You should go back and reread the beginning if this thread. The hypotheses of "greenhouse gas" theory are wrong.
Oh, so greenhouse gases do not exist? That's a great argument, K-S-U. You should get far with that one.
I'm pretty sure you're not trolling, which is sad, so I'll try to explain this to you again. Of course gasses such as CO2 and H2O exist. The extent to which they have a "greenhouse effect," however, has been overestimated at best. Again, the models that predicted temperatures would rise as greater concentrations of these "greenhouse gasses" entered the atmosphere are
wrong.
AGW theory is premised on "greenhouse effect" theory. Thus, your argument that AGW theory is valid because of "greenhouse gasses" is circular reasoning and idiotic. You fit right in among your libtard brothers and sisters.