it sounds like some of you disagree with some of the details of catmatt's account. all i can say is that, at least he has made the effort to compile a history of that fascinating, formative time period of kstatefans.com. whether he got every single i dotted and every t crossed is hardly the point, as is the debate about whether this history could be best illustrated and preserved as blog, podcast or video. about all i can say about it is, the historical narrative begins with a single word, a single paragraph, a single voice, and catmatt's distinctive voice is once again moving the emaw narrative forward, which is great for everyone (except kougs, in this case), which is about all i can say right now.