Author Topic: Marcus Foster (Read 263901 times)

michigancat · « **Reply #1375 on:** March 25, 2015, 10:14:45 AM »

I hope he goes to South Carolina

'taterblast · « **Reply #1376 on:** March 25, 2015, 10:15:24 AM »

south carolina or illinois.

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #1377 on:** March 25, 2015, 10:17:10 AM »

It's going to be SMU and you all know it.

Mr Bread · « **Reply #1378 on:** March 25, 2015, 10:17:52 AM »

#hoiball

ksupamplemousse · « **Reply #1379 on:** March 25, 2015, 10:31:35 AM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on March 25, 2015, 10:13:19 AM

Quote from: Lucas Scoopsalot on March 25, 2015, 09:55:21 AM
I hope he gets on a team that plays us next year and rubs his dick in oscar's face.

He won't be able to play next year, maybe in 2?

Isn't there an exemption for players that get run off? Seems like this would be the definition of getting run off.

steve dave · « **Reply #1380 on:** March 25, 2015, 10:32:26 AM »

Quote from: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 10:14:45 AM

I hope he goes to South Carolina

YES. or SFA.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #1381 on:** March 25, 2015, 10:36:05 AM »

I really want to see him at a school where he will play oscar Weber at least once.

CNS · « **Reply #1382 on:** March 25, 2015, 11:46:53 AM »

I bet it's LSU, A&M, or something like that. He is too big for SMU, imo.

Skipper44 · « **Reply #1383 on:** March 25, 2015, 11:50:15 AM »

Quote from: CNS on March 25, 2015, 11:46:53 AM

I bet it's LSU, A&M, or something like that. He is too big for SMU, imo.

LSU can give us the Josh Gray/Marcus Foster backcourt we dreamed of

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #1384 on:** March 25, 2015, 11:51:03 AM »

Was SMU too small for Semi?

CNS · « **Reply #1385 on:** March 25, 2015, 11:51:54 AM »

Quote from: WackyCat08 on March 25, 2015, 11:51:03 AM

Was SMU too small for Semi?

1. I have no clue

2. Semi was a kid who saw the bench and wanted out. Marcus is a rough ridin' all conf star who's coach is a dumbass

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #1386 on:** March 25, 2015, 11:53:08 AM »

True, but SMU has really been swinging their dicks these days with stud recruits. I could see LSU too.

CNS · « **Reply #1387 on:** March 25, 2015, 11:56:05 AM »

Quote from: WackyCat08 on March 25, 2015, 11:53:08 AM

True, but SMU has really been swinging their dicks these days with stud recruits. I could see LSU too.

Yeah, and who wouldn't want to play for Larry. That said, they are the big fish in a small pond. If Marcus is the guy that tucks want us to think he is, the kid wants national television and match ups that get discussion before and after.

kslim · « **Reply #1388 on:** March 25, 2015, 12:01:51 PM »

heart wants him in the big 12, brain tells me he is going somewhere that he will be the lone star. i think it will be aTm

wetwillie · « **Reply #1389 on:** March 25, 2015, 12:04:03 PM »

Iowa state

CNS · « **Reply #1390 on:** March 25, 2015, 12:05:04 PM »

I am pretty sure he isn't going Big12. Don't think there is any way he wants to sit two years and I am pretty sure MIR dispelled the thought of him getting some exemption in another thread.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #1391 on:** March 25, 2015, 12:23:05 PM »

Quote from: CNS on March 25, 2015, 12:05:04 PM

I am pretty sure he isn't going Big12. Don't think there is any way he wants to sit two years and I am pretty sure MIR dispelled the thought of him getting some exemption in another thread.

The NCAA officially changed the transfer hardship rules last week: http://newsok.com/ncaa-changes-eligibility-rules-for-transfer-athletes-requesting-hardship-waivers-for-immediate-playing-time/article/5402603

CNS · « **Reply #1392 on:** March 25, 2015, 12:25:52 PM »

Looks like it might have worked with the runoff rule, too bad he wasn't cancer'ey enough to be dismissed a couple weeks ago.

Skipper44 · « **Reply #1393 on:** March 25, 2015, 12:30:02 PM »

yeah, it would seem like being dismissed from the team would make him a candidate for the run off rule but I can't find any specifics on the rule

CNS · « **Reply #1394 on:** March 25, 2015, 12:44:34 PM »

Quote from: Skipper44 on March 25, 2015, 12:30:02 PM

yeah, it would seem like being dismissed from the team would make him a candidate for the run off rule but I can't find any specifics on the rule

that article said no more immediate eligibility, but instead, they would get a 6th yr.

Skipper44 · « **Reply #1395 on:** March 25, 2015, 01:09:57 PM »

Quote from: CNS on March 25, 2015, 12:44:34 PM

Quote from: Skipper44 on March 25, 2015, 12:30:02 PM
yeah, it would seem like being dismissed from the team would make him a candidate for the run off rule but I can't find any specifics on the rule

that article said no more immediate eligibility, but instead, they would get a 6th yr.

I took that as they didn't want to have to evaluate how sick grandma was for hardships and I was under the impression that the "run off rule" was created as an answer to oversigning & coaches leaving.

pvegs · « **Reply #1396 on:** March 25, 2015, 01:16:45 PM »

Fitz on Wichita radio saying no one liked Foster and he's not in touch with his family or AAU. Also said he's trying to declare for the NBA draft and strong inferences to being on drugs. Oh boy.

Spracne · « **Reply #1397 on:** March 25, 2015, 01:21:03 PM »

Ruthless

kso_FAN · « **Reply #1398 on:** March 25, 2015, 01:21:29 PM »

I thought this narrative would probably be coming.

CNS · « **Reply #1399 on:** March 25, 2015, 01:22:08 PM »

GPC is known for sitting on info until it is confirmed.