0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/362234-clintons-understated-support-from-firm-hired-by-russian-nuclear-company?amp
I’m stunned you commented on it......
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/362823-clinton-on-matt-lauer-every-day-i-believe-more-in-karma
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2017, 03:45:21 PMhttp://thehill.com/homenews/media/362823-clinton-on-matt-lauer-every-day-i-believe-more-in-karma Haha, she will be getting hers soon after the Strzok news.
So Comey's first draft of his announcement exonerating Clinton said she was "grossly negligent." Then somebody figured out that "gross negligence" is expressly criminalized by the statute - so it was revised to "extremely careless."http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/358982-early-comey-memo-accused-clinton-of-gross-negligence-on-emailsWhat do you even say at this point? I'm honestly having difficulty finding the right words to describe the magnitude of Comey's incompetence. Or is incompetence even the right word? Corruption? Some scary/sad mishmash of incompetence, spinelessness, swampiness, and corruption?QuoteComey: Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were grossly negligent in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.Peter Strzok: Hold on a second, sir, let me just finish sending this text message. Uh sir, "gross negligence" is a violation of the law - it's right here in the statute.Comey: [loud mouth breathing] Oh.... What should we say?Peter Strzok: How about "extremely careless?"
Comey: Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were grossly negligent in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.Peter Strzok: Hold on a second, sir, let me just finish sending this text message. Uh sir, "gross negligence" is a violation of the law - it's right here in the statute.Comey: [loud mouth breathing] Oh.... What should we say?Peter Strzok: How about "extremely careless?"
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning. They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.
In light of the recent bombshell, we have a better of how the revisions went down....Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 06, 2017, 02:54:03 PMSo Comey's first draft of his announcement exonerating Clinton said she was "grossly negligent." Then somebody figured out that "gross negligence" is expressly criminalized by the statute - so it was revised to "extremely careless."http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/358982-early-comey-memo-accused-clinton-of-gross-negligence-on-emailsWhat do you even say at this point? I'm honestly having difficulty finding the right words to describe the magnitude of Comey's incompetence. Or is incompetence even the right word? Corruption? Some scary/sad mishmash of incompetence, spinelessness, swampiness, and corruption?QuoteComey: Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were grossly negligent in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.Peter Strzok: Hold on a second, sir, let me just finish sending this text message. Uh sir, "gross negligence" is a violation of the law - it's right here in the statute.Comey: [loud mouth breathing] Oh.... What should we say?Peter Strzok: How about "extremely careless?"
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/942343647126867969
I sure hope sessions has never sent any derogatory texts about Hillary
Hillary Clinton suggested that people who supported President Trump in 2016 did so because they “didn’t like black people getting rights,” or women getting jobs, during a discussion at the India Today Conclave on Sunday.“If you look at the map of the United States, there’s all that red in the middle where Trump won. I win the coasts, I win Illinois, I win Minnesota, places like that,” Clinton said.“What the map doesn’t show you is that I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s gross domestic product,” Clinton explained. “So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, ‘Make America Great Again,’ was looking backwards.”
Hillary Clinton said that white women voted for President Trump during the 2016 presidential election because their husbands told them to, during a discussion at the India Today Conclave on Saturday.The moderator asked Clinton why she thinks almost 52 percent of white women voted for Trump, despite them knowing about the controversial “Access Hollywood” tape.“[Democrats] do not do well with white men and we don’t do well with married, white women,” Clinton explained. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should.”