They have got to have an episode (and maybe it's this next one) where they discuss the defense attorney.
I mean she sounds awful. The cross examination of Jay was atrocious.
I don't buy the motive, I don't buy the timeline, and I think Adnan was an easy target because of profiling. Once they got a whiff of testimony from Jay, it went down the path, evidence be damned, and they constructed a case based on a whole hell of a lot of conjecture.
Even when people are presented the facts, and then they say, "Do you think Adnan did it?", everyone always comes back and say, "Well, if he didn't do it, who did?"
And that's what makes this so bizarre. It's not the evidence that really points to a killer, it's the lack of a killer that lead them to "evidence".