0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Who is the athletic director?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning. They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.
What will it cost to get the despicable, corrupt, venal Hillary elected?
What will it cost to get the despicable, corrupt, venal Hillary elected? Only about $2.5 billion according to the campaign's own estimates.http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-to-spend-37.92-for-every-vote-in-2.5b-campaign/article/2563004
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 11:46:23 AMWhat will it cost to get the despicable, corrupt, venal Hillary elected? Only about $2.5 billion according to the campaign's own estimates.http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-to-spend-37.92-for-every-vote-in-2.5b-campaign/article/2563004It seems like we should be able to get some bipartisan support to put a cap on political donations, then. I think $500 is more than enough.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 11:50:13 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 11:46:23 AMWhat will it cost to get the despicable, corrupt, venal Hillary elected? Only about $2.5 billion according to the campaign's own estimates.http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-to-spend-37.92-for-every-vote-in-2.5b-campaign/article/2563004It seems like we should be able to get some bipartisan support to put a cap on political donations, then. I think $500 is more than enough.Or rather than try to regulate it, which both violates the First Amendment (for domestic donors) and doesn't really work, voters could just punish these arrogant assclowns.
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 12:33:40 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 11:50:13 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 11:46:23 AMWhat will it cost to get the despicable, corrupt, venal Hillary elected? Only about $2.5 billion according to the campaign's own estimates.http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-to-spend-37.92-for-every-vote-in-2.5b-campaign/article/2563004It seems like we should be able to get some bipartisan support to put a cap on political donations, then. I think $500 is more than enough.Or rather than try to regulate it, which both violates the First Amendment (for domestic donors) and doesn't really work, voters could just punish these arrogant assclowns.A limit to how much money you can give to a campaign is not a violation of your free speech. GMAFB.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 12:39:08 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 12:33:40 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 11:50:13 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 11:46:23 AMWhat will it cost to get the despicable, corrupt, venal Hillary elected? Only about $2.5 billion according to the campaign's own estimates.http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-to-spend-37.92-for-every-vote-in-2.5b-campaign/article/2563004It seems like we should be able to get some bipartisan support to put a cap on political donations, then. I think $500 is more than enough.Or rather than try to regulate it, which both violates the First Amendment (for domestic donors) and doesn't really work, voters could just punish these arrogant assclowns.A limit to how much money you can give to a campaign is not a violation of your free speech. GMAFB."Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech." So how's that square with making a law that limits how much money can be spent conveying that speech? Especially political speech, which is really important speech in a democracy?The First Amendment is a really, really big deal. That's why it was FIRST. You really think it was only intended to apply to people standing on a soap box in the town square? They had printing presses back then, and I assume they operated for profit.
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 01:01:05 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 12:39:08 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 12:33:40 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 11:50:13 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 11:46:23 AMWhat will it cost to get the despicable, corrupt, venal Hillary elected? Only about $2.5 billion according to the campaign's own estimates.http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-to-spend-37.92-for-every-vote-in-2.5b-campaign/article/2563004It seems like we should be able to get some bipartisan support to put a cap on political donations, then. I think $500 is more than enough.Or rather than try to regulate it, which both violates the First Amendment (for domestic donors) and doesn't really work, voters could just punish these arrogant assclowns.A limit to how much money you can give to a campaign is not a violation of your free speech. GMAFB."Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech." So how's that square with making a law that limits how much money can be spent conveying that speech? Especially political speech, which is really important speech in a democracy?The First Amendment is a really, really big deal. That's why it was FIRST. You really think it was only intended to apply to people standing on a soap box in the town square? They had printing presses back then, and I assume they operated for profit.What is your opinion on requiring permits to stage demonstrations? Is that abridging free speech?
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 01:09:52 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 01:01:05 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 12:39:08 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 12:33:40 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 11:50:13 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 11:46:23 AMWhat will it cost to get the despicable, corrupt, venal Hillary elected? Only about $2.5 billion according to the campaign's own estimates.http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-to-spend-37.92-for-every-vote-in-2.5b-campaign/article/2563004It seems like we should be able to get some bipartisan support to put a cap on political donations, then. I think $500 is more than enough.Or rather than try to regulate it, which both violates the First Amendment (for domestic donors) and doesn't really work, voters could just punish these arrogant assclowns.A limit to how much money you can give to a campaign is not a violation of your free speech. GMAFB."Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech." So how's that square with making a law that limits how much money can be spent conveying that speech? Especially political speech, which is really important speech in a democracy?The First Amendment is a really, really big deal. That's why it was FIRST. You really think it was only intended to apply to people standing on a soap box in the town square? They had printing presses back then, and I assume they operated for profit.What is your opinion on requiring permits to stage demonstrations? Is that abridging free speech?My opinion is that your rights must coexist with the rights of others. That is why you don't have the right to engage in speech that places other people in physical danger (the shouting fire in a theater example), or breaking into someone's provate property to yell at them, or shutting down a street in protest (which gets to your permit question, but even then the government cannot arbitrarily restrict the location).
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 01:16:40 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 01:09:52 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 01:01:05 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 12:39:08 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 12:33:40 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 14, 2015, 11:50:13 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 14, 2015, 11:46:23 AMWhat will it cost to get the despicable, corrupt, venal Hillary elected? Only about $2.5 billion according to the campaign's own estimates.http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-to-spend-37.92-for-every-vote-in-2.5b-campaign/article/2563004It seems like we should be able to get some bipartisan support to put a cap on political donations, then. I think $500 is more than enough.Or rather than try to regulate it, which both violates the First Amendment (for domestic donors) and doesn't really work, voters could just punish these arrogant assclowns.A limit to how much money you can give to a campaign is not a violation of your free speech. GMAFB."Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech." So how's that square with making a law that limits how much money can be spent conveying that speech? Especially political speech, which is really important speech in a democracy?The First Amendment is a really, really big deal. That's why it was FIRST. You really think it was only intended to apply to people standing on a soap box in the town square? They had printing presses back then, and I assume they operated for profit.What is your opinion on requiring permits to stage demonstrations? Is that abridging free speech?My opinion is that your rights must coexist with the rights of others. That is why you don't have the right to engage in speech that places other people in physical danger (the shouting fire in a theater example), or breaking into someone's provate property to yell at them, or shutting down a street in protest (which gets to your permit question, but even then the government cannot arbitrarily restrict the location).Well, when you give $1 million to a candidate you completely devalue the $100 I give to the other candidate, thus violating my first amendment rights.
At some point, and on some issues, you have to agree, at least hypothetically, that such an approach could be detrimental to the country and it's ppl.
Quote from: CNS on April 14, 2015, 01:36:44 PMAt some point, and on some issues, you have to agree, at least hypothetically, that such an approach could be detrimental to the country and it's ppl.Ah, but who decides? Our elected representatives? The very people with a vested interest in protecting their own incumbency and power? That's exactly why we have the first amendment, and why the founders put it first.
Hillary sits down to coffee in Iowa with "ordinary people" - who were recruited from DNC central casting. I don't think there has even been a more inauthentic candidate. Congrats Dems. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3040482/Campaign-staff-DROVE-ordinary-Iowans-Hillary-s-campaign-stop-including-health-care-lobbyist-training-Obama-campaign-intern-Biden-chauffeur.html
Will ksuw survive this election? I'm not so sure