "maybe in 4 years".

No, any players who pan out and demonstrate that they are good will be traded away by then.

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1223 on: April 27, 2012, 02:55:07 PM »
I don't know if .500 is "competing" in the Division.  But, even with this horrid start, I think the neighborhood of .500 baseball is attainable.  And I, for one, would be pretty content with that in '12.  We have the youngest team in baseball, across the board.   

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39235
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #1224 on: April 27, 2012, 03:11:14 PM »
Look up the word "compete" . . . I didn't say win, but there's simply no excuse to mired in last place if it's "our time".

Outside of Detroit, the Central pretty much sucks.

So they finish in 3rd place and 20 games behind Detroit that's competing? ok